8,992 research outputs found
Eric Denison, Canon Smith, and Betty Jane Denison at baby Ricky',s christening
No full textLeft to right: Eric Denison, Canon Smith, baby Ricky and Betty Jane Denison
Adrienne (Adry) Cools', bridal shower at the home or Eric and Betty Jane Denison
No full textLeft to right: Adry Cools, Betty Jane Denison, most likely Betty Jane',s son Eric Fleming Denison and Betty Fleming
Members of the Denison family
No full textStanding left to right: Enid Denison, Aunt Francis (Mabel',s sister?), Betty Denison. Sitting is Eric Denison and Mabel Denison (mother)
Women\u27s Studies Newsletter October 1981
No full textWomen\u27s Studies newsletter October 1981. Contents: OPINIONS AND COMMENTARY; TANSY, Ruth Danon; MISSING BOOKS; WOMAN\u27S ACTION GROUP, Becky Pschirrer; WOMAN\u27S ACTION GROUP CONSTITUTION; PLANNED PARENTHOOD, Lynda Hart Ford; PLANNED PARENTHOOD AT DENISON; ANN ARBOR SUMMER INSTITUTE, Nan Nowik; BATTERED WOMEN\u27S SHELTER, Eileen Krimsky; NEW EDITION, Becky Pschirrer; MELLON PROGRAMS; WOMEN AND THE WEIGHT ROOM, Eric Straumanis; PROPOSED MINOR, GLCA WOMEN\u27S STUDIES CONFERENCE; Juliana Mulroy
Denison children and friends? or cousins?
No full textLeft to right back row: Betty Denison, Enid Denison and Kay. Left to right front row: Joan, Pat, Marjorie and Eric Denison
The Value of Natural Kinds from a Kripkean Perspective: A Critique of Eric Katz\u27s \u27Organism, Community and the Substitution Problem
No full textThe author endeavors to extend the Kripke/Putnam theory of reference in order to improve Eric Katz’s argument in “Organism, Community, and the ‘Substitution Problem.” Katz criticizes the organism model for species and supports the community model, which supposedly strikes a balance with a species’ intrinsic value and functional purpose within a natural ecosystem. But since it can be shown that the so-called organism model includes intrinsic value, too, the substitution problem (which had plagued it for Katz) is unfounded. Because Katz’s real goal is to differentiate between the intrinsic and instrumental value of a given species, Kripke’s theory of natural kinds coupled with Putnam’s counterfactual reasoning can help make Katz’s ethics into a stronger argument. Even still, Kripke’s thought urges us to recognize that human science improves and our understanding of a species is never a fixed one. Thus, theory alone cannot definitively conclude how best to treat a given species
- …
