1,721,150 research outputs found
EORTC Quality of Life Group Item Library user guidelines
No full textThis manual has been developed by the EORTC Quality of Life Group (QLG), with the aim of providing guidance on the use of the EORTC Item Library. These guidelines should be referred to by anyone who has agreed to the Item Library’s terms of use for the creation of item lists. This is a developing document and will be updated on a regular basis
The Cancer-Specific Health Economic Measure QLU-C10D is Valid and Responsive for Assessing Health Utility in Patients with Thyroid Cancer
Full text linkBackground: Health economic appraisals often rely on the assessment of health utilities using preference-based measures (PBM). The cancer-specific PBM, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility - Core 10 Dimensions (EORTC QLU-C10D), was developed recently, and now needs to be validated in various clinical populations.Methods: In a multicenter, multinational prospective cohort study, we longitudinally collected EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L data from patients with thyroid cancer. We applied seven country-specific value sets to the QLQ-C30 data to derive country-specific utility values and used the EQ-5D-5L as a comparator PBM. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating index scores and Bland-Altman plots. Construct validity was investigated by correlating domain scores. Known-group comparisons and responsiveness were assessed using external clinical criteria.Results: A total of 181 patients with thyroid cancer from nine countries (three continents) provided analyzable data. Patients were included if they had differentiated, medullary, or anaplastic thyroid cancer. Mean utility values of both instruments were generally lower compared to general population norms. No floor or ceiling effects were present for the QLU-C10D. The intra-class correlation for EQ-5D-5L and QLU-C10D index values ranged from 0.761 to 0.901 across the measurement timepoints, supporting criterion validity. Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.289 to 0.716 for theoretically corresponding domain pairs. The QLU-C10D detected differences in 9 of 15 known-group comparisons, supporting sensitivity. Clinically important changes were detected by all QLU-C10D country specific value sets, supporting responsiveness. Further, the QLU-C10D had higher statistical efficiency than the EQ-5D-5L in 74.7% of comparisons.Conclusions: The QLU-C10D is a valid PBM for health economic evaluations in thyroid cancer studies. We recommend its use to estimate health utilities in economic evaluations of thyroid cancer therapies
Development of a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire module for patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours.
No full textReference values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma and in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors.
No full textOBJECTIVES: To provide reference values for the European Organisation for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients and 5-year HL survivors. The QLQ-C30 is the most widely used cancer-specific questionnaire to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL).
METHODS: The EORTC database was searched to identify HL RCTs in which patients' and survivors' HRQoL was assessed by the QLQ-C30. HRQoL mean scores were calculated and stratified by age and gender. Minimal important differences were used to assess the clinical relevance of the findings. Data from one RCT with HRQoL scores available at baseline (n = 343) and four RCTs with HRQoL scores available at follow-up (n = 1665) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Patients reported worse HRQoL scores than survivors across most functioning scales and symptoms' scales. These scores varied as a function of gender but not age. Survivors' HRQoL reports were comparable to the ones of the general population.
CONCLUSIONS: These values provide an assessment framework for the comparison and interpretation of QLQ-C30 scores in advanced-stage HL. Our findings suggest that although HL patients' HRQoL scores are worse than the general population, HRQoL scores may normalize over long-term survival
Development of a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire module for patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group
No full textQuality of life (QoL) measurements are increasingly being used as an end point in cancer clinical trials. Standard generic QoL questionnaires may not assess symptoms produced by neuroendocrine tumours. Here we report the development of a disease-specific quality of life score questionnaire for patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the gut to supplement the EORTC core cancer questionnaire, the QLQ-C30. Phases 1–3 of the EORTC quality of life group guidelines for module development were used to design the new questionnaire. Forty-one relevant issues (questions) were generated after an extensive literature search. Following interviews of 15 health care workers and 35 patients, a 35 question provisional questionnaire was constructed. This was translated into seven European languages and pre-tested in 180 patients resulting in a 21-item module that will be validated in an international clinical trial. The EORTC QLQ-NET21 provides a site-specific module to supplement the QLQ-C30 for patients with neuroendocrine tumours.Quality of life (QoL) measurements are increasingly being used as an end point in cancer clinical trials. Standard generic QoL questionnaires may not assess symptoms produced by neuroendocrine tumours. Here we report the development of a disease-specific quality of life score questionnaire for patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the gut to supplement the EORTC core cancer questionnaire, the QLQ-C30. Phases 1–3 of the EORTC quality of life group guidelines for module development were used to design the new questionnaire. Forty-one relevant issues (questions) were generated after an extensive literature search. Following interviews of 15 health care workers and 35 patients, a 35 question provisional questionnaire was constructed. This was translated into seven European languages and pre-tested in 180 patients resulting in a 21-item module that will be validated in an international clinical trial. The EORTC QLQ-NET21 provides a site-specific module to supplement the QLQ-C30 for patients with neuroendocrine tumours
