39 research outputs found
Tarsonemus annotatus Livshits, Mitrofanov and Sharonov 1979
No full textTarsonemus annotatus Livshits, Mitrofanov and Sharonov, 1979 (Figs. 10–17, 18B, D) Tarsonemus annotatus Livshits, Mitrofanov and Sharonov, 1979: 19 -20, Fig.22. Material examined: 2 females, Jolfa, Iri village commune, 38°46' 35"N, 45°59'51"E, 1,085 m.a.s.l., ex soil and litter, 26-March-2014; 7 females, Marand, Osdaghi village commune, 38°24'38"N, 45°52'01"E, 1,485 m.a.s.l., ex apricot leaves, 25-April-2014; 3 females, Jolfa, Gordian plain commune, 38°52'33"N, 45°42'26"E, 970 m.a.s.l., ex apricot leaves, 29-May-2014; 2 females, Jolfa, Kordasht village commune, 38°50'10"N, 46°13'43"E, 724 m. a.s.l., ex pomegranate leaves, 29-May-2014; 11 females, Jolfa, Novje–Mehr village commune, 38°52'16"N, 46°01'34"E, 1,064 m.a.s.l., ex mulberry leaves, 30-May-2014; 2 females, Sufiyan, Sar village commune, 38°20'51"N, 46°06'18"E, 1,624 m.a.s.l., ex apple leaves, 10-October-2014; all coll. S. Gheblealivand. Diagnosis. Females. Pharynx oval, without constriction. Dorsal setae c 1 and c 2 tapered, setiform, pointed. Setae 1a, 2a, 3a and 3b smooth, attenuated. Tegula subtrapezoidal in shape with rounded posterior edge. Tarsal part of Tbt I with two attenuated setae. Redescription- FEMALE (Figs. 10–18B, D). Gnathosoma (Figs. 11–12): capsule triangular-ovoid. Pharynx (Fig. 18B) with sclerotized lateral walls, oval in outline, as wide as 0.4x maximum width of gnathosoma and as long as 0.65x of ventral length of gnathosomal capsule, with hardly discernible transverse striation and with a pair of glandular bodies moderate in size. Postpalpal (pp) setae indiscernible. Setae dgs visibly longer than vgs. Cheliceral stylets and levers fine but pronounced. Palpi moderately large, straight, slightly convergent, each with small palptarsal processes and two minute setae. Idiosomal dorsum: (average length: 214 (SD ± 13), width: 122 (SD ± 14); length = 1.8x width; Fig. 10); relative length of setae (v 1: sc 2: c 2: c 1: d: e: f: h): 1: 2.2: 0.9: 0.8: 0.3: 0.4: 0.4: 0.4. Rostral shieldlet 2.5– 3x wider than long, round - sub trapezoidal. Vertical setae (v 1) setiform, pointed, smooth, separated by a distance of their length. Prodorsal shield (PrS) with concave posterior edge, 1.4x wider than long. Stigmata located posterolaterally of setae v 1, tracheal tubes with internal atria followed by post-atrial segments with sclerotized post-atrial sacs. Sensilla sc 1 clavate, covered with fine spines. Pits v 2 in mid-length of line between stigmata and setae sc 2 on each side, separated by distance slightly smaller than that between sc 2. Setae sc 2 located posteriad mid-length of prodorsal shield (measured from line of stigmata to posterior edge), reaching with their tips 1/2 their length beyond posterior edge of PrS, separated by distance of ca. 0.9x their length. Setae c 2 slightly longer than c 1, both pairs slender, sharp. Setae c 1, located posteriad of level of c 2, reaching to 2/3 of distance between their bases and posterior edge of tergite C; separated by transverse distance of ca. 4x their length. Posterior edge of tergite C straight, waved irregularly. Setae d, e, f and h short, stiff and blunt. Setae d separated by transverse distance of ca. 4– 5x their length, not reaching posterior edge of shield D. Posterolateral margin of shield D emarginated corresponding to bases of setae e. Setae f slightly shorter than e but slightly longer than d, separated by a distance of over 2x their length. Distance between setae e and f on each side ca. 1.5x that of between f. Setae h subequal to e and slightly longer than f, located in distance of ca. 5x their length each to another. Dorsal shielding with fine uniform dimpled ornamentation. Idiosomal venter (Fig. 11): apodemes 1 poorly defined, joined with anteromedian apodeme; the latter well defined, consisting of very short segment near bases of 1a, and another one continuous from a level near anterolateral ends of apodemes 2 to sejugal apodeme, with diffused junction area. Sejugal apodeme with slight inflexions in lateral parts; together with anteromedial apodeme forming shape of anchor. Ridge of ventral propodosomal plate between trochanters I and II angular. Setae 1a -3b slender, sharply pointed; 1a located posteriad apodemes 1 at distance barely longer than their length to each other. Setae 2a inserted on medial parts of apodemes 2, in distance of over 2x their lengths between their bases. Apodemes 3 strongly sclerotized, extended from anterior margins of trochanters III anteromedially and widened towards bases of 3a; apodemes 4 weak, separated from posteromedial apodeme medially; latter one bifurcated anteriorly. Setae 3a separated by distance of ca. 1.4– 2x; 3b slightly shorter than 3a, separated by distance of 2.5– 3x their lengths, but similar to that between 3a. Ventral metapodosomal plate with anterior edge weakly concave. Tegula (Fig. 18C) round-trapezoidal in outline, with rounded posterior edge ca. 1.7x wider than long. Setae ps stiff, slightly barbed and blunt, their bases separated by distance of ca. 2x their lengths. Surface of ventral plates covered with fine uniform dimpled ornamentation. Legs (Figs. 13–16): Proportions of free segments of legs (I: II: III: IV): 1.0: 0.9: 1.0: 0.7. Leg I: Chaetotaxy: 4–4–6(2 φ)+7(1 ω). Tarsal claw hooked, slightly stronger than those of tarsi II and III. Subunguinal seta s tapering, blunt, apparently smaller than u’ of tarsi II and III. Tarsal unguinal setae u’ – u” indiscernible. Tibiotarsus ca. 3.3x longer than wide at base. Eupathidion p” subequal to p’, both located apically; eupathidion tc’ slightly longer than tc”, the latter similar in length to p’ and p”, located in distal 1/3 length of segment. Two tarsal setae pv’, pv” slender and pointed (pl" absent). Solenidion ω clavate, larger than Ta II ω. Solenidion φ 2 with striated head, shorter than φ 1, famulus k longer than φ 1. Setae Ge v’, l’ and l” stiff and pointed. Seta Fe d short, stiff, and sharp, seta l’ strong, stiff and pointed. Leg II: Chaetotaxy: 3– 3– 4– 6(1 ω). Claws on tarsus hooked, well developed. Seta u’ spine-like, u" indiscernible. Spine-like seta pl” slightly longer than solenidion Ta II ω, located at same level. Seta tc” about 1.3x longer than tc’ and other tarsal setae, reaching somewhat beyond tip of empodium. Tibial setae l’, v’ and v” weakly barbed; l’ the shortest. Seta Ge l’ stout, smooth, pointed. Femur with a latero-ventral lobe; seta l’ tapering, weakly barbed and bluntly ended, seta d moderately stout. Leg III: Chaetotaxy: 1+3–4–5. Tarsal claws similar to those of leg II, though thinner. Seta u’ similar to that on tarsus II; u” indiscernible. Seta tc” over 2x longer than other setae on segment. Seta Ge l’ simple, weak. Genual part of femorogenu on right leg of one specimen has one extra seta, probably v”. Leg IV: free segments of leg IV slightly longer than femorogenu and tibia III. Femorogenu over 3x longer than tibiotarsus. Femoral seta slightly shorter and clearly weaker than genual one. Seta Tb v’ as long as femorogenu; stout, very weakly barbed. Seta Ta tc” ca. 1.6x as long as whole leg IV. Measurements (5 specimens): body and tagmata: length of body: 225–240; length of idiosoma: 195-227; width of idiosoma (approx.): 110–145; length of gnathosoma: 31–33; width of gnathosoma: 21–23; length