21 research outputs found
Telemedicine in the treatment of gestational diabetes: An observational cohort study on pregnancy outcomes and maternal satisfaction
Aims: Gestational diabetes treatment requires several outpatient consultations from diagnosis until delivery in order to prevent hyperglycaemia, which is associated with maternal and fetal complications. There is limited evidence in the literature about telemedicine superiority in improving pregnancy outcomes for women with gestational diabetes. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate maternal and fetal outcomes, while the secondary aim was to estimate the degree of satisfaction with gestational diabetes treatment, comparing telemedicine versus outpatient care.
Methods: This observational cohort study involved 60 consecutive women with gestational diabetes treated at the Diabetology Unit of Ferrara: 27 were followed up through a weekly remote control method (telemedicine group) and 33 in ambulatory clinics every 2 or 3weeks (conventional group). After giving birth, 56 women responded to the modified Oxford Maternity Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to assess their satisfaction with diabetes care.
Results: No statistically significant differences were found in most of the maternal and neonatal parameters evaluated in both groups. The questionnaire scores were positive in all areas investigated. Telemedicine follow-up made women feel more controlled (p=0.045) and fit better with their lifestyle (p=0.005). It also emerged that almost all women treated with telemedicine would recommend this method to a relative or a friend.
Conclusions: Telemedicine follow-up proved to be safe both in terms of meta-
bolic control and pregnancy outcomes; furthermore, it significantly decreased the need for outpatient consultations and increased women's satisfaction. Studying the impact of telemedicine is also necessary, considering the current difficulties associated with the Sars-COV-2 pandemic
Management of the pelvic floor disfunctions: combined versus single surgical procedure in a multidisciplinary approach: a retrospective study
The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of combined surgical treatment of multicompartmental pelvic floor defects versus single procedures
within a multidisciplinary path in order to try to clarify what is
the most effective surgical approach
Evaluation on prognostic efficacy of lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in complicated colon cancer: the first study in emergency surgery
Abstract Background Lymph node involvement is one of the most important prognostic factors in colon cancer. Twelve is considered the minimum number of lymph nodes necessary to retain reliable tumour staging, but several factors can potentially influence the lymph node harvesting. Emergent surgery for complicated colon cancer (perforation, occlusion, bleeding) could represent an obstacle to reach the benchmark of 12 nodes with an accurate lymphadenectomy. So, an efficient classification system of lymphatic involvement is crucial to define the prognosis, the indication to adjuvant therapy and the follow-up. This is the first study with the aim to evaluate the efficacy of lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in the prognostic assessment of patients who undergo to urgent surgery for complicated colonic cancer. Methods This is a retrospective study carried out on patients who underwent urgent colonic resection for complicated cancer (occlusion, perforation, bleeding, sepsis). We collected clinical, pathological and follow-up data of 320 patients. Two hundred two patients met the inclusion criteria and were distributed into three groups according to parameter N of TNM, LNR and LODDS. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier curves, investigating both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 17. In 78.71% (n = 159) of cases, at least 12 lymph nodes were examined. Regarding OS, significant differences from survival curves emerged for ASA score, surgical indication, tumour grading, T parameter, tumour stage, N parameter, LNR and LODDS. In multivariate analysis, only LODDS was found to be an independent prognostic factor. Concerning DFS, we found significant differences between survival curves of sex, surgical indication, T parameter, tumour stage, N parameter, LNR and LODDS, but none of these confirmed its prognostic power in multivariate analysis. Conclusions We found that N, LNR and LODDS are all related to 5-year OS and DFS with statistical significance, but only LODDS was found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS in multivariate analysis
Preoperative endoscopic tattooing to mark the tumour site does not improve lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
Background: A direct correlation between number of lymph nodes retrieved and evaluated after a colectomy for
colorectal cancer and survival of the patient has been reported, and consensus guidelines recommend to assess at
least 12 lymph nodes for adequate staging. Many factors (i.e., patients’ and tumour characteristics, surgeon, and
pathologist) may influence the evaluation of the presence of neoplastic disease in lymph nodes as well as the total
number of lymph nodes examined. Preoperative endoscopic tattooing to mark the site of the tumour has recently
been suggested to facilitate the retrieval of lymph nodes in colorectal specimens. The aim of this study was to
investigate its association with adequate lymphadenectomy (≥12 nodes) after colorectal resection for cancer.
