1,721,116 research outputs found

    I’m Afloat, I’m Afloat

    Full text link
    80.7568.549 – “I’m Afloat, I’m Afloat”: Russell, Henry: Cook, Eliza: Minstrel, Ballad, Sea Song: n.d.: Solo Voice

    Letter from Oblinger, Uriah W. to Cook, John; Cook, Eliza

    No full text
    Letter from Oblinger, Uriah W. (Uriah Wesley), 1842-1901 to Cook, John; Cook, Eliza (Eliza Oblinger

    Letter from Cook, Eliza to Oblinger, Uriah W.

    No full text
    Letter from Cook, Eliza (Eliza Oblinger) to Oblinger, Uriah W. (Uriah Wesley), 1842-190

    Letter from Cook, Eliza to Oblinger, Mattie V.

    No full text
    Letter from Cook, Eliza (Eliza Oblinger) to Oblinger, Mattie V. (Martha Virginia Thomas), 1844-188

    Nur-i-Afshan V.06 no.07 February 1902

    No full text
    Contents: Editorial notes - Living witnesses - Current thought and incident : who was Jesus Christ? - No [Poetry] by Cook, Eliza, 1818-1889 - Telegrams [Letter] This volume of Nur-i-Afshan published weekly on Fridays from Ludhiana

    [The] Indian Hunter

    Full text link
    80.7568.564 – “[The] Indian Hunter”: Russell, Henry: Cook, Eliza: Peter & Field: Cincinnati: Minstrel: ca 1848: Solo Voice

    Love On

    Full text link
    80.7568.718 – “Love On”: Blockley, John: Cook, Eliza: Geo. P. Reed: Boston: Minstrel, Ballad, Love Song: n.d.: Solo Voice

    Cook, Eliza

    No full text
    A carte-de-visite card of Eliza Cook, 1818-1889, English author and poet.https://digitalcommons.lmunet.edu/allmcdv/1112/thumbnail.jp

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore