1,721,026 research outputs found
Factors impacting closure of beds and delays in cancer treatment: Insights from the European Cancer Nursing Index 2022 survey
Purpose: The European Cancer Nursing Index (ECNI) 2022 survey identified critical challenges in cancer nursing across Europe. One part of the survey, presented here, aimed at describing European cancer nursing staffing and exploring factors associated with bed closures and cancer treatment delays due to nursing shortages. Methods: A secondary analysis of the European Cancer Nursing Index 2022 dataset was conducted, including responses from 436 cancer nurses across 29 European countries. Two multivariable logistic regression models were performed to assess the association between workforce-related variables and (1) bed closures and (2) delays in cancer treatment. Independent variables included nurse-to-patient ratio, advanced cancer nursing roles, inpatient setting, preparation of hazardous drugs, and nurse-led care. Results: Nearly 18 % (n = 80) of respondents reported bed closures and treatment delays in the previous year due to nursing shortages. Logistic regression showed that nurses preparing hazardous drugs at their workplaces, rather than at a pharmacy/lab, were over twice as likely to report treatment delays (OR = 2.16, 95 % CI: 1.24-3.82, p = 0.007). Moreover, each additional patient per nurse increased the likelihood of reporting cancer treatment delay by 9 % (OR = 1.09, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.17, p = 0.026). Conclusions: Findings highlight the impact of excessive workload and unsafe drug preparation practices on timely cancer care delivery. Centralizing hazardous drug preparation and optimizing staffing may reduce delays and improve patient safety. Further research is needed to understand systemic factors behind bed closures and to inform workforce planning strategies across oncology settings
Self-care behaviours in older adults treated with oral anticancer agents: A qualitative descriptive study
Purpose: Older adults treated with oral anticancer agents may have several needs related to managing their treatment at home. Moreover, the experiences of older adults engaging in self-care have been poorly investigated. This study aimed to explore and describe self-care behaviours in older adults treated with oral anticancer agents. Method: This is a qualitative study using content analysis with both a deductive and an inductive approach. Guided by the Middle-Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness, we explored the three theoretical dimensions of self-care maintenance (i.e., behaviours to maintain illness stability), self-care monitoring (i.e., behaviours to monitor signs and symptoms) and self-care management (i.e., responses to signs and symptoms). Patients over 70 years of age who were treated with oral anticancer agents for at least 3 months were interviewed. Results: We enrolled 22 participants (13 males), age range: 70–87 years. Nine categories emerged within the three identified dimensions—self-care maintenance: medication adherence, dietary adaptations and physical activity; self-care monitoring: general health status, cancer monitoring, sign and symptom recognition and attending visits; and self-care management: oral anticancer agent side effects management and illness management. Conclusions: Self-care is a growing area in cancer research. However, it is poorly understood among older patients taking oral anticancer agents. Oncology nurses can play a pivotal role in evaluating and supporting self-care behaviours, educating patients to effectively implement correct self-care behaviours and ensuring positive outcomes for these patients. Further research is needed to establish appropriate interventions to improve self-care in older patients taking oral anticancer agents
Predictors of self-care in patients with cancer treated with oral anticancer agents: A systematic review
Background In the last two decades, the use of oral anticancer agents (OAAs) has increased in cancer patients. Despite this, patients and their caregivers face some challenging issues (side effects, drug-to-drug interactions, etc.) related to OAA administration. The three dimensions of self-care by Riegel et al., self-care maintenance (i.e., stability of patient condition), self-care monitoring (i.e., detection of side effects), and self-care management (i.e., management of side effects), may be implemented to avoid negative outcomes. However, knowledge of self-care determinants is necessary to recognise people at risk of poor self-care behaviours. Aims Determine which are the predictors of self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring and self-care management in patients with cancer taking OAA. Methods A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted. We included studies on adult patients with cancer using any kind of oral anticancer agent and describing a predictor of self-care. The search was performed on PubMed, CINAHL/PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Results Of 3,061 records, 45 studies were included in this review. Forty-six predictors organised into 14 categories were identified. In general, all studies focused only on adherence, considered as a self-care maintenance component, and none of them focused on other dimensions of self-care. The predictors of OAA adherence most reported were age, side effects, and socioeconomic factors (e.g., insurance status, and annual income). Conclusions This systematic review highlighted the literature gap on the analysis of determinants of self-care behaviours in patients taking OAAs. This element could be a starting point for future research that can provide elements to support the oncology nursing research agenda, aimed at recognising patients at risk of poor self-care
