18 research outputs found
FIGURE 3. Sishiniheia diamantina, n. gen. n in A new genus and species of cricket from the Chapada Diamantina National Park, northeastern Brazil (Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae; Luzarinae)
FIGURE 3. Sishiniheia diamantina, n. gen. n. sp.. Genitalia. Male genitalia in dorsal (A), ventral (B), lateral (C) and superior (D) view.Published as part of Souza Dias, Pedro G. B., Mello, Francisco De Assis Ganeo De & Vieira, Lelisberto Baldo, 2016, A new genus and species of cricket from the Chapada Diamantina National Park, northeastern Brazil (Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae; Luzarinae), pp. 258-266 in Zootaxa 4121 (3) on page 263, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4121.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/25743
CaRo 2.0: A system for social active listening and expressive performing of music content
FIGURE 1. Sishiniheia diamantina, n. gen. n in A new genus and species of cricket from the Chapada Diamantina National Park, northeastern Brazil (Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae; Luzarinae)
FIGURE 1. Sishiniheia diamantina, n. gen. n. sp. General morphology. A—male habitus (living individual), dorsal; Bholotype (male) habitus, dorsal; C—female head and pronotum, dorsal; D—male head and palpus; E—male head, pronotum and FW, lateral; F—male metanotum, dorsal; G—male metanotum, lateral; H—male head, frontal; I—female supra-anal plate; J—female subgenital plate; K—male supra-anal plate; L—male subgenital plate; M—male terminalia, lateral.Published as part of Souza Dias, Pedro G. B., Mello, Francisco De Assis Ganeo De & Vieira, Lelisberto Baldo, 2016, A new genus and species of cricket from the Chapada Diamantina National Park, northeastern Brazil (Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae; Luzarinae), pp. 258-266 in Zootaxa 4121 (3) on page 261, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4121.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/25743
Sishiniheia de Mello & Souza-Dias, n. gen.
Sishiniheia de Mello & Souza-Dias n. gen. Etymology. Taxon named after Brazilian entomologist Silvio Shigueo Nihei. Type species. Sishiniheia diamantina de Mello & Souza-Dias, n. sp. Diagnosis. Head and pronotum with few bristles. Metanotum with glandular area composed of two rounded, whitish humps. Male FWs coriaceous, glabrous, somewhat reduced, internal margins of left and right ones touching but not overlapping, distal margins round, bearing a conspicuous yellowish border (Figs. 1 A–C), stridulatory file or any specialized veins or areas for sound production and propagation absent; thick longitudinal venation present, perpendicular veinlets weak; glandular thickening under posterior margins absent; hind wings absent. Male genitalia. Ventral projection of the pseudepiphallus present, almost reaching the PsP 1; pseudepiphallic arms thin, the apex pointed and curved inwards; rami elongated; PsP 2 located between the pseudepiphallic arms, highly sclerotized, large and conspicuous, with two projections curved inwards, resembling a “C”. Female. Larger and more robust than male; FW’s even more reduced than those of male. Description. Occiput and vertex without bristles (Fig. 1 B). Fastigium below vertex level, wider than long, slightly narrowed toward the apex, and narrower than scape (Figs. 1 B, D, E).Maxillary palpi dark brown, thin, long, specially joints 3 to 5; apical third of joint 5 curved, the apex whitish (Figs. 1 D, E, H); antenomeres medium brown, with interspersed light brown antenomeres. Three large, circular ocelli present (Figs. 1 D, E, H). Dorsal disk of pronotum wider than long (Figs. 1 B, E), its cephalic and caudal margins sub-straight (Fig. 1 B); ventro-cephalic angle of lateral lobes rounded, ventro-caudal margin gradually ascendant (Fig. 1 E). TIII sub-apical spurs 4 / 4, with serrulation between and above them; apical spurs 3 / 3, more developed on inner face; inner apical spurs: dorsal one the longest (iad), median slightly shorter (iam), ventral the smallest (iav) (iad>iam>iav); outer apical spurs: dorsal one the longest (oad), median slightly shorter (oam), ventral the smallest (oav) (oad>oam>oav). Male. Metanotum with glandular area composed of two rounded projections (Figs. 1 F, G; 4 A–D); metanotal structures: a pair of projections, and a pair of fossae (Figs. 4 A–D). Male FWs coriaceous, glabrous, reduced, without stridulatory file or specialized veins for sound production (Figs. 1 A, B, E); longitudinal venation thick, perpendicular venation weak (Figs. 1 B, E); glandular thickening absent. Hind wings absent. Supra-anal plate as in Fig. 1 K; shield-shaped. Subgenital plate pubescent, concave, posterior margin as in Fig. 1 L. Male genitalia. Pseudepiphallus: pseudepiphallic sclerite transverse; pseudepiphallic sclerite constricted on its median part, with a small apodeme (Figs. 2 A, 