5,695 research outputs found

    Mobile nation: driving workforce participation and productivity

    No full text
    Over the past three decades, the capabilities and adoption of mobile technologies have grown substantively. They have gone from being a novelty to become ubiquitous; an essential tool for modern life. Today, faster connections and ubiquity mean that mobile devices are used for everything – from commerce and research to location-based services and games. The mobile revolution has spread beyond smartphones to a range of devices, including tablets, laptops and dongles. The next wave of the mobile revolution is now emerging. More businesses and individuals are adapting the way they behave and respond to mobile technology. Improvements in speed and latency will enable a range of new disruptive services, including the Internet of Things (IoT), autonomous driving, mobile wallets and drone technologies. The Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association (AMTA) has asked Deloitte Access Economics to report on the updated impact of mobile on productivity in the Australian economy. The research also assesses the importance of mobile technologies in enabling workforce participation. The report is informed by new modelling of the drivers of productivity, based on data from 37 countries over 30 years, as well as a survey of 1,000 Australians less likely to be working, or less likely to be working full time. It finds that, in total, Australia’s economy is $42.9 billion larger in 2015 than it would otherwise be because of the long-term productivity and workforce participation impacts generated by mobile

    Shedding light on the debate: myth-busting tax reform #1

    No full text
    Downloading this report requires a free registration with Deloitte. Overview The easy ride is over. No longer is Australian prosperity able to slipstream on the growth of a fast charging China. Our living standards have stalled since 2011, and there is a risk this period of stagnation will linger unless and until our nation once more takes charge of its own destiny. It doesn’t need to be this way. 2015 should be a year of opportunity as Australia considers key changes to tax policy. But the signs aren’t encouraging. A better tax system could be a big contributor to building the Lucky Country, a key goal for Deloitte. Yet to date a mix of factors – the political climate, the reactions of vested interests, and the sheer breadth of the reform opportunities being considered – has resulted in a debate that has been confusing, contradictory and inflexible. Most frustratingly, it has been characterised by a proliferation of myths and misconceptions. That’s why Deloitte is releasing two reports aimed at shedding light where there is currently too much heat. Our first report covers three contentious areas: fiscal drag, GST and company tax. Reforms to all three are vital. But they are dogged by misconceptions that just won’t die

    Building resilient infrastructure

    No full text
    This is the third report prepared for the Australian Business Roundtable for Disaster Resilience and Safer Communities by Deloitte Access Economics. The Roundtable’s first report, released in 2013, looked at the financial costs of extreme weather events in Australia and the dramatic growth in anticipated costs to 2050. We found that carefully targeted investment in resilience measures now will reduce Australian Government expenditure on natural disaster relief and recovery by more than 50% by 2050. We also found that in 2015 the total economic cost of natural disaster events in Australia exceeded 9billion,orabout0.69 billion, or about 0.6% of gross domestic product. These costs are expected to rise to an average of 33 billion per year by 2050. Between 2002-03 and 2010-11, more than 450millionwasspenteachyearbyAustraliangovernmentstorestorecriticalinfrastructureafterextremeweatherevents.Thisequatestoabout1.6450 million was spent each year by Australian governments to restore critical infrastructure after extreme weather events. This equates to about 1.6% of total public infrastructure spending. In addition, it is estimated that 17 billion (in net present value terms) will be needed to directly replace critical infrastructure between 2015 and 2050 due to the impact of natural disasters. A total of $1.1 trillion will be spent on critical infrastructure between now and 2050. Resilient infrastructure will play a crucial role in helping communities to withstand, respond to and recover from the potentially devastating impact of natural disasters in Australia. Despite this, the report finds only limited reference to resilience in the cost-benefit analysis guidelines applicable to infrastructure project appraisals. It is concerning that there is currently no requirement for government or the private sector to consider resilience when making investment decisions, nor are there best practice principles to encourage its consideration

    Australia’s health and medical research workforce: expert people providing exceptional returns

    No full text
    Over a number of years, ASMR has observed, with deep concern, the erosion of Australia’s health and medical research workforce. A large proportion of this workforce is supported by the National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the peak funding body for Australian health and medical research. However, five years of static investment into the NHMRC has resulted in falling grant funding rates and a decline in the NHMRC-funded workforce; this trend endangers the capacity of NHMRC investment to continue producing exceptional health and economic returns [Access Economics 2008b] and will equate to major negative impacts on the ability of the workforce to respond to the escalating and unsustainable healthcare crisis Australia now faces. This report sought to describe the dynamics and quantify the value of the NHMRC-funded health and medical research workforce in Australia. Furthermore, the report calculates the health and economic gains attributable to the NHMRC-funded workforce under various contrasting scenarios, including changes to workforce size and investment models. The methodology used within the report has been described and validated elsewhere [Access Economics 2008b], with slight adjustments