of pharynx: 20–24; width of pharynx: 8–9; dgs: 12–17; vgs: 8–10. Dorsum - length of PrS: 70–76; width of PrS: 95–110; distance between stigmata: 44–46. Lengths of setae: v 1: 25–31; sc 1 11–15; sc 2: 60–65; c 2: 25–30; c 1: 18–26; d: 8–10; e: 11–13; f: 10–12; h: 11–13. Distances between setae: v 1 -v 1: 27–28; sc 1 -sc 1: 42–50; sc 2 -sc 2: 57–61; c 2 -c 2: 100–115; c 1 -c 1: 81–92; d -d: 38–40; e -e: 85–95; e -f: 30–40; f -f. 22–30; h -h: 53–60. Venter: lengths of setae: 1a: 9 –10; 2a: 12–15; 3a: 14–18; 3b: 10–12; ps: 9–10. Distances between setae: 1a -1a: 10; 2a -2a: 30–32; 3a -3a: 22–27; 3b -3b: 26–30; ps -ps: 19–22. Length of PrP: 55–60; width of PrP: 90–110; ap. 1–1: 7–10; ap. 2– 2: 38–40. Length of tegula: 6–9; width of tegula:12–15. Leg segments and leg setae (lengths): Tbt I: 24–25; ω I: 6–7; φ 1: 2–3; φ 2: 4–5; қ: 6; ω II: 4–5; FeGe IV: 30–34; Tbt IV: 9–11; Fe v’: 12–15; Ge v': 14–17; Tb v': 28–35; Ta tc": 62–70. MALE and LARVA unknown. Distribution. Eastern Europe: Crimea (Livshitz et al. 1979) and Northwestern Iran. Differential diagnosis. Females of T. annotatus are similar to Tarsonemus bilobatus Suski, 1965a in having a similar structure of the sejugal apodeme, sclerotized post-atrial sacs, and slender 3b setae. However it differs from the latter by (1) apodemes 2 ending medially in the distance of 1/ 2x their length to anteromedial apodeme (vs. apodemes 2 clearly reaching to anteromedial apodeme); (2) bifurcation of posteromedial apodeme expressed (vs. bifurcation of posteromedial apodeme absent); (3) Setae ps separated by distance of ca. 2x their lengths (vs. ps separated by distance apparently larger than 2x their lengths). Remarks. Previous records from Iran: East Azerbaijan (Sufiyan, the soil of alfalfa cultivations, Lotfollahi & Haddad Irani-Nejad 2010).Published as part of Gheblealivand, Saeide S., Irani-Nejad, Karim Haddad, Magowski, Wojciech Ł. & Manzari, Shahab, 2018, The genus Tarsonemus Canestrini and Fanzago, 1876 (Acari: Heterostigmatina: Tarsonemidae) in East Azerbaijan, Iran, with a description of T. lenticulatus sp. nov. and re-description of T. annotatus Livshits, Mitrofanov and Sharonov, 1979, pp. 13-38 in Zootaxa 4446 (1) on pages 22-27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4446.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/143734
Eriophyes lentiginosus Mitrofanov, Sharonov et Sekerskaja, 1983 Supplementary
No full text<i>Eriophyes lentiginosus</i> Mitrofanov, Sharonov et Sekerskaja, 1983 Supplementary description <p> FEMALE (Figs 3–4) (18 specimens): Body vermiform; 171–279 long; 48–61 wide. Gnathosoma 24–30 long; dorsal pedipalpal genual seta <i>d</i> 7–10 long; <i>ep</i> seta 3 long; cheliceral stylets 23–29 long. Prodorsal shield oval with short subrounded lobe reaching half of cheliceral base. Shield 36–43 long, 35–39 wide. Shields surface with many spots, forming three longitudinal lines in centre of shield; surface near shield with subrounded microtubercles. Tubercles of setae <i>sc</i> 18–22 apart, ahead of rear shield margin and directing setae centrad; setae <i>sc</i> 7–10 long.</p> <p> Leg I 35 –42; femur 9–10, seta <i>bv</i> 10–14, position of seta <i>bv</i> 4–6; genu 6–8, seta <i>l”</i> 38– 45, position of seta <i>l”</i> 3–5; tibia 8–10, seta <i>l’</i> 8–10, position of seta <i>l’</i> 3–4. Tarsus 7–9, setae: <i>ft”</i> 26­30, <i>ft’</i> 17–26, <i>u’</i> 5–7. Tarsal solenidion 7–9, slightly knobed; tarsal empodium simple, symmetrical, 6–8, 4­rayed. Leg II 30–36; femur 10–11, <i>bv</i> 9–11, position of <i>bv</i> 4–6; genu 5–7, <i>l”</i> 9–14, position of <i>l”</i> 3–4; tibia 7–8. Tarsus 7–9, <i>ft”</i> 25–31, <i>ft’</i> 8–11, <i>u’</i> 5–7; solenidion 8–10, slightly knobed; empodium 6–8, 4­rayed.</p> <p> Coxae with pattern of spots and cavities. Setae <i>1b</i> 10–14 apart, 10–14 long; setae <i>1a</i> 9–13 apart, 22–29 long; setae <i>2a</i> 28–29 apart, 48–53 long; distance between setae <i>1b</i> and <i>1a</i> 8–9, distance between setae <i>1a</i> and <i>2a</i> 7–10.</p> <p>Opisthosoma with 59–70 dorsal annuli, 54–71 ventral annuli, 5–6 coxogenital annuli. Microtubercles bead­like, located on annuli margins; ventral larger than dorsal. On telosomal annuli dorsal microtubercles minute, ventral elongated.</p> <p> Seta <i>c2</i> 33–43 long, located on 7th–11th annulus; tubercles <i>c2</i> 46–57 apart; ventral seta <i>d</i> 24–37 long, located on 17th–23rd annulus; tubercles <i>d</i> 28–38 apart; seta <i>e</i> 13–16 long, located on 43rd­44th annulus; tubercles <i>e</i> 15–20 apart; seta <i>f</i> 24–30 long, located on 50th– 67th annulus, or 5th–6th annulus from rear; tubercles <i>f</i> 18–24 apart.</p> <p> Setae <i>h1</i> 3–5 long, 7–10 apart; setae <i>h2</i> 86 long, 10–13 apart; distance between <i>h1</i> and <i>h2</i> 2.</p> <p> Genital parts 15–18 long, 21–26 wide, genital coverflap with 10–13 longitudinal ribs posteriorly and 3–4 transversal ribs anteriorly. Setae <i>3a</i> 15–20 long, 15–19 apart.</p> <p> MALE (8 specimens): body length 143–195; width 40–53. Body shape similar to that of female. Gnathosoma 24–29 long; dorsal seta <i>d</i> 7–8 long; <i>ep</i> seta 3 long; chelicerae 21– 27 long. Prodorsal shield shape and design similar to that of female; 29–38 long; 31–38 wide. Tubercles of setae <i>sc</i> ahead of rear shield margin and directing setae centrad, 15–18 apart; setae <i>sc</i> 7–10 long.</p> <p> Leg I 29–35; femur 8–10, seta <i>bv</i> 10–13, position of seta <i>bv</i> 3–5; genu 4–6, seta <i>l”</i> 26– 33; position of seta <i>l”</i> 2–4; tibia 7, seta <i>l’</i> 7–10; position of seta <i>l’</i> 2–3. Tarsus 6–7, setae: <i>ft”</i> 22–24, <i>ft’</i> 14–16, <i>u’</i> 5–6; solenidion 6–8; empodium 5–7, 4–rayed. Leg II 26–32; femur 8–10, <i>bv</i> 7­10, position of <i>bv</i> 4–5; genu 4–5, <i>l”</i> 8–10; position of seta <i>l”</i> 2–3; tibia 5–6. Tarsus 5–7, <i>ft”</i> 17–25, <i>ft’</i> 7–10, <i>u’</i> 4–5; solenidion 6–8; empodium 5–6, 4­rayed.</p> <p> Coxae with pattern similar to that of female. Setae <i>1b</i> 9–12 apart, 7–12 long; setae <i>1a</i> 8–12 apart, 19–27 long; setae <i>2a</i> 17–26 apart, 38–43 long; distance between setae <i>1b</i> and <i>1a</i> 7–9, distance between setae <i>1a</i> and <i>2a</i> 6–9.</p> <p>Opisthosoma with 51–57 dorsal annuli, 47–58 ventral annuli, 5–7 coxogenital annuli. Dorsal annuli similar to that of female; ventral hook­like (Fig. 4).</p> <p> Seta <i>c 2</i> 24–29 long, located on 7th–9th annulus, tubercles <i>c2</i> 36–55 apart; ventral seta <i>d</i> 24–29 long, located on 14th–16th annulus; tubercles <i>d</i> 23–30 apart; seta <i>e</i> 10–13 long, located on 26th–29th annulus; tubercles <i>e</i> 11–16 apart; seta <i>f</i> 19–24 long, located on</p> <p> 42nd­53rd annulus, or 5th annulus from rear; tubercles <i>f</i> 16–21 apart.</p> <p> Setae <i>h1</i> 3–4 long, 5–8 apart; setae <i>h2</i> 57–72 long, 9–10 apart; distance between <i>h1</i> and <i>h2</i> 2.</p> <p> Genital parts 13–15 long, 17–20 wide; setae <i>3a</i> 11–15 long, 11–15 apart; surface below the genital opening with numerous, minute microtubercles (Fig. 4).</p> <p> NYMPH (Fig. 5) (15 specimens): body vermiform; 136–204 long, 33–48 wide. Gnathosoma 18–25 long; dorsal seta <i>d</i> 6–8 long; <i>ep</i> seta 3 long; chelicerae 20–25 long. Shape and design of prodorsal shield similar to that of female, with exception that slender median and admedian lines are visible. Shield 29–34 long, 29–35 wide. Tubercles of setae <i>sc</i> ahead of rear shield margin and directing setae centrad, 15–21 apart; seta <i>sc</i> 6–10 long.