3 A); pseudepiphallic arms thin, with pointed apex, its distal half curved inwards (Figs. 2 A–C, 3 A–D). Pseudepiphallic ventral projection present, weak sclerotized, almost reaching the small PsP 1, and linked to it by a membrane (Figs. 2 B, C, 3 B, C). Rami elongated, not directly connected to the pseudepiphallic sclerite, longer than the pseudepiphallic arms and ectophallic apodeme (Figs. A–B, 3 A–B). Pseudepiphallic parameres 2 (PsP 2) located between the pseudepiphallic arms, well developed, and highly sclerotized (Figs. 2 A–B, 3 A–C); PsP 2 with two projections curved inwards, resembling a “C” (Figs. 2 A, C). Pseudepiphallic parameres 1 (PsP 1) small, linked to the pseudepiphallic ventral projection by a membrane (Figs. 2 B, 3 B). Ectophallic invagination: ectophallic apodemes short (Figs. 2 A, 3 A); ectophallic arc straight, located right below the median part of the pseudepiphallic sclerite, in dorsal view (Figs. 2 A, 3 A); dorsal projections of the ectophallic invagination absent; ventral projections of the ectophallic invagination longer than the ectophallic apodemes (Figs. 2 B, 3 B); ectophallic fold completely membranous. Endophallus: endophallic sclerite and apodeme up-curved (Fig. 2 A–C, 3 A–C), bearing a small endophallic crest; pair of lamellar apodemes very reduced in comparison to those of related genera (see below) (Figs. 2 B, C). Female. Larger than male; general coloration medium brown, marbled (Fig 1 C). Female FWs similar to those of male but even more reduced, also with thick longitudinal venation, internal margins of left and right wings not touching each other (Fig. 1 C). Subgenital plate short, distal margin bilobate (Fig. 1 J). Supra-anal as in Fig. 1 I, its distal margin rounded. Female genitalia. Copulatory papilla longer than wide, apex and basis rounded as in Figs. 2 D–F. Systematic relationships. Sishiniheia n. gen. was compared to Guabamima de Mello, 1992, Mellopsis Mews & Sperber, 2010, and Pizacris Souza-Dias & Desutter-Grandcolas, 2015. All these genera share similar morphological characters, mainly regarding male genitalia, as the great development of the PsP 2, and the elongated rami. In Guabamima and Sishiniheia n. gen. the pseudepiphallic arms are lateral, pointed, not tubular; in Pizacris and Mellopsis, the pseudepiphallic arms are ventrally-oriented. The phylogenetic relationships among these genera, however, are unknown; a cladistic analysis of Neotropical Luzarinae, with the inclusion of Sishiniheia n. gen., are being performed. For more information about the male genitalia of these genera see Souza-Dias et al. (2015).Published as part of Souza Dias, Pedro G. B., Mello, Francisco De Assis Ganeo De & Vieira, Lelisberto Baldo, 2016, A new genus and species of cricket from the Chapada Diamantina National Park, northeastern Brazil (Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae; Luzarinae), pp. 258-266 in Zootaxa 4121 (3) on page 260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4121.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/25743
Aumentar el conocimiento biológico para una mejor gestión de las especies de captura incidental: edad, crecimiento y mortalidad de garneo y arete (Teleostei: Triglidae)
Gurnards are a valuable by-catch of mixed demersal fisheries and are commercially important in European waters, but they are often discarded, reported under “mixed gurnards” and with incomplete biological information by species. In the present work, a total of 558 piper gurnard specimens of between 10.9 and 44.4 cm (1 to 11 years) and 425 red gurnard specimens of between 10.2 and 42.1 cm (0 to 9 years) from the northeast Atlantic (Portuguese) coast were used to study age and growth. The von Bertalanffy growth parameters for piper gurnard were estimated through the combination of whole-otolith readings and back-calculation (L∞=44.7 cm, k=0.16 yr–1 and t0=–2.781 yr). For red gurnard the same growth parameters were estimated using whole-otolith readings (L∞=40.2 cm, k=0.28 yr–1 and t0=–1.074 yr). The results indicate that the red gurnard reaches a smaller length, although it grows faster than the piper gurnard. Natural, instantaneous and fishing mortalities were estimated as well as the exploitation rate for both species. For the Portuguese coast, the red gurnard showed a higher fishing mortality and exploitation rate than the piper gurnard, raising concerns about its sustainable management.Los rubios son una captura incidental valiosa de las pesquerías demersales mixtas y comercialmente importantes en las aguas europeas, pero a menudo se descartan, se informan como “rubios mixtos” y con información biológica incompleta por especie. En el presente trabajo se han recogido un total de 558 ejemplares de ganeo, de entre 10,9 y 44,4 cm (1 a 11 años), y 425 individuos de arete, de entre 10,2 y 42,1 cm (0 a 9 años) procedentes del Atlántico nororiental (costa portuguesa) se utilizaron