37,732 research outputs found
Milthinae Chavan 1969
No full textSubfamily MILTHINAE Chavan, 1969 <p>REMARKS</p> <p> Most of the genera with living species included in the subfamily by Chavan (1969) have now been assigned to other subfamilies (Taylor <i>et al.</i> 2011). Two genera, <i>Miltha</i> H. & A. Adams, 1853 and <i>Eomiltha</i> Cossmann, 1912, remain and the status of the subfamily is unresolved pending inclusion of any of the three living species in molecular analysis. Despite the name, shell characters of <i>Eomiltha</i> have little similarity to <i>Miltha</i> and any relationship is doubtful. In the following section we introduce a new genus name for the living species usually called <i>Eomiltha voorhoevei</i> together with an antecedent species from the Eocene. To provide background to this decision we briefly review <i>Eomiltha</i> below.</p>Published as part of <i>Taylor, John D. & Glover, Emily A., 2018, Hanging on - lucinid bivalve survivors from the Paleocene and Eocene in the western Indian Ocean (Bivalvia: Lucinidae), pp. 123-142 in Zoosystema 40 (7)</i> on page 130, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a7, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/3738245">http://zenodo.org/record/3738245</a>
L'évolution de la pensée religieuse de Vinet
No full textChavan Aimé. L'évolution de la pensée religieuse de Vinet. In: Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 3e année n°3, Mai-juin 1923. pp. 210-228
Edmond Schérer et la crise de la foi
No full textChavan Aimé. Edmond Schérer et la crise de la foi. In: Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 3e année n°2, Mars-avril 1923. pp. 106-124
Mélanchthon et la prédestination
No full textChavan Aimé. Mélanchthon et la prédestination. In: Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 4e année n°3, Mai-juin 1924. pp. 250-263
La séparation de l'Église et de l'État d'après Alexandre Vinet et dans l'histoire contemporaine
No full textChavan Aimé. La séparation de l'Église et de l'État d'après Alexandre Vinet et dans l'histoire contemporaine. In: Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 4e année n°6, Novembre-décembre 1924. pp. 534-552
Jules Le Coultre, Maturin Cordier et les origines de la pédagogie protestante dans les pays de langue française (1530 — 1564), Mémoires de l'Université de Neuchâtel, 1926
No full textChavan Aimé. Jules Le Coultre, Maturin Cordier et les origines de la pédagogie protestante dans les pays de langue française (1530 — 1564), Mémoires de l'Université de Neuchâtel, 1926. In: Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 7e année n°3, Mai-juin 1927. pp. 282-284
Jules Le Coultre, Maturin Cordier et les origines de la pédagogie protestante dans les pays de langue française (1530 — 1564), Mémoires de l'Université de Neuchâtel, 1926
No full textChavan Aimé. Jules Le Coultre, Maturin Cordier et les origines de la pédagogie protestante dans les pays de langue française (1530 — 1564), Mémoires de l'Université de Neuchâtel, 1926. In: Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 7e année n°3, Mai-juin 1927. pp. 282-284
Barbierella Chavan 1938
No full textGenus Barbierella Chavan, 1938 Cavilucina (Barbierella) Chavan, 1938: 115. TYPE SPECIES. — Lucina barbieri Deshayes, 1857, early Eocene, Paris Basin (original designation). DIAGNOSIS. — Small, less than 12 mm long, ovately trigonal, prominent posterior sulcus, with marginal sinus. Sculpture of prominent, reflexed, regularly spaced, scalloped, commarginal lamellae with underlying radial undulations. Thickening of lamellae aligned in radial lines. Lamellae raised into short spines along ventral edge of posterior sulcus. Lunule short, deeply impressed. Ligament short, external. Hinge: RV with a single narrow cardinal tooth, LV with a socket. Lateral teeth absent or vestigial, small anterior lateral tooth present in B. barbieri. Anterior adductor muscle scar short, diverging from pallial line for about 1/3 of length. Pallial line entire. Inner shell margin undulose to coarsely plicate. GEOLOGICAL RANGE. — Paleocene (Late Danian) to Recent. INCLUDED SPECIES. — Paleocene. Late Danian: Barbierella briarti (Cossmann, 1908) Calcaire de Mons, Belgium (see Glibert & van de Poel 1973: 28, pl. 5, fig. 5). Eocene. Barbierella barbieri (Deshayes, 1857) (1857: 651-652, pl. 43, figs 1-5) known from Ypresian and Lutetian of the Paris Basin, France (Fig. 3 A-D); also figured by Cossmann & Pissarro (1904 -6, pl. 24, fig. 82-16). Barbierella navicula (Cossmann, 1904) (1904: 152, pl. 10, figs 18-20) is a similar species from Bartonian sands at Bois-Gouët, Loire-Atlantique, France. Miocene. Barbierella miobarbieri (Sacco, 1901) (1901: 97, pl. 21, fig. 6), Piedmont, Italy (Fig. 3E, F), see also Merlino (2007: pl. 15, fig. 12a, b). Recent. Barbierella louisensis (Viader, 1951) Mauritius and Mozambique Channel (Fig. 4) and synonym B. scitula Oliver & Abou-Zeid, 1986, northern Red Sea (Fig. 4 E-G). REMARKS The hinge of B. barbieri was illustrated by Cossmann (1913: 86, fig. 100) who claimed two cardinal teeth in each valve with the anterior much reduced. He also illustrated anterior and indistinct posterior lateral teeth in each valve but these are barely visible in Eocene specimens we have examined (Fig. 3B, C). In living B. louisensis the lateral teeth are