1,722,449 research outputs found

    COMMUNIA Final Report

    No full text
    This document incorporates the results of several months of discussions among COMMUNIA members. The main author and the project coordinator wish to thank everyone who contributed, and particularly Lucie Guibault, Paul Keller, Séverine Dusollier and Patrick Peiffer whose comments and analyzes have greatly enhanced this text. eContentplus This project is funded under the eContentplus programme, 1 a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable

    COMMUNIA Final Report

    No full text
    This document incorporates the results of several months of discussions among COMMUNIA members. The main author and the project coordinator wish to thank everyone who contributed, and particularly Lucie Guibault, Paul Keller, Séverine Dusollier and Patrick Peiffer whose comments and analyzes have greatly enhanced this text. eContentplus This project is funded under the eContentplus programme, 1 a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable

    Proprie communia dicere

    No full text
    L’articolo tratta di Hor. ars 128 difficile est proprie communia dicere. Dopo aver discusso l’organizzazione tripartita delle varie interpretazioni offerta da Brink nel suo commento del 1971, l’autore riflette in particolare sul terzo gruppo e sul suo legame con Arist. Po. 9. Nonostante l’indicazione della coppia aristotelica καθόλου / καθ᾽ἕκαστον quale base della formulazione proprie communia (Brink 1971, 204-207), l’autore considera più adeguata al contesto oraziano la coppia ellenistica κοινόν / ἴδιον, quale possiamo trovare in due frammenti filodemei già esaminati da molti studiosi nell’interpretazione di ars 128. Nel proporre una nuova analisi dei due frammenti, l’autore riconosce i tratti di una teoria (non necessariamente filodemea) dell’elaborazione di un argomento poetico, tradizionale o nuovo che sia. Questa teoria risulta assai simile a quanto Aristotele illustra sul medesimo tema in Po. 17, dove l’uso del termine καθόλου sembra più strettamente collegato al significato filodemeo di κοινόν, e corrisponde in maniera più plausibile all’oraziano communia. The article deals with Hor. ars 128 difficile est proprie communia dicere: after discussing the threefold setting of its several understandings provided by Brink in 1971, the author particularly dwells upon the third group and its link with Arist. Po. 9. Despite the indication of the Aristotelian pair καθόλου / καθ᾽ἕκαστον as the background to Horace’s wording proprie communia (Brink 1971, 204-207), the author regards as better fitting the Horatian context the hellenistic pair κοινόν / ἴδιον, as we can find it in two Philodemean fragments already examined by scholars in interpreting ars 128. In proposing a new analysis of the two fragments, the author singles out the elements of a (not necessarily Philodemean) theory about the working out of a poetic subject, either traditional or new. This theory turns out to be strictly similar to Aristotle’s exposition about the same topic in Po. 17: here, the use of the term καθόλου seems to be more closely inherent to the Philodemean meaning of κοινόν, and more convincingly fits the Horatian communia

    Are there more versions of the Communia Naturalium ? Soundings of the Manuscript Tradition

    No full text
    Il contributo è basato su di un esame della tradizione manoscritta dell'opera Communia naturalium di Ruggero Bacone. La tesi sostenuta è che l'opera sia stata tramandata in almeno due version

    Les <i>Communia super Priscianum minorem</i>

    No full text
    Summary The teaching of syntax in the 13th-century university was based on the last two books of Priscian of Caesarea’s Institutiones Grammaticae (c.500 A.D.). Following the order proposed by Priscian, the medieval grammarian first studies orthography, which deals with the constituent parts of the word (dictio), then etymology, which is concerned with the word in itself (simpliciter) and its grammatical accidents, and finally diasynthetic or syntax, which discusses the construction of words as constituents of a sentence (oratio). Each of these particular sciences (orthography, etymology and diasynthetic) has its own particular subject, which is, as some philosophers believe, predicated of the subject of the general science according to the aim it purports to achieve. Written probably in the first half of the 1250s in an academic philosophical environment, the Communia super Priscianum minorem, a subsection and the culmination of the Communia super totam gramaticam, are interesting, among other things, in that they specify the epistemological relation that links syntax to the science of grammar in general. In a polemical effort to dismiss the sentence (oratio) as the subject of diasynthetic, the unknown author of the Communia opens the section of syntax with a discussion which aims to establish the “word in relation with another according to their accidental compatibility or incompatibility” as the real subject of syntax, doing so in a typically Aristotelian way.</jats:p

    COMMUNIA Final Report on the Digital Public Domain

    No full text
    The Report is the outcome of the work of the EU funded COMMUNIA Network on the Digital Public Domain. The Report was undertaken to (i) review the activities of COMMUNIA; (ii) investigate the state of the digital public domain in Europe; and (iii) recommend policy strategies for enhancing a healthy public domain and making digital content in Europe more accessible and usable. The COMMUNIA Report website can be found here: http://communia-project.eu/final-report.sponsorship: The European Union: eContentplus framework project ECP-2006-PSI-610001status: Publishe
    corecore