3 research outputs found
沈德潛《古詩源》研究
No full text[[abstract]]論文摘要
本論文主要是以沈德潛所編選的《古詩源》為研究範圍，針對沈德潛欲「探本溯源，提倡詩教」的詩觀作具體而實際的驗證，進而理解沈德潛詩歌理論的內涵及「溫柔敦厚詩教觀」深刻的意義及對現今詩歌教學上啟發。
第一章說明研究動機、範圍和方法，沈氏編選漢魏六朝選集，序中就說「既以編詩，亦以論世」，同樣的，我們要瞭解沈氏編選《古詩源》，亦要從其時代背景及生平先有基本的認識，才能進而知其為人，明其詩論，所以第二章，我們先就沈德潛所處的時代背景、政治環境及他詩論形成的淵源作一說明，並將重心置於沈德潛對其師葉燮在詩歌理論上的繼承與發展，葉燮的詩歌理論對沈德潛評選古詩有重要的影響，所以我們分從一、詩歌發展源流、正變之觀念；二、溫柔敦厚的詩教原則；三、詩人創作的主觀條件和四、詩法概述這四部分加以論述，一方面說明葉燮詩論，另一方面也指出沈氏的繼承與發展，以了解沈氏詩論之基本內涵。
第三章則從本選集形式上作析論，運用歸納、分析的方法，就選集外在的形式作具體的分析。首先探究沈氏編選本詩歌選集的動機，從序中歸納出沈氏編選《古詩源》的動機。沈氏有鑑於明代七子以來復古模擬之風興起，一方面乃?矯正七子詩論所產生的流弊，另一方面詩歌自漢魏以下漸失風雅遺緒，沈氏為正詩風，溯詩源，於是從編選古詩中提倡詩教；再者，沈氏對唐以前詩歌之評論，大抵是歸納、引申，甚至在原有的基礎上再加以發揮，然因前人選本所側重的方向不同，沈氏對古詩範圍的界定與王士禛選本的界定不同，在體裁及時代上亦有所差異，所以沈氏欲以其詩歌理論為基礎對古詩進行裁選和批評的工作，因此而有此詩歌選集之產生。第二節即就《古詩源》在實際編選過程中，沈氏如何選、編、評、論，在此過程中沈氏標準為何？呈現出什麼特色？尤其在評與論上，沈氏有哪些是對前人的繼承？是否對前人之論提出不同的看法等等，則是我們所關心的重點。
第四章內容分析的部分，沈氏在選集前的例言，十分清楚而明確的指出各代詩歌的特色及其代表詩人，我們就從他的評論中，去歸納出他對古詩主題的選取傾向和對詩歌內容具體的評論上，去觀察並驗證沈氏的詩歌理論，進一步歸納出他的詩教觀、詩史觀和創作觀。
最後，第五章結論部分，我們綜合前面形式及內容具體的分析後，提出沈氏這些批評理論和價值觀對於當時的學者和近代讀者在古詩在鑑賞和創作上，有哪些影響和啟發？這將有助於我們思考未來如何開創出適於現代的古典詩歌審美、批評和鑑賞的理論，同時在今日古典詩歌教學方面可供我們做有系統的參考教材。
[[alternative]]Research on the kindergarten student teacher's perceived probelms and solutions in student teaching: Field experience of a preservice teacher
No full text[[abstract]]The purpose of this qualitative case study was to examine the problemsa kindergarten student teacher perceived during student teaching and how shedealt with these problems. This inquiry was based on observations of studentteaching, interviews with student teacher and two cooperating teachers, andstudent teacher diary. Analysis of data indicated the following findings.First, five groups of perceived problems included (a) communications andrelations between partner and cooperating teachers,(b)role definition,(c) lackof professional knowledgeand skills, (d) limitations in the practice setting,and (e) student teaching program issues. Second, four solutions the preserviceteacher adopted when experiencing problematic situations were (a)introspectingherself, (b) compromising, (c)trying to change, (d) asking for helps.
[[alternative]]A Study on the Self-evaluation for Vocational High School in Taipei City
No full text[[abstract]]The purpose of this study is to investigate the self-evaluation on school administration by senior vocational schools in Taipei City, including educators’ recognition of the purposes of self-evaluation, implementation of self-evaluation on school administration, the obstacles in the process of self-evaluation, and related suggestions. The suggestions for improvements were provided as a guideline to school and education administration bureaus.
The research method adopted in this study included investigation research to collect data. The subjects were educators from 18 senior vocational schools and 10 high school affiliated vocational schools in Taipei City. A total of 588 questionnaires were sent, 422 were return; the valid return rate was 71.77%. SPSS 11.0 for Windows was used for data analysis. The results were as follows:
1. In terms of recognition of self-evaluation on school administration, school educators showed considerable degree of recognition.
2. In terms of the implementation of self-evaluation on school administration:
1) Most schools of various types and characteristics completed the promotion and preparation on self-evaluation.
2) Most schools of various types and characteristics completed the self-evaluation process.
3) Most schools of various types and characteristics completed the usage and application of self-evaluation process results.
3. In terms of the obstacles in the process of self-evaluation and related suggestions:
1) In terms of the obstacles, school educators believed that the amount of obstacles was low but specific incentive on self-evaluation was highly needed.
2) In terms of the improvement suggestions, 8 items were recognized by over 78.0% subjects on improvement, and proved those to be the improvements urgent to status quo.