absent and there are no visible cardinal teeth in the left valve but they may be fused with the edge of the lunule and ligamental ridge. Prior to the introduction of the name Barbierella the placement of Lucina barbieri had been unstable and variously included in Phacoides Agassiz, 1846, Here Gabb, 1866 and Lucinisca Dall, 1901, although Cossmann (1913: 86) recognised its unusual features and uncertain assignment. Proposing Barbierella as a subgenus Chavan (1938: 114-115) considered it related to but separate from Cavilucina P. Fischer, 1887 and also noted a possible resemblance to Recurvella Chavan, 1937 (type species Lucina dolabra Conrad, 1833) from the Eocene of eastern United States of America (USA). Sacco (1901) placed B. miobarbieri in Here Gabb, 1866, Recent, northeastern Pacific, probably because of the deeply scooped lunule but otherwise the shells are dissimilar. Later, Woodring (1925: 121) stated “The lucinoid described by Sacco as Here miobarbieri from the Helvetian of the Piedmont basin, probably is a Pleurolucina ”. However, although there is some similarity of external sculpture the hinge teeth are quite different, Pleurolucina Dall, 1901 having two cardinal teeth and prominent lateral teeth in each valve. The deeply scooped lunule impinging on the cardinal teeth and commarginal lamellae resemble some living Lamellolucina Taylor & Glover, 2002 species such as L. gemma (Reeve, 1850) but all species in the genus have strong lateral teeth. Although from shell characters we place Barbierella in the Lucininae the relationships of this enigmatic genus remain uncertain pending inclusion in molecular analyses. Throughout their geological range Barbierella species have always been rare. In the original description of B. barbieri Deshayes (1857: 652) remarked on “this rare and beautiful shell”. Sacco (1901: 97) said that B. miobarbieri (as Here) was rather rare in the Miocene of northern Italy. From probable mid-late Miocene rocks of Cyprus, Reed (1935: 5) recorded a partial external mold (SM C8911) of Barbierella miobarbieri (as Phacoides (Pleurolucina)) and Studencka et al. (1998) recorded B. miobarbieri as rare in mid-Miocene deposits of Parathethys.Published as part of Taylor, John D. & Glover, Emily A., 2018, Hanging on - lucinid bivalve survivors from the Paleocene and Eocene in the western Indian Ocean (Bivalvia: Lucinidae), pp. 123-142 in Zoosystema 40 (7) on pages 129-130, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a7, http://zenodo.org/record/373824
Folioceros harrietii S. J. Chavan, Bioinfolet
No full text<p> ** <i>Folioceros harrietii</i> S.J.Chavan,</p> <p> <i>Bioinfolet</i> 8 (3): 242, 2011, <i>nom. inval.</i> ICN Art. 40.1; no type indicated (see Chavan 2011). ORIGINAL MATERIAL: “[Andaman] s.loc.spec”.</p>Published as part of <i>Söderström, Lars, Hagborg, Anders & Konrat, Matt Von, 2014, Early Land Plants Today: Index of Liverworts & Hornworts 2011 - 2012, pp. 61-85 in Phytotaxa 170 (2)</i> on page 68, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.170.2.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4779611">http://zenodo.org/record/4779611</a>
Open access self-archiving: An author study
No full textThis, our second author international, cross-disciplinary study on open access had 1296 respondents. Its focus was on self-archiving. Almost half (49%) of the respondent population have self-archived at least one article during the last three years. Use of institutional repositories for this purpose has doubled and usage has increased by almost 60% for subject-based repositories. Self-archiving activity is greatest amongst those who publish the largest number of papers. There is still a substantial proportion of authors unaware of the possibility of providing open access to their work by self-archiving. Of the authors who have not yet self-archived any articles, 71% remain unaware of the option. With 49% of the author population having self-archived in some way, this means that 36% of the total author population (71% of the remaining 51%), has not yet been appraised of this way of providing open access. Authors have frequently expressed reluctance to self-archive because of the perceived time required and possible technical difficulties in carrying out this activity, yet findings here show that only 20% of authors found some degree of difficulty with the first act of depositing an article in a repository, and that this dropped to 9% for subsequent deposits. Another author worry is about infringing agreed copyright agreements with publishers, yet only 10% of authors currently know of the SHERPA/RoMEO list of publisher permissions policies with respect to self-archiving, where clear guidance as to what a publisher permits is provided. Where it is not known if permission is required, however, authors are not seeking it and are self-archiving without it. Communicating their results to peers remains the primary reason for scholars publishing their work; in other words,
researchers publish to have an impact on their field. The vast majority of authors (81%) would willingly comply with a mandate from their employer or research funder to deposit copies of their articles in an institutional or subject-based repository. A further 13% would comply reluctantly; 5% would not comply with such a mandate
- …
