1,720,981 research outputs found

    Supplemental Material, MRX823191_Supplemental_Appendix_1 - The Complex Sources of Immigration Control

    No full text
    Supplemental Material, MRX823191_Supplemental_Appendix_1 for The Complex Sources of Immigration Control by Darshan Vigneswaran in International Migration Review</p

    Shifting the Focus of Migration Back Home: Perspectives from Southern Africa

    No full text
    Loren B. Landau and Darshan Vigneswaran raise three fundamental critiques about how contemporary migration and development debates are likely to affect sub-Saharan Africa. They suggest that the focus should shift from movements out of Africa to migration, displacement and urbanization within the continent in order to take into account the negative effects of migration on families, conflict and political accountability. They argue that given that the balance of negotiating power rests with Europe and North America, it is unlikely that any future agenda on migration will give priority to African interests. Development (2007) 50, 82–87. doi:10.1057/palgrave.development.1100435

    Shifting the Focus of Migration Back Home: Perspectives from Southern Africa

    No full text
    ABSTRACT Loren B. Landau and Darshan Vigneswaran raise three fundamental critiques about how contemporary migration and development debates are likely to affect sub-Saharan Africa. They suggest that the focus should shift from movements out of Africa to migration, displacement and urbanization within the continent in order to take into account the negative effects of migration on families, conflict and political accountability. They argue that given that the balance of negotiating power rests with Europe and North America, it is unlikely that any future agenda on migration will give priority to African interests

    Forecasting Territorial Change

    No full text

    Migration and Mental Maps

    No full text

    Expansion of the British Empire

    No full text

    The End of Migration Studies

    No full text
    The discipline of Migration Studies should be dismantled. Migration Studies has made major achievements in explaining why people move across borders and how societies and states adapt and respond to the movement and settlement of people. However, the discipline possesses a deeply problematic and irreparable ontology. Its focus on the 'migrant' and 'migration' as objects of study necessarily predispose the discipline to statist and anti-migrant forms of study. Many previous works have diagnosed this problem and posed conceptual and methodological means of resolving them. This paper explains why these solutions have not works. Migration Studies' ontology continues to be reinforced by the disciplinary apparatus of Migration Studies institutions and associations. Hence, the paper calls for the dismantling of these institutions and associations and proposes ways in which research on human mobility, state power and territory might develop in less politically problematic ways

    Introduction

    No full text
    corecore