167,021 research outputs found
A Tripartite Post-Recession Rebalancing
No full textIn this latest Advance & Rutgers Report, entitled “A Tripartite Post-Recession Rebalancing,” Dean James W. Hughes and Professor Joseph J. Seneca deliver an incisive assessment of the current market conditions and obstacles in the path of our economic recovery. They offer a statistical cautionary tale that the private and public sector need to hear and acknowledge in order for the economy to make continued progress.This report was published as Issue Paper Number 7, November 2011, in Advance & Rutgers Report
The Receding Metropolitan Perimeter: A New Postsuburban Demographic Normal
No full textThe report traces population changes for two time periods: 1950 to 1980, reflecting the nation’s unprecedented postwar suburbanization, and 2010 to 2013, for the recovery period to date from aftershocks of the Great 2007-2009 Recession. The decades between the two time periods analyzed – the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s – are also examined for the influence of overall regional growth, age-structure variations and immigration levels on population change.
Twenty-seven of the suburban-ring counties in the four states witnessed explosive growth in the 30-year period from 1950 to 1980, gaining more than 5.3 million residents, and nearly doubling their population. By contrast, the regional core of eight urban counties in New York and New Jersey contracted sharply during the same period, losing nearly a million people.
Then, during the 2010–2013 period, the trend reversed: the regional core grew at a rate more than double that of the suburban ring, adding 85,284 persons per year. The regional core accounted for most of the total population growth, a phenomenon unparalleled since World War II. All of the suburban counties with population losses were on the metropolitan outer ring with the exception of Monmouth County, which suffered impacts from Superstorm Sandy.
The authors insistently caution that this shift in population growth is not necessarily a long-term change since the latest time period is so limited. However, the data suggest a change of the crest of the wave nature indicating that the multidecade pattern of further growth on the perimeter of the region out has shifted.
The report also discusses the influence of young adults’ locational preferences for urban lifestyle and workplace choices post-2000 as one contributing factor to these shifting population patterns
Solar Power in the Garden State
No full textThis special issue on energy and solar power in New Jersey was made possible because of the extensive portfolio of research centers and institutes at the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy. Dr. Frank A. Felder, an Associate Research Professor, has been director of the School’s Center for Energy, Economic & Environmental Policy (CEEEP) since 2006. Frank is a nuclear engineer with a PhD degree from MIT, and he, along with his CEEEP colleague, Shankar N. Chandramowli, coauthored the main article in this issue of the Advance & Rutgers Report. CEEEP has worked extensively with the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities on projects, including New Jersey’s current Energy Master Plan.Shining Brightly: Bloustein's Centers of Excellence / by James W. Hughes and Joseph S. Seneca -- Solar Power in the Garden States / by Shankar N. Chandramowli and Frank A. Felder.Guest contributors include Shankar N. Chandramowli and Frank A. Felder, PhD, Director—Center for Energy, Economic and Environmental Policy at the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public PolicyReports published as Issue Paper Number 5, May 2011, in Advance & Rutgers Report, Special Issue
Author Correction: Establishment and equilibrium levels of deleterious mutations in large populations (Scientific Reports, (2019), 9, 1, (10384), 10.1038/s41598-019-46803-7)
No full textThe original version of this Article contained errors. Affiliations 1 and 2 were reversed. Secondly, Affiliation 7 was incorrectly given as ‘Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Department of Immunology, and SAMRC Extramural Unit for Stem Cell Research and Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0084, South Africa’. Thirdly, an affiliation was omitted for the author Michael S. Pepper, which is now listed as Affiliation 8. Fourthly, Affiliation 1 was omitted for the author Johan W. Viljoen. Finally, Augustinus J. van Zyl was incorrectly affiliated with ‘Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS ‘Burlo Garofolo’, Trieste, Italy.’ The correct author affiliations are listed below: Affiliation 1: Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, EBIT, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa Johan W. Viljoen and J. Pieter de Villiers Affiliation 2: Development, Research and Technology Department, Hensoldt Optronics, Centu..
