220 research outputs found
The role of six biomarkers in diagnosis of hemophilic arthropathy: review of the literature
No full textThe aim of our narrative review of the literature is to identify the role of six important biomarkers: synovial fluid thrombomodulin, fibroblast-like synoviocytes, synovial tissue growth factor , vascular endothelial growth factor in synovium and peripheral blood, urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen, and synovial fluid tumor necrosis factor alpha. These urinary, serum and synovial biomarkers illustrated should be evaluated in patients with hemophilic arthropathy for early diagnosis of hemophilic arthropathy, because they have important implications in the development of arthrofibrosis, altered inflammatory response and bleeding. Moreover, better knowledge of their biological activity is important to identify possible new biological treatment options
Consensus recommendations for the use of FEIBA<sup>®</sup> in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors undergoing elective orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic surgery
No full textSummary: A growing number of publications have described the efficacy and safety of FEIBA as a first-line haemostatic agent for surgical procedures in haemophilia A patients with high-responding FVIII inhibitors. The aim of this study was to provide practical guidance on patient management and selection and also to communicate a standardized approach to the dosing and monitoring of FEIBA during and after surgery. A consensus group was convened with the aims of (i) providing an overview of the efficacy and safety of FEIBA in surgery; (ii) sharing best practice; (iii) developing recommendations based on the outcome of (i) and (ii). To date there have been 17 publications reporting on the use of FEIBA in over 210 major and minor orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic surgical procedures. Haemostatic outcome was rated as 'excellent' or 'good' in 78-100% of major cases. The reporting of thromboembolic complications or anamnestic response to FEIBA was very rare. Key to the success of FEIBA as haemostatic cover in surgery is to utilize the preplanning phase to prepare the patient both for surgery and also for rehabilitation. Haemostatic control with FEIBA should be continued for an adequate period postoperatively to support wound healing and to cover what can in some patients be an extended period of physiotherapy. Published data have demonstrated that FEIBA can provide adequate, well tolerated, peri and postoperative haemostatic cover for a variety of major and minor surgical procedures in patients with haemophilia A. The consensus recommendations provide a standardized approach to the dosing and monitoring of FEIBA.</p
Pain Care Management in Rare Diseases
No full text: In this Special Issue on "Musculoskeletal Pain Care and Management in Rare Disease", it is essential to make it clear that, while specialists in rare diseases (RDs) are often very knowledgeable about the management of the specific diseases in which they are experts, primary care physicians and other physicians who are not experts in a given disease often have very little contact with the patients who experience it [...]
HJHS 2.1 and HEAD-US assessment in the hemophilic joints: How do their findings compare?
No full text: In hemophilic patients methods are needed to better diagnose joint damage early, so that treatments can be adjusted to slow the progression of hemophilic arthropathy. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 (HJHS 2.1) and hemophilia early arthropathy detection with ultrasound (HEAD-US) scales, as well as each of their individual items, to better understand the value each provides on the joint condition of patients with hemophilia. The study included data from patients with hemophilia older than 16 years of age, who attended a routine check-up. HJHS 2.1 and HEAD-US assessments were performed on the elbows, knees and ankles. We studied the correlations and agreements between the two scales and analyzed the relationship between the various items of the HJHS 2.1 (inflammation, duration, atrophy, crepitation, flexion deficit, extension deficit, pain, strength, gait) and HEAD-US (synovitis, cartilage and bone). The study included 203 joints from 66 patients with hemophilia (mean age, 34 years). We found a good correlation between the two scales (r = 0.717). However, HJHS 2.1 revealed only 54% of the cases with synovitis and 75% of the cases with osteochondral damage. HEAD-US detected several relevant physical and functional aspects in less than 53% of the cases. HJHS 2.1 and HEAD-US provide complementary data on joint disease in adults with hemophilia; both assessments should therefore, be made available. HEAD-US presented the added value of detecting early joint changes (synovitis and osteochondral damage), while HJHS 2.1 showed the added value of detecting relevant physical and functional changes
Total joint arthroplasty: the final solution for knee and hip when synovitis could not be controlled
No full text
- …
