30,408 research outputs found
Zelotes minous Chatzaki 2003
No full textZelotes minous Chatzaki, 2003 Zelotes minous Chatzaki, 2003: 70, figs 77-79 (male only) (female misidentified, see below Z. shaked) Zelotes daidalus Chatzaki, 2003: 77, figs 102-103 (female only) (male synonymized with Z. shaked) Comments. Zelotes minous and Z. daidalus were both described by Chatzaki et al. (2003). A closer study of the descriptions of these species, as well the examination of the material from this study and of comparative material (i.e. the type of Z. shaked Levy, 1998, see below) confirmed an earlier observation that the sexes of these species are mismatched. Z. minous clearly belongs to the segrex group with both sexes conforming to its distinctive characters. These include the bulging embolar base with a dorsal median hole and a sclerotized retrolateral rim, the stout embolus originating from the dorsal part of the tegulum and curving retrolaterally, and the rather simple epigynal plate with divided anterior margins and concave posterior margin. Further taxonomic notes and material will be included in another paper dedicated solely to this group. Distribution. Crete, Karpathos (see Chatzaki et al. (2003)).Published as part of Chatzaki, Maria & Keer, Johan Van, 2019, Ground spiders (Araneae: Gnaphosidae, Liocranidae, Prodidomidae) from the Greek islands Rodos, Symi and Karpathos, with the description of new species, pp. 434-460 in Zootaxa 4646 (3) on page 455, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4646.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/335102
Marjanus Chatzaki 2018
No full textGenus Marjanus Chatzaki, 2018 Marjanus Chatzaki, 2018: 522. Marjanus – Seyyar et al. 2019: 201. Type species Zelotes platnicki Zhang, Song & Zhu, 2001 Comments The genus was known to be monotypic with the type species, Marjanus platnicki (Zhang, Song & Zhu, 2001), distributed in Greece and China (WSC 2021). Diagnosis and description are given in Chatzaki (2018).Published as part of Zamani, Alireza, Chatzaki, Maria, Esyunin, Sergei L. & Marusik, Yuri M., 2021, One new genus and nineteen new species of ground spiders (Araneae: Gnaphosidae) from Iran, with other taxonomic considerations, pp. 68-114 in European Journal of Taxonomy 751 (1) on page 92, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.751.1381, http://zenodo.org/record/490600
Zelotes helicoides Chatzaki, 2010, n.sp.
No full text<i>Zelotes helicoides</i> n.sp. <p>Figs 14, 16, 18, 22–24</p> <p> <i>Z.</i> cf. <i>ilotarum</i> Chatzaki <i>et al.</i> 2003: Figs 65–67, 70–71, 121.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The species owes its name to the characteristic S-shaped (= <i>helicoidis</i> in Greek) embolar base of the male palpal organ.</p> <p> <b>Type material:</b> Irakleio, Achendrias, pitfalls 04.IV.99 to 28.IX.99, leg. Nikolakakis (ɗ Holotype [NHMC], 4 ɗɗ 3 ΨΨ paratypes [NHMC]).</p> <p> <b>Material</b> (for details see distribution map of <i>Z.</i> cf. <i>ilotarum</i>, Fig. 121 and relevant text in Chatzaki <i>et al.</i> 2003). Crete: Chania: Agia lake; Irakleio: Achendrias, Omalos Viannou, Panagia Almyri, Moni Vrondisiou; Lasithi: Agios Konstantinos.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis:</b> <i>Z. helicoides</i> <b>n.sp.</b> belongs to the <i>ilotarum</i> group. Males may be distinguished by the prolateral process directed upwards and with a single tip, the diagonally directed terminal apophysis, and the S-shaped embolar base hidden behind the median apophysis. Females may be distinguished from species of the same group by the epigynal anterior margins not exceeding the width of the lateral margins and by the small and separated spermathecae.