    Australia’s health and medical research workforce: expert people providing exceptional returns

    No full text
    Over a number of years, ASMR has observed, with deep concern, the erosion of Australia’s health and medical research workforce. A large proportion of this workforce is supported by the National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the peak funding body for Australian health and medical research. However, five years of static investment into the NHMRC has resulted in falling grant funding rates and a decline in the NHMRC-funded workforce; this trend endangers the capacity of NHMRC investment to continue producing exceptional health and economic returns [Access Economics 2008b] and will equate to major negative impacts on the ability of the workforce to respond to the escalating and unsustainable healthcare crisis Australia now faces. This report sought to describe the dynamics and quantify the value of the NHMRC-funded health and medical research workforce in Australia. Furthermore, the report calculates the health and economic gains attributable to the NHMRC-funded workforce under various contrasting scenarios, including changes to workforce size and investment models. The methodology used within the report has been described and validated elsewhere [Access Economics 2008b], with slight adjustments

    The economic contribution of Melbourne’s foodbowl

    No full text
    The value of Melbourne’s foodbowl to the regional economy is significant: Melbourne’s foodbowl  accounts for more than 1.7 million hectares of agricultural land, consisting of a mix of enterprises, most notably vegetables, poultry, dairy and livestock production. It contributes 2.45billionperannumtotheregionaleconomyofMelbourne.Thevalueunderfuturescenarios:Melbournesurbandevelopmentaffectsthevalueofthefoodbowlintwowayslessagriculturallandleadstolowersupplyoffood,atthesametimeagrowingMelbourneleadstohigherfooddemand.Bothmechanismswilldrivefoodpriceshigher.Thethreattothevalueofthefoodbowlfromurbandevelopmentissignificant.UnderafutureofMelbourneat7millionpeople,somelossofagriculturallandtourbandevelopmentisexpectedandthevalueofannualagriculturaloutputismodelledtofallbybetween2.45 billion per annum to the regional economy of Melbourne . The value under future scenarios: Melbourne’s urban development affects the value of the foodbowl in two ways - less agricultural land leads to lower supply of food, at the same time a growing Melbourne leads to higher food demand. Both mechanisms will drive food prices higher. The threat to the value of the foodbowl from urban development is significant. Under a future of Melbourne at 7 million people, some loss of agricultural land to urban development is expected and the value of annual agricultural output is modelled to fall by between 32 million and 111million,withhigherfreshfoodprices.Acontinuationofarecenttrendtowardspreferringmorelocalsourcesoffoodincreasesthevalueoffoodproductionfromthefoodbowl.UnderascenariowhereconsumersinMelbournesfoodbowlincreasetheirconsumptionoflocalfoodbyamodestamountof10111 million, with higher fresh food prices. A continuation of a recent trend towards preferring more local sources of food increases the value of food production from the foodbowl. Under a scenario where consumers in Melbourne’s foodbowl increase their consumption of local food by a modest amount of 10%, the value of annual agricultural output from the foodbowl is  modelled to be 290 million higher per annum. The ancillary benefits of Melbourne’s foodbowl beyond these quantitative metrics include the insurance value against drought and climate change, the green wedge values associated with land used for farming rather than urban development, and the option value of land use that is retained when land is used for farmin

    Economic effects of ridesharing in Australia

    No full text
    This report looks at the economic effects in Australia of Uber and its uberX ridesharing platform. The impact of the launch, and subsequent growth of Uber, and particularly its UberX platform is playing out as one of Australia’s most compelling sharing economy and digital disruption stories. This report, commissioned by Uber, looks at the impacts of the new ridesharing economy on consumers, uberX driver-partners and the wider community. Key report findings include: Operating at current levels, uberX creates benefits for consumers of approximately $81 million per year Ridesharing is growing the point-to-point transport market, with more than 60% of uberX rides new to the point-to-point transport market uberX services are, on average, just under 20% cheaper than equivalent taxi fares, including dynamic (surge) pricing

    Deloitte Access Economics

    No full text
    This publication contains many links to external sites. These external sites may no longer be active.Made available by the Library & Archives NT via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT)

    Deloitte Access Economics

    No full text
    This publication contains many links to external sites. These external sites may no longer be active.Made available by the Library & Archives NT via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT)

    Deloitte Access Economics

    No full text
    This publication contains many links to external sites. These external sites may no longer be active.Made available by the Library & Archives NT via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT)
    corecore