12 research outputs found
No Association Between Breast Pain and Breast Cancer. A Prospective Cohort Study of 10,830 Symptomatic Women Presenting to a Breast Cancer Diagnostic Clinic
No full textBackground Women with breast pain constitute upto 20% of breast clinic attendees.Aim To investigate breast cancer incidence in women presenting with breast pain and establish health economics of referring women with breast pain to secondary care.Design & Setting Prospective cohort study of all consecutive women referred to a breast diagnostic clinic over 12 months.Methods Women were categorised by presentation into 4 distinct clinical groups and cancer incidence investigated.Results Of 10 830 women, 1972 (18%) were referred with breast pain, 6708 (62%) with lumps, 480 (4%) with nipple symptoms,1670 (15%) with ‘other’ symptoms. Mammography, performed in 1112 women with breast pain, identified cancer in 8 (0.7%). In 1972 women with breast pain, breast cancer incidence was 0.4% compared with ~5% in each of the three other clinical groups. Using ‘breast lump’ as reference, odds ratio (OR) of women referred with breast pain having breast cancer was 0.05 (95% confidence interval 0.02–0.09; P<0.001). Compared to reassurance in primary-care, referral was more costly (net cost £262) without additional health benefits (net Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) loss -0.012). Greatest impact on the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was when QALY loss due to referral associated anxiety was excluded. Primary-care reassurance no longer dominated, but the ICER remained greater (£45,528/QALY) than typical UK National Health Service cost-effectiveness thresholds.Conclusions This study shows that referring women with breast pain to a breast diagnostic clinic is an inefficient use of limited resources. Alternative management pathways could improve capacity and reduce financial burden
No Association Between Breast Pain and Breast Cancer. A Prospective Cohort Study of 10,830 Symptomatic Women Presenting to a Breast Cancer Diagnostic Clinic
No full textBackground Women with breast pain constitute upto 20% of breast clinic attendees.Aim To