para estudiar la edad y el crecimiento. Los parámetros de crecimiento de von Bertalanffy para ganeo se estimaron mediante la combinación de lecturas de otolitos enteros y retrocálculo (L∞=44,7 cm, k=0,16 año–1 y t0=-2,781 años). Para el arete se estimaron los mismos parámetros de crecimiento usando lecturas de otolito entero (L∞=40.2 cm, k=0.28 año–1 y t0=–1.074 año). Los resultados indican que el arete alcanza una talla menor, aunque crece más rápido que el ganeo. Se estimó la mortalidad natural, instantánea y por pesca, así como la tasa de explotación para ambas especies. Para la costa portuguesa, el arete presentó una mortalidad por pesca y una tasa de explotación más altas que el ganeo, lo que generó preocupaciones sobre su gestión sostenible
Biologia e comportamento de Diachasmimorpha longicaudata Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) criado sobre larvas de Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann (Diptera: Tephritidae) irradiadas e não irradiadas com radiação gama
O presente trabalho teve por objetivo estudar a biologia e comportamento do parasitóide Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), durante seis gerações, criado sobre larvas de Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) irradiadas e não irradiadas com radiação gama e foi desenvolvido no Laboratório de Irradiação de Alimentos e Radioentomologia do Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura (CENA), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brasil. Para o tratamento com radiação gama, utilizou-se uma fonte de Cobalto – 60, modelo Gammabeam – 650. A dose utilizada no tratamento foi de 63,25 Gy, sob uma taxa de dose média de 287,83 Gy/hora. O experimento foi conduzido sob condições controladas com temperatura de 27 ± 1oC, umidade relativa de 70 ± 10% e fotofase de 14 horas. Foram utilizados 2 tratamentos, hospedeiros não irradiados e hospedeiros irradiados. Nos dez dias consecutivos de parasitismo em cada geração, foram fornecidas 750 larvas/gaiola/tratamento no primeiro dia e à medida que as fêmeas morriam, o número de larvas oferecidas diminuía a fim de se manter a proporção de 10 larvas/fêmea. Foram utilizadas 3 gaiolas/tratamento com tempo de parasitismo de 40 minutos. Os parâmetros biológicos avaliados foram: 1) Peso de pupas; 2) Porcentagem de emergência; 3) Razão sexual; 4) Longevidade de adultos sob estresse e 5) Habilidade de Vôo. Foram pesadas pupas de C. capitata com 7 e 13 dias de idade contendo, no seu interior, o parasitóide D. longicaudata. Verificou-se que pupas advindas de larvas hospedeiras não irradiadas foram mais pesadas, devido a presença de moscas pré-emergentes, no primeiro caso (7 dias) e a menor porcentagem de pupas “vazias” na pesagem ao 13o dia. Pôde-se verificar maior porcentagem de emergência de parasitóides em hospedeiros irradiados e maior porcentagem de parasitóides... .The objective of this work was study the biology and behavior of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), during six generations, reared on larvae of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) irradiated and not irradiated with gamma radiation and was developed in the Laboratory of Food Irradiation and Radioentomology of the Center of Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (CENA), University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil. For gamma radiation treatment, a source of Cobalt–60 (Gammabeam – 650) was used. A dose of 63.25 Gy was used, at an average dose rate of 287.83 Gy/h. The experiment was conduced under controlled environment (27 ± 1ºC, 70 ± 10% RH, and photoperiod of 14:10 L:D). Two treatments were used: not irradiated and irradiated host larvae. During 10 consecutive days of parasitism in each generation, 750 larvae/cage/treatment were supplied and, as the females died, the number of offered larvae was decreased in order to keep the proportion of 10 larvae/female. Three cages/treatment were used and the parasitism period was 40 minutes. The evaluated biological parameters were: 1) weight of pupae; 2) percent adult emergency; 3) sexual rate; 4) adult’s longevity under stress, and 5) flight ability. Pupae of C. capitata with 7 and 13 d of age were heavier holding, his inside, the parasitoid D. longicaudata. Pupae coming from not irradiated host larvae were heavier, due to the presence of pre-emerging flies in the first case (7 d), and due to a smaller percentage of “empty” pupae at the 13th d. Larger percentage of parasitoids emergency in irradiated hosts and larger percentage of female parasitoids in laboratory in both treatments, discarding the possibility that the radiation influences on the sexual rate of parasitoids. There was not difference in the longevity of the parasitoids between the irradiated and not irradiated treatments... (Complete abstract, click electronic address below)
Desutterella Souza-Dias & Campos & Mello 2017, n. gen.
