1,721,033 research outputs found
Peritoneal cancer and occupational exposure to asbestos: results from the application of a job-exposure matrix.
No full textBACKGROUND: Because of the rarity of peritoneal mesothelioma, occupational risks associated with it have seldom been studied, particularly among women. In this respect, death certificates databases may provide numbers large enough for analysis, although the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) does not single out mesothelioma from the rest of peritoneal cancers. The aim of this paper is twofold: to explore occupational risks of peritoneal cancer among men and women, and to test the performance of a job-exposure matrix in detecting its association with asbestos exposure using the occupation and industry reported in the death certificate.
METHODS: From a large database containing information on the 1984-1992 death certificates of 24 U.S. states, we identified 657 deaths from peritoneal cancer and 6,570 controls who died from non-malignant diseases, 1:10 matched by region, gender, race, and 5-year age group.
RESULTS: Occupations at risk included insulators among men, and machine operators among women. Among men, we found a significant increase in risk associated with employment in manufacturing industries, such as industrial and miscellaneous chemicals; miscellaneous non-metallic mineral and stone products; construction and material handling machines; and electrical machinery, equipment, and supplies; as well as in services to dwellings and other buildings. Industries at increased risk among women included elementary and secondary schools; miscellaneous retail stores; and publishing and printing. Our job-exposure matrix classified 17 male cases and 3 controls in the high probability category of exposure to asbestos (OR = 61.6). Among men, risk of peritoneal cancer increased significantly by probability and intensity of exposure to asbestos. No such pattern was observed among women. The job-exposure matrix did not classify any female subjects in the high probability or intensity of asbestos exposure.
DISCUSSION: This study provides evidence that death certificate data and job-exposure matrices are useful tools to observe well-established associations, such as the one existing between peritoneal cancer and asbestos exposure among men, in spite of crude information, disease misclassification, and occupational misclassification. These factors are more likely to preclude meaningful results among women
Occupational risk factors for cancer of the central nervous system (CNS) among US women.
No full textBACKGROUND: In a recent report, we found an elevated risk of cancer of the central nervous system (CNS) in several occupations and industries, and a modest association with exposure to solvents and to contact with the public.
METHODS: To further explore the occupational risk of CNS cancer among women, we extended the analysis of the previous death certificate-based case-control study, including 12,980 female cases (ICD-9 codes 191 and 192) in 24 US states in 1984-1992 and 51,920 female controls who died from diseases other than malignancies and neurological disorders. We applied newly designed job-exposure matrices for 11 occupational hazards, previously reported as brain cancer risk factors, to the occupation and industry codes in the death certificates. We also conducted a separate analysis of 161 meningioma cases (ICD-9 codes 192.1 and 192.3), a tumor more frequent among women, particularly in the postmenopausal age group.
RESULTS: Overall, CNS cancer risk showed a 20-30% increase among women exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMF), methylene chloride, insecticides and fungicides, and contact with the public. Risk for meningioma was elevated among women exposed to lead (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.0, 3.9). CNS cancer did not show a clear pattern of risk increase by probability and intensity of exposure to any of the explored risk factors. Cross-classification by probability and intensity of exposure did not reveal any significant trend. Cases were too few to explore trends of meningioma by probability and intensity of exposure to lead.
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence of a strong contribution of 11 occupational hazards to the etiology of CNS cancer. However, limitations of the occupational information might have reduced our ability to detect clear patterns of risk
Mortality from gastric cardia and lower esophagus cancer and occupation among women
No full textThe incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia and esophagus is increasing steadily in the United States. Little is known about the etiology of these cancers. We used occupation and industry information on the death certificates from 24 states (1984 to 1989) to conduct a case-control analysis of gastric cardia and gastric cardia/lower esophagus cancer. Risks were also calculated for other gastric cancers combined. Controls were deaths from other causes except cancer and gastrointestinal disorders. Increased risks of gastric cardia and cardia/lower esophagus among white women were found for administrative jobs (cardia odds ratio (OR) = 3.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5-9.8) and health professionals (cardia OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 0.6-5.3). Occupations associated with a lower socioeconomic status showed no significant excess risks. A similar pattern in risks was seen for men
Lung cancer among silica-exposed workers: the quest for Truth between chance and necessity
No full textBACKGROUND: In 1997, IARC upgraded crystalline silica to a Group 1 human carcinogen. However, the IARC report itself acknowledged variations in risk depending on inherent characteristics of the crystalline silica or external factors affecting its biological activity or distribution of its polymorphs.