Health-Related Quality of Life and Needs of Care and Support of Adult Tanzanians with Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Full text linkCancer is among the three leading causes of death in low income countries and the highest increase with regard to incidence figures for cancer diseases are found in these countries. This is the first report of the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and needs of care and support of adult Tanzanians with cancer. A mixed-methods design was used. The study was conducted at Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. One hundred and one patients with a variety of cancer diagnoses treated and cared for at ORCI answered the Kiswahili version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 investigating HRQOL. Thirty-two of the patients participated in focus group interviews discussing needs of care and support. Data from focus group interviews were analyzed with content analysis. The findings show that the patients, both women and men, report a low quality of life, especially with regard to physical, role, and social function and a high level of symptoms and problems especially with financial difficulties and pain. Financial difficulties are reported to a remarkably high extent by both women and men. The patients, both women and men report least problems with emotional function. A content analysis of the interview data revealed needs of food and water, hygienic needs, emotional needs, spiritual needs, financial needs, and needs of closeness to cancer care and treatment services. The high score for pain points out that ORCI is facing severe challenges regarding care and treatment. However, when considering this finding it should be noted that the pain subscale of the Kiswahili version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 did not reach acceptable internal consistency and showed less than satisfactory convergent validity. This also applies to the subscales cognitive function and global health/quality of life. Attention should be drawn to meet the identified needs of Tanzanian cancer patients while hospitalized but also when at home. Increased accessibility of mosquito nets, pads, and pain-killers would help to fulfil some needs
Development of an EORTC Item Bank for Computer-Adaptive Testing of Nausea and Vomiting
Full text linkObjectives
Nausea and vomiting (NV) remain common cancer symptoms and frequent side effects of anticancer therapies despite available antiemetics. They can lead to treatment disruption and discontinuation. NV is an important patient reported outcome in oncology. This study aimed to build an item bank for computer-adaptive testing (CAT) based on NV questions in the European Organisation for Research for Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life for Cancer Patients (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire and complete the first three phases of development as described in the EORTC Quality of Life Group guidelines.
Data Sources
The development followed a standard procedure. The three phases include conceptualization and literature search (phase 1); item classification, selection, formulation and rating, and expert evaluations (phase 2); and patient pretesting (phase 3). The literature search resulted in a preliminary list of 115 items. Following classification, formulation, and rating, 21 candidate items adhered to the QLQ-C30 format. Evaluation by experts (n = 11) from five countries and patients (n = 31) pretesting in Denmark, Poland, and the UK lead to a final list of 20 items.
Conclusion
The selection, development, and refining of NV items have been described. The nature of this testing ensures an initial CAT item bank that after field testing (phase 4) and psychometric analysis is expected to provide a precise and efficient NV measurement while still being comparable to the original QLQ-C30 scale.
Implications for Nursing Practice
Access to reliable tools that facilitate NV comprehensive assessment is an important issue for nurses caring for patients with cancer. This CAT item bank is meant to support clinical decisions when all phases of testing are completed
Cross-cultural development of a quality-of-life measure for patients with melanoma: phase 3 testing of an EORTC Melanoma Module
No full textMelanoma is an increasingly common skin cancer worldwide. Recent treatment advances have provided patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) with choices where quality of life (QoL) and toxicity are important considerations. A melanoma-specific QoL questionnaire is being developed in a cross-cultural setting using a four phase process developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group. In phase 1, a literature search identified a list of pertinent QoL issues; this was shown to HCPs and patients in eight countries and rated for importance and relevance. Questions were constructed for the highest-rated issues (phase 2) and piloted in another patient sample (phase 3). Using EORTC Quality of Life Group criteria and sequential use of factor and Rasch analysis, scales were hypothesized for field testing (phase 4). Seven QoL domains (disease symptoms, treatment issues, financial issues, access/quality of information, satisfaction with care, psychosocial issues and support), comprising 73 QoL issues, were rated by 46 HCPs and 78 patients. Fifty-six issues were rephrased as questions and piloted with 132 patients. A 38-item questionnaire (QLQ-MEL38) is available for field testing in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30. This study has shown that melanoma patients have important QoL issues that have been incorporated into a new cross-culturally validated instrument. Future testing of this EORTC module is planned and will be an important step forward in providing reliable QoL data to aid future decision-making in the management and clinical trials of this complex group of patients