Desutterella Souza-Dias, Campos & de Mello n. gen. Etymology. Taxon named after the French Orthopterist Laure Desutter-Grandcolas, for her work on Neotropical Grylloidea. Type species. Desutterella manauara Souza-Dias, Campos & de Mello n. sp. Species included. Desutterella manauara Souza-Dias, Campos & de Mello n. sp., Desutterella colombiana Souza-Dias, n. sp. Distribution. Amazon Forest, in Brazil (Amazonas State), and Colombia (Amazonas Department). Diagnosis. Size small, slender, as the other genera from Aracambiae group. General coloration light to medium brown. Head, pronotum and legs I and II with sparse, thick setae. Fastigium with double row of thick setae. Three ocelli, large, circular. Maxillary palpi elongated, joints 3–5 whitish, pilose. Legs elongated, not annulated; tympanum on inner face of TI. Male. Metanotum with two projections rounded, whitish, glandular. Male FWs short, rounded, membranous; right FW medium brown, apex light brown, pilose; stridulatory file very reduced; veins and areas for sound propagation absent. Male genitalia. Male genitalia bearing a pair of genital glands within pseudepiphallic sclerite, connected to tubular pseudepiphallic arms. Pseudepiphallic arms curved outwards. Pseudepiphallic parameres highly sclerotized; PsP2 with two pairs of distinct projections. Female. Almost same size as males. Females FWs yellowish brown, transparent, small, reaching first abdominal tergite. Description. Occiput and vertex with thick setae (Figs. 2 A–D, 5 A–C). Fastigium wider than long, with double row of thick setae, below vertex level and not separated from it by line or furrow (Figs. 2 A–D, G, 5 A–C, F). Three ocelli, large, circular (Figs. 2G, 5F). Antennal scape longer than wide (Figs. 2 A–D, 5 A–C). Maxillary palpi elongated, joints 3–5 elongated, whitish, pilose, joint 4 longest (Figs. 2J, 5E); joint 5 curved, apex rounded (Figs. 2J, 5E). Pronotum DD longer than wide, with thick setae, mainly on cephalic margin (Figs. 2 A–F, 5A, B). Tergites slightly pubescent, without apparent tergal glands (Figs. 2A, B, D, 5A). Legs I and II not annulated, with thick setae. Tympanum on inner face of TI. TIII not annulated. Subapical spurs 4/4, with serrulation between and above them; inner distal subapical spur near upper apical; apical spurs 3/3, more developed on inner face; inner apical spurs: dorsal longest (iad), median slightly shorter (iam), ventral smaller (iav) (iad>iam>iav); outer apical spurs: median longest (oam), dorsal slightly shorter (oad), ventral smaller (oav) (oam>oad>oav). Basitarsus III with double row of spines. Male. Metanotum with two glandular projections whitish, rounded (Figs. 2D, E, 3 A–B, 5D). Male FWs short, reaching half of abdomen (Figs. 1A, 2A, 5A); right FW medium brown, pilose (Figs. 2A, C, 5 A–C); without specialized veins or areas for sound production and propagation; left FW membranous, transparent, lateral field medium brown (Fig. 5D). Supra anal plate not constricted medially (Figs. 2H, 5H); distal margin without extended angles (Figs. 2H, 5H). Subgenital plate elongated, pubescent (Figs. 2I, 5G). Male genitalia. Male genitalia bearing a pair of genital glands within pseudepiphallic sclerite, connected to tubular pseudepiphallic arms (Figs. 4 A–C, 6 A–C). Pseudepiphallus: pseudepiphallic sclerite transverse, (Figs. 4 A–C, 6 A–C); pseudepiphallic arms curved outwards (Figs. 4A, B, 6A, B); apex with opening duct, rounded. Rami elongated, connected to pseudepiphallic sclerite, reaching apex of ectophallic apodemes (Figs. 4A, 6A). Pseudepiphallic parameres (PsP) highly sclerotized (Figs. 4 A–C, 6 A–C); PsP2 with two pairs of distinct projections: one elongated, upcurved, lateral; second small, medial, semicircular, visible in dorsal view (Figs. 4A, 6A); PsP1 elongated (Figs. 4B, 6B). Ectophallic invagination. Ectophallic apodemes elongated, thin (Figs. 4A, 6A). Ectophallic fold sclerotized, surrounding apex of medio-posterior