Sebastes ensifer Chen 1971
No full textSebastes ensifer Chen, 1971. Swordspine Rockfish. To 30.5 cm (12 in) TL (Miller and Lea 1972). Oregon (43°56’N) (NWFSC-FRAM) to Banco Ranger (28°25’N, 115°32’W), central Baja California (Chen 1971). Benthic; depth: 50–433 m (164–1,420 ft) (min.: M.L., unpubl. data; max.: Miller and Lea 1972).Published as part of Love, Milton S., Bizzarro, Joseph J., Cornthwaite, Maria, Frable, Benjamin W. & Maslenikov, Katherine P., 2021, Checklist of marine and estuarine fishes from the Alaska-Yukon Border, Beaufort Sea, to Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, pp. 1-285 in Zootaxa 5053 (1) on page 108, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5053.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/557800
Anisops rhomboides Nieser & Chen 1999
No full text<i>Anisops rhomboides</i> Nieser & Chen, 1999 <p> <i>Anisops tahitiensis</i> (nec <i>A</i>. <i>tahitiensis</i> Lundblad, 1933, misidentifications): LANSBURY (1967: 97); NIESER & ZETTEL (1999: 123).</p> <p> <i>Anisops rhomboides</i> Nieser & Chen, 1999: 111; ZETTEL (2003: 126); CHEN et al. (2005: 422).</p> <p> <b>Material examined. BRUNEI: BELAIT DISTRICT:</b> Peat-swampy area draining to Sungai Ingei, 6.vi.2010, leg. D. J. W. Lane (15), 1 J (UBDB). <b>PHILIPPINES: LEYTE:</b> Leyte Province, Mahaplag, Hilusig River, 6.iii.2001, leg. F. E. Bendanillo, 1 J (USCP).</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> <i>Anisops rhomboides</i> is a West Malesian species so far recorded from Borneo, Sulawesi, and the Philippines (NIESER & CHEN 1999, CHEN et al. 2005). This species is the only notonectid species previously recorded from Brunei (from km 29.5 on Labi road [in Belait District], NIESER & CHEN 1999). Philippine records are only from the south: Mindanao (South Cotabato) (NIESER & CHEN 1999), Tawi Tawi (LANSBURY 1967, as <i>A</i>. <i>tahitiensis</i>), and Palawan (ZETTEL 2003). This first record from Leyte (Leyte Province) represents the species’ northernmost occurrence.</p>Published as part of <i>Zettel, Herbert, Lane, David J. W., Pangantihon, Clister V., Freitag, Hendrik & Be, Jalan Tungku Link, 2012, Notes on Notonectidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from southeastern Asia, mostly from Brunei and the Philippines, pp. 29-48 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 52 (1)</i> on page 35, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5330381">10.5281/zenodo.5330381</a>
Mr. Melvin J. Collier, RWWL AUC, June 2011
No full textThis video is a conversation with Mr. Melvin J. Collier. Mr. Collier talks about his book, "From Mississippi to Africa: A Journey of Discovery". Daniel Le, AUC Woodruff Library, is the interviewer
Correspondence, W. J. Hawks to Richard Parker, March 15, 1855
No full textA letter to Richard Parker from W. J. Hawks regarding a bill for a carriage repository. 1 page
Early post-stress LV dyssynchrony: A new marker for significant CAD