</p> <p> Leg I 26–30; femur 6–8, seta <i>bv</i> 9–10, position of seta <i>bv</i> 3–5; genu 4–5, seta <i>l”</i> 26– 33; position of seta <i>l”</i> 2–3; tibia 5–6, seta <i>l’</i> 6–8, position of seta <i>l’</i> 2–3. Tarsus 5–6, setae: <i>ft”</i> 17–24, <i>ft’</i> 12­16, <i>u’</i> 4–5; solenidion 5–7; empodium 5–6, 3–rayed. Leg II 22­27; femur 7–8, <i>bv</i> 7–8, position of <i>bv</i> 2–4; genu 4–5, <i>l”</i> 7–8; position of <i>l”</i> 2–3; tibia 4–5. Tarsus 5–6, <i>ft”</i> 17–24, <i>ft’</i> 9, <i>u’</i> 4–5; solenidion 6–8; empodium 5–6, 3­rayed.</p> <p> Coxae with spots and microtubercles. Setae <i>1b</i> 9–11 apart, 7–10 long; setae <i>1a</i> 8–11 apart, 16­24 long; setae <i>2a</i> 18–24 apart, 36–43 long; distance between setae <i>1b</i> and <i>1a</i> 7–9, distance between setae <i>1a</i> and <i>2a</i> 5–8.</p> <p> Opisthosoma with 55–66 dorsal annuli, 47–63 ventral annuli, 8–11 annuli to <i>3a</i> setae. Microtubercles set along annuli margins; dorsal beadlike, ventral subrounded.</p> <p> Seta <i>c 2</i> 14–22 long, located on 8th–12th annulus, tubercles <i>c2</i> 33–44 apart; ventral seta <i>d</i> 16–26 long, located on 16th–24th annulus, tubercles <i>d</i> 23–29 apart; seta <i>e</i> 9–10 long, located on 26th­38th annulus, tubercles <i>e</i> 13–17 apart; seta <i>f</i> 18–25 long, located on 42nd– 58th annulus, or 4th–5th annulus from rear, tubercles <i>f</i> 17–22 apart.</p> <p> Setae <i>h1</i> 3–4 long, 5–8 apart; setae <i>h2</i> 67 long, 9–10 apart; distance between <i>h1</i> and <i>h2</i> 2. Setae <i>3a</i> 7–9 long, 7–11 apart.</p> <p> LARVA (Fig 6) (7 specimens): body vermiform; 111–149 long, 33–36 wide. Gnathosoma 18­24 long; chelicerae 18–21 long. Prodorsal shield oval with spots and slender median, admedian and I submedian lines. Shield 24–33 long, 26–29 wide. Tubercles of setae <i>sc</i> ahead of rear shield margin and directing setae centrad, 13–17 apart; seta <i>sc</i> 5–8 long.</p> <p> Leg I 21–29; femur 8–9, seta <i>bv</i> 7, position of seta <i>bv</i> 3–4; genu 3–5, seta <i>l”</i> 17–26; position of seta <i>l”</i> 2; tibia 4–6, seta <i>l’</i> 7, position of seta <i>l’</i> 2–3. Tarsus 5–4, setae: <i>ft”</i> 14– 17, <i>ft’</i> 11, <i>u’</i> 3; solenidion 4–6; empodium 4–5, 3­rayed. Leg II 17–24; femur 5–7, <i>bv</i> 6– 9, position of <i>bv</i> 2–3; genu 3–4, <i>l”</i> 7; position of <i>l”</i> 2; tibia 3–4. Tarsus 4–5, <i>ft”</i> 15–17; solenidion 4–6; empodium 4–5, 3­rayed.</p> <p> Coxae with spots. Setae <i>1b</i> 8–10 long; setae <i>1a</i> 9–10 apart; setae <i>2a</i> 17–21 apart; distance between setae <i>1b</i> and <i>1a</i> 6–7, distance between setae <i>1a</i> and <i>2a</i> 5–6.</p> <p> Opisthosoma with 48–57 dorsal annuli, 37–43 ventral annuli, 7–13 annuli to <i>3a</i> setae. Dorsal and ventral microtubercles similar to that of nymph.</p> <p> Seta <i>c 2</i> 10–15 long, located on 8th annulus, tubercles <i>c 2</i> 25–36 apart; ventral seta <i>d</i> 10– 17 long, located on 15th–19th annulus, tubercles <i>d</i> 21–23 apart; seta <i>e</i> 7–10 long, located on 21st–31st annulus, tubercles <i>e</i> 12–13 apart; seta <i>f</i> 11–17 long, located on 34th–39th annulus,</p> <p> or 4th–5th annulus from rear, tubercles <i>f</i> 13–16 apart.</p> <p> Setae <i>h1</i> 2–3 long, 5–6 apart; setae <i>h2</i> 10 apart; distance between <i>h1</i> and <i>h2</i> 2. Setae <i>3a</i> 5–6 long, 6–7 apart.</p> <p> MATERIAL: 51 females, 11 males, 19 nymphs, 7 larvae from <i>Carex arenaria</i> L. West Poland, Sieraków, scarp near the border of pinewood, in the shaded place near pine and birch trees; 26.08.2003; leg. W. Rakowski. Mites are vagrants on upper leaf surfaces.</p> <p>Other records</p> <p> <i>C. arenaria</i>: 1) North Poland, Wislana spit, Piaski (Nowa Karczma), grey dune with scarce young pines, grassland on acid, base­poor soil; 20.08.2003, leg. W. Rakowski; 39 specimens. 2) Puszcza Notecka forest, Sierakow forest inspectorate, Gospodka forest district, 26.08.2003, leg. W. Rakowski; locality 1: large aggregation in open and sunny place, heathland within <i>Leucobryo­Pinetum</i> pinewood, 2 specimens; locality 2: large aggregation along forest road shaded by pine trees, 19 specimens.</p> <p> <i>C. ligerica</i>: 1) West Poland, Poznań, Ligowiec airfield, open space exposed to sunlight, in large aggregation, leg. W. Rakowski; 24. 06.2003, 9 specimens; 27.06.03, 71 specimens. 2) West Poland, Poznań, Milostowo cemetery; 24.06.03; leg. W. Rakowski; locality 1: near the NE border of Milostowo cemetery, in shady pine grove, 100 specimens; locality 2: in patches of acidophilous grassland <i>Festuco­Koelerietum glaucae</i>, open space exposed to sunlight, 27 specimens.</p> <p> REMARKS: This species so far was recorded in Krymskaya Region, Ukraine on undetermined sedge plant (Mitrofanov <i>et al</i>. 1983). Authors of this species reported that specific features of <i>E. lentiginosus</i> are the absence of lines on prodorsal shield and 5­rayed empodium. However, females found in Poland have 4­rayed empodium and there are three entire lines in the centre of the shield forming by spots. What is more, the lines are more distinct and visible on the shield of nymph and larva. Specimens from Ukraine and Poland differs also in: the number of opisthosomal annuli, the appearance of microtubercles and the shape of the prodorsal shield. In females described by Mitrofanov <i>et al.</i> (1983) there are 88–95 annuli, microtubercles are ellipsoidal with conical top, the anterior margin of prodorsal shield is blunt. Females found in Poland have 54–71 annuli, bead­like microtubercles and short subrounded lobe reaching the half of the chelicerae. All these differences between the populations collected in Ukraine and Poland may result from intraspecific variability influenced by host, seasonal, geographical or others factors.</p>Published as part of <i>Skoracka, Anna, Macuk, Lucyna & Rakowski, Wojciech, 2004, New eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) from sedges in Poland and supplement description of Eriophyes lentiginosus Mitrofanov, Sharonov et Sekerskaja, 1983, pp. 1-15 in Zootaxa 446</i> on pages 8-14, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/157646">10.5281/zenodo.157646</a>
Eriophyes lentiginosus Mitrofanov, Sharonov et Sekerskaja, 1983 Supplementary