projection of endophallic sclerite (Figs. 4B, 6B). Endophallus. Endophallic sclerite large, flat (Figs. 4B, 6B); latero-posterior projections short; medio-posterior projection elongated (Figs. 4B, 6B). Endophallic apodeme paired, curved outwards, apex pointed (Figs. 4B, 6B). Female. In comparison with other Luzarinae crickets, females of Desutterella Souza-Dias, Campos & de Mello n. gen. are almost same-sized as males—in the Aracambiae genera, frequently the females are larger than males. Head, pronotum, abdomen and legs with thick setae (Figs. 1B, 2B). Females FWs small, translucent, reaching half of first tergite (Figs. 2B, F). Supra anal plate pubescent, slightly constricted medially (Figs. 2K). Subgenital plate pubescent, small (Figs. 2L). Female genitalia: copulatory papilla small, basis rounded, apex pointed centrally (Figs. 3 D–F).Published as part of Souza-Dias, Pedro G. B., Campos, Lucas Denadai De & Mello, Francisco De Assis Ganeo De, 2017, Desutterella n. gen., a new genus of Luzarinae (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae) and the first report of the Aracambiae group Souza-Dias & Desutter-Grandcolas, 2014 in the Amazon in Zootaxa 4350 (1), DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4350.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/105094
Desutterella manauara Souza-Dias & Campos & Mello 2017, n. sp.
Desutterella manauara Souza-Dias, Campos & de Mello n. sp. Figures 1–4 http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Orthoptera.speciesfile.org:TaxonName:500285 Type locality. Brazil, Amazonas State, municipality of Manaus, Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke (02o55’S, 59o58’W). Etymology. The specific epithet is a gentilic adjective that refers to Manaus, type locality of this species. Distribution. Amazon Forest, in Amazonas State, municipality of Manaus, Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke (Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve), and in Pará State, municipality of Melgaço, Floresta Nacional de Caxiuanã (Caxiuanã National Forest), Estação Científica Ferreira Penna (Ferreira Penna Scientific Station). Type material. Holotype, 8 males paratypes, 10 females paratypes. Holotype: male, with genitalia removed and kept with the specimen, labeled Manaus, AM [Amazonas], Brazil. Reserva ‘ Adolfo’ Ducke. 2o55’47.07”S, 59o58’29.48”W. F.A.G. Mello & equipe // CNPq-SISBIOTA (MZSP). Paratypes: 6 males, 8 females, same data as the holotype (MZSP); 1 male, same data as the holotype, labeled “GRYLLO/ MAN C2SUP (BOTU); 1 male, same data as the holotype, labeled PSD44 (BOTU); 1 female, same data as the holotype, labeled “GRYLLO/ MAN H6J 3X (BOTU); 1 female, same data as the holotype, labeled PSD45 (BOTU). Diagnosis. Within the genus, D. manauara n. sp. can be recognized by the following characters: pseudepiphallic parameres (PsP) highly sclerotized; PsP2 with two pairs of distinct projections: one elongated, upcurved, second small, medial, semicircular, visible in dorsal view; PsP1 elongated, outer face of apex pointed, inner face rounded; ectophallic arc curved, below the median part of pseudepiphallic sclerite; ventral projections of the ectophallic invagination bent on the half of its extension, distal half and apex linked to the rest of the projection; ectophallic fold sclerotized, surrounding the apex of medio-posterior projection of endophallic sclerite. Description. In addition to the characters of the genus: Head. Occiput and vertex medium brown, almost uniform, with thick setae (Figs. 2 A–D). Fastigium wider than long, medium brown, with double row of thick setae, below vertex level and not separated from it by line or furrow (Figs. 2 A–D, G). Antennal scape longer than wide, scape and pedicel light brown; proximal antennomeres light brown, medial and distal medium brown (Figs. 2 A–D). Frons medium brown (Fig. 2G). In frontal view, gena dark brown (Fig. 2G). In lateral view, gena