25,123 research outputs found
The political role of the people's liberation army 1949-1973
Get PDFThis thesis is to study the political role of the People's Liberation Army from the approach of structure and function. The framework of the thesis consists of three major parts, first, the influence of Chinese traditional political culture on, and the formation of, the political role of the PL A; second, the influence of domestic political struggles and external military conflicts on the development of the political role of the PLA; and the third, the analysis of the transition of the PLA's political role from the structure and personnel arrangements of the CCPCC Within the above-mentioned three scopes, this thesis make a thorough discussion on the following: (1) The relationship between the structure of the PRC and the formation of the PLA's political role; (2) How has ideology influenced the army's political role; (3) What is Mao's viewpoint and his influence on the development of the army's political role; (4) What is the link between the army and the party, and how has this developed; (6) What accounts for the expansion of the PLA's political functions; (7) What is the influence of political factional struggles on the PLA's political role; (8) Is it political institution or military institution that controls the recruitment of the military elite; (9) What are the disparities between the military elite in handling international conflicts and what are their political considerations; (10) What is the Party's position in the army; (11) How have the Party’s important meetings and personnel arrangements influenced the rise and fall of the PLA's political role
Letter from Frank Chin
No full textA letter from Frank Chin arguing that their should be a day name after Japanese American activist James Omura, and describing the kind of celebration that should take place in his honor. The day Chin proposes in November 27th, Omura's birthday.These materials are from box 73 and 74 of the Frank Chin Papers. The Frank Chin Papers contain personal and professional correspondence between Frank Chin and Michi Weglyn relating to particular projects on which either author was working as well as files related to the Day of Remembrance Tribute to Michi Weglyn
Letter from [Frank] Chin to Paul [Tsuneishi], December 23, 1997
No full textA letter to Paul [Tsuneishi] from [Frank] Chin about planning the speakers and the media outreach for "Michi Day," the event to celebrate author Michi Weglyn and her book "Years of Infamy."These materials are from box 73 and 74 of the Frank Chin Papers. The Frank Chin Papers contain personal and professional correspondence between Frank Chin and Michi Weglyn relating to particular projects on which either author was working as well as files related to the Day of Remembrance Tribute to Michi Weglyn
Letter from [Frank] Chin to David
No full textA letter from [Frank] Chin to David about buying space for a classified ad in the New York Times Sunday Book Review, that will mention the tribute to Michi Weglyn in February of 1998. The purpose of the ad is to solicit "photos and artifacts depicting the different phases of Michi's life." Chin writes that the materials will be used in"Yosh Kurimoya's Michi Show" at the event.These materials are from box 73 and 74 of the Frank Chin Papers. The Frank Chin Papers contain personal and professional correspondence between Frank Chin and Michi Weglyn relating to particular projects on which either author was working as well as files related to the Day of Remembrance Tribute to Michi Weglyn
Letter from Frank Chin to Dale [Minami], December 7, 1997
No full textA letter from Frank Chin to Dale [Minami] thanking him for sending a VHS clip for "Michi Day." Chin devotes the bulk of the letter to a proposal for creating a bell, that would be made of pieces of metal from incarceration camps, to celebrate Japanese American redress.These materials are from box 73 and 74 of the Frank Chin Papers. The Frank Chin Papers contain personal and professional correspondence between Frank Chin and Michi Weglyn relating to particular projects on which either author was working as well as files related to the Day of Remembrance Tribute to Michi Weglyn
Letter from [Frank Chin] to Momo and Lawson, January 21, 1998
No full textA letter to Momo and Lawson, possibly from Frank Chin, about a performance of the story Kaguya Hime, princess of the moon in Japanese folklore. The purpose of the performance is to drum up interest for the children's storytelling event that would be part of the tribute to Michi Weglyn on February 21, 1998.These materials are from box 73 and 74 of the Frank Chin Papers. The Frank Chin Papers contain personal and professional correspondence between Frank Chin and Michi Weglyn relating to particular projects on which either author was working as well as files related to the Day of Remembrance Tribute to Michi Weglyn