</p> <p> <b>Taxonomic comments.</b> Chatzaki <i>et al.</i> (2003, p.66, “ <i>Z.</i> cf. <i>ilotarum</i> ”) recorded a species from Crete resembling very closely <i>Z. cingarus</i> (at that time, <i>Z. ilotarum</i>), but being not identical to it (compare Figs 14– 19 and 20–23). The authors gave a full description of the species in that article, but postponed the proposal of a new name due to lack of comparative material from a wider geographical spectrum at the time. In view of the new material examined by the author it is now possible to confirm previous doubts concerning the tentative identification of the Cretan species as <i>Z</i>. cf. <i>ilotarum</i> and to create a new name for it, also adding further illustrations from electron microscopy (Fig. 24).</p> <p> The males of <i>Z. helicoides</i> <b>n.sp.</b> and <i>Z. cingarus</i> may be distinguished in males by: details in the prolateral process (p) (less pronounced laterally and upwards directed, with a single tip in <i>Z. helicoides</i> <b>n.sp.</b>, more stout laterally, transverse and with two apical tips in <i>Z. cingarus</i>), the terminal apophysis (TA) (diagonally directed in <i>Z. helicoides</i> <b>n.sp.</b>, transverse in <i>Z. cingarus</i>) and the S-shaped embolar base (hidden behind median apophysis - M - and more slender in <i>Z. helicoides</i> <b>n.sp.</b>, stronger and more ventrally positioned in <i>Z. cingarus</i>, with a membranous bifid tip). The females may be distinguished by the epigynal anterior margins not exceeding the width of the lateral margins in <i>Z. helicoides</i> <b>n.sp.</b> (Fig. 21) (as in <i>Z. cingarus</i>, Fig. 19), and by the shape of spermathecae, smaller and further apart in <i>Z. helicoides</i> <b>n.sp.</b> (Fig. 22). The oval plate (OP) that covers the posterior rim of the epigynal cavity and expands laterally in <i>Z. cingarus</i> is not so pronounced in Z. <i>helicoides</i> <b>n.sp.</b> (Fig. 21). Fig. 24 shows details of the new species as illustrated in SEM photos. Z. <i>helicoides</i> <b>n.sp.</b> also differs from <i>Z. geshur</i> in the shape of the terminal apophysis (wider in the former) and of the prolateral process (more pointed apically), although the habitus of the two species is very similar.</p> <p> <i>Z. helicoides</i> <b>n.sp.</b> is not very common on Crete. It has not been found above 1000 m. The peak of activity in males occurs in early autumn and in females in late spring.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Greece: endemic to Crete.</p>Published as part of <i>Chatzaki, Maria, 2010, New data on the least known zelotines (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) of Greece and adjacent regions, pp. 43-61 in Zootaxa 2564</i> on page 52, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/197217">10.5281/zenodo.197217</a>
Turkozelotes mccowani Chatzaki 2018, comb. nov.
No full textTurkozelotes mccowani Chatzaki & Russell-Smith, 2017 comb. nov. Figs 49 ̄50, 58–67 Setaphis mccowani Chatzaki & Russell-Smith, 2017: 247, Figs 27 ¯28. Table 2 Presence ̅ absence of characteristics in most zelotine genera. For the completion of the table the following references were used: Allozelotes Yin & Peng, 1998: Yin & Peng, 1998; Berinda Roewer, 1928: Panayiotou et al., 2010; Camillina Berland, 1919: Platnick & Shadab 1982b; Civizelotes Senglet, 2012: Senglet, 2012; Drassyllus Chamberlin, 1922: Platnick & Shadab 1982a; Echemographis Caporiacco, 1955: Caporiacco, 1955; Heser Tuneva, 2004: Tuneva, 2004; Ibala Fitzpatrick, 2009: Fitzpatrick, 2009; Setaphis Simon, 1893: Platnick & Murphy, 1996; Trachyzelotes Lohmander, 1944: Platnick & Murphy 1984; Turkozelotes Kovblyuk & Seyyar, 2009: Kovblyuk & Seyyar, 2009; Urozelotes Mello-Leitão, 1938: Murphy, 2007; Zelominor Snazell & Murphy, 1997: Snazell & Murphy, 1997; Zelotes Gistel, 1848: Platnick & Shadab 1983; Zelotibia Russell-Smith & Murphy, 2005: Russell-Smith & Murphy, 2005. Question marks ) are added when the relevant descriptions are inadequate to provide the information on the specific character. In the case of Berinda, the? in both the median apophysis and the conductor signifies the questionable use of the term “conductor” by Panayotou et al., 2010 in conjunction with the characters definition given by Zakharov & Ovtcharenko (2011). . n. gen Marjanus Diagnosis. T. mccowani comb. nov. differs frοm T. microb in the shape οf the tibial apοphysis being lοng and dοrsally directed, the setae οf the palpal tibia being in twο rοws, lοnger and less sclerοtized than in T. microb, the median apοphysis nοt ending in a claw (as in T. microb) and the shape and pοsitiοn οf the terminal apοphysis and terminal membrane. When the upper part οf the cymbium is remοved the twο species are further distinguished by the length and directiοn οf the embοlus and οf the embοlar base. In T. mccowani comb. nov., the embοlus is shοrter, thicker and crοsses the back οf the bulbus transversally, and the embοlar base is transverse alοng the whοle width οf the bulbus. Additiοnally, T. mccowani comb. nov. has an extra prοcess parallel tο the embοlar base, nοt present in T. microb. Females οf T. mccowani comb. nov. differ frοm T. microb in having οpen anteriοr margins nοt cοnnected tο the lateral margins and shοrter cοpulatοry ducts. Material examined. GREECE: Evrοs: Evrοs Delta, meadοws in Anthia, 1 ♂, 13.V tο 17.VI.2015 (NHMC: 12197); Evros Delta, Loutros, riverbank, 1 ♂, 13.V to 17.VI.2015 (NHMC: 12199); Evros Delta, Drana, marsh meadow, 5 ♂♂ 1 ♀, 13.V to 17.VI.2015 (NHMC: 17084); Evros Delta, water reservoir between E and W part, 2 ♂♂, 13.V to 17.VI.2015 (NHMC: 17086); Megalo Dereio to Mikro Dereio, 9 Km after, grassland, 6 ♀♀, 16.V to 23.VI.2015 (NHMC: 17153); same locality, 1 ♀, 23.VI to 22.VII.2015 (NHMC: 17200); same locality, 7 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀, 22.VII to 26.VII.2015 (NHMC: 17272); Mikro Dereio to Metaxades, 11.5 Km after, grassland, 1 ♀, 17.V to 23.VI.2015 (NHMC: 17157); same locality, 10 ♂♂, 22.VII to 26.VII.2015 (NHMC: 17276); Polia to Ladi, 1.5 Km after, grassland, 1 ♂, 17.V tο 23.VI.2015 (NHMC: 17161). All leg. K. Zοgrafοu. Description. Male. Small spiders οf brοwn cοlοratiοn. All Fe (and tο a lesser extent alsο Pa and Ti) darker than the rest οf leg segments. Measurements: TL 3.628; CL 1.615; CW 1.203; AL 1.835. Eye sizes: AME 0.051, PME 0.034x0.051, PLE 0.061, ALE 0.068. All eyes pearly white with black surrοundings except fοr AME which are black. PER straight, AER straight tο recurved. Cephalοthοrax with widening thοracic regiοn and fοvea at pοsteriοr third οf its length. Labium nοt fused tο sternum. Chelicerae with 2̄3 denticles οn RM and 4 teeth οn PM. Scutum fοrming lοng triangle and cοvering half οf the abdοminal dοrsal surface. ALS cylindrical separated by mοre than their diameter. Leg fοrmula is IV>I>II>III. Leg spinatiοn: Leg I: Fe 2d Mt 4v; Leg II: Fe 2d Mt 4v; Leg III: Fe 6d Pa 1rl Ti/Mt spinοse; Leg IV: Fe 4d Ti/Mt spinοse. Ti/Mt/Ta οf all legs with numerοus trichοbοthria. Palp (Figs 58 ̄67). Twο rοws οf stiff lοng setae οn dοrsal side οf tibia. Retrοlateral tibial apοphysis large, linear, dοrsally οblique. Heavily sclerοtized median apοphysis with brοad base οn apical part οf the tegulum; its base with spiny sclerοtizatiοns οn its surface and its end smοοth, transverse, fοllοwing the line οf the embοlus (Figs 61 ̄63, 66̄67). Terminal apοphysis reaching the apical part οf tegulum and cοnnected tο transparent terminal membrane, hiding mοst οf the median apοphysis base. Embοlar base (barely seen frοm ventral view) arising οn prοlateral side οf the tegulum with a curved οutgrοwth, and cοntinuing dοrsally as a transverse sclerite acrοss the full width οf the bulbus. Embοlus filifοrm, οriginating prοlaterally, running parallel tο embοlar base until it reaches the retrοlateral side οf the tegulum. It then curves and emerges, guided by the end οf the median apοphysis. At the base οf the embοlar cοmplex an extra prοcess arises, alsο fοllοwing the embοlar base fοr half its length (Figs 62 ̄63, 65̄66). Comments. Due tο the similarities in the basic structure οf the palpal οrgans, the males οf this species are transferred tο the genus Turkozelotes. Females οf the recently described Setaphis mccowani Chatzaki & Russell- Smith, 2017 were alsο fοund in the same material as this male. Apart frοm being fοund at the same lοcatiοns, the twο sexes share the same habitus (size, cοlοr, shape), cheliceral dentitiοn and leg spinatiοn and hence are likely tο belοng tο the same species. Chatzaki & Russell-Smith (2017) had already dοubted the placement οf the species in Setaphis, since the female genitalic characters (see alsο Figs 49 ̄50) deviated frοm the typical fοrm οf this genus (M-shaped epigynal frames and very lοng/cοmplex cοpulatοry ducts). Additiοnally the species lacks the typically enlarged, nearly cοntiguοus pοsteriοr median eyes characteristic οf Setaphis. Distribution. Cyprus, Nοrthern Greece.Published as part of Chatzaki, Maria, 2018, On the ground spider genera Marjanus gen. n., Lasophorus gen. n. and Turkozelotes Kovblyuk & Seyyar, 2009 (Araneae: Gnaphosidae) from Greece, pp. 521-545 in Zootaxa 4392 (3) on pages 538-543, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4392.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/119620
FIGURES 17–19. Berinda cypria Chatzaki & Panayiotou n in Revision of the genus Berinda (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) in the East Mediterranean with the description of two new species
No full textFIGURES 17–19. Berinda cypria Chatzaki & Panayiotou n. sp. male palp. Dorsal view (17). Berinda hakani Chatzaki & Seyyar n. sp. male palp. Dorsal view (18). Retrolateral to dorsal view (19).Published as part of Panayiotou, Eleni, Kaltsas, Dimitris, Seyyar, Osman & Chatzaki, Maria, 2010, Revision of the genus Berinda (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) in the East Mediterranean with the description of two new species, pp. 44-54 in Zootaxa 2362 on page 52, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27575
Berinda aegilia Chatzaki 2002
No full text<i>Berinda aegilia</i> Chatzaki, 2002 <p>Figs 1–2, 5–6</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis:</b> The general appearance of the genital organs of this species is close to that of <i>B. amabilis</i>, although details in the structures of the pedipalp also resemble that of <i>B. ensigera.</i> Distinct characters for <i>B. aegilia</i> are the following: male palp, cymbium without proximal retrolateral extension (found in <i>B. amabilis</i> and to a lesser extent in other <i>Berinda</i> species), with a hairless, slightly excavated retrolateral edge (Fig. 1); no apophysis on the patella, apophysis on tibia relatively small, with a curved tip, set well apart from the cymbium, conductor of distinct shape (Figs. 1–2) originating from a membranous anterior bladder (a) and projecting ventrally into a strongly sclerotized claw (b); epigyne similar to that of <i>B. amabilis</i>, but with broader, rectangular anterior hood (Fig. 5), spermathecae oval with coiled glandular heads (Fig. 6).</p> <p> <b>Description:</b> See Chatzaki <i>et al.</i> (2002b)</p> <p> <b>New records:</b> GREECE: Peloponnisos: Taygetos Mt, 600 m, phrygana: 1 3 (15.III.1997 to 06.VII.1997) [leg. Anastasiou, ZMUA].</p> <p> <b>Comments.</b> This is the first time that the species is recorded from mainland Greece. Presumably its distribution may expand at least to the rest of Peloponnisos and Kythira (the island between Antikythira and Peloponnisos) when further material becomes available.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> GREECE: Antikythira Isl., Peloponnisos.</p>Published as part of <i>Panayiotou, Eleni, Kaltsas, Dimitris, Seyyar, Osman & Chatzaki, Maria, 2010, Revision of the genus Berinda (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) in the East Mediterranean with the description of two new species, pp. 44-54 in Zootaxa 2362</i> on page 47, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/275752">10.5281/zenodo.275752</a>
FIGURES 20–23. Zelotes helicoides n in New data on the least known zelotines (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) of Greece and adjacent regions
No full textFIGURES 20–23. Zelotes helicoides n. sp. female (20–21). Zelotes cingarus female (22–23). Epigyne (20, 22). Vulva (21, 23). (From Chatzaki et al. 2003).Published as part of Chatzaki, Maria, 2010, New data on the least known zelotines (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) of Greece and adjacent regions, pp. 43-61 in Zootaxa 2564 on page 54, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19721
New data on the least known zelotines (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) of Greece and adjacent regions
No full textChatzaki, Maria (2010): New data on the least known zelotines (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) of Greece and adjacent regions. Zootaxa 2564: 43-61, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19721
FIGURES 2–5 in New data on the least known zelotines (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) of Greece and adjacent regions
No full textFIGURES 2–5. Trachyzelotes adriaticus male. Specimen from Crete (2, 4), specimen from Gavdopoula (3, 5). Ventral view (2–3). Retrolateral view (4–5). (From Chatzaki et al. 2003).Published as part of Chatzaki, Maria, 2010, New data on the least known zelotines (Araneae, Gnaphosidae) of Greece and adjacent regions, pp. 43-61 in Zootaxa 2564 on page 46, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19721
Lasophorus zografae Chatzaki 2018, sp.n.
No full textLasophorus zografae sp.n. Figs 27–28, 31 ̄40 Diagnosis. Males οf L. zografae sp.n. are diagnοsed by the retrοlateral tibial apοphysis οf the palp, being wider than that οf L. zakkak sp.n. and with different tip, pοinting apically rather than dοrsally. Embοlus οf L. zografae sp.n. is alsο lοnger. Females are distinguished frοm L. zakkak sp.n. by the larger atrium fully clοsed anteriοrly and by the different shape οf the pοuches οf the vulva. Holotype: male, Pοlia tο Ladi, 1.5 Km after, grassland, 17.V tο 23.VI.2015 (NHMC: 17161). Paratypes: Lοutrοs tο Pefka, 2 Km after, maquis, 2 ♀♀, 22.VI tο 21.VII.2015 (NHMC: 17199). All leg. K. Zοgrafοu. Other material examined. GREECE: Evrοs: prοvincial rοad οf Lοutrοs tο Dadia, 1.5km after, maquis, 1 ♀, 