medium brown, not divided by stripe, with dark brown spots. Mandibles light to medium brown (Fig. 2G). Clypeus medium brown, center light brown; labrum greyish brown (Fig. 2G). Maxillary palpi elongated, joints 3–5 elongated, joint 4 longest; whitish, ventral half light brown (entirely light brown in some specimens); fifth joint whitish, apex light brown (medium brown in some specimens), curved, rounded (Figs. 1 A–B, 2J). Thorax. Pronotum DD longer than wide, borders medium to dark brown (except cephalic margin), with thick setae, mainly on cephalic margin (Figs. 2 A–F). DD cephalic margin slightly convex, DD caudal margin substraight, LL ventro-cephalic angle curved, ventral margin ascending, ventro-caudal angle gradually ascendant (Figs. 2 A–F). Remarks. The holotype lost the setae on pronotum DD. Legs. Legs I and II light to medium brown, not annulated, pubescent, with thick setae (Figs. 1 A–B, 2 A–B). Tympanum on inner face of TI. TI and TII with two ventral spurs. TII with two ventral spurs, and one dorsal—the outer dorsal is absent. FIII basis inflated; outer face light to medium brown, with dark brown maculae, inner face with same pattern (Figs. 1 A–B). TIII light to medium brown, not annulated. Subapical spurs 4/4, with serrulation between and above them; inner distal subapical spur near upper apical; apical spurs 3/3, more developed on inner face; inner apical spurs: dorsal longest (iad), median slightly shorter (iam), ventral smaller (iav) (iad>iam>iav); outer apical spurs: median longest (oam), dorsal slightly shorter (oad), ventral smaller (oav) (oam>oad>oav). Basitarsus III with double row of spines. Abdomen. Tergites slightly pubescent, without tergal glands; dark brown, coloration almost uniform (Figs. 2A, D). Sternites light to medium brown. Cerci light to medium brown. Supra anal plate light to medium brown, not constricted medially; proximal margin slightly concave; distal margin straight, wide, without extended angles (Fig. 2H). Subgenital plate elongated, light brown, pubescent; proximal margin concave; median portion of distal margin convex, with short angles, resembling an open “w (Fig. 2I). Male. Metanotum with two projections whitish, rounded (Figs. 2 D–E, 3 A–B); metanotal projections glandular (Figs. 3A–B). Male FWs short, rounded, reaching half of abdomen (Figs. 1A, 2A); right FW medium brown, distal half with thick setae (Figs. 2A, C); apex light brown (Fig. 1A); stridulatory file vestigial (very reduced, almost indistinguishable); other specialized veins or areas for sound production and propagation absent; left FW membranous, transparent, lateral field medium brown, with sparse setae. Male genitalia. Male genitalia bearing a pair of genital glands within pseudepiphallic sclerite, connected to tubular pseudepiphallic arms (Figs. 4 A–C). Pseudepiphallus: pseudepiphallic sclerite transverse, with phallic glands connected to two dorsal pseudepiphallic arms tubular (Figs. 4 A–C); pseudepiphallic arms curved outwards (Figs. 4A, B); apex with opening duct, rounded. Rami elongated, connected to pseudepiphallic sclerite, reaching apex of ectophallic apodemes (Fig. 4A). Pseudepiphallic parameres (PsP) highly sclerotized (Figs. 4 A–C); PsP2 with two pairs of distinct projections: one elongated, upcurved; second small, medial, semicircular, visible in dorsal view (Fig. 4A); PsP1 elongated, outer face of apex pointed, inner face rounded (Fig. 4B, C). Ectophallic invagination. Ectophallic apodemes elongated, thin (Figs. 4A, B); ectophallic arc curved, below median part of pseudepiphallic sclerite (Figs. 4A, B); dorsal projections of ectophallic invagination absent; ventral projections bent on half of its extension, distal half and apex linked to rest of the projection (Fig. 4B). Ectophallic fold sclerotized, surrounding apex of medio-posterior projection of endophallic sclerite (Fig. 4B). Endophallus. Endophallic sclerite large, flat (Figs. 4A, B); latero-posterior