Core Outcomes of Self-Care Behaviours in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Oral Anticancer Agents: A Systematic Review
Background/Objectives: The use of oral anticancer agents (OAA) dates to the late 20th century in cancer treatment. It is crucial that patients implement self-care behaviours to keep their disease stable and manage their OAA treatment. The three dimensions of self-care according to Riegel et al., self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and self-care management, may be implemented to avoid negative outcomes. This paper seeks to identify outcomes associated with self-care in breast cancer patients during treatment with OAA and to compare which of these outcomes fall into the core outcome categorizations in oncology (minimal set of outcomes that research on a given health issue should measure). Methods: A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted. This study included patients with breast cancer taking any kind of OAA and described outcomes of self-care. The search was performed on MEDLINE, Web of Science and CINAHL/PsycINFO; Results: Of 4173 records, eight studies were selected and reviewed. The core outcomes mainly considered were mortality, survival, disease recurrence and quality of life. All studies focused only on pharmacological adherence outcome; none of them focused on other dimensions of self-care. Conclusions: This systematic review highlighted that there is a great lack of research on outcomes related to self-care in patients with breast cancer taking OOA. Even though pharmacological adherence to OAA is important, other behaviours are also important to improve patients’ outcomes, but they have not been studied. Further research is needed to study how self-care behaviours can impact patients’ outcomes
Self-care behaviors in patients with cancer treated with oral anticancer agents: a systematic review
Purpose of review Continuous progress in cancer care has led to its increased use in oral anticancer agents that are easily managed by patients at home with fewer costs and hospitalizations. However, correct self-care behaviors are needed for the safe use of these medications. This review aimed to synthesize studies on self-care behaviors in patients treated with oral anticancer agents. Methods This systematic review used a convergent qualitative synthesis design for mixed studies. Studies on adult patients with cancer using any kind of oral anticancer agent and describing self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and/or self-care management behaviors were searched on PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL. After data extraction, the findings were retained for qualitative synthesis. Findings Of 3419 records, 19 studies were included in this review. From the qualitative synthesis, all the retrieved behaviors were synthesized in the three self-care dimensions. Five themes and 18 subthemes were identified. Self-care maintenance included "adherence to the medications" and "prevention." Self-care monitoring consisted of "health surveillance and recognition of illness changes." Self-care management included "seeking help" and "autonomous management of side effects." Overall, most of the behaviors described focused only on adherence. Conclusion The findings of this systematic review could guide future studies on self-care and drive future interventions aimed at improving self-care in this vulnerable population. Nurses and other healthcare professionals should provide self-care support to patients taking oral anticancer agents. In particular, they should promote behaviors aimed at improving well-being, preserving health, or managing side effects
A systematic review of self-care behaviours among patients with cancer who take oral anticancer agents
Development and Content Validity of the Self-Care of Oral Anticancer Agents Index (SCOAAI)
Objective: To develop and test the content validity of the Self-Care of Oral Anticancer Agents Index (SCOAAI). Data Sources: SCOAAI items were developed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. The Middle Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illnesses informed item generation. A four-phase procedure was followed; Phase 1: items were created based on a previous systematic review and a qualitative study; Phase 2: the SCOAAI comprehensibility and comprehensiveness were established through qualitative interviews with clinical experts and with patients (Phase 3); and Phase 4: the SCOAAI was then administered through an online survey to a group of clinical experts for the Content Validity Index (CVI) calculation. Conclusion: The first version of the SCOAAI included 27 items. Five clinical experts and 10 patients tested the comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of instructions, items, and response options. Fifty-three experts (71.7% female, mean experience with patients on oral anticancer agents 5.8 years [standard deviation ± .2]; 66% nurses) participated in the online survey for content validity testing. The final version of the SCOAAI includes 32 items. Item CVI ranges between 0.79 and 1; the average Scale CVI is 0.95. Future studies will test the psychometric properties of the tool. Implications for Nursing Practice: The SCOAAI showed excellent content validity, confirming its usefulness for assessing self-care behaviors for patients on oral anticancer agents. By implementing this instrument, nurses could define and implement targeted interventions for improving self-care and obtaining more positive outcomes (eg, better quality of life, reduced hospitalizations and emergency department visits)
- …