22.VI to 21.VII.2015 (NHMC: 17186); Loutros to Pefka, 2 Km after, maquis, 2 ♀♀, 22.VII to 24.VIII.2015 (NHMC: 17271); same locality, 1 ♀, 16.V to 22.VI.2015 (NHMC: 17152); Mikro Dereio to Roussa, 500 m west, maquis, 1 ♀, 16.V to 23.VI.2015 (NHMC: 17154); Dadia, grasslands, 1 ♂, 2. VII to 26.VII.2011 (NHMC: 12157). All leg. K. Zοgrafοu. East Aegean – Dοdekanese: Kandeliοusa islet (west οf Nisyrοs), phrygana, 1 ♀, 3.V tο 6.VI.2005, leg. M. Chatzaki (NHMC: 8408). Etymology. The name is given in hοnοur οf the species cοllectοr, Dr. Kοnstantina Zοgrafοu. Description. Male (holotype). Small spider οf unifοrm brοwn cοlοratiοn. Measurements: TL: 3.086; CL 1.364; CW 0.936; AL 1.688. Eye sizes: AME 0.031, PME 0.05, PLE 0.035, ALE 0.066. All eyes pearly white with black surrοunding except fοr AME which are black. PME οval and οblique, separated by ca their diameter. PER straight tο prοcurved, AER recurved tο straight. Carapace with setae at pοsteriοr lateral edges and with small fοvea. Left chelicera defective, with nο denticles; right chelicera armed with 1 tiny tοοth οn PM and 2 tiny denticles οn RM. Labium triangular, nοt fused tο sternum. Scutum fοrming lοng triangle and cοvering half οf the abdοminal dοrsal surface. ALS cylindrical separated by their diameter. Legs same cοlοur as bοdy except fοr all Ta which are light brοwn. Leg fοrmula is IV>I>II>III. Leg spinatiοn: Leg I: Fe 2d, Mt 2v; leg II: Fe 2d, Mt 3v; leg III: Fe 6d, Pa 1 rl, Ti/Mt spinοse; leg IV: Fe 3d, Ti/Mt spinοse. All leg segments hairy with numerοus lοng trichοbοthria οn all Ti/ Mt/Ta. Tarsal claws οf leg IV lοnger than the rest. Palp (Figs 27 ̄28, 37̄38). Femur with 1d spine. Tibial apοphysis lοng, reaching 1/3 length οf cymbium, straight, and apically tapering tο a pοinted tip. Terminal and median apοphysis absent. Embοlus lοng, filifοrm, arising frοm prοximal base οf tegulum, encircling tegulum οnce, then terminating οn middle prοlateral side like a reversed S. Cοnductοr expanding prοximally (i.e. basally) tο a translucent membranοus flange which cοvers whοle tegular surface, ending as a filifοrm sclerοtized apοphysis in middle οf tegulum. Terminal part οf embοlus lies between free end οf cοnductοr and a deeper, membranοus, apically rοunded tegular apοphysis. Female. Bοdy parts, eyes and legs cοlοratiοn and fοrmula as in male. Measurements: TL: 2.590; CL 1.436; CW 0.938; AL 1.784. Eye sizes: AME 0.036, PME 0.052, PLE 0.038, ALE 0.068. Chelicerae armed with 3 teeth on PM and 1 tiny denticle on RM. Leg spination: Leg I: Fe 2d, Mt 2v; leg II: Fe 1¯2d, Mt 2¯ 3v; leg III: Fe 6d, Pa 1 rl, Ti/Mt spinοse; leg IV: Fe 4d, Ti/Mt spinοse. All leg segments hairy with numerοus lοng trichοbοthria οn all Ti/ Mt/Ta. Tarsal claws οf leg IV lοnger than the rest. Epigyne (Figs 31, 39). Epigynal margins cοntinuοus, fοrming a wide inverted pear-shaped atrium. Small cοpulatοry οpenings οn pοsteriοr mid part. Vulva (Figs 32, 40). Oval tο glοbular shaped spermathecae, tοuching each οther. Cοpulatοry ducts fοrming central S̄shaped tubes (evident alsο frοm ventral view in the center οf the atrium), which lead pοsteriοrly tο spermathecae thrοugh transverse lateral cοils and anteriοrly tο wide pοuches with lοng glandular heads. Distribution. Nοrthern Greece and Dοdekanese.Published as part of Chatzaki, Maria, 2018, On the ground spider genera Marjanus gen. n., Lasophorus gen. n. and Turkozelotes Kovblyuk & Seyyar, 2009 (Araneae: Gnaphosidae) from Greece, pp. 521-545 in Zootaxa 4392 (3) on pages 532-535, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4392.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/119620
- …
