157,997 research outputs found
Ji Han xiang chen zhuan
No full text[V.1-2]. 前漢相臣傳 : 十二卷 -- [v.3-5]. 後漢相臣傳 : 十六卷 -- [v.6]. 季漢相臣傳 : 六卷.[V.1-2]. Qian Han xiang chen zhuan : shi er juan -- [v.3-5]. Hou Han xiang chen zhuan : shi liu juan -- [v.6]. Ji Han xiang chen zhuan : liu juan.魏顯國纂述 ; 魏一鵬編次.綫裝, 1函.框22x14.3公分, 10行20字, 白口, 單黑魚尾, 四周單邊, 版心上鐫題名, 中鐫卷次, 下鐫葉次及小題.刻書年據《四庫全書存目叢書》鈐有"元鑑齋", "潤州笪重光鑒定印", "毛氏收藏子孫永保"印.Library's copy: 本館只存《歷代相臣傳》中《前漢》, 《後漢》, 《季漢》共六冊.Xian zhuang, 1 han.Kuang 22 x 14.3 gong fen, 10 hang 20 zi, bai kou, dan hei yu wei, si zhou dan bian, ban xin shang juan ti ming, zhong juan juan ci, xia juan ye ci ji xiao ti.Ke shu nian ju "Si ku quan shu cun mu cong shu"Wei Xianguo zuan shu ; Wei Yipeng bian ci.Qian you "Yuan jian zhai", "Runzhou Da Chongguang jian ding yin", "Mao shi shou cang zi sun yong bao" yin.Library's copy: ben guan zhi cun "Li dai xiang chen zhuan" zhong "Qian Han", "Hou Han", "Ji Han" gong liu ce
The Study on House Tax Equity in Taipei
No full text本研究實證分析台北市2007至2009年不動產交易資料，結果顯示臺北市房屋稅之估價比率大多集中在10%至16%之間，估價比率之中位數為14.79%，從市郊往開發越早的市中心，水平不公平就越嚴重；垂直不公平部分，低價位房屋具有累退性的問題，中高價位房屋則呈現累進性的現象，此外，低價位房屋的估價比率差異程度較大。故房屋稅在進行房屋現值評定時，對於低價位房屋應調降其評估價值，並設法減輕低價位房屋的估價比率差異程度；中高價位房屋現值的評定雖皆具累進性，但許多高價位房屋的估價比率是低於中低價位房屋之估價比率，豪宅稅的課徵似能提高高價位房屋之估價比率，並使房屋稅更加公平，但其效果仍有待觀察。This study investigates house tax equity in Taipei. By analyzing the real estate transaction data from 2007 to 2009, the results show that the median assessment ratio is 14.79% and most of the assessment ratios are between 10% and 16%. The horizontal equity does not hold in Taipei and it gets worse in the downtown. The results also show that the house tax for low-cost houses is regressive. In addition, the variation in the assessment ratios of low-cost houses is the largest. Therefore, the local government should reduce the assessment value and its variation for low-cost houses. Because there are many high-cost houses with lower assessment ratios, the mansion tax may make the house tax more equity by increasing the assessment ratios of high-cost houses. But its effect needs more studies
Place attachment of Ngāi Te Ahi to Hairini Marae
No full textTwelve members of Ngāi Te Ahi, a hapū from Tauranga, were interviewed to explore how they talk about their place attachment to Hairini Marae. This was organized around five key dimensions of place attachment taken from the literature—continuity, distinctiveness, symbolism, attachment and familiarity. We found that in discussing all dimensions, place attachment was equally about social and cultural relationships, history, and socialization. Place attachment for groups such as Māori is complex because it encompasses all social relationships past and present. The implication for those working with Māori is to take seriously the wider connotations of place when talking to Māori about marae, traditional homelands, and their land
Sinogastromyzon nantaiensis Chen, Han and Fang 2002
No full text118. Sinogastromyzon nantaiensis Chen, Han and Fang, 2002:240, figs. 1–2 Holotype: NMMBP 465 (44.7), Laonon River, Kaoping basin, Darjin, Liukuei, Pingtung County, Taiwan, Aug. 1994, coll. I.–S. Chen. Paratype: NMMBP 466 (3, 36.8–40.3), same data as holotype; NMMBP 467 (7, 33.4–44.2), Laonon River, Kaoping basin, Tsaolan, Liukuei, Pingtung County, S Taiwan, Feb. 1995, coll. I.–S. Chen et al.; NMMBP 468 (2, 29.8–35.6), Nanhaur River, Tzengwen River, Peiliao, Tainan County, Taiwan, 29 Oct. 1999, coll. I.–S.Chen and R.–S. Wu.Published as part of Ho, Hsuan-Ching & Shao, Kwang-Tsao, 2011, 2957, pp. 1-74 in Zootaxa 2957 on page 3
Tiphia (Jaynesia) borealis Chen & Yang 1990
No full textTiphia (Jaynesia) borealis Chen & Yang, 1990 Tiphia (Jaynesia) borealis Chen & Yang, 1990: 253–255. Material examined. ♀, China, Shanxi prov., Datong City, 39°40’32”N, 113°42’29”E, 1212m, 26.VII.2001, Zhiguo Li (YNAU); 15♂♂, China, Inner Mongolia, Hohehot City, Horinger County, Suojiayao Village, 40°34’10”N, 111°57’39.36”E, 1221m, 15.VII.2019, Xu Zhang (CNU); ♀, China, Inner Mongolia, Hailar District, 49°12’35”N, 119°43’41”E, 628m, 4.VIII.1981, Jiang Xiong (KIZ); ♂, China, Inner Mongolia, Ulanqab, 41°1’50”N, 113°6’22”E, 1415m, 30.VII.2009, Rui Zhang (KIZ); ♀ 2♂♂, China, Inner Mongolia, Otog Front Banner, 37°44’4”N, 106°26’2”E, 1260m, 24.VII.2006, Haiyan Zhang (YNAU); ♀ 11♂♂, China, Gansu prov., Zhangye City, Gao- tai County, Heiquan Town, Yanzhibao Village, 39°32’33”N, 99°37’28”E, 1321m, 1. VI.2019, Qian Han (CNU); 15♀♀ 13♂♂, China, Ningxia prov., Wuzhong City, Yanchi County, Shaquanwan Village, 37°16’2”N, 106°49’5”E, 1638m, 24.VII.2020, Qian Han (CNU). Distribution. China (Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Henan, Shaanxi, Gansu, Ningxia).Published as part of Han, Qian, Chen, Bin & Li, Ting-Jing, 2021, Three new species of the subgenus Jaynesia Allen, 1969 of the genus Tiphia Fabricius, 1775 (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae: Tiphiinae) from China, with a key to all known species, pp. 313-324 in Zootaxa 4970 (2) on page 322, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4970.2.5, http://zenodo.org/record/476180
Campoplex xuthomelonus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021, sp. nov.
