767 research outputs found
Store architecture in a persistant operating system / David Hulse.
No full textBibliography: leaves 207-214.viii, 214 leaves : ill. ; 30 cm.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Computer Science, 199
Conférence de David Wilkins et Shelly Hulse Wilkins, présentation de l’ouvrage Dismembered: Native Disenrollment and the Battle for Human Rights
No full textDavid Wilkins et Shelly Hulse Wilkins ont présenté Dismembered (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2017) le vendredi 6 octobre 2017 à l’université Paris-Diderot à l’invitation de Marine Le Puloch, Maître de conférences et spécialiste des questions autochtones dans les Amériques. Leur livre, consacré aux récentes vagues d’exclusions qui ont décimé plusieurs groupes tribaux des Etats-Unis, est le premier ouvrage universitaire consacré à un phénomène qui a passionné les médias américains. ..
Talking about a Christine Borland sculpture: effective empathy in contemporary anatomy art (and an emerging counterpart in medical training?)
No full textThis Introduction and interview discusses the poetical and empathic insights that are a key to the effectiveness of contemporary artist Christine Borland's practice and its relevance to the medical humanities, visual art research and medical students’ training. It takes place in a context of intensive interest in reciprocity and conversation as well as expert exchange between the fields of Medicine and Contemporary Arts. The interview develops an understanding of medical research and the application of its historical resources and contemporary practice-based research in contemporary art gallery exhibitions. Artists tend not to follow prescriptive programmes towards new historical knowledge, however, a desire to form productive relationships between history and contemporary art practice does reveal practical advantages. Borland's research also includes investigations in anatomy, medical practices and conservatio
W R B executive summary
No full text"Alternative futures analysis is an environmental assessment approach for helping communities make decisions about land and water use. Its role is to provide a long-term, large-area perspective on the combined effects of the multiple policies and regulations affecting the quality of the environment and natural resources within a geographic area. The alternative futures process helps community members articulate and understand their different viewpoints, priorities, and goals. The product of the process is a suite of alternative 'visions' for the future expressed as maps of land use and land cover that reflect the likely outcomes of the options being advocated. Potential effects of these alternative futures are then evaluated for a wide array of ecological and socio-economic endpoints (i.e., things people care about). By capturing the essential elements of a complex debate in a fairly small number of alternative futures, and combining them with an objective evaluation of the consequences of each choice, this process can help groups move toward common understanding, and possible resolution and collective action. Here we summarize results from an alternative futures analysis conducted in the Willamette River Basin in western Oregon"--Page 1.conducted by the Pacific Northwest Ecosystem Research Consortium, consisting of scientists from EPA, Oregon State University, and the University of Oregon; Joan P. Baker, U.S. Environmental Research Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division; David Hulse, University of Oregon, Department of Landscape Architecture; Stan Gregory, Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife"EPA 600/R-02/045(a)"This archived document is maintained by the State Library of Oregon. It is for informational purposes and may not be suitable for legal purposesIncludes bibliographical reference (page 9)Funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Mode of access: Internet from the State Library of Oregon U.S. Government Publications CollectionText in Englis
Research workplan: year 1
No full textThis archived document is maintained by the Oregon State Library as part of the Oregon Documents Depository Program. It is for informational purposes and may not be suitable for legal purposes."Submitted to Dr. Dixon Landers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by Stanley v. Gregory, principal investigator; David Hulse, co-principal investigator, Rick Edwards, co-principal investigator."Includes executive summary, bibliographical references (leaves 131-142) , and vitae of investigators.Mode of access: Internet from the Oregon Government Publications Collection
Recommended from our members
Confirmation bias ::inside Washington's war over the Supreme Court, from Scalia's death to Justice Kavanaugh /
No full text"From the chief Washington correspondent for the New York Times, a richly detailed, news-breaking look at the unprecedented political fight over Antonin Scalia's Supreme Court vacancy and the seemingly irreversible dysfunction it triggered across all three branches in the nation's capital--ultimately delivering us Trump, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh. The embodiment of American conservative thought and jurisprudence, Antonin Scalia cast an expansive shadow over the Supreme Court for three decades. His death at a Texas hunting resort in February 2016 created a dilemma for Republican leadership faced with the prospect of yet another Obama Supreme Court nominee, this time one who could tip the ideological balance of the court and alter the course of American history. In [this book], Carl Hulse tells an exclusive account of the rush of events following Scalia's death, including Mitch McConnell's extraordinary snap decision to deny President Obama's nominee so much as a hearing, let alone a vote. The author recounts the unsuccessful Democratic effort to break the Republican blockade on behalf of Merrick Garland, a failure that allowed Donald Trump to exploit the vacancy to entice evangelicals and other leery Republicans to rally support and deliver him the presidency. Newly empowered, Trump and his White House counsel Donald F. McGahn II moved quickly to install Neil Gorsuch on the court. The plan from the start was to have a second judge with a Republican pedigree--Brett Kavanaugh--join Gorsuch at the first opportunity in order to cement a majority conservative bloc. Aided by McConnell and the willingness of Republicans to bend Senate practices, the new administration set out to remake not only the Supreme Court, but the lower courts as well, further roiling the Senate and threatening public confidence in the federal judiciary. With unrivaled access to figures on both sides of the aisle, Hulse revisits the judicial wars of the past twenty years to show how those conflicts have led to our current polarization and resulted in not one but two Trump-nominated conservative justices who could be serving for decades. [This book] is a prodigious look inside the bitter judicial politics that have torn apart the Senate and transformed the modern Supreme Court from an institution that is supposed to rise above partisanship into one that is increasingly an extension of it. History will show, argues Hulse, that Scalia's death and the ugly battles fought in its wake represent an inflection point in American politics, changing the trajectory of three vital arms of our government--the Senate, the presidency, and the Supreme Court--in ways McConnell could not have envisioned that night in 2016"--Jacket
Choice, diversity and coordination: improving access to social housing
No full textAllocations systems lie at the core of social housing. They determine who is eligible for housing (and who is not), the order of providing assistance, and matching of households with specific properties, as well as affecting all aspects of housing providers’ operations including tenancy management, asset planning and management, rent revenue, and ultimately financial viability. This article raises some issues about allocations, which are central to discussions about the future of public housing in Australia. It reports, and reflects, on some of the findings of recent research (Hulse and Burke 2004) for the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI), although it should be emphasised that the views expressed are those of the author not AHURI Ltd
Comparing consortial repositories: a model-driven analysis
No full textThis study aims to provide a comparative assessment of different repository consortia as a reference to inform future work in the area. A review of the literature was used to identify repository consortia, and their features were compared. Three models of consortial repositories were derived from this comparison, based on their structure and aims. The consortial models were based around either: creating a shared repository for the members, developing a repository software platform or creating a metadata harvesting service to aggregate content. Using case studies of each type of repository consortium, each model was assessed in terms of its particular strengths and weaknesses. These strengths were then compared across the models to enable those considering a consortial repository project to assess which model, or combination of models, would best address their needs and to aid in project planning
Group work experts share their favorite activities: A guide to choosing, planning, conducting, and processing -revised ed.
No full textDiana Hulse-Killacky is a contributing author, The names activity , pp. 52-53.
Book description: This revised edition is a compilation of over 50 group activities that represent a variety of types of groups from task and work to psychoeducational to counseling and therapy groups to training and supervision groups. Various populations, from children and adolescents to older adults are included. Members of the Association for Specialists in Group Work have shared many of their favorite group activities in this useful volume
- …