Flexibility in patient-reported outcome and health-related quality of life measurement:The EORTC Quality of Life Group measurement strategy
No full textThe development of the first European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires contributed to the systematic uptake of HRQoL as an endpoint in cancer clinical trials, and to the measurement of HRQoL for individual assessment in routine care. Following a modular approach, these patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) ensure that both generic and disease-specific issues are assessed, enabling comparison of PROs across groups and studies. The application of a comprehensive and continually refined methodology for developing and updating these PROMs has been crucial in supporting their psychometric and cross-cultural validity, and their continued implementation in clinical research. However, the advancement of measurement science, the more widespread implementation of PROMs, and the significant evolution of anti-cancer therapies over the last decades have highlighted the need to adopt more flexible approaches to PRO assessment to ensure that PROMs remain relevant and fit-for-purpose. The QLG has responded to this call by implementing more tailored PRO measurement approaches through the development and release of the computerised adaptive test (CAT) version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (i.e., the EORTC CAT Core) and the EORTC Item Library. The EORTC Item Library is an interactive online platform that allows for the creation of customised questionnaires (item lists) from the pool of available items derived from established EORTC QLG PROMs. The aim of this article is to describe the current EORTC QLG approach to PRO measurement in oncology, covering important historical developments and best practice recommendations.The development of the first European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires contributed to the systematic uptake of HRQoL as an endpoint in cancer clinical trials, and to the measurement of HRQoL for individual assessment in routine care. Following a modular approach, these patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) ensure that both generic and disease-specific issues are assessed, enabling comparison of PROs across groups and studies. The application of a comprehensive and continually refined methodology for developing and updating these PROMs has been crucial in supporting their psychometric and cross-cultural validity, and their continued implementation in clinical research. However, the advancement of measurement science, the more widespread implementation of PROMs, and the significant evolution of anti-cancer therapies over the last decades have highlighted the need to adopt more flexible approaches to PRO assessment to ensure that PROMs remain relevant and fit-for-purpose. The QLG has responded to this call by implementing more tailored PRO measurement approaches through the development and release of the computerised adaptive test (CAT) version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (i.e., the EORTC CAT Core) and the EORTC Item Library. The EORTC Item Library is an interactive online platform that allows for the creation of customised questionnaires (item lists) from the pool of available items derived from established EORTC QLG PROMs. The aim of this article is to describe the current EORTC QLG approach to PRO measurement in oncology, covering important historical developments and best practice recommendations
Development of a health-related quality of life tool for adolescents and young adults with cancer
No full textImportance: a diagnosis of cancer during adolescence and young adulthood (AYA) disrupts key developmental stages impacting multiple domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To provide a comprehensive assessment of the HRQoL issues of AYAs, a questionnaire dedicated to this age group is needed.Objective: develop a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG) questionnaire measuring HRQoL issues of relevance and importance to AYAs aged 14-39 years with cancer to supplement the cancer generic measure, EORTC QLQ-C30. Design: this survey study was informed by a systematic review of AYA oncology literature published up until 2015 and interviews with AYAs with cancer and health care professionals (HCPs) between 2015-2024. A draft questionnaire was created and tested for relevance and importance. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) identified questionnaire sub-scales. Internal consistency of items within domains was checked using Cronbach's alpha.Setting: participants were recruited from cancer treatment centres across multiple countries.Participants: participants included HCPs and AYAs (14-39 years) receiving treatment for cancer, completed treatment within the past 12 months or receiving palliative care. Main outcome; the primary study outcome was the development of a HRQoL questionnaire assessing issues of importance and relevance to AYAs with cancer.Results: a total of 365 AYAs aged 14-39 years and 28 HCPs from 20 countries were involved in this survey study. Pilot testing of the draft questionnaire resulted in a 30-item questionnaire covering five sub-scales: Activity limitations, Worry about cancer and the future, Self-esteem, Relationships and Positive outlook, and nine single questions. Reliability testing indicated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha range between 0.66 and 0.77). Questions about re-evaluation of priorities and motivation to live life to the full were the most relevant (89% and 84% of AYAs respectively). Concerns about appearance changes and fertility were identified as priority questions (24% AYAs). Conclusion: in this survey study of the HRQoL issues experienced by AYAs with cancer we developed and tested the EORTC QLQ-AYA30 ,a cross-cultural, comprehensive, acceptable, and reliable assessment of HRQoL for use in clinical practice, trials, and research. Future international validation work will further test the QLQ-AYA30.<br/
- …
