178 research outputs found
From Male Master To Caring Mediator. Lieven De Cauter on utopia, the commons, urban gardening and the changing role of the architect
Get PDFINTRODUCTION This interview took place in early January, 2023 between Belgian philosopher, art historian, writer, and activist, Lieven De Cauter (b. 1959), and Ralph Ghoche, Assistant Professor of Architecture at Barnard College, Columbia University. De Cauter is Professor of the Philosophy of Culture in the Department of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning at KU Leuven and the author of some 20 books. Beyond his academic writings, De Cauter has published poems, essays in architectural critic..
“Literature and Energy” at TALES (Tampere Literary Evenings), 10 April 2024
No full textLooking forward to today's TALES event (Tampere Literary Evenings), where I join author/energy activist Risto Isomäki to talk about literature and energy. Risto Isomäki does not really need an introduction to a Finnish audience, but for an international public it might be interesting to know that he is the author of one of the first novels to explicitly consider man-made future climate catastrophe in his novel The Sands of Sarasvati (Sarasvatin hiekkaa; 2005), also made into a fascinating gr..
Future of the Novel - syllabus update and guest lecture
No full textThe course I am co-teaching with Natalya Bekhta on "The Future of the Novel" is nearing its final stages, with the most recent classes on Bulgarian author Gospodinov's Time Shelter and Polish author Tokarczuk's The House of Day, the House of Night, and the final class in a few weeks on Norwegian author Rimbereid's Solaris corrected. Full updated syllabus below and in this pdf. Today (25 March), instead of a regular class, our students are listening in to a guest lecture by Eric Hayot on "The..
New insights in the costs and quality of life of patients after ischemic stroke : implications for heath care policy
No full textPor que e como escrever histórias da tradução?
No full textTranslation into Brazilian Portuguese of the article “Why and How to Write Translation Histories?”, written by Lieven D’Hulst and originally published in english in the special edition of Crop (v. 6, São Paulo, 2001) focused on translation history in Brazil. By taking the mnemonic hexameter used by classical rhetoric to address oratory - who (quis); what (quid); where (ubi); by which means (quibus auxiliis), why (cur); how (quomodo); when (quando) - and applying it specifically to the context of translation history and historiography, D’Hulst shows what can/should be covered by this area of translation studies. We would like to note that the translation of this article also involved an editing effort. As the opening text of the special edition just cited, the author mentions several other articles which are part of the same edition as examples of researches conducted; we chose to transfer these mentions to the footnotes with the objective to give the text a better flow within a new publication context.Tradução para o português brasileiro do artigo “Why and How to Write Translation Histories?”, de Lieven D’Hulst, publicado originalmente em inglês na edição especial da Revista Crop (v. 6, São Paulo, 2001) dedicada à história da tradução no Brasil. Retomando o hexâmetro mnemônico utilizado pela retórica clássica para abordar a oratória - quem (quis); o que (quid); onde (ubi); por quais meios (quibus auxiliis), por que (cur); como (quomodo); quando (quando) - e aplicando-o especificamente à história e à historiografia da tradução, D’Hulst aponta o que pode/deveria ser abordado por essa área dos estudos da tradução. Traduzir este artigo implicou também um trabalho de edição. Sendo o texto de abertura da referida edição especial, o autor faz menção a vários de seus artigos como exemplos de pesquisas realizadas; optamos por transferir tais menções para as notas de rodapé com o objetivo de conferir maior fluidez ao texto no contexto de uma nova publicação
Por que e como escrever histórias da tradução?
Get PDFTranslation into Brazilian Portuguese of the article “Why and How to Write Translation Histories?”, written by Lieven D’Hulst and originally published in english in the special edition of Crop (v. 6, São Paulo, 2001) focused on translation history in Brazil. By taking the mnemonic hexameter used by classical rhetoric to address oratory - who (quis); what (quid); where (ubi); by which means (quibus auxiliis), why (cur); how (quomodo); when (quando) - and applying it specifically to the context of translation history and historiography, D’Hulst shows what can/should be covered by this area of translation studies. We would like to note that the translation of this article also involved an editing effort. As the opening text of the special edition just cited, the author mentions several other articles which are part of the same edition as examples of researches conducted; we chose to transfer these mentions to the footnotes with the objective to give the text a better flow within a new publication context.Tradução para o português brasileiro do artigo “Why and How to Write Translation Histories?”, de Lieven D’Hulst, publicado originalmente em inglês na edição especial da Revista Crop (v. 6, São Paulo, 2001) dedicada à história da tradução no Brasil. Retomando o hexâmetro mnemônico utilizado pela retórica clássica para abordar a oratória - quem (quis); o que (quid); onde (ubi); por quais meios (quibus auxiliis), por que (cur); como (quomodo); quando (quando) - e aplicando-o especificamente à história e à historiografia da tradução, D’Hulst aponta o que pode/deveria ser abordado por essa área dos estudos da tradução. Traduzir este artigo implicou também um trabalho de edição. Sendo o texto de abertura da referida edição especial, o autor faz menção a vários de seus artigos como exemplos de pesquisas realizadas; optamos por transferir tais menções para as notas de rodapé com o objetivo de conferir maior fluidez ao texto no contexto de uma nova publicação
La théologie aux marges et aux carrefours Théologie, Église, université, société
No full textTheology no longer seems to have a self-evident role in the domains in which it has belonged from of old : the university, the Church, and society. On the contrary, it appears to have shifted to the margin of what happens in all three of them. In this contribution the author argues that theology can only fulfill its task well today if it refuses to fly away from this marginalization, but undergoes this knowingly and willingly. Theology will regain its credibility and relevance when it consciously takes its place starting precisely from the margins at the crossroads of university, Church, and society. In the first part the author discusses the changed position of theology in the university, Church, and society, and develops his thesis that theology today should recover its place from the margins and at the crossroads of these domains. In the second part he shows how – in a renewed retrieval of the traditional adage philosophia ancilla theologiae – theology can be assisted in doing so by a critical-productive dialogue with contemporary philosophies of difference. In the third part he illustrates how theology, precisely from this difference, can ‘make a difference’ in each of the abovementioned domains, in the margins and at the crossroads.La théologie ne paraît plus avoir de rôle évident dans les domaines auxquels elle appartient depuis longtemps : l’université, l’Église et la société. Au contraire, elle semble avoir glissé à la marge de ce qui se passe dans ces trois domaines. Dans cet article, l’auteur soutient la thèse que la théologie ne peut bien remplir sa tâche aujourd’hui que si elle refuse de s’opposer à cette marginalisation et accepte de la subir sciemment et volontairement. La théologie retrouvera sa crédibilité et sa pertinence à partir du moment où elle prendra intentionnellement sa juste place en partant de la marge, au carrefour de l’université, de l’Église et de la société. Dans la première partie, l’auteur expose le changement de la position de la théologie à l’université, dans l’Église et dans la société, et il développe sa thèse que la théologie d’aujourd’hui devrait retrouver sa place à partir de la marge et au carrefour de ces domaines. Dans la deuxième, il montre comment – dans une reprise nouvelle de l’adage traditionnel philosophia ancilla theologiae – la théologie peut être aidée dans cette démarche par un dialogue critico-productif avec les philosophies contemporaines de la différence. Dans la troisième partie, il illustre comment la théologie, précisément à partir de cette différence, à la marge et au carrefour, peut dans chacun des domaines mentionnés, «faire la différence » .Boeve Lieven. La théologie aux marges et aux carrefours Théologie, Église, université, société. In: Revue théologique de Louvain, 44ᵉ année, fasc. 3, 2013. pp. 388-412
Retaliation as a response to procedural unfairness: a self-regulatory approach
No full textWhen does procedural unfairness result in retaliation, and why do recipients of unfair treatment sometimes pursue and other times inhibit retaliation? Five studies addressed these questions. The authors proposed and found that regulatory focus moderates retaliation against an unfairness-enacting authority: Promotion-focus participants were more likely to retaliate than prevention-focus participants. Promotion focus was associated with, and also heightened the accessibility of, the individual self. In turn, individual-self accessibility influenced retaliation. In fact, prevention-focus participants were as retaliatory as promotion-focus participants under conditions of high individual-self accessibility. Implications for the procedural fairness and regulatory focus literatures are discussed, and suggestions for future research are offered
- …