Results: All patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer between 2009 and 2011 at the S. Anna
University Hospital in Ferrara, Italy (N = 250) were retrospectively divided into two cohorts according to whether ink
tattooing to mark the tumour site was performed during preoperative colonoscopy. The two cohorts were
comparable regarding age, gender, body mass index, tumour location and size, TNM staging, and DNA microsatellite
instability-high status. No difference between the tattoo (N = 107) and control (N = 143) groups could be detected in
the rate of adequate lymphadenectomies performed (78% vs. 79%, p = 0.40). All factors known to influence lymph
nodes retrieval from colorectal specimen were specifically evaluated. Rectal and colonic cancers were analysed together
and separately. Full adjusted logistic regression analysis in patients who underwent colonic resection showed that
right hemicolectomy (OR 4.72; CI95% 1.09-20.36) was the only factor associated to adequate lymphadenectomy.
No association between ink tattooing performed preoperatively to mark the site of the tumour and adequate
lymphadenectomy after colorectal resection was found with logistic regression analysis.
Conclusion: This study shows that preoperative ink tattooing utilized to mark the site of the tumour does not improve
adequate lymphadenectomy and lymph nodes yield from colorectal cancer specimens. Further studies are therefore
needed to determine if preoperative colonoscopic tattooing to mark the tumour site can refine staging
Combined rectal and gynecologic surgery in complex pelvic floor dysfunction: clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients treated by a multidisciplinary group
Economic impact of kidney patients with sepsis in hospital setting
Introduction: Over the last decades, sepsis has become a real medical emergency, with a high mortality rate and often requiring admission to an intensive care unit. An increasing number of CKD patients contracts sepsis due to several clinical risk factors (use of catheters, immunosuppressive therapy, comorbidity, etc.) and is treated in Nephrology wards, generating additional costs that are not covered by hospital Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) reimbursement. The aim of the study is to evaluate the costs of sepsis in one Nephrology Unit and to detect the mortality rate of CKD patients with sepsis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on a cohort of CKD patients admitted into one Nephrology Unit in 2017. CKD inpatients were divided in two groups: patients with sepsis (SP) and without (control group). Socio-demographic, clinical and therapeutic data, as well as routine biochemistry, were collected through a "sepsis form". SP were identified thanks to hospital discharge records (HDR). The hospital-related costs of a SP were obtained by summing up: (1) the average cost of an inpatient day of care for the average length of stay in the Nephrology Unit; (2) the average cost of the antimicrobial therapy, as recorded on the clinical folder. Results: Among the 408 CKD inpatients, 61 were septic. The overall average cost of a SP was 23.087,57 €; the average cost of the hospital stay and of the antimicrobial therapy was 19.364,98 € and 3.722,60 € respectively. The average length of stay in the Nephrology Unit was 16.7 days. The in-hospital mortality rate was 41.7%, with a 312% additional mortality rate. Conclusions: SP had an overall average cost three times higher than CKD inpatients without sepsis (9.290,79 €). This additional cost was due to a longer hospital stay (8.7 days more on average) and a higher cost of antimicrobial therapy per case (€ 221,24). A national multi-centre study is needed to confirm our data and to promote an adjustment of reimbursement tariff for DRG-sepsis, which is now applicable only to an ICU setting
Impatto economico correlato alla gestione di pazienti nefropatici con diagnosi di sepsi in ambiente ospedaliero
Introduzione: La sepsi è diventata negli ultimi decenni una vera emergenza medica, associata ad una mortalità elevata; necessita spesso di ricovero in ambito ospedaliero intensivistico, determinando elevati costi di gestione dei pazienti. A causa di una serie di fattori clinici (utilizzo di cateteri, terapie immunosoppressive, comorbilità, etc.) un numero sempre maggiore di pazienti nefropatici contraggono una sepsi e vengono trattati all’interno di degenze nefrologiche e ciò compromette la capacità del meccanismo di rimborso da tariffario nazionale dei Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) di remunerare gli inevitabili costi aggiuntivi. Lo scopo principale di questo studio è quello di valutare i costi della sepsi nel caso di una singola Unità Operativa di Nefrologia e, secondariamente, rilevare il tasso di mortalità dei pazienti settici in ambito nefrologico. Metodi: È stato condotto uno studio retrospettivo con riferimento alla coorte dei pazienti ricoverati in una degenza nefrologica nel 2017. I pazienti sono stati divisi in due gruppi: quelli che hanno contratto la sepsi e quelli che invece non l’hanno contratta, questi ultimi considerati come gruppo controllo. Sono stati raccolti dati anagrafici, ematochimici, clinici e terapeutici del campione