projections short, pointed (Fig. 4B); medio-posterior projection elongated (Fig. 4B). Endophallic apodeme paired, curved outwards, apex pointed (Figs. 4A, B). Female. General coloration: body medium to yellowish brown; head, pronotum, abdomen, and legs with thick setae (Figs. 1B, 2B); abdomen pubescent, medium brown with sparse maculae yellowish brown (Fig. 2B); legs, pronotum, and structures of head same colored as males. Females FWs yellowish brown, translucent, reaching half of first tergite (Figs. 2B, F); inner margins juxtaposed (Fig. 2F). Supra anal plate pubescent, medium brown, medially constricted; proximal margin slightly concave, distal rounded (Fig. 2K). Subgenital plate pubescent, small; proximal margin convex, distal margin medially convex, angles rounded (Fig. 2L). Apex of ovipositor as in Figs. 2M, N. Female genitalia: copulatory papilla small, basis rounded, apex pointed centrally, as in Figs. 4 D–F. Measurements (mm). Males (n=10) —media (range): HW—1.87 (1.7–1.9); IOD—0.94 (0.8–1.1); PL—1.84 (1.7–1.9); AWP—1.80 (1.7–1.9); PWP—2.13 (1.9–2.3); PW—2.24 (2.1–2.2); FWL—3.07 (2.8–3.2); FWW—2.44 (2.2–2.5); LFIII—7.06 (6.7–7.6); WFIII—1.96 (1.8–2.1); LTIII—6.75 (6.3–7.5); LBt-III—2.11 (1.9–2.4). Females (n=10): HW—2.11 (1.9–2.2); IOD—1.04 (0.9–1.1); PL—2.03 (1.8–2.1); AWP—2.05 (1.9–2.1); PWP—2.43 (2.1–2.6); PW—2.51 (2.2–2.7); LFIII—7.74 (6.6–8.5); WFIII—2.28 (1.9–2.4); LTIII—7.05 (6.1–7.5); LBt-III—1.99 (1.6–2.2); OL—7.50 (6.9–8.4).Published as part of Souza-Dias, Pedro G. B., Campos, Lucas Denadai De & Mello, Francisco De Assis Ganeo De, 2017, Desutterella n. gen., a new genus of Luzarinae (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae) and the first report of the Aracambiae group Souza-Dias & Desutter-Grandcolas, 2014 in the Amazon in Zootaxa 4350 (1), DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4350.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/105094
Sishiniheia diamantina de Mello & Souza-Dias, n. sp.
Sishiniheia diamantina de Mello & Souza-Dias n. sp. Figures 1–4 http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Orthoptera.speciesfile.org:TaxonName: 477668 Type locality. Brazil, Bahia State, Lençóis, Parque Nacional da Chapada Diamantina. 12 ° 35 ' 16 ''S, 41 ° 24 ' 35 ''W. Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the Chapada Diamantina, type locality of this species. Type material. Holotype, allotype, 20 male paratypes, 8 female paratypes. Holotype: BRASIL, BA [Bahia], Lençóis, Pq. Nac. [National Park] da Chapada Diamantina. 12 o 35 ’ 16 ”S 41 o 24 ’ 35 ”W. Alt.: 600– 900m. 13- 19.ii. 2013. de Mello leg. CNPq-SISBIOTA (MZSP). Allotype (copulatory papilla removed and kept with the allotype): same data as the holotype (MZSP). Paratypes: 7 males, 4 females paratypes, same data as the holotype (MZSP); 1 male paratype, same data of the holotype, labeled ‘GRYLLO/CDI/NB0FG’, with complex phallic removed and kept with the specimen (MZSP); 1 male paratype, same data of the holotype, labeled ‘GRYLLO/CDI/ 9 B 918 ’, with thorax removed for SEM analysis (MZSP); 1 male, 1 female paratypes, same data as the holotype (MPEG); 10 males, 3 females paratypes, same data as the holotype (Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu). Diagnosis. General coloration dark brown, almost uniform. Occiput, vertex and fastigium dark brown, with small bristles; frons and gena dark brown. Pronotum dark brown; metanotum with glandular area composed of two rounded, whitish humps. Male FWs dark brown, coriaceous, glabrous, reduced, not surpassing the third tergite; longitudinal venation yellowish and connected to the rounded apex of the FW; glandular thickening absent; hind wings absent. Tergites dark brown, with medium brown spots; without tergal glands. Male and female genitalia as described for the genus. Description. In addition to the characters of the genus: Head. Occiput and vertex dark brown, without bristles (Fig. 1 