METHODS: We reviewed silica physical and physico-chemical properties and how such properties may affect its interaction with the target cells. Studies of silica, silicosis and lung cancer published from 1997 onwards are then reviewed in the search of any new advances in knowledge about silica carcinogenicity. Finally, other possible confounding factors contributing to inconsistent findings on silica, silicosis, and lung cancer are reviewed.
RESULTS: Host factors, physico-chemical characteristics of the surface of silica particles, exposure circumstances, and the mineral ore composition experimentally affect the ability of silica particles of inducing release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and TNF-alpha by alveolar macrophages, possibly accounting for the great variation in lung cancer risk among dust exposed workers across the individual studies. Most recent epidemiological studies do not consider such complex pattern of modifying factors, and they keep replicating inconsistent findings. The hypothesis of a silicosis-mediated pathway, although more consistent from an epidemiological perspectives, and reassuring in terms of the effectiveness of current standards in preventing lung cancer risk among silica exposed workers, does not seem to explain elevated risks at low silica exposure levels.
CONCLUSION: Future studies of lung cancer risk among workers exposed to silica-containing dust should consider measurement of ROS and TNF-alpha release by workplace dust samples as intermediate end-points predicting lung cancer risk better than silica concentration, allowing to more effectively address preventive action
Risk of stomach cancer associated with 12 workplace hazards: analysis of death certificates from 24 states of the United States with the aid of job exposure matrices.
No full textOBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of gastric cancer associated with 12 workplace exposures suspected or discussed as aetiological agents in previous reports.
METHODS: A case-control study was conducted based on the death certificates of several million deaths in 24 states of the United States in 1984-96. Overall, the data base included 41,957 deaths from stomach cancer among subjects aged > or = 25 years. These were 20,878 white men, 14,125 white women, 4215 African American men, and 2739 African American women. Two controls for each case were selected from among subjects who died from non-malignant diseases, frequency matched to cases by geographic region, race, sex and 5 year age group. Each three digit occupation and industry code listed in the 1980 United States census was classified for probability and intensity of exposure to asbestos, inorganic dust, metals, lead, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitrogen oxides, nitrosamines, sulphuric acid, fertilisers, herbicides, other pesticides (including insecticides and fungicides), and wood dust. These job exposure matrices were subsequently applied to the occupation-industry combinations in the death certificates of study subjects, separately by sex and race.
RESULTS: Risk of stomach cancer showed a modest association with occupational exposure to inorganic dust (odds ratio (OR) = 1.06; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.03 to 1.11) with significant increasing trends by probability and intensity of exposure overall and by cross classification of the two exposure matrices. Workplace exposure to nitrosamines also showed a modest association (OR = 1.06; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11), but the excess risk was even smaller after adjusting for inorganic dust exposure. Risk of gastric cancer was not associated with any of the other workplace exposures considered in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-differential misclassification of exposure may have caused negative findings in this study, and inorganic dust may be a partial surrogate for exposure to other unknown risk factors. Alternatively, our results suggest that occupational factors contribute little to the aetiology of gastric cancer. Inorganic dust might act through non-specific mechanisms, similar to those proposed for salt, aspirin, and heat by other authors
111. Gender differences in risk of renal cell carcinoma and occupational exposure to chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons
No full textBACKGROUND: Organic solvents have been associated with renal cell cancer; however, the risk by gender and type of solvents is nuclear.
METHODS: We evaluated the risk of renal cell carcinoma among men and women exposed to all organic solvents-combined, all chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (CAHC)-combined, and nine individual CAHC using a priori job exposure matrices developed by NCI in a population-based case-control study in Minnesota, U.S. We interviewed 438 renal cell cancer cases (273 men and 165 women) and 687 controls (462 men and 225 women).
RESULTS: Overall, 34% of male cases and 21% of female cases were exposed to organic solvents in general. The risk of renal cell carcinoma was significantly elevated among women exposed to all organic solvents combined (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.3-4.2), to CAHC combined (OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.1-3.9), and to trichloroethylene (TCE) (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.0-4.0). Among men, no significant excess risk was observed among men exposed to any of these nine individual CAHCs, all CAHCs-combined, or all organic solvents-combined.
DISCUSSION: These observed gender differences in risk of renal cell carcinoma in relation to exposure to organic solvents may be explained by chance based on small numbers, or by the differences in body fat content, metabolic activity, the rate of elimination of xenobiotics from the body, or by differences in the level of exposure between men and women, even though they have the same job title
Occupational risk factors for cancer of the gastric cardia. Analysis of death certificates from 24 US states.
No full textWe evaluated the risk of gastric cardia cancer by occupation and industry in a case-control study using information from death certificates for 24 US states in 1984-1992. One thousand fifty-six cases of gastric cardia cancer were identified among men aged 20 years or more, including 1,023 whites and 33 blacks. Controls were 5,280 subjects who died of nonmalignant diseases, 5:1 matched to cases by geographic region, race, gender, and 5-year age group. Among white men, occupations with elevated risk included financial managers (odds ratio [OR] = 6.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-28.8), janitors and cleaners (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.9), production inspectors (OR = 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-6.9), and truck drivers (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.2). Industries with elevated risk included pulp and paper mills (OR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-37), newspaper publishing and printing (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.0-6.3), industrial and miscellaneous chemicals (OR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-3.9), water supply and irrigation (OR = 5.6; 95% CI, 1.6-19.9). Among black men, risks were nonsignificantly increased for subjects employed in railroads (3 cases, 2 controls) and for carpenters (3 cases, 0 controls). We created job-exposure matrices for asbestos, inorganic dust, metal dust, lead, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, nitrosamines, sulfuric acid, fertilizers, herbicides, other pesticides, and wood dust. Among white men, a consistent pattern of risk increase by level and probability of exposure was observed only for sulfuric acid mists, with a twofold excess (95% CI, 0.6-7.3) associated with high probability of high intensity exposure. A significant 30% increase in risk was observed for those subjects with a high probability of exposure (all levels combined) to lead, and a 60% increase was observed for subjects with high-level exposure to lead (all probabilities combined). However, crosstabulation of gastric cardia cancer risk by probability and level of exposure to lead did not show consistent trends. Asbestos exposure also showed an overall 50% increase but no consistent trends among white men. None of the 12 occupational hazards showed an association with risk for black me
Brain cancer and occupational exposure to lead.
No full textA recent report in the literature suggested a link between occupational exposure to lead and brain cancer. To explore the hypothesis, we applied a job-exposure matrix for lead to the occupation and industry codes given on the death certificate of 27,060 brain cancer cases and 108,240 controls who died of non-malignant diseases in 24 US states in 1984-1992. Brain cancer risk increased by probability of exposure to lead among Caucasian men and women with high-level exposure, with a significant twofold excess among Caucasian men with high probability and high level of exposure to lead (odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.0). Risks were also elevated in the low- and medium-probability cells for African-American men with high-level exposure to lead. Trend by intensity level was statistically significant among African-American men (all probabilities combined). Although exposure assessment was based solely on the occupation and industry reported on the death certificate, these results add to other epidemiologic and experimental findings in lending some support to the hypothesis of an association between occupational exposure to lead and brain cancer risk. Analytic studies are warranted to further test this hypothesis
Occupational risk factors for cancer of the central nervous system: a case-control study on death certificates from 24 U.S. states.
No full textThe risk of cancer of the central nervous system (CNS) by industry and occupation was investigated with a case-control analysis of the death certificates of 28,416 cases and 113,664 controls, selected from over 4.5 million deaths in 24 U.S. states between 1984 and 1992. Industries showing consistent increases in risk by gender and race included textile mills, paper mills, printing and publishing industries, petroleum refining, motor vehicles manufacturing, telephone and electric utilities, department stores, health care services, elementary and secondary schools, and colleges and universities. CNS cancer risk was increased for administrators in education and related fields, secondary school teachers, and other education- and health-related occupations. The application of job-exposure matrices to the industry/occupation combinations revealed a modest increase in risk for potential contact with the public at work and exposure to solvents. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) was not associated with CNS cancer, although an association was observed with a few EMF-related occupations and industries. Agricultural exposures were associated with significant risk increases among white women and white men. Further work is required to investigate in more detail specific occupational exposures or possible confounders responsible for the observed association
- …