No full text<i>Eriophyes lentiginosus</i> Mitrofanov, Sharonov et Sekerskaja, 1983 Supplementary description <p> FEMALE (Figs 3–4) (18 specimens): Body vermiform; 171–279 long; 48–61 wide. Gnathosoma 24–30 long; dorsal pedipalpal genual seta <i>d</i> 7–10 long; <i>ep</i> seta 3 long; cheliceral stylets 23–29 long. Prodorsal shield oval with short subrounded lobe reaching half of cheliceral base. Shield 36–43 long, 35–39 wide. Shields surface with many spots, forming three longitudinal lines in centre of shield; surface near shield with subrounded microtubercles. Tubercles of setae <i>sc</i> 18–22 apart, ahead of rear shield margin and directing setae centrad; setae <i>sc</i> 7–10 long.</p> <p> Leg I 35 –42; femur 9–10, seta <i>bv</i> 10–14, position of seta <i>bv</i> 4–6; genu 6–8, seta <i>l”</i> 38– 45, position of seta <i>l”</i> 3–5; tibia 8–10, seta <i>l’</i> 8–10, position of seta <i>l’</i> 3–4. Tarsus 7–9, setae: <i>ft”</i> 26­30, <i>ft’</i> 17–26, <i>u’</i> 5–7. Tarsal solenidion 7–9, slightly knobed; tarsal empodium simple, symmetrical, 6–8, 4­rayed. Leg II 30–36; femur 10–11, <i>bv</i> 9–11, position of <i>bv</i> 4–6; genu 5–7, <i>l”</i> 9–14, position of <i>l”</i> 3–4; tibia 7–8. Tarsus 7–9, <i>ft”</i> 25–31, <i>ft’</i> 8–11, <i>u’</i> 5–7; solenidion 8–10, slightly knobed; empodium 6–8, 4­rayed.</p> <p> Coxae with pattern of spots and cavities. Setae <i>1b</i> 10–14 apart, 10–14 long; setae <i>1a</i> 9–13 apart, 22–29 long; setae <i>2a</i> 28–29 apart, 48–53 long; distance between setae <i>1b</i> and <i>1a</i> 8–9, distance between setae <i>1a</i> and <i>2a</i> 7–10.</p> <p>Opisthosoma with 59–70 dorsal annuli, 54–71 ventral annuli, 5–6 coxogenital annuli. Microtubercles bead­like, located on annuli margins; ventral larger than dorsal. On telosomal annuli dorsal microtubercles minute, ventral elongated.</p> <p> Seta <i>c2</i> 33–43 long, located on 7th–11th annulus; tubercles <i>c2</i> 46–57 apart; ventral seta <i>d</i> 24–37 long, located on 17th–23rd annulus; tubercles <i>d</i> 28–38 apart; seta <i>e</i> 13–16 long, located on 43rd­44th annulus; tubercles <i>e</i> 15–20 apart; seta <i>f</i> 24–30 long, located on 50th– 67th annulus, or 5th–6th annulus from rear; tubercles <i>f</i> 18–24 apart.</p> <p> Setae <i>h1</i> 3–5 long, 7–10 apart; setae <i>h2</i> 86 long, 10–13 apart; distance between <i>h1</i> and <i>h2</i> 2.</p> <p> Genital parts 15–18 long, 21–26 wide, genital coverflap with 10–13 longitudinal ribs posteriorly and 3–4 transversal ribs anteriorly. Setae <i>3a</i> 15–20 long, 15–19 apart.</p> <p> MALE (8 specimens): body length 143–195; width 40–53. Body shape similar to that of female. Gnathosoma 24–29 long; dorsal seta <i>d</i> 7–8 long; <i>ep</i> seta 3 long; chelicerae 21– 27 long. Prodorsal shield shape and design similar to that of female; 29–38 long; 31–38 wide. Tubercles of setae <i>sc</i> ahead of rear shield margin and directing setae centrad, 15–18 apart; setae <i>sc</i> 7–10 long.</p> <p> Leg I 29–35; femur 8–10, seta <i>bv</i> 10–13, position of seta <i>bv</i> 3–5; genu 4–6, seta <i>l”</i> 26– 33; position of seta <i>l”</i> 2–4; tibia 7, seta <i>l’</i> 7–10; position of seta <i>l’</i> 2–3. Tarsus 6–7, setae: <i>ft”</i> 22–24, <i>ft’</i> 14–16, <i>u’</i> 5–6; solenidion 6–8; empodium 5–7, 4–rayed. Leg II 26–32; femur 8–10, <i>bv</i> 7­10, position of <i>bv</i> 4–5; genu 4–5, <i>l”</i> 8–10; position of seta <i>l”</i> 2–3; tibia 5–6. Tarsus 5–7, <i>ft”</i> 17–25, <i>ft’</i> 7–10, <i>u’</i> 4–5; solenidion 6–8; empodium 5–6, 4­rayed.</p> <p> Coxae with pattern similar to that of female. Setae <i>1b</i> 9–12 apart, 7–12 long; setae <i>1a</i> 8–12 apart, 19–27 long; setae <i>2a</i> 17–26 apart, 38–43 long; distance between setae <i>1b</i> and <i>1a</i> 7–9, distance between setae <i>1a</i> and <i>2a</i> 6–9.</p> <p>Opisthosoma with 51–57 dorsal annuli, 47–58 ventral annuli, 5–7 coxogenital annuli. Dorsal annuli similar to that of female; ventral hook­like (Fig. 4).</p> <p> Seta <i>c 2</i> 24–29 long, located on 7th–9th annulus, tubercles <i>c2</i> 36–55 apart; ventral seta <i>d</i> 24–29 long, located on 14th–16th annulus; tubercles <i>d</i> 23–30 apart; seta <i>e</i> 10–13 long, located on 26th–29th annulus; tubercles <i>e</i> 11–16 apart; seta <i>f</i> 19–24 long, located on</p> <p> 42nd­53rd annulus, or 5th annulus from rear; tubercles <i>f</i> 16–21 apart.</p> <p> Setae <i>h1</i> 3–4 long, 5–8 apart; setae <i>h2</i> 57–72 long, 9–10 apart; distance between <i>h1</i> and <i>h2</i> 2.</p> <p> Genital parts 13–15 long, 17–20 wide; setae <i>3a</i> 11–15 long, 11–15 apart; surface below the genital opening with numerous, minute microtubercles (Fig. 4).</p> <p> NYMPH (Fig. 5) (15 specimens): body vermiform; 136–204 long, 33–48 wide. Gnathosoma 18–25 long; dorsal seta <i>d</i> 6–8 long; <i>ep</i> seta 3 long; chelicerae 20–25 long. Shape and design of prodorsal shield similar to that of female, with exception that slender median and admedian lines are visible. Shield 29–34 long, 29–35 wide. Tubercles of setae <i>sc</i> ahead of rear shield margin and directing setae centrad, 15–21 apart; seta <i>sc</i> 6–10 long.</p> <p> Leg I 26–30; femur 6–8, seta <i>bv</i> 9–10, position of seta <i>bv</i> 3–5; genu 4–5, seta <i>l”</i> 26– 33; position of seta <i>l”</i> 2–3; tibia 5–6, seta <i>l’</i> 6–8, position of seta <i>l’</i> 2–3. Tarsus 5–6, setae: <i>ft”</i> 17–24, <i>ft’</i> 12­16, <i>u’</i> 4–5; solenidion 5–7; empodium 5–6, 3–rayed. Leg II 22­27; femur 7–8, <i>bv</i> 7–8, position of <i>bv</i> 2–4; genu 4–5, <i>l”</i> 7–8; position of <i>l”</i> 2–3; tibia 4–5. Tarsus 5–6, <i>ft”</i> 17–24, <i>ft’</i> 9, <i>u’</i> 4–5; solenidion 6–8; empodium 5–6, 3­rayed.</p> <p> Coxae with spots and microtubercles. Setae <i>1b</i> 9–11 apart, 7–10 long; setae <i>1a</i> 8–11 apart, 16­24 long; setae <i>2a</i> 18–24 apart, 36–43 long; distance between setae <i>1b</i> and <i>1a</i> 7–9, distance between setae <i>1a</i> and <i>2a</i> 5–8.</p> <p> Opisthosoma with 55–66 dorsal annuli, 47–63 ventral annuli, 8–11 annuli to <i>3a</i> setae. Microtubercles set along annuli margins; dorsal beadlike, ventral subrounded.</p> <p> Seta <i>c 2</i> 14–22 long, located on 8th–12th annulus, tubercles <i>c2</i> 33–44 apart; ventral seta <i>d</i> 16–26 long, located on 16th–24th annulus, tubercles <i>d</i> 23–29 apart; seta <i>e</i> 9–10 long, located on 26th­38th annulus, tubercles <i>e</i> 13–17 apart; seta <i>f</i> 18–25 long, located on 42nd– 58th annulus, or 4th–5th annulus from rear, tubercles <i>f</i> 17–22 apart.</p> <p> Setae <i>h1</i> 3–4 long, 5–8 apart; setae <i>h2</i> 67 long, 9–10 apart; distance between <i>h1</i> and <i>h2</i> 2. Setae <i>3a</i> 7–9 long, 7–11 apart.</p> <p> LARVA (Fig 6) (7 specimens): body vermiform; 111–149 long, 33–36 wide. Gnathosoma 18­24 long; chelicerae 18–21 long. Prodorsal shield oval with spots and slender median, admedian and I submedian lines. Shield 24–33 long, 26–29 wide. Tubercles of setae <i>sc</i> ahead of rear shield margin and directing setae centrad, 13–17 apart; seta <i>sc</i> 5–8 long.</p> <p> Leg I 21–29; femur 8–9, seta <i>bv</i> 7, position of seta <i>bv</i> 3–4; genu 3–5, seta <i>l”</i> 17–26; position of seta <i>l”</i> 2; tibia 4–6, seta <i>l’</i> 7, position of seta <i>l’</i> 2–3. Tarsus 5–4, setae: <i>ft”</i> 14– 17, <i>ft’</i> 11, <i>u’</i> 3; solenidion 4–6; empodium 4–5, 3­rayed. Leg II 17–24; femur 5–7, <i>bv</i> 6– 9, position of <i>bv</i> 2–3; genu 3–4, <i>l”</i> 7; position of <i>l”</i> 2; tibia 3–4. Tarsus 4–5, <i>ft”</i> 15–17; solenidion 4–6; empodium 4–5, 3­rayed.</p> <p> Coxae with spots. Setae <i>1b</i> 8–10 long; setae <i>1a</i> 9–10 apart; setae <i>2a</i> 17–21 apart; distance between setae <i>1b</i> and <i>1a</i> 6–7, distance between setae <i>1a</i> and <i>2a</i> 5–6.</p> <p> Opisthosoma with 48–57 dorsal annuli, 37–43 ventral annuli, 7–13 annuli to <i>3a</i> setae. Dorsal and ventral microtubercles similar to that of nymph.</p> <p> Seta <i>c 2</i> 10–15 long, located on 8th annulus, tubercles <i>c 2</i> 25–36 apart; ventral seta <i>d</i> 10– 17 long, located on 15th–19th annulus, tubercles <i>d</i> 21–23 apart; seta <i>e</i> 7–10 long, located on 21st–31st annulus, tubercles <i>e</i> 12–13 apart; seta <i>f</i> 11–17 long, located on 34th–39th annulus,</p> <p> or 4th–5th annulus from rear, tubercles <i>f</i> 13–16 apart.</p> <p> Setae <i>h1</i> 2–3 long, 5–6 apart; setae <i>h2</i> 10 apart; distance between <i>h1</i> and <i>h2</i> 2. Setae <i>3a</i> 5–6 long, 6–7 apart.</p> <p> MATERIAL: 51 females, 11 males, 19 nymphs, 7 larvae from <i>Carex arenaria</i> L. West Poland, Sieraków, scarp near the border of pinewood, in the shaded place near pine and birch trees; 26.08.2003; leg. W. Rakowski. Mites are vagrants on upper leaf surfaces.</p> <p>Other records</p> <p> <i>C. arenaria</i>: 1) North Poland, Wislana spit, Piaski (Nowa Karczma), grey dune with scarce young pines, grassland on acid, base­poor soil; 20.08.2003, leg. W. Rakowski; 39 specimens. 2) Puszcza Notecka forest, Sierakow forest inspectorate, Gospodka forest district, 26.08.2003, leg. W. Rakowski; locality 1: large aggregation in open and sunny place, heathland within <i>Leucobryo­Pinetum</i> pinewood, 2 specimens; locality 2: large aggregation along forest road shaded by pine trees, 19 specimens.</p> <p> <i>C. ligerica</i>: 1) West Poland, Poznań, Ligowiec airfield, open space exposed to sunlight, in large aggregation, leg. W. Rakowski; 24. 06.2003, 9 specimens; 27.06.03, 71 specimens. 2) West Poland, Poznań, Milostowo cemetery; 24.06.03; leg. W. Rakowski; locality 1: near the NE border of Milostowo cemetery, in shady pine grove, 100 specimens; locality 2: in patches of acidophilous grassland <i>Festuco­Koelerietum glaucae</i>, open space exposed to sunlight, 27 specimens.</p> <p> REMARKS: This species so far was recorded in Krymskaya Region, Ukraine on undetermined sedge plant (Mitrofanov <i>et al</i>. 1983). Authors of this species reported that specific features of <i>E. lentiginosus</i> are the absence of lines on prodorsal shield and 5­rayed empodium. However, females found in Poland have 4­rayed empodium and there are three entire lines in the centre of the shield forming by spots. What is more, the lines are more distinct and visible on the shield of nymph and larva. Specimens from Ukraine and Poland differs also in: the number of opisthosomal annuli, the appearance of microtubercles and the shape of the prodorsal shield. In females described by Mitrofanov <i>et al.</i> (1983) there are 88–95 annuli, microtubercles are ellipsoidal with conical top, the anterior margin of prodorsal shield is blunt. Females found in Poland have 54–71 annuli, bead­like microtubercles and short subrounded lobe reaching the half of the chelicerae. All these differences between the populations collected in Ukraine and Poland may result from intraspecific variability influenced by host, seasonal, geographical or others factors.</p>Published as part of <i>Skoracka, Anna, Macuk, Lucyna & Rakowski, Wojciech, 2004, New eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) from sedges in Poland and supplement description of Eriophyes lentiginosus Mitrofanov, Sharonov et Sekerskaja, 1983, pp. 1-15 in Zootaxa 446</i> on pages 8-14, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/157646">10.5281/zenodo.157646</a>
Neotarsonemoides (Ototarsonemus) alatus Livshits, Mitrofanov and Sharonov 1979
No full textNeotarsonemoides (O.) alatus (Livshits, Mitrofanov and Sharonov, 1979) Material examined. 4 females, Marand, Yam village district, 45°51'907"E, 38°20'486"N, 1,724 m, sample of litter and soil, 25 April 2014, coll. S. Gheblealivand; 1 female, Jolfa, Siahrood district, 46°01'582"E, 38°52'273"N, 1,064 m, sample of litter and soil, 30 May 2014, coll. S. Gheblealivand; 2 females, Marand, Seyvan village district, 45°47'803"E, 38°20'995"N, 1,694 m, sample of soil, 27 June 2014, coll. S. Gheblealivand. Diagnosis. Pharynx elongate-elliptical, without transverse striations, with pair of moderately large, ovoid glandular bodies. Tergital setae d, e, f and h all long, stiff, tapering but blunt, subequal in length, 2- 3x longer than c 1; setae f as long as 1.7x distance between their bases; apodemes 1 near indiscernible; tegula broad roundrhomboidal with rounded tip; setae ps tapering, but stiffer than other attenuate setae, as long as 0.7x distance between their bases. Spine-like seta pl” lacking from Ta II, tarsus III with 4 simple setae. Redescription. FEMALE (Figs. 9–16): Gnathosoma (Figs. 11–12): capsule oval- heart shaped, slightly triangular; with well-developed ventrolateral apodemes. Pharynx as wide as 0.24x maximum width of gnathosoma, and as long as 0.7x of ventral length of gnathosomal capsule, elongate-elliptical, with sclerotized walls but without transverse striations and with pair of moderately large, ovoid glandular bodies. Postpalpal (pp) setae absent. Setae dgs subequal to vgs. Cheliceral stylets small, slender and with inconspicuous cheliceral levers. Palpi small, only slightly longer than wide, directed convergently, with pronounced bases, each with 2 processes: apical and ventral (palptarsal), and 2 fine setae. Idiosomal dorsum (average length: 185 (SD ± 20.4), width: 114 (SD ±12.2); length = 1.6x width; Fig. 9): relative length of setae (v 1: sc 2: c 2: c 1: d: e: f: h): 1: 1.8: 0.8: 0.6: 1.3: 1.2: 1.3: 1. Rostral shieldlet rounded, subtriangular in outline, 2.6x wider than long. Setae v 1 slender, sharp, separated by distance of 2x their length each from another. Prodorsal shield (PrS) rounded trapezoidal (almost semicircular) in outline, 1.4x as wide as long, with well-developed anterolateral (prodorsal lateral) lobes, with somewhat irregular posterior edge. Sensilli sc 1 clavate, with elongate globular head, covered with fine spines. Stigmata located posterolaterally of setae v 1, tracheal tubes each with poorly sclerotized atrial segments and pair of weakly defined, elongate postatrial expansions. Pits v 2 each located somewhat mediad of line between setae sc 2 and v 1 on either side. Setae sc 2 inserted in mid-length of prodorsal shield, extending beyond posterior edge of prodorsal shield, separated by distance of 1.4x their length. Setae c 2 slender, pointed, located in oblique line of level of c 1, latter slender, sharp, reaching with tips 1/3 of distance to posterior edge of tergite C, separated by transverse distance nearing 7x their length. Posterior edge of tergite C weakly undulate without apparent lateral emarginations. Setae d -h long, tapering, stiff and blunt; barbed, setae d reaching beyond insertions of h, separated by transverse distance of more than 1.2x their length; posterolateral margin of tergite D with lateral emarginations corresponding to setae e of succeeding shield; f as long as d and slightly longer than e, latter somewhat longer than h; setae f separated by transverse interval of 0.6x their length. Distance between setae e and f on each side greater than 2x that between setae f. Setae h located in distance of 1.6x their length each to another. All dorsal shields with fine uniform dimpled ornamentation. Idiosomal venter (Fig.10): apodemes 1 hardly discernible; anteromedial apodeme posteriorly diffused past level of posteromedial ends of apodemes 2, lacking apparent junction with sejugal apodeme; latter continuous, slightly sinous anteromedially; setae 1a -3b slender, sharp; 1a nearly contiguous with front edge of propodosomal plate, in distance each to another similar to their length. Setae 2a inserted on apodemes 2, near their distal extremities, in distance between their bases of almost 5x