Letter from Michi Weglyn to Frank Chin
No full textA letter from Michi Weglyn to Frank Chin about another letter written by Lilian Baker, a conservative author who denied that Japanese American incarceration had taken place during World War II.These materials are from box 73 and 74 of the Frank Chin Papers. The Frank Chin Papers contain personal and professional correspondence between Frank Chin and Michi Weglyn relating to particular projects on which either author was working as well as files related to the Day of Remembrance Tribute to Michi Weglyn
Rethinking Import-substituting Industrialization: Development Strategies and Institutions in Taiwan and China
Get PDFimport-substituting industrialization, export-oriented industrialization, development strategies, institutions
On the Wei Chin Sheng Liu Hua Tsan by Ku K'ai-chih
Get PDFThe Biography of Ku K'ai-chih, contained in the fifth volume of the Li Tai Ming Hua Chi (Notes on Famous Artists of Respective Periods), states that he wrote the Wei Chin Ming Ch'ên Hua Tsan (Eulogies on Portraits of Eminent Persons of the Wei and Chin Dynasties) in which he discussed on the subject in great details, and that he also wrote the Lun Hua (Discussions on Painting) to explain how to copy old masterpieces; this Biography ends with a paragraph beginning with an introductory sentence: “K’ai-chih, in his Wei Chin Shêng Liu Hua Tsan, said as follows.” (Ming Ch'ên and Shêng Liu are the same in meaning.)
The Lun Hua and the Wei Chin Shêng Liu Hua Tsan mentioned here seem confused in appearance, for the former lists and criticizes ancient paintings while the latter discribes about the attitude of mind, the materials and the techniques required in copying old works. An attempt was therefore made to interchange
settle the apparent contradiction between their titles and their contents (KIMBARA, Shōgo: “Studies on Art Criticism in Ancient China). However, the Wei Ching Shêng Liu Hua Tsan by Ku K'ai-chih existed separately, and was different from what was quoted in the Li Tai Ming Hua Chi. Portions of this Hua Tsan are found quoted in annotations on the Shih Shuo Hsin Yü (a collection of Chinese annecdotes) and in annotations by Li Shan on the Wên Hsuan (a collection of old Chinese writings). Judged from these scattered segments, the original form of the Hua Tsan by Ku K'ai-chih appears to have been modelled after the Hua Tsan written by Ts'ao Chih in the Wei Dynasty: that is to say, it probably was a versified writing consisting of four-character lines preceded by an introductory paragraph. This is the real Wei Chin Shêng Liu Hua Tsan, or the Wei Chin Ming Chên Hua Tsan “in which he discussed in great details” according to the Li Tai Ming Hua Chi.
The discussions in the Wei Chin Shêng Liu Hua Tsan are not on the characteristics and value of the paintings as works of art, but are on the personalities of the figure subjects depicted therein. They are notes, not on the paintings themselves but on their subject matters. This was the case even with Ku K'aichih, who was an artist and art critic of a very creative mind. This fact may be understood to represent an aspect of the characteristic Chinese term of view on art.
The portion entitled Wei Chin Shêng Liu Hua Tsan in the Li Tai Ming Hua Chih is nothing but a part of the Lun Hua. It explains the mental and material preparations necessary in copying old paintings, while the portion entitled Lun Hua comments on the styles of old masters in order to tell what are important in copying their works. The two are parts of the same writing, Lun Hua, giving instructions for copyists. The present writer is inclined to think that a careless editor in a later period gave the title Wei Chin Shêng Liu Hua Tsan to the second half of what had been recorded as Lun Hua in the Li Tai Ming Hua Chi, simply because a mention of the Hua Tsan is found in a previous paragraph of the Biography.journal articl
Letter from Michi Weglyn to Frank Chin
No full textA letter from Michi Weglyn to Frank Chin in which she mentions an essay of his she read.These materials are from box 73 and 74 of the Frank Chin Papers. The Frank Chin Papers contain personal and professional correspondence between Frank Chin and Michi Weglyn relating to particular projects on which either author was working as well as files related to the Day of Remembrance Tribute to Michi Weglyn
- …
