1,721,212 research outputs found
Regulación de la multiplicación celular en escherichia coli por el AMP cíclico
Fil: De Robertis, E. M. F.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
Regulación de la multiplicación celular en escherichia coli por el AMP cíclico
Fil: De Robertis, E. M. F.. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
Tools for protective lung ventilation - the elastic pressure-volume curve and aspiration of dead space
Dact-4 is a Xenopus laevis Spemann organizer gene related to the Dapper/Frodo antagonist of β-catenin family of proteins
Dact/Dapper/Frodo members belong to an evolutionarily conserved family of Dishevelled-binding proteins present in mammals, birds, amphibians and fishes that are involved in the regulation of Wnt and TGF-β signaling. In addition to the three established genes (Dact1-3) that compose the Dact family, a fourth paralogue group of related proteins has been recently identified and named Dact-4. Interestingly, Dact-4 is the most rapidly evolving gene of the entire family, as it displays very low homology with other Dact proteins and has lost key conserved domains. Dact-4 is not present in mammals, but weakly conserved homologs were found in reptiles and fishes. Recent RNAseq from our group identified new genes specifically expressed in the Xenopus laevis Spemann organizer. Among these, LOC100170590 mRNA encoded a protein sharing weak homology with a coelacanth Dact-like protein member. Here, by analyzing protein phylogeny and synteny, we show that this organizer gene corresponds to Dact-4. We report that Dact-4 is expressed in the Xenopus blastula pre-organizer region in addition to the gastrula organizer, as well as in placodes, eyes, neural tube, presomitic mesoderm and pronephros. Dact-4-Flag microinjection experiments suggest it is a nucleocytoplasmic protein, as are the other Dact paralogues
PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: take the right time!
Unexpected intensive care unit admission after surgery: impact on clinical outcome
Purpose of review This review is focused on providing insights into unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery, including its causes, effects on clinical outcome, and potential strategies to mitigate the strain on healthcare systems. Recent findings Postoperative unplanned ICU admission results from a combination of several factors including patient’s clinical status, the type of surgical procedure, the level of supportive care and clinical monitoring outside the ICU, and the unexpected occurrence of major perioperative and postoperative complications. The actual impact of unplanned admission to ICU after surgery on clinical outcome remains uncertain, given the conflicting results from several observational studies and recent randomized clinical trials. Nonetheless, unplanned ICU admission after surgery results a significant strain on hospital resources. Consequently, this issue should be addressed in hospital policy with the aim of implementing preoperative risk assessment and patient evaluation, effective communication, vigilant supervision, and the promotion of cooperative healthcare. Summary Unplanned ICU admission after surgery is a multifactorial phenomenon that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems without a clear impact on clinical outcome. Thus, the early identification of patient necessitating ICU interventions is imperative
Comfort During Non-invasive Ventilation
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to be effective in avoiding intubation and improving survival in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF) when compared to conventional oxygen therapy. However, NIV is associated with high failure rates due, in most cases, to patient discomfort. Therefore, increasing attention has been paid to all those interventions aimed at enhancing patient's tolerance to NIV. Several practical aspects have been considered to improve patient adaptation. In particular, the choice of the interface and the ventilatory setting adopted for NIV play a key role in the success of respiratory assistance. Among the different NIV interfaces, tolerance is poorest for the nasal and oronasal masks, while helmet appears to be better tolerated, resulting in longer use and lower NIV failure rates. The choice of fixing system also significantly affects patient comfort due to pain and possible pressure ulcers related to the device. The ventilatory setting adopted for NIV is associated with varying degrees of patient comfort: patients are more comfortable with pressure-support ventilation (PSV) than controlled ventilation. Furthermore, the use of electrical activity of the diaphragm (EADi)-driven ventilation has been demonstrated to improve patient comfort when compared to PSV, while reducing neural drive and effort. If non-pharmacological remedies fail, sedation can be employed to improve patient's tolerance to NIV. Sedation facilitates ventilation, reduces anxiety, promotes sleep, and modulates physiological responses to stress. Judicious use of sedation may be an option to increase the chances of success in some patients at risk for intubation because of NIV intolerance consequent to pain, discomfort, claustrophobia, or agitation. During the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, NIV has been extensively employed to face off the massive request for ventilatory assistance. Prone positioning in non-intubated awake COVID-19 patients may improve oxygenation, reduce work of breathing, and, possibly, prevent intubation. Despite these advantages, maintaining prone position can be particularly challenging because poor comfort has been described as the main cause of prone position discontinuation. In conclusion, comfort is one of the major determinants of NIV success. All the strategies aimed to increase comfort during NIV should be pursued
- …