their lengths. Ventral propodosomal plate weakly biconvex anteriorly, with soft angularities between trochanters I and II. Apodemes 3 strongly sclerotized, well developed laterally related to anterial extremities of trochanters III (not forming continuous sclerotized transverse stripe); apodemes 4 almost straight, extending very slightly posterolaterad of setae 3b, joining with posteromedial apodeme; latter anteriorly ended with pronounced bifurcation; setae 3a separated by transverse distance of 2.2x their length each to another. Setae 3b shorter than 3a, separated by distance of 3.3x their lengths; i.e. slightly exceeding that between 3a. Ventral metapodosomal plate with anterior extremity irregular, almost straight, and with apparent spine-like processes between trochanters III and IV. Tegula rounded subtriangular in outline, 1.5x wider than long with rounded tip. Aggenital plate divided in its posterior part. Setae ps tapering, but stiffer than other attenuate setae, sharply pointed, weakly barbed; their bases separated by distance little smaller than their lengths. Ventral plates with uniform, fine dimpled ornamentation. Legs (Figs. 13–16): proportions of free segments of legs (I: II: III: IV): 1.0: 0.9: 1.0: 0.6. Leg setation: I: 4–4– 6(2 φ)+8(1 ω); II: 3–3–4–5(1 ω); III: 1+3–4–5. Unguinal setae u” (and u’ on Ta I) indiscernible. Leg I: claw hooked, medium sized, similar in size to claws of tarsus II. Empodium small. Spine-like subunguinal seta s similar to setae u ' on tarsi II and III. Tibiotarsus with weak ventral bend in area of tibia, 3x as long as wide at base. Eupathidion p’ slightly shorter than p”, both located subapically, eupathidia tc’ and tc” equal in length, located above mid-length of segment. Three tarsal setae pv’, pv” and pl’ slender and sharp. Solenidion ω fusiform, as long as 1.3x Ta II ω. Solenidion φ 2 larger than φ 1, famulus k apparently longer than solenidia. Seta Ge l’ rather thick, pointed, barbed. Femur I without ventral protrusion. Seta Fe l’ strong, stiff; d short, stiff; both sharp. Leg II: claws medium-sized, hooked; empodium almost twice as long as in leg I. Spine-like seta pl” absent. Seta tc” slightly longer than other setae of segment, reaching tip of empodium. Seta Ge II l’ thick, pointed, barbed, slightly more slender than Ge I l’. Seta Fe d short, tapering. Leg III: claws weaker than, and empodium as long as that in leg II. Seta tc” over 3x longer than other setae of segment, more than 2x length of Ta III. Seta Ge l’ as that in leg II. Leg IV: free segments subequal to femorogenu and tibia III. Femorogenu 3x as long as tibiotarsus. Femoral seta v’ longer than genual v’, both slender, slightly barbed. Seta Tb v’ clearly longer than femorogenu, with one fine spine in its proximal length. Seta Ta tc” over 2.5x as long as entire leg IV. Measurements: (4 non-type specimens) - body and tagmata: length of body: 155–225; length of idiosoma: 155–200; width of idiosoma (approx.): 104–130; length of gnathosoma: 35; width of gnathosoma: 25–30; length of pharynx: 20–25; width of pharynx: 6–7. dgs: 10–13; vgs: 10–13. Dorsum - length of PrS: 65–70; width of PrS: 90– 95; distance between stigmata: 48–53. Lengths of setae: v 1: 15–25; sc 1 10–15; sc 2: 26–48; c 2: 14–15; c 1: 10–11; d: 18–28; e: 20–25; f: 23–26; h: 16–21. Distances between setae: v 1 -v 1: 38–40; sc 1 -sc 1: 32–50; sc 2 -sc 2: 45–53; c 2 -c 2: 110; c 1 -c 1: 65–80; d -d: 26–35; e -e: 68–75; e -f: 30–35; f -f: 12–16; h -h: 28–31. Venter- lengths of setae: 1a: 10; 2a: 7–10; 3a: 7–12; 3b: 6–10; ps: 8–11. Distances between setae: 1a -1a: 10; 2a -2a: 40; 3a -3a: 19–25; 3b -3b: 23–28; ps -ps: 14–16. Length of PrP: 45–53; width of PrP: 75–87; ap. 2-2: 38–43. Length of tegula: 9–10; width of tegula: 12–15. Leg segments and leg setae (lengths): Tbt I: 23–25; Ta I ω: 8–9; Tb φ 2: 4–5; Tb φ 1: 3–4; Tb k: 5–7; Ta II ω: 5–8; Fege IV: 26–27; Tbt IV: 7–9; Ge IV v': 15–18; Tb IV v': 33–38; Ta IV tc": 90–110. MALE and LARVA unknown. Distribution. East Europe: Ukraine (Livshits et al. 1979), Central Europe: Hungary (Nemestothy & Mahunka 1981), Northwestern Iran: East Azerbaijan province (new record). Differential diagnosis. Females of the species are similar to N. (O.) auritus (Mahunka, 1971) in having dorsal opisthosomal setae h longer than 0.5x f, lacking spine-like seta pl” from Ta II, and having four setiform setae on Ta III. However it differs from the latter by (1) setae c 1 longer than half the distance between bases of c 1 and c 2 (vs. c 1 shorter than half the distance between bases of c 1 and c 2) (2) setae 1a about as long as the distance between their bases (vs. setae 1a over twice shorter than distance between their bases), (3) setae 3b as long as 0.3x the distance between their bases (vs. setae 3b shorter than 0.25x the distance between their bases).Published as part of Gheblealivand, Saeide S., Irani-Nejad, Karim Haddad, Manzari, Shahab, Vahed, Mohammad Moghadam & Magowski, Wojciech Ł., 2016, A new species and new records of the genus Neotarsonemoides Kaliszewski, 1984 (Acari: Tarsonemidae) from East Azerbaijan province, Northwestern Iran, pp. 63-78 in Zootaxa 4184 (1) on pages 70-76, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4184.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/26280
“Blind Zone’’ of L. Karsavin’s Archival Heritage
Get PDFThe recent publication of Lev Karsavin's essay of 1929 in the Bulletin of Ekaterinburg Theological Seminary calls for focusing on the appearance of this article at this very time. The essay summarizes religious-philosophical and philosophical-political views of L. Karsavin as an ideologist of Eurasianism and is addressed to his associates in the movement. Paradoxically, this historical source available for decades in Bakhmeteff Archive of the Russian and East European Culture of Columbia University Library has remained (with a single exception) unclaimed and unknown to domestic and foreign researchers of the Eurasianism, despite the fact that research papers on the topic are estimated in hundreds. Meanwhile, it reveals a dangerous trend — the lack of necessary attention to archival funds and to the search for new historical documents among authors writing on the topics of Russian religious philosophy and Eurasianism, and suggests that the author's demand for constant verification of published information by documentary sources has decreased. An example of this trend is the current situation with the legacy of Lev Karsavin and the archival materials concerning his life and work. The long stay of a significant part of such materials in the “blind” zone have led to the replication of unverified information, errors and outright fantasies about the researcher, thinker and poet, including casting a shadow on the spiritual portrait of this faithful son of the Orthodox Church, to which Lev Karsavin remained loyal until his last breath. The article shows the groundlessness of many stories and assessments roaming through publications, related to the life of L. Karsavin, including the unsubstantiated statements about his conversion to Catholicism. The author raises the problem of a diversity of the “blind” zone, when the religious nature of Karsavin's thought is ignored by researchers and conveniently adjusted through sociological and political science analysis and science-oriented reinterpretation.