mediante la scheda aziendale “Sepsi”. I pazienti settici sono stati rilevati utilizzando le Schede di Dimissione Ospedaliera (SDO). Il costo relativo ad un ricovero per sepsi è stato ottenuto dalla somma di: (1) il costo medio di una giornata di degenza moltiplicato per il numero complessivo di giornate di degenza consumate; (2) il costo specifico del trattamento antibiotico eseguito in corso di degenza, rilevato direttamente dalla documentazione clinica. Risultati: Su 408 pazienti arruolati, 61 sono risultati con sepsi. Il costo medio complessivo pro-capite del ricovero di un paziente con sepsi in Nefrologia ammontava a 23.087,57 €; esso era costituito dal costo medio totale del ricovero per questa tipologia di paziente (19.364,98 €) e dal costo medio totale ponderato pro-capite della antibiotico terapia (3.722,60 €). Il tasso di mortalità è risultato pari al 41,7%, con una mortalità addizionale del 312%. Conclusioni: Un paziente nefropatico con sepsi aveva un costo totale di 23.087,57 €, pari quasi al triplo di un analogo paziente senza sepsi (9.290,79 €) ricoverato in Nefrologia. Le cause principali di questo discostamento erano dovute alla degenza media più lunga di 8,7 giorni e ai costi medi giornalieri pro-capite elevati della terapia antibiotica (221,24 €). Sono necessari ulteriori studi multicentrici nazionali per un’analisi più ampia dei costi aggiuntivi e per favorire l’adeguamento del corrispettivo tariffario di rimborso DRG della sepsi, attualmente applicabile principalmente in ambito intensivistico.Introduction: Over the last decades, sepsis has become a real medical emergency, with a high mortality rate and often requiring admission to an intensive care unit. An increasing number of CKD patients contracts sepsis due to several clinical risk factors (use of catheters, immunosuppressive therapy, comorbidity, etc.) and is treated in Nephrology wards, generating additional costs that are not covered by hospital Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) reimbursement. The aim of the study is to evaluate the costs of sepsis in one Nephrology Unit and to detect the mortality rate of CKD patients with sepsis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on a cohort of CKD patients admitted into one Nephrology Unit in 2017. CKD inpatients were divided in two groups: patients with sepsis (SP) and without (control group). Socio-demographic, clinical and therapeutic data, as well as routine biochemistry, were collected through a "sepsis form". SP were identified thanks to hospital discharge records (HDR). The hospital-related costs of a SP were obtained by summing up: (1) the average cost of an inpatient day of care for the average length of stay in the Nephrology Unit; (2) the average cost of the antimicrobial therapy, as recorded on the clinical folder. Results: Among the 408 CKD inpatients, 61 were septic. The overall average cost of a SP was 23.087,57 €; the average cost of the hospital stay and of the antimicrobial therapy was 19.364,98 € and 3.722,60 € respectively. The average length of stay in the Nephrology Unit was 16.7 days. The in-hospital mortality rate was 41.7%, with a 312% additional mortality rate. Conclusions: SP had an overall average cost three times higher than CKD inpatients without sepsis (9.290,79 €). This additional cost was due to a longer hospital stay (8.7 days more on average) and a higher cost of antimicrobial therapy per case (€ 221,24). A national multi-centre study is needed to confirm our data and to promote an adjustment of reimbursement tariff for DRG-sepsis, which is now applicable only to an ICU setting
Thyroid disrupting effects of low-dose dibenzothiophene and cadmium in single or concurrent exposure: new evidence from a translational zebrafish model
Thyroid hormones (THs) are major regulators of biological processes essential for correct development and energy homeostasis. Although thyroid disruptors can deeply affect human health, the impact of exogenous chemicals and in particular mixture of chemicals on different aspects of thyroid development and metabolism is not yet fully understood. In this study we have used the highly versatile zebrafish model to assess the thyroid axis disrupting effects of cadmium (Cd) and dibenzothiophene (DBT), two environmental endocrine disruptors found to be significantly correlated in epidemiological co-exposure studies. Zebrafish embryos (5hpf) were exposed to low concentrations of Cd (from 0.05 to 2 μM) and DBT (from 0.05 to 1 μM) and to mixtures of them. A multilevel assessment of the pollutant effects has been obtained by combining in vivo morphological analyses allowed by the use of transgenic fluorescent lines with liquid chromatography mass spectrometry determination of TH levels and quantification of the expression levels of key genes involved in the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Thyroid Axis (HPTA) and TH metabolism. Our results underscore for the first time an important synergistic toxic effect of these pollutants on embryonic development and thyroid morphology highlighting differences in the mechanisms through which they can adversely impact on multiple physiological processes of the HPTA and TH disposal influencing also heart geometry and function