B). Fastigium dark brown, with small bristles (Figs. 1 B, D, E). Antennal scape medium brown, dark brown on inner face (Figs. 1 B, D, H). Frons and gena dark brown; frons with a thin, medium brown, vertical stripe (Figs. 1 D, E, H). Thorax. Pronotum DD dark brown, with short bristles restricted to the cephalic and caudal margins (Figs. 1 B, E); DD cephalic and caudal margins sub-straight (Fig. 1 B); LL ventro-cephalic angle rounded, ventro-caudal margin gradually ascendant (Fig. 1 E). Legs. TI bearing a large tympanum on both sides; FI and FII dark brown, not annulated (Fig. 1 A); TI and TII dark brown annulated with medium brown (Fig. 1 A); TI with two same-sized ventral apical spurs; TII with two inner and two outer apical spurs. Posterior legs not annulated (Fig. 1 A). FIII medium to light brown, with medium brown diagonal, thin stripes on outer face, apical third medium brown. TIII dark brown. Basitarsus III yellowish brown, with a double row of spines. Abdomen. Abdomen pubescent; tergites dark brown, with medium brown spots (Figs. 1 A, B); without tergal glands. Sternites medium brown. Cerci dark brown. Supra-anal plate pubescent, medium brown; with dark brown maculae in the center (Fig. 1 K); proximal margin slightly concave; distal margin rounded, with very short extended angles(Fig. 1 K). Subgenital plate pubescent, medium brown (Fig. 1 L). Male. Male FWs dark brown with longitudinal veins yellowish and connected to the apex (Figs. 1 A, B). FWs covering part of the abdomen, not surpassing the third tergite (Figs. 1 A, B); posterior part of internal margin and apex yellowish (Figs. 1 A, B, E); internal margins well separated over its length or touching at the median part (Fig. 1 B); apex rounded, not truncated distally. Male genitalia as described for the genus. Female. Larger than male; general coloration medium brown, marbled (Fig 1 C). Female FWs similar to those of male, even more reduced, also bearing yellowish longitudinal veins (Fig. 1 C). Subgenital plate short, distal margin bilobate (Fig. 1 J). Supra-anal plate similar to male, distal margin rounded (Fig. 1 I). Female genitalia as described for the genus. Measurements (mm). Males (n= 10): HW— 3.42 (3.25–3.75); IOD— 1.54 (1.35–1.80); PL— 2.72 (2.20– 3.10); AWP— 3.61 (3.50–4); PWP— 4.05 (3.50–4.50); PW— 4.66 (4.25 –5.00); FWL— 4.66 (3.80–5.55); FWW— 2.67 (2.30–3.25); LFIII— 14.71 (12.90–17.55); WFIII— 3.77 (3.50–4.20); LTIII— 13.27 (12.15–15); LBt-III— 4.19 (3.70–5). Females (n= 5): HW— 3.81 (3.60–4); IOD— 1.77 (1.70–1.85); PL— 2.68 (2.25–3); AWP— 4.14 (3.95–4.45); PWP— 4.91 (4.55–5.20); PW— 5.32 (4.85–5.55); FWL— 2.65 (2.25–3); FWW— 1.77 (1.35–1.95); LFIII— 15.66 (13.50–15.15); WFIII— 4.12 (4–4.50); LTIII— 15.51 (14.55–17.25); LBt-III— 4.16 (3.70–4.70); OL— 16.32 (15– 17.25)..Published as part of Souza Dias, Pedro G. B., Mello, Francisco De Assis Ganeo De & Vieira, Lelisberto Baldo, 2016, A new genus and species of cricket from the Chapada Diamantina National Park, northeastern Brazil (Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae; Luzarinae), pp. 258-266 in Zootaxa 4121 (3) on pages 262-265, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4121.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/25743
FIGURE 4. Desutterella manauara n. gen. n in Desutterella n. gen., a new genus of Luzarinae (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae) and the first report of the Aracambiae group Souza-Dias & Desutter-Grandcolas, 2014 in the Amazon
FIGURE 4. Desutterella manauara n. gen. n. sp. Male and female genitalia. Male genitalia in dorsal (A), ventral (B) and lateral (C) views. Female copulatory papilla in dorsal (D), ventral (E) and lateral (F) views. Conventions: Armpseudepiphallic arm; EctAp—ectophallic apodeme; EctF—ectophallic fold; EndAp—endophallic apodeme; EndScendophallic sclerite; Gland—phallic gland; PsP1—pseudepiphallic paramere 1; PsP2—pseudepiphallic paramere 2;R—ramus. Scale bar: 1mm
