117,451 research outputs found

    Does evidence support the use of mobile phone apps as a driver for promoting healthy lifestyles from a public health perspective? A systematic review of Randomized Control Trials

    No full text
    Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to find a scientific evidence on the efficacy of apps in promoting healthy lifestyles. Methods: The research was carried out according to PRISMA Statement. Pubmed, Embase and Google Scholar searches were carried out up to September 2016 focusing on randomized control trials (RCTs). Results: Forty RCTs were selected. Most of the studies targeted weight management, PA and healthy eating (N = 35). A few RCTs focused on apps designed to sun protection, smoking cessation and alcohol consumption (N = 5). Only 10 RCTs (25%) found statistical difference between intervention and control groups for all the outcomes measured. Most of the studies had a short follow-up (65%, less than 6 months) and half of them a very small sample size (fewer than 100 subjects). Conclusion: Overall, the evidence so far showed a modest efficacy of apps in health promotion. Practice implications: There is a need to improve the overall quality of intervention studies focused on mobile apps in order to understand if they could became a valuable tool in support of health professionals and their efforts to promote education and health

    Do polychlorinated biphenyls cause cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies on risk of cutaneous melanoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

    No full text
    In 2015 a IARC Working Group upgraded the classification of PCBs to Group 1 “Carcinogenic to humans”, also on the basis of evidence from epidemiological studies showing an excess risk for melanoma. Increased risks for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and breast cancer were also reported though the evidence was limited. However, some recent reviews of studies on PCB exposure and risk of cancer provided discrepant findings. Therefore, we re-evaluated the association between exposure to PCBs and risk of melanoma and NHL by a systematic review and meta-analysis. We retrieved 11 independent cohort studies on occupationally exposed workers. About half of them showed increased standardized mortality or incidence ratios (SMRs or SIRs) for melanoma and none for NHL. The pooled SMRs were 1.32 (95% CI: 1.05e1.64) for melanoma and 0.94 (0.73e1.23) for NHL. Among population-based cohort and case-control studies with individual measures of PCB exposure, one only study was carried out on PCB exposure and melanoma, showing an odds ratio (OR) of 6.0 (2.0e18.2) for the highest compared to lowest quartile of PCB distribution. 13 cohort and case-control studies evaluated the association between NHL and PCB concentration in blood or subcutaneous fat, with summary OR 1⁄4 1.5 (1.1e1.7) for the highest vs lowest quantile of PCB distribution. However, two cohort studies on people intoxicated by rice oil containing PCBs found no excess of deaths for skin cancer and inconsistent results for NHL. In conclusion, these findings do not provide a strong evidence that PCB exposure can increase the risk of melanoma and NHL in humans

    Assessing the state of Web-based communication for public health: a systematic review

    No full text
    Background: Communicating strategically is a key issue for health organisations and, over the past decade, healthcare communication via social media and websites has generated a great deal of studies. As for systematic reviews, there is, however, fragmentary evidence on this type of communication. The aim of this research was to summarise the evidence on Web institutional health communication for public health authorities to evaluate aim-specific key points based on existing studies. Methods: Guided by the PRISMA statement, we conducted a comprehensive review across two electronic databases (PubMed and Web of Science) from 2011 until 7 October 2021, searching for studies investigating institutional health communication. Two independent researchers reviewed the articles for inclusion, and assessment of methodological quality was based on the Kmet appraisal checklist. iii334 European Journal of Public Health, Volume 32 Supplement 3, 2022 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/issue/32/Supplement_3 by guest on 27 April 2024 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/issue/32/Supplement_3 by BIBLIOTECA FACOLTA' DI SCIENZE POLITICHE user on 24 October 2024 Results: 78 articles were selected. Most of the studies targeted health promotion/disease prevention (n = 35), followed by crisis communication (n = 24), general health (n = 13), and misinformation correction/health promotion (n = 6). Engagement and message framing were the most analysed aspects. Few studies focused on campaign effectiveness. Only 18 studies had an experimental design. Kmet evaluation was used to distinguish studies presenting a solid structure from lacking studies. In particular, considering the 075-point threshold, out of 74 studies, 28 were excluded (378% of the total). Studies above this threshold were used to identify a series of aim-specific and medium-specific suggestions, as communication strategies employed differ quite greatly. Conclusions: Overall, findings suggest that no single strategy works best in the case of Web-based healthcare communication. The extreme variability of outcomes and the lack of a unitary measure for assessing the end-points of a specific campaign or study leads us to reconsider the tools we use to evaluate the efficacy of Web-based health communication. Key messages: This systematic review provides an overview on Web-based health communication. Results suggest that no single strategy works best and the need to reassess its evaluation tools. Communicating strategically is key for health organisations. This systematic review analyses a corpus of texts, in an effort to summarise and analyse existing, albeit fragmentary, evidence

    Antibiotic resistance: is knowledge the only driver for awareness and appropriate use of antibiotics?

    No full text
    Background: The fight against antibiotic resistance (AR) is nowadays a world priority. Antibiotic resistance is largely associated with the overuse of antibiotics and a lack of awareness of the problem. Considering the large use of antibiotics in the paediatric age, the aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and perception of antibiotic resistance in a sample of parents. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of parents of children aged 0-14. Data on antibiotic use and awareness of antibiotic resistance were collected by a self-administrated questionnaire. The potential predictors of the antibiotic resistance awareness were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 610 parents of which 91% (n=553) used antibiotics for their children. Summarizing the answers related to antibiotic resistance knowledge and perception, 36% of parents gave a correct answers to at least 9 of 12 questions. Fever seemed to represent a reason of anxiety in parents. Using a 10-point scale, the perceived anxiety by parents was measured based on a situation when the child wakes up in the morning with a fever at 38°C and the doctor suggests to wait at least 48 hours before administering the antibiotic. Almost half of parents (49%) indicated a low degree of anxiety (1-4), 31% medium (5-6), and 20% high (7-10). Multivariate analysis showed that a good level of education, healthcare occupation and low grade of anxiety are associated with antibiotic resistance awareness. Conclusions: The awareness of antibiotic resistance is not strong. The study highlights the need to put effort on tailored education programs aimed to improve knowledge of antibiotic resistance and guide mainly anxious parents to appropriate management of disease of their children

    Mobile apps and health promotion: what is the evidence?

    No full text
    The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review in order to find a scientific evidence about the efficacy of apps in health promotion
    corecore