No full text[No abstract available]Aggarwal H, 2014, J NUCL CARDIOL, V21, P739, DOI 10.1007-s12350-014-9886-4; AlJaroudi W, 2012, J NUCL CARDIOL, V19, P958, DOI 10.1007-s12350-012-9592-z; AlJaroudi W, 2012, J NUCL CARDIOL, V19, P63, DOI 10.1007-s12350-011-9463-z; AlJaroudi W, 2011, J NUCL CARDIOL, V18, P36, DOI 10.1007-s12350-010-9296-1; AlJaroudi W, 2010, J NUCL CARDIOL, V17, P1058, DOI 10.1007-s12350-010-9271-x; AlJaroudi W, 2012, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V39, P665, DOI 10.1007-s00259-011-2025-4; AlJaroudi W, 2012, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V39, P1581, DOI 10.1007-s00259-012-2171-3; AlJaroudi WA, 2010, J NUCL CARDIOL, V17, P398, DOI 10.1007-s12350-009-9169-7; Berman DS, 2007, J NUCL CARDIOL, V14, P521, DOI 10.1016-j.nuclcard.2007.05.008; Chen CC, 2012, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V39, P1904, DOI 10.1007-s00259-012-2208-7; Chen J, 2005, J NUCL CARDIOL, V12, P687, DOI 10.1016-j.nuclcard.2005.06.088; Daou D, 2004, J NUCL CARDIOL, V11, P53, DOI 10.1016-j.nuclcard.2003.09.011; Emmett L, 2012, J NUCL CARDIOL, V19, P735, DOI 10.1007-s12350-012-9571-4; Goldberg AS, 2014, J NUCL CARDIOL, V21, P57, DOI 10.1007-s12350-013-9787-y; Henneman MM, 2007, J NUCL MED, V48, P1104, DOI 10.2967-jnumed.107.039925; Henneman MM, 2007, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V49, P1708, DOI 10.1016-j.jacc.2007.01.063; Huang W, 2014, J NUCL CARDIOL; Igarashi Y, 2013, CIRC J, V78, P141; Johnson LL, 1997, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V30, P1641, DOI 10.1016-S0735-1097(97)00388-4; Kakouros N, 2013, EUR RADIOL, V23, P958, DOI 10.1007-s00330-012-2670-4; Lin XH, 2010, J NUCL CARDIOL, V17, P811, DOI 10.1007-s12350-010-9238-y; Marsan NA, 2008, J AM SOC ECHOCARDIOG, V21, P801, DOI 10.1016-j.echo.2007.12.006; Naya M, 2014, J NUCL MED, V55, P248, DOI 10.2967-jnumed.113.121442; Salimian S, 2014, J NUCL CARDIOL, V21, P375, DOI 10.1007-s12350-013-9847-3; Trimble MA, 2008, NUCL MED COMMUN, V29, P374, DOI 10.1097-MNM.0b013e3282f81380; Van Tosh A, 2013, J NUCL CARDIOL, V20, P1060, DOI 10.1007-s12350-013-9784-1; Zhou Yanli, 2013, World J Nucl Med, V12, P3, DOI 10.4103-1450-1147.113931; Zhou YL, 2013, NUCL MED COMMUN, V34, P124, DOI 10.1097-MNM.0b013e32835c08c1; Zoghbi GJ, 2008, NUCL CARDIAC IMAGING0
Economic Soft Patch 2: A Second-Half Rebound or Redux?
No full textAs this issue (August 2011) of the Advance & Rutgers Report was on press, the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce released revised Gross Domestic Product (GDP) estimates on July 29, 2011 that showed the December 2007– June 2009 recession to be far deeper than originally determined. The 4.1 percent recessionary decline in real GDP was revised to a much larger 5.1 percent decrease; therefore, the analysis of economic output starting on page 8 of this report is slightly altered.
Before the revisions, GDP had fully recovered all of its recessionary losses by the fourth quarter of 2010, 36 months after the recession began. However, the revised estimates show that GDP had not yet fully recovered its recessionary losses by the second quarter of 2011, 42 months after the recession began. This affects figures 3 and 4 on pages 9 and 10 of the report.
But the conclusions in the report remain valid: The U.S. economy today is close (real GDP in the second quarter of 2011 is 0.42 percent below the fourth quarter of 2007) to producing the same pre-recessionary economic output with about 7 million fewer private-sector workers, and the time elapsed for full recovery of economic output (42 months and counting) is far more severe than the recovery time (21 months) from the July 1981-November 1982 recession, the previous post-World War II record holder.This report was published as Issue Paper Number 6, August 2011, in Advance & Rutgers Report
- …
