1,720,995 research outputs found
Adenocarcinoma of the duodenojejunal flexure. A report of 2 clinical cases and a review of the literature [L'adenocarcinoma della giunzione duodeno-digiunale. Presentazione di due casi clinici e revisione della letteratura.]
No full text
Mesh repair of inguinal and femoral hernia [Chirurgia protesica delle ernie inguinali e crurali.]
No full textAbstract
The authors describe a 6-year experience with mesh repair of inguinal and femoral hernia in a surgical teaching department. Two hundred and ninety-seven hernioplasties were performed in 256 consecutive patients: 237 Trabucco sutureless and 11 Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasties for inguinal hernia; 21 tension-free hernioplasties for femoral hernia; 20 Wantz GPRVS and 8 Rutkow tension-free hernioplaties for recurrences. Local anaesthesia was used in 59% of cases. Seventy-two patients (28.1%) refused this type of anaesthesia. The hospital stay was two days in all cases. The local postoperative morbidity rate was 8.7% (wound infections: 1.0%; neuralgia: 1.3%; haematomas: 2.0%; seromas: 2.3%; no testicular atrophies). The recurrence rate was 1.9% in the group of patients undergoing surgery from 1994 to 1997 (103 herniorrhaphies; follow-up: 3-6 years) and 0% in the group of patients operated on after 1997 (170 herniorrhaphies; follow-up: 2 years-6 months). The results confirm that the use of a prosthetic mesh (patch and plug) is the treatment of choice for hernia repair. Moreover, this experience in a surgical teaching department shows that these procedures can be safely and effectively performed by all surgeon
[Multicenter prospective study of informed consent in general surgery].
No full textTo understand the level of acceptance, awareness and usefulness of informed consent, a group of 119 patients (59 men and 60 women) from different types of hospitals were given a questionnaire which required only 'YES or NO' answers, both before and after surgery. The questionnaire concerned the patient's knowledge about pathology, operative risks, approval, anxiety caused, understanding of information received and consent given, and also if he would inform a relative in the same condition. From the analysis of the results it was established that: the more information a patient has about his illness and operation risks, the more he will want to have; the less he knows the less he will want to know, and he will also have more faith in the doctors. Some patients would not inform a relative with a similar pathology. To conclude, informed consent, instead of being a right of the patient is progressively becoming more a right of the doctor. It does not have any real effect on the patient's choice but is useful, as it represents a moment of personalised attention from medical personnel, though the patient may not completely understand the information received. There are few advantages in strictly medical terms but informed consent has increased malpractice litigation
- …
