45 research outputs found
Durable Response to Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib for the Treatment of BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma in Routine Clinical Practice
No full textBackground: The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors delays the onset of resistance and provides more sustained and dramatic responses in comparison with a BRAF inhibitor in monotherapy. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination therapy with vemurafenib/cobimetinib in terms of durability, and to describe differential characteristics in patients associated to durable responses in real-world settings.Patients and Methods: Retrospective, observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involving 41 patients with advanced melanoma harboring a BRAF(v600) mutation who initiated a combination therapy with vemurafenib/cobimetinib between May 2018 and March 2019. Participants were differentiated regarding the durability of the response: durable (complete response, CR, or a partial response, PR, for at least 12 months) and non-durable (stable disease, SD, progressive disease, PD, or CR/P
Health-Related Quality of Life with Pembrolizumab in Patients with Locally Advanced or Recurrent or Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: KEYNOTE-629
No full textAdvanced squamous cell carcinoma; Immunotherapy; PembrolizumabCarcinoma de cèl·lules escamoses avançat; Immunoteràpia; PembrolizumabCarcinoma de células escamosas avanzado; Inmunoterapia; PembrolizumabIntroduction
At first interim analysis of KEYNOTE-629, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with pembrolizumab was stable or improved over 48 weeks in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). HRQoL results from the second interim analysis in R/M or locally advanced (LA) cSCC are presented.
Methods
Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for ≤ 2 years. Change in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EQ-5D-5L scores were exploratory end points. Primary analysis was performed at week 12 to ensure adequate completion/compliance. Descriptive analyses were also conducted through weeks 48 and 75 for the LA and R/M cohorts, respectively.
Results
At data cutoff (29 July 2020), mean scores in the LA cohort (n = 47) were stable from baseline to week 12 for EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) (−0.27 points [95% confidence interval (CI) −10.93 to 10.39]), physical functioning (−1.29 points [95% CI −8.77 to 6.19]), and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (2.06 [95% CI −7.70 to 11.82]). HRQoL remained stable through week 48 in the LA cohort; 76.6% and 74.5% of patients had improved or stable GHS/QoL and physical functioning scores, respectively. HRQoL continued to show stability or improvement through week 75 in the R/M cohort (n = 99); 71.7% and 64.6% of patients had improved or stable GHS/QoL and physical functioning scores, respectively.
Conclusions
Pembrolizumab has demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety. The current analysis shows pembrolizumab treatment preserved HRQoL. Collectively, these results support pembrolizumab as standard of care for LA or R/M cSCC.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03284424—September 15, 2017.Funding for this research and the journal’s Rapid Service Fee was provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
Characterization of water and wildlife strains as a subgroup of Campylobacter jejuni using DNA microarrays.
No full textCampylobacter jejuni is the leading cause of human bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide, but source attribution of the organism is difficult. Previously, DNA microarrays were used to investigate isolate source, which suggested a non-livestock source of infection. In this study we analysed the genome content of 162 clinical, livestock and water and wildlife (WW) associated isolates combined with the previous study. Isolates were grouped by genotypes into nine clusters (C1 to C9). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) data demonstrated that livestock associated clonal complexes dominated clusters C1-C6. The majority of WW isolates were present in the C9 cluster. Analysis of previously reported genomic variable regions demonstrated that these regions were linked to specific clusters. Two novel variable regions were identified. A six gene multiplex PCR (mPCR) assay, designed to effectively differentiated strains into clusters, was validated with 30 isolates. A further five WW isolates were tested by mPCR and were assigned to the C7-C9 group of clusters. The predictive mPCR test could be used to indicate if a clinical case has come from domesticated or WW sources. Our findings provide further evidence that WW C. jejuni subtypes show niche adaptation and may be important in causing human infection
Combined immunotherapy in melanoma patients with brain metastases: A multicenter international study
No full textBrain metastases; Combined immunotherapy; Stereotactic radiosurgeryMetàstasis cerebrals; Immunoteràpia combinada; Radiocirurgia estereotàcticaMetástasis cerebrales; Inmunoterapia combinada; Radiocirugía estereotáxicaBackground
Ipilimumab plus nivolumab (COMBO) is the standard treatment in asymptomatic patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). We report a retrospective study aiming to assess the outcome of patients with MBM treated with COMBO outside clinical trials.
Methods
Consecutive patients treated with COMBO have been included. Demographics, steroid treatment, Central Nervous System (CNS)-related symptoms, BRAF status, radiotherapy or surgery, response rate (RR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been analyzed.
Results
376 patients were included: 262 received COMBO as first-line and 114 as a subsequent line of therapy, respectively. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (≥1 vs 0) [HR 1.97 (1.46–2.66)], extracerebral metastases [HR 1.92 (1.09–3.40)], steroid use at the start of COMBO [HR 1.59 (1.08–2.38)], CNS-related symptoms [HR 1.59 (1.08–2.34)], SRS (Stereotactic radiosurgery) [HR 0.63 (0.45–0.88)] and surgery [HR 0.63 (0.43–0.91)] were associated with OS. At a median follow-up of 30 months, the median OS (mOS) in the overall population was 21.3 months (18.1–24.5), whilst OS was not yet reached in treatment-naive patients, steroid-free at baseline. In patients receiving COMBO after BRAF/MEK inhibitors(i) PFS at 1-year was 15.7%. The dose of steroids (dexamethasone < vs ≥ 4 mg/day) was not prognostic. SRS alongside COMBO vs COMBO alone in asymptomatic patients prolonged survival. (p = 0.013). Toxicities were consistent with previous studies. An independent validation cohort (n = 51) confirmed the findings.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate remarkable long-term survival in treatment-naïve, asymptomatic, steroid-free patients, as well as in those receiving SRS plus COMBO. PFS and OS were poor in patients receiving COMBO after progressing to BRAF/MEKi
Phase Ib Study of Immunocytokine Simlukafusp Alfa (FAP-IL2v) Combined with Pembrolizumab for Treatment of Advanced and/or Metastatic Melanoma
No full textImmunocitocina simlukafusp alfa; Pembrolizumab; Melanoma avançatInmunocitocina simlukafusp alfa; Pembrolizumab; Melanoma avanzadoImmunocytokine simlukafusp alfa; Pembrolizumab; Advanced melanomaPurpose:
This study explored the combination of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) IL2 variant (FAP-IL2v), a novel immune-cytokine, with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and/or metastatic melanoma.
Patients and Methods:
This open-label, multicenter, phase Ib clinical study (NCT03875079) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of FAP-IL2v (simlukafusp alfa, RO6874281) in combination with pembrolizumab. Patients with advanced and/or metastatic melanoma were either checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-naïve or CPI-experienced. Patients received 10 mg FAP-IL2v either continuously once every 3 weeks (Q3W) or in an induction/maintenance setting consisting of a 3-week induction phase with weekly (QW) dosing followed by continuous Q3W dosing. Pembrolizumab was dosed Q3W at 200 mg.
Results:
Eighty-three patients were treated: 16 patients in two safety run-in cohorts and 67 patients in two extension cohorts; 75 (90.4%) patients were CPI-experienced. The pharmacokinetics of FAP-IL2v in combination with pembrolizumab was similar to that after administration as monotherapy. Consistent with the proposed mode of action, FAP-IL2v preferentially expanded NK and CD8 T cells. The most common FAP-IL2v–related grade 3/4 adverse events were lymphopenia (23%), elevated γ-glutamyltransferase (8%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (6%), and infusion-related reaction (6%). A response was observed in 5 of 75 (6.7%) CPI-experienced patients (all partial responses) and 2 of 8 CPI-naïve patients (one complete response and one partial response). The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months.
Conclusions:
The safety profile of FAP-IL2v in combination with pembrolizumab was manageable and consistent with the known safety profile. However, further exploration of FAP-IL2v and pembrolizumab was precluded in patients with melanoma with prior CPI due to the lack of clinical activity.
Significance:
In this phase Ib study, the combination of FAP-IL2v, an immune-cytokine developed to overcome the limitations of wild-type IL2, with the CPI pembrolizumab did not show meaningful antitumor activity in patients who had progressed on prior CPI therapy, suggesting that FAP-IL2v alone cannot overcome CPI resistance or unresponsiveness.This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
Neoadjuvant PD-1 and LAG-3-targeting bispecific antibody and other immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in resectable melanoma: the randomized phase 1b/2 Morpheus-Melanoma trial
No full textBispecific antibody; Immune checkpoint inhibitor; Resectable melanomaAnticossos biespecífics; Inhibidors de punts de control immunitari; Melanoma resecableAnticuerpos biespecíficos; iInhibidores de puntos de control inmunitario; Melanoma resecablePatients with stage III melanoma are at high risk of relapse. The NADINA trial evaluating neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab and the SWOG-1801 trial evaluating neoadjuvant pembrolizumab have demonstrated superior clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant checkpoint inhibition. Morpheus-Melanoma was a phase 1b/2, randomized umbrella trial evaluating tobemstomig (anti-PD-1/anti-LAG-3 bispecific antibody; n = 40), tobemstomig plus tiragolumab (anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody; n = 20) and atezolizumab (PD-L1-targeting monoclonal antibody) plus tiragolumab (n = 20) versus nivolumab (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody; n = 22) in stage III melanoma. The primary endpoint was pathological response by independent pathological review. Additional endpoints included safety and exploratory biomarkers. Here tobemstomig showed a similar pathological response rate (pRR) versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab (80.0% (32/40) versus 77.3% (17/22)); major pathological responses were less frequent with tobemstomig versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment (62.5% (25/40) versus 72.7% (16/22)). Tobemstomig plus tiragolumab and atezolizumab plus tiragolumab showed a lower pRR versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab (60.0% (12/20) and 45.0% (9/20) versus 77.3% (17/22), respectively). Tobemstomig demonstrated improved safety versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with 2.5% (1/40) and 22.7% (5/22) of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), respectively, and 0% (0/40) and 13.6% (3/22) of patients discontinuing treatment due to TRAEs, respectively. Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were reported by 15% (3/20) of patients in the tobemstomig plus tiragolumab arm and by no patients in the atezolizumab plus tiragolumab arm. Baseline CD8+ and CD3+ tumor-infiltrating T cell density, IFNγ pathway and effector T cell gene expression, tumor mutational burden and pre-surgery circulating tumor DNA correlated with pathological response across treatments. In conclusion, in the Morpheus-Melanoma study, tobemstomig demonstrated a similar pathological response and improved safety profile versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with resectable stage III melanoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05116202
Combined immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab with and without sequential or concomitant stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with melanoma brain metastasis: An international retrospective study
No full textComboimmunotherapy; Concomitant radiotherapy; Melanoma brain metastasesInmunoterapia combinada; Radioterapia concomitante; Metástasis cerebrales de melanomaImmunoteràpia combinada; Radioteràpia concomitant; Metàstasis cerebrals de melanomaBackground: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab (COMBO) is the standard treatment in patients with asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM). We report a retrospective study aiming to assess the outcome of patients with MBM treated with COMBO with or without sequential/concomitant stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).
Methods: MBM patients treated with COMBO with or without SRT have been retrieved: demographics, steroid treatment, Central Nervous System [CNS]-related symptoms, BRAF status, radiotherapy (yes/no and timing) or surgery, number of MBM, maximum diameter of metastasis, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been analyzed.
Results: 453 patients were included: 190 received COMBO alone, 107 received COMBO and concomitant SRT, 156 COMBO and sequential SRT, respectively. At multivariable analysis the line of treatment [> 1st vs 1st: HR 2.60 (1.93-3.50)], sequential SRT vs no radiotherapy [HR 0.45 (0.32-0.64)], concomitant SRT vs no radiotherapy [HR 0.48 (0.33-0.69)], steroids [HR 1.56 (1.17-2.08)], age [HR 1.01 (1.00-1.02)] and number of MBM [≥ 3 vs 1 HR 1.55 (1.11-2.17)), 2 vs 1 HR 1.53 (1.02-2.31)] at baseline were associated with OS. There was no significant difference between patients who received concomitant vs sequential SRT. At a median follow-up of 29 months, the median-OS in the overall population was 17.8 months while in those who received SRT was 27.3 (15.3-39.4) for patients receiving sequential radiotherapy and 22.2 (12.7-31.7) for those receiving radiotherapy concomitantly to COMBO. The incidence of radionecrosis was 10.3 %. Toxicities were consistent with previous studies.
Conclusions: Our results suggest a better OS in patients who receive SRT plus COMBO, regardless of timing of SRT. Prospective studies are needed to validate our findings
Combined immunotherapy in melanoma patients with brain metastases: A multicenter international study
No full textBackground: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab (COMBO) is the standard treatment in asymptomatic patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). We report a retrospective study aiming to assess the outcome of patients with MBM treated with COMBO outside clinical trials. Methods: Consecutive patients treated with COMBO have been included. Demographics, steroid treatment, Central Nervous System (CNS)-related symptoms, BRAF status, radiotherapy or surgery, response rate (RR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been analyzed. Results: 376 patients were included: 262 received COMBO as first-line and 114 as a subsequent line of therapy, respectively. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (≥1 vs 0) [HR 1.97 (1.46–2.66)], extracerebral metastases [HR 1.92 (1.09–3.40)], steroid use at the start of COMBO [HR 1.59 (1.08–2.38)], CNS-related symptoms [HR 1.59 (1.08–2.34)], SRS (Stereotactic radiosurgery) [HR 0.63 (0.45–0.88)] and surgery [HR 0.63 (0.43–0.91)] were associated with OS. At a median follow-up of 30 months, the median OS (mOS) in the overall population was 21.3 months (18.1–24.5), whilst OS was not yet reached in treatment-naive patients, steroid-free at baseline. In patients receiving COMBO after BRAF/MEK inhibitors(i) PFS at 1-year was 15.7%. The dose of steroids (dexamethasone < vs ≥ 4 mg/day) was not prognostic. SRS alongside COMBO vs COMBO alone in asymptomatic patients prolonged survival. (p = 0.013). Toxicities were consistent with previous studies. An independent validation cohort (n = 51) confirmed the findings. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate remarkable long-term survival in treatment-naïve, asymptomatic, steroid-free patients, as well as in those receiving SRS plus COMBO. PFS and OS were poor in patients receiving COMBO after progressing to BRAF/MEKi
Combined immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab with and without sequential or concomitant stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with melanoma brain metastasis: An international retrospective study
No full textBackground: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab (COMBO) is the standard treatment in patients with asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM). We report a retrospective study aiming to assess the outcome of patients with MBM treated with COMBO with or without sequential/concomitant stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Methods: MBM patients treated with COMBO with or without SRT have been retrieved: demographics, steroid treatment, Central Nervous System [CNS]-related symptoms, BRAF status, radiotherapy (yes/no and timing) or surgery, number of MBM, maximum diameter of metastasis, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been analyzed. Results: 453 patients were included: 190 received COMBO alone, 107 received COMBO and concomitant SRT, 156 COMBO and sequential SRT, respectively. At multivariable analysis the line of treatment [> 1st vs 1st: HR 2.60 (1.93–3.50)], sequential SRT vs no radiotherapy [HR 0.45 (0.32–0.64)], concomitant SRT vs no radiotherapy [HR 0.48 (0.33–0.69)], steroids [HR 1.56 (1.17–2.08)], age [HR 1.01 (1.00–1.02)] and number of MBM [≥ 3 vs 1 HR 1.55 (1.11–2.17)), 2 vs 1 HR 1.53 (1.02–2.31)] at baseline were associated with OS. There was no significant difference between patients who received concomitant vs sequential SRT. At a median follow-up of 29 months, the median-OS in the overall population was 17.8 months while in those who received SRT was 27.3 (15.3–39.4) for patients receiving sequential radiotherapy and 22.2 (12.7–31.7) for those receiving radiotherapy concomitantly to COMBO. The incidence of radionecrosis was 10.3 %. Toxicities were consistent with previous studies. Conclusions: Our results suggest a better OS in patients who receive SRT plus COMBO, regardless of timing of SRT. Prospective studies are needed to validate our findings
Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in challenging subgroups with advanced melanoma who progressed on or after ipilimumab treatment: A single-arm, open-label, phase II study (CheckMate 172)
No full textBACKGROUND Limited data are available on nivolumab in challenging subgroups with advanced melanoma. We report outcomes of nivolumab after prior ipilimumab in patients who are typically excluded from clinical trials.
PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicentre study (CheckMate 172), patients with advanced melanoma who progressed on or after ipilimumab received nivolumab 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks for up to 2 years. The primary objective was incidence of grade ≥3, treatment-related select adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS At a minimum follow-up of 18 months, grade ≥3 treatment-related select AEs with the most variation across subgroups were diarrhoea and colitis (1.1% [n = 11] and 0.3% [n = 3] for the total population [n = 1008]; 0.6% [n = 1] and 0.6% [n = 1] for patients with an asymptomatic central nervous system [CNS] metastasis [n = 165; 16.4%]; 4.5% [n = 3] and 3.0% [n = 2] for patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS] of 2 [n = 66; 6.5%]; 2.4% [n = 2] and 0% for those who experienced a grade 3/4 immune-related AE [irAE] with prior ipilimumab [n = 84; 8.3%]; and 0% and 0% for autoimmune disease [n = 25; 2.5%], respectively). Median overall survival was 21.4 months in the total population and was 11.6, 2.4, 21.5, and 18.6 months in patients with a CNS metastasis, ECOG PS 2, a grade 3/4 irAE with prior ipilimumab, and autoimmune disease, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS In this large, phase II clinical trial of patients with advanced melanoma who progressed on or after ipilimumab, nivolumab demonstrated a safety profile consistent with that of prior clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02156804
