1,980 research outputs found
Heartbeat Horizon: Saunders\u27s Presentation to Executive Board of Directors Sept. 2012
Speech/presentation by Saunders to the Board of Directors. Outlines how Heartbeat changed Saunders\u27s view of God, Jesus, the Bible, and the church; the importance of vision and the compelling drive of Heartbeat\u27s vision; and a proposal for Heartbeat for the next three years of 2012-2015 and the role Saunders feels he should play. Future goals include a book Saunders wants to author, a Heartbeat Institute, and a plan for laying up content and marketing it to a wide audience.
Typed presentation also contains notes and revisions handwritten by Saunders
Stroke in childhood neurofibromatosis type 2
This commentary is on the case series by Lascelles et al. on pages 1285–1288 of this issue
sj-docx-1-hsb-10.1177_00221465231205549 – Supplemental material for Health Care Stereotype Threat and Sexual and Gender Minority Well-Being
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-hsb-10.1177_00221465231205549 for Health Care Stereotype Threat and Sexual and Gender Minority Well-Being by R. Kyle Saunders, Dawn Carr and Amy M. Burdette in Journal of Health and Social Behavior</p
Photograph of Benk Green and Tom B. Saunders III at Saunders Ranch Museum
Photograph at the Saunders Ranch Museum of author Benk Green and Tom B. Saunders III
Opt-out organ donation without presumptions
This paper defends an 'opt-out' scheme for organ procurement, by distinguishing this system from 'presumed consent' (which the author regards as an erroneous justification of it). It, first, stresses the moral importance of increasing the supply of organs and argues that making donation easier need not conflict with altruism. It then goes on to explore one way that donation can be increased, namely by adopting an opt-out system, in which cadaveric organs are used unless the deceased (or their family) registered an objection. Such policies are often labelled 'presumed consent', but it is argued that critics are right to be sceptical of this idea -- consent is shown to be an action, rather than a mental attitude, and thus not something that can be presumed. Either someone has consented or they have not, whatever their attitude to the use of their organs. Thankfully, an opt-out scheme need not rest on the presumption of consent. Actual consent can be given implicitly, by one's actions, so it is argued that the failure to register an objection (given certain background conditions) should itself be taken as sign of consent. Therefore, it is permissible to use the organs of someone who did not opt out, because they have -- by their silence -- actually consented
Recommended from our members
'Out Vile Jelly': Sarah Kane's 'Blasted' & Shakespeare's 'King Lear'
Sarah Kane's notorious 1995 debut, Blasted, has been widely though belatedly recognized as a defining example of experiential or ‘in-yer-face’ theatre. However, Graham Saunders here argues that the best playwrights not only innovate in use of language and dramatic form, but also rewrite the classic plays of the past. He believes that too much stress has been placed on the play's radical structure and contemporary sensibility, with the effect of obscuring the influence of Shakespearean tradition on its genesis and content. He clarifies Kane's gradually dawning awareness of the influence of Shakespeare's King Lear on her work and how elements of that tragedy were rewritten in terms of dialogue, recast thematically, and reworked in terms of theatrical image. He sees Blasted as both a response to contemporary reality and an engagement with the history of drama. Graham Saunders is Senior Lecturer in Theatre Studies at the University of the West of England, Bristol, and author of the first full-length study of Kane's work: ‘Love Me or Kill Me’: Sarah Kane and the Theatre of Extremes (Manchester University Press, 2002). An earlier version of this article was given as a paper at the ‘Crucible of Cultures: Anglophone Drama at the Dawn of a New Millennium’ conference in Brussels, May 2001. Saunders is currently working on articles about Samuel Beckett and Edward Bon
Prof. Peter Saunders, 1992
Prof. Peter Saunders, one of the world's leading urban sociologists and author of six books, including his most recent book, 'A Nation of Home Owners'. Prof. Saunders gave a public seminar on his research into the effects of privatisation of the Water Industry in the United Kingdom. Photograph originally appeared in the 'Staff News', 30th April 1992
J. Saunders Redding, circa 1970
A portrait photo of author Jay Saunders Redding. Written on verso: Saunders Redding (author) - first AA faculty at an Ivy League (Brown).The Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library acknowledges the generous support of the Joseph & Evelyn Lowery Institute for Justice and Human Rights, the Joseph Echols Lowery Irrevocable Trust, and other donors in supporting the processing and digitization of Morehouse College's Joseph Echols and Evelyn Gibson Lowery Collection
Still kicking: George Saunders and ‘shadow realism’
International audienceEven as George Saunders jettisons the usual trappings of literary realism, he does so not in order to debunk authorship and authority (cf. Barthes) or to reduce a story to the language of its own telling. Rather, he reasserts the writer’s moral role, and thereby defines a space for the figure of the author. With reference to Lionel Trilling’s defence of Nathaniel Hawthorne and ‘shadow realism’ this article situates Saunders in a literary tradition which challenges reductive conceptions of mimesis. It cites examples from Saunders’ short stories and novellas (CivilWarLand in Bad Decline, 1996; Pastoralia, 2000; In Persuasion Nation, 2006), and also addresses an author-sponsored website, with attention to how Internet materials are not only a promotion of Saunders’ work, but also an extension of it. Saunders foregrounds the referential workings of language while remaining attached to a sense that language is a tool for moral questions
- …