As an appendix to this article, a letter from P. N. Malevsky-Malevich to L. P. Karsavin dated September 28 of 1929 with the author's comments on Karsavin's “Testament” to the Eurasians is published for the first time
Semiconductors V. 33, I. 04
No full textdc.description[en_US]Semiconductors -- April 1999
Volume 33, Issue 4, pp. 377-481
ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND NON-ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES OF SEMICONDUCTORS
Low-temperature relaxation of a solid solution of iron in gallium phosphide
E. S. Demidov, V. V. Karzanov, A. B. Gromoglasova, and O. N. Morozkin
Full Text: PDF (74 kB)
Modeling Si nanoprecipitate formation in SiO2 layers with excess Si atoms
A. F. Leier, L. N. Safronov, and G. A. Kachurin
Full Text: PDF (126 kB)
ELECTRONIC AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF SEMICONDUCTORS
Optical spectra and electronic structure of indium nitride
V. V. Sobolev and M. A. Zlobina
Full Text: PDF (104 kB)
Electrostatic model of the energy gap between Hubbard bands for boron atoms in silicon
N. A. Poklonskii and A. I. Syaglo
Full Text: PDF (99 kB)
The influence of defect clusters on redistribution of doping impurities in n- and p-type Si0.7Ge0.3 irradiated by reactor neutrons
A. P. Dolgolenko
Full Text: PDF (86 kB)
Acoustostimulated activation of bound defects in CdHgTe alloys
A. I. Vlasenko, Ya. M. Olikh, and R. K. Savkina
Full Text: PDF (100 kB)
A model of how the thermal ionization energy of impurities in semiconductors depends on their concentration and compensation
N. A. Poklonskii, A. I. Syaglo, and G. Biskupski
Full Text: PDF (140 kB)
Low-temperature photoluminescence in holmium-doped silicon
B. A. Andreev, N. A. Sobolev, Yu. A. Nikolaev, D. I. Kuritsin, M. I. Makovijchuk, and E. O. Parshin
Full Text: PDF (61 kB)
SEMICONDUCTORS STRUCTURES,INTERFACES,AND SURFACES
Generation-recombination instabilities in thin-film structures
V. V. Kolobaev
Full Text: PDF (52 kB)
Oscillations in the induced photopleochroism of In(Au)/Si thin-film structures
V. M. Botnaryuk, Yu. V. Zhilyaev, Yu. V. Rud', and V. Yu. Rud'
Full Text: PDF (99 kB)
Surface of n-type InP (100) passivated in sulfide solutions
V. N. Bessolov, M. V. Lebedev, and D. R. T. Zahn
Full Text: PDF (108 kB)
Electrical and photoelectric characteristics of an isotypic n-ZnO���n-Si structure
S. V. Slobodchikov, Kh. M. Salikhov, and E. V. Russu
Full Text: PDF (77 kB)
LOW-DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS
Analysis of mechanisms for electron scattering in GaAs/AlxGa1 ��� xAs superlattices with doped quantum wells for longitudinal resonant current flow in high electric fields and at low temperatures
S. I. Borisenko and G. F. Karavaev
Full Text: PDF (149 kB)
Luminescence and electrical properties of InGaN/AlGaN/GaN light emitting diodes with multiple quantum wells
V. E. Kudryashov, A. N. Turkin, A. �. Yunovich, A. N. Kovalev, and F. I. Manyakhin
Full Text: PDF (138 kB)
Photoionization of deep impurity centers in quantum well structures
V. I. Belyavskii and Yu. A. Pomerantsev
Full Text: PDF (123 kB)
Photovoltaic effect in the impurity absorption region of Si-structures with blocked impurity conductivity
B. A. Aronzon, V. V. Rylkov, L. Asadauskas, R. Brazis, D. Yu. Kovalev, and J. Leotin
Full Text: PDF (163 kB)
AMORPHOUS,GLASSY,AND POROUS SEMICONDUCTORS
Defects in a-Si:H films induced by Si ion implantation
O. A. Golikova
Full Text: PDF (92 kB)
Absorption and the optical gap of a-C:H films produced from acetylene plasmas
E. A. Konshina
Full Text: PDF (105 kB)
Conductivity relaxation in coated porous silicon after annealing
S. P. Zimin and A. N. Bragin
Full Text: PDF (68 kB)
PHYSICS OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
Photomemory in CdTe thin-film solar cells
�. N. Voronkov, A. E. Sharonov, and V. V. Kolobaev
Full Text: PDF (64 kB)
Polarization photosensitivity of ZnO/CdS/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells
V. Yu. Rud', Yu. V. Rud', and H. W. Schock
Full Text: PDF (92 kB)
Exciton waveguide and lasing in structures with superfine GaAs quantum wells and InAs submonolayer inclusions in an AlGaAs host
A. F. Tsatsul'nikov, B. V. Volovik, N. N. Ledentsov, M. V. Maksimov, A. Yu. Egorov, A. R. Kovsh, V. M. Ustinov, A. E. Zhukov, P. S. Kop'ev, Zh. I. Alf�rov, I. �. Kozin, M. V. Belousov, and D. Bimberg
Full Text: PDF (76 kB)
Influence of deep traps on current transport in Pd���p(n)���CdTe structures
S. V. Slobodchikov, Kh. M. Salikhov, and E. V. Russu
Full Text: PDF (57 kB)
Determination of the parameters of deep levels from the relaxational delay of breakdown of a p���n junction
S. V. Bulyarskii, Yu. N. Ser�zhkin, and V. K. Ionychev
Full Text: PDF (86 kB)
Effect of laser radiation on GaP epitaxial diode structures
V. V. Inyakov, E. N. Moos, and Yu. A. Shrainer
Full Text: PDF (50 kB)
PERSONALIA
Vitali[i-breve] Ivanovich Stafeev (on his 70th birthday)
Full Text: PDF (176 kB)
Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Lebedev (on his 70th birthday)
Full Text: PDF (124 kB)dc.description.contributor[en_US]dc.description.contributor[en_US
Semiconductors V. 33, I. 04
No full textSemiconductors -- April 1999
Volume 33, Issue 4, pp. 377-481
ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND NON-ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES OF SEMICONDUCTORS
Low-temperature relaxation of a solid solution of iron in gallium phosphide
E. S. Demidov, V. V. Karzanov, A. B. Gromoglasova, and O. N. Morozkin
Full Text: PDF (74 kB)
Modeling Si nanoprecipitate formation in SiO2 layers with excess Si atoms
A. F. Leier, L. N. Safronov, and G. A. Kachurin
Full Text: PDF (126 kB)
ELECTRONIC AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF SEMICONDUCTORS
Optical spectra and electronic structure of indium nitride
V. V. Sobolev and M. A. Zlobina
Full Text: PDF (104 kB)
Electrostatic model of the energy gap between Hubbard bands for boron atoms in silicon
N. A. Poklonskii and A. I. Syaglo
Full Text: PDF (99 kB)
The influence of defect clusters on redistribution of doping impurities in n- and p-type Si0.7Ge0.3 irradiated by reactor neutrons
A. P. Dolgolenko
Full Text: PDF (86 kB)
Acoustostimulated activation of bound defects in CdHgTe alloys
A. I. Vlasenko, Ya. M. Olikh, and R. K. Savkina
Full Text: PDF (100 kB)
A model of how the thermal ionization energy of impurities in semiconductors depends on their concentration and compensation
N. A. Poklonskii, A. I. Syaglo, and G. Biskupski
Full Text: PDF (140 kB)
Low-temperature photoluminescence in holmium-doped silicon
B. A. Andreev, N. A. Sobolev, Yu. A. Nikolaev, D. I. Kuritsin, M. I. Makovijchuk, and E. O. Parshin
Full Text: PDF (61 kB)
SEMICONDUCTORS STRUCTURES,INTERFACES,AND SURFACES
Generation-recombination instabilities in thin-film structures
V. V. Kolobaev
Full Text: PDF (52 kB)
Oscillations in the induced photopleochroism of In(Au)/Si thin-film structures
V. M. Botnaryuk, Yu. V. Zhilyaev, Yu. V. Rud', and V. Yu. Rud'
Full Text: PDF (99 kB)
Surface of n-type InP (100) passivated in sulfide solutions
V. N. Bessolov, M. V. Lebedev, and D. R. T. Zahn
Full Text: PDF (108 kB)
Electrical and photoelectric characteristics of an isotypic n-ZnO–n-Si structure
S. V. Slobodchikov, Kh. M. Salikhov, and E. V. Russu
Full Text: PDF (77 kB)
LOW-DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS
Analysis of mechanisms for electron scattering in GaAs/AlxGa1 – xAs superlattices with doped quantum wells for longitudinal resonant current flow in high electric fields and at low temperatures
S. I. Borisenko and G. F. Karavaev
Full Text: PDF (149 kB)
Luminescence and electrical properties of InGaN/AlGaN/GaN light emitting diodes with multiple quantum wells
V. E. Kudryashov, A. N. Turkin, A. É. Yunovich, A. N. Kovalev, and F. I. Manyakhin
Full Text: PDF (138 kB)
Photoionization of deep impurity centers in quantum well structures
V. I. Belyavskii and Yu. A. Pomerantsev
Full Text: PDF (123 kB)
Photovoltaic effect in the impurity absorption region of Si-structures with blocked impurity conductivity
B. A. Aronzon, V. V. Rylkov, L. Asadauskas, R. Brazis, D. Yu. Kovalev, and J. Leotin
Full Text: PDF (163 kB)
AMORPHOUS,GLASSY,AND POROUS SEMICONDUCTORS
Defects in a-Si:H films induced by Si ion implantation
O. A. Golikova
Full Text: PDF (92 kB)
Absorption and the optical gap of a-C:H films produced from acetylene plasmas
E. A. Konshina
Full Text: PDF (105 kB)
Conductivity relaxation in coated porous silicon after annealing
S. P. Zimin and A. N. Bragin
Full Text: PDF (68 kB)
PHYSICS OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
Photomemory in CdTe thin-film solar cells
É. N. Voronkov, A. E. Sharonov, and V. V. Kolobaev
Full Text: PDF (64 kB)
Polarization photosensitivity of ZnO/CdS/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells
V. Yu. Rud', Yu. V. Rud', and H. W. Schock
Full Text: PDF (92 kB)
Exciton waveguide and lasing in structures with superfine GaAs quantum wells and InAs submonolayer inclusions in an AlGaAs host
A. F. Tsatsul'nikov, B. V. Volovik, N. N. Ledentsov, M. V. Maksimov, A. Yu. Egorov, A. R. Kovsh, V. M. Ustinov, A. E. Zhukov, P. S. Kop'ev, Zh. I. Alfërov, I. É. Kozin, M. V. Belousov, and D. Bimberg
Full Text: PDF (76 kB)
Influence of deep traps on current transport in Pd–p(n)–CdTe structures
S. V. Slobodchikov, Kh. M. Salikhov, and E. V. Russu
Full Text: PDF (57 kB)
Determination of the parameters of deep levels from the relaxational delay of breakdown of a p–n junction
S. V. Bulyarskii, Yu. N. Serëzhkin, and V. K. Ionychev
Full Text: PDF (86 kB)
Effect of laser radiation on GaP epitaxial diode structures
V. V. Inyakov, E. N. Moos, and Yu. A. Shrainer
Full Text: PDF (50 kB)
PERSONALIA
Vitali[i-breve] Ivanovich Stafeev (on his 70th birthday)
Full Text: PDF (176 kB)
Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Lebedev (on his 70th birthday)
Full Text: PDF (124 kB)Archived web conten
Acoustical Physics V. 47, I. 01
No full textdc.description[en_US]Acoustical Physics -- January 2001Acoustical Physics -- January 2001
Volume 47, Issue 1, pp. 1-114
To the Readers of Acoustical Physics
pp. 1-2 Full Text: PDF (27 kB)
On the Uniqueness of the Problem of Acoustic Diffraction by an Infinite Plate
with Local Irregularities
I. V. Andronov and B. P. Belinskii
pp. 3-9 Full Text: PDF (93 kB)
Two-Dimensional Mechanisms of Interaction between Ultrasound and Sound in
Bubbly Liquids: Interaction Equations
I. Sh. Akhatov and D. B. Khismatullin
pp. 10-15 Full Text: PDF (98 kB)
Photosynthesis in Eucalyptus Studied by the Open Photoacoustic Technique:
Effects of Irradiance and Temperature
P. R. Barja, A. M. Mansanares, E. C. da Silva, A. C. N. Magalh�es, and P. L.
C. A. Alves
pp. 16-21 Full Text: PDF (77 kB)
Acousto-Optic Interaction of Diverging Gaussian Beams in Anisotropic Media
A. V. Vershubskii, V. N. Parygin, and Yu. G. Rezvov
pp. 22-28 Full Text: PDF (96 kB)
Acoustic Tomography of Currents in the Ocean by the Linearized Method of
Matched Nonreciprocity
V. V. Goncharov
pp. 29-34 Full Text: PDF (148 kB)
Characteristics of the Diffraction of Acoustic Waves in Stratified Sound
Channels
V. A. Grigor'ev, B. G. Katsnel'son, V. M. Kuz'kin, and V. G. Petnikov
pp. 35-41 Full Text: PDF (137 kB)
A Tunable Gas Sensor Using an Acoustic Waveguide
Yu. V. Gulyaev, V. E. Zemlyakov, R. G. Kryshtal', A. V. Medved', Khoang van
Fong, and V. V. Shemet
pp. 42-44 Full Text: PDF (47 kB)
Internal Structural Symmetry of Optimal Layered Structures
E. L. Gusev
pp. 45-49 Full Text: PDF (57 kB)
Electromagnetic���Acoustic Evaluation of the Permeability of Porous Media1
A. A. Davydov and L. M. Lyamshev
pp. 50-55 Full Text: PDF (81 kB)
Mode Spectrum of Noncollinear Electroacoustic Boundary-Guided Waves in a
Ferroelectric with a Moving Strip Domain
O. Yu. El'meshkin and N. S. Shevyakhov
pp. 56-61 Full Text: PDF (85 kB)
Blind Dereverberation in the Deep Sea
V. A. Zverev, A. A. Pavlenko, A. D. Sokolov, and G. A. Sharonov
pp. 62-67 Full Text: PDF (271 kB)
Damping of the Acoustic Diffraction and Radiation Fields Produced by a Convex
Body
V. P. Ivanov
pp. 68-75 Full Text: PDF (116 kB)
Acoustic Fields Detected by a Laser Interferometer in Aluminum Single Crystals
A. S. Krivonosova, A. B. Rinkevich, and Ya. G. Smorodinskii
pp. 76-84 Full Text: PDF (1003 kB)
Spatial Structure of the Coherence Parameter of the Sound Field in an
Irregular Arctic Waveguide
F. I. Kryazhev and V. M. Kudryashov
pp. 85-92 Full Text: PDF (90 kB)
Spectrum of Acoustic Radiation Caused by Cavitation: Analytical Model
A. O. Maksimov
pp. 93-101 Full Text: PDF (533 kB)
Sound Amplification in Inhomogeneous Flows of Nonequilibrium Gas
N. E. Molevich
pp. 102-105 Full Text: PDF (53 kB)
Formation of a Deep Scattering Layer in a Stratified Flow behind a
Two-Dimensional Obstacle
V. E. Prokhorov
pp. 106-111 Full Text: PDF (157 kB)
The 7th International Congress on Sound and Vibration
L. M. Lyamshev
pp. 112-114 Full Text: PDF (31 kB)dc.description.contributor[en_US]dc.description.contributor[en_US
Acoustical Physics V. 47, I. 01
No full textAcoustical Physics -- January 2001Acoustical Physics -- January 2001
Volume 47, Issue 1, pp. 1-114
To the Readers of Acoustical Physics
pp. 1-2 Full Text: PDF (27 kB)
On the Uniqueness of the Problem of Acoustic Diffraction by an Infinite Plate
with Local Irregularities
I. V. Andronov and B. P. Belinskii
pp. 3-9 Full Text: PDF (93 kB)
Two-Dimensional Mechanisms of Interaction between Ultrasound and Sound in
Bubbly Liquids: Interaction Equations
I. Sh. Akhatov and D. B. Khismatullin
pp. 10-15 Full Text: PDF (98 kB)
Photosynthesis in Eucalyptus Studied by the Open Photoacoustic Technique:
Effects of Irradiance and Temperature
P. R. Barja, A. M. Mansanares, E. C. da Silva, A. C. N. Magalhães, and P. L.
C. A. Alves
pp. 16-21 Full Text: PDF (77 kB)
Acousto-Optic Interaction of Diverging Gaussian Beams in Anisotropic Media
A. V. Vershubskii, V. N. Parygin, and Yu. G. Rezvov
pp. 22-28 Full Text: PDF (96 kB)
Acoustic Tomography of Currents in the Ocean by the Linearized Method of
Matched Nonreciprocity
V. V. Goncharov
pp. 29-34 Full Text: PDF (148 kB)
Characteristics of the Diffraction of Acoustic Waves in Stratified Sound
Channels
V. A. Grigor'ev, B. G. Katsnel'son, V. M. Kuz'kin, and V. G. Petnikov
pp. 35-41 Full Text: PDF (137 kB)
A Tunable Gas Sensor Using an Acoustic Waveguide
Yu. V. Gulyaev, V. E. Zemlyakov, R. G. Kryshtal', A. V. Medved', Khoang van
Fong, and V. V. Shemet
pp. 42-44 Full Text: PDF (47 kB)
Internal Structural Symmetry of Optimal Layered Structures
E. L. Gusev
pp. 45-49 Full Text: PDF (57 kB)
Electromagnetic–Acoustic Evaluation of the Permeability of Porous Media1
A. A. Davydov and L. M. Lyamshev
pp. 50-55 Full Text: PDF (81 kB)
Mode Spectrum of Noncollinear Electroacoustic Boundary-Guided Waves in a
Ferroelectric with a Moving Strip Domain
O. Yu. El'meshkin and N. S. Shevyakhov
pp. 56-61 Full Text: PDF (85 kB)
Blind Dereverberation in the Deep Sea
V. A. Zverev, A. A. Pavlenko, A. D. Sokolov, and G. A. Sharonov
pp. 62-67 Full Text: PDF (271 kB)
Damping of the Acoustic Diffraction and Radiation Fields Produced by a Convex
Body
V. P. Ivanov
pp. 68-75 Full Text: PDF (116 kB)
Acoustic Fields Detected by a Laser Interferometer in Aluminum Single Crystals
A. S. Krivonosova, A. B. Rinkevich, and Ya. G. Smorodinskii
pp. 76-84 Full Text: PDF (1003 kB)
Spatial Structure of the Coherence Parameter of the Sound Field in an
Irregular Arctic Waveguide
F. I. Kryazhev and V. M. Kudryashov
pp. 85-92 Full Text: PDF (90 kB)
Spectrum of Acoustic Radiation Caused by Cavitation: Analytical Model
A. O. Maksimov
pp. 93-101 Full Text: PDF (533 kB)
Sound Amplification in Inhomogeneous Flows of Nonequilibrium Gas
N. E. Molevich
pp. 102-105 Full Text: PDF (53 kB)
Formation of a Deep Scattering Layer in a Stratified Flow behind a
Two-Dimensional Obstacle
V. E. Prokhorov
pp. 106-111 Full Text: PDF (157 kB)
The 7th International Congress on Sound and Vibration
L. M. Lyamshev
pp. 112-114 Full Text: PDF (31 kB)Archived web conten