No full textCampoplex xuthomelonus sp. nov. Figs. 83–84 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 20.IX.1989, Wang Jiashe, No 964206; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 18.VIII.1984, Zhang Kechi, No 860667; 1 female, 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan, 14.VII.1994, Chen Xuexin, No 943666, 943664; 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan Qiliguadun, 18.IV.2009, Zengjie, No 201605323; 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan Sangangguadun, 18.IV.2009, Wang Manman, No 201605775; 1 female, Guangdong, Shixing Chebaling, 25. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 201806165; 1 male, Guangxi Damingshan, 6.VIII.2011, Yan Chengjin, No 201108006; 2 males, Guizhou, Dushan, 6. V.1980, Zhou Shengzhen, No 860552, 860539; 1 female, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Jinding, 10.VII.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 937487; 2 females, Guizhou, Xishui, 26.IX.2000, Ma Yun, No 200102281, 200102738; 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia Qianjiapin, 21. V.2012, Shi Kai, No 201204451; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Dahe, 20.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206019; 1 male, Sichuan, Chongqing, 24.VII.1980, He Junhua, No 801974; 1 female, Sichuan, Guanxian, 4.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 802013; 1 female, Yunnan, Lijiang Ninglangladuhe, 19.VIII.2003, Li Tingjing, No 20046213; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 28. VI.1991, He Junhua, No 911187; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 21. V.1983, He Junhua, No 830292; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 12. VI.1958, Hu Cui, No 5855.7; 14 males, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 22.IV.1994, Wu Hong, No 947063, 947029, 947070, 947071, 947028, 947072, 947073, 947025, 947073, 947025, 947074, 947076, 947075, 947067, 947069, 980639; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 7.VII.1992, Chen Hanlin, No 924533; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 27. VI.1994, Chen Hanlin, No 954191; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 16.X.1982, He Junhua, No 826303; 2 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27. V.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 995361,995783; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 30.VII.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 999236; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27. VI.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 999517; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 4.IX.1987, Chen Xuexin, No 877098; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 13. VI.1998, Chen Xuexin, No 980674; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. VI.1983, Zhou Caie, No 830726; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. VI.1983, Zhou Caie, No 830726. Description. Female (Fig. 83) holotype. Body length 6.3 mm, fore wing length 4.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.35× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 84E) strongly granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 84E) mat, slightly convex, apical margin slightly curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 84F) 1.45× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 84G) granulose. Scutellum granulose with posterior rugose. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 84B) granulose-punctate, transstriate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 84B) granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Propodeum (Fig. 84C) with anterior transverse carina close to base; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed medially; all carina strong; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 84A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.25 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.5× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.52× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 84H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina and a shallow lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.73× as long as first tergite, 1.7× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, small, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.0× its length. Third tergite 1.1× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.0× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 84D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, malar space, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; all coxae and hind trochanter, black; remainder of leg yellowish brown with base and apex of hind tibia, apical segments of fore and middle tarsus and whole of hind tarsus, infuscated; metasoma entirely black. Male. Propodeal carina stronger and surface structure of propodeum coarser; otherwise similar to female. Variation. Propodeal lateral carina weak to strong, second metasomal tergite 1.7–2.0× longer than its apical width. Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hubei, Shanxi, Sichuan, Yunnan, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. anatolus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having the malar space yellowish brown, all propodeal carinae strong, and punctures of mesopleuron dorsally larger and denser than in C. anotolus. Etymology. Name derived from “xuthos” (Greek for “yellowish brown”) and “melon” (Greek for “cheek”), because its malar space is yellowish brown.Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 115-120, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/565393
“BODY-SNATCHING”: Changes to coroners legislation and possible Māori responses
No full textThe term body-snatcher has enjoyed a renaissance in the media recently, as various Māori have moved to reclaim their deceased relations. From a Māori perspective, the claiming of bodies has nothing to do with body-snatching, a term that referred to episodes in the West. Indeed, Māori may see some laws themselves as instruments that snatch the body, in contravention of Māori customs. One of these laws, the Coroners Act 2006, may have made some progress by quietly acknowledging these customs in many ways, but that is merely the start of a greater dialogue between Māori and the Crown in relation to proper Māori respect of the dead body
FIGURE 2 in Two new species of Helobdella Blanchard 1896 (Hirudinida: Rhynchobdellida: Glossiphoniidae) from Taiwan, with a checklist of hirudinea fauna of the island
No full textFIGURE 2. Internal morphology of Helobdella octatestisaca n. sp. Roman numerals of X and XX indicate the orders of the ganglia. an. Anus; atr. Atrium; br. Brain; cr. Crop and crop caeca; ejc. Ejaculatory duct; g. Ganglion; int. Intestine and intestine caeca; mth. Mouth; ov. Ovary; prb. Proboscis; rt. Rectum; salg. Salivary gland; scu. Scute; te. Testisacs.Published as part of Lai, Yi-Te, Chang, Chih-Han & Chen, Jiun-Hong, 2009, Two new species of Helobdella Blanchard 1896 (Hirudinida: Rhynchobdellida: Glossiphoniidae) from Taiwan, with a checklist of hirudinea fauna of the island, pp. 27-46 in Zootaxa 2068 on page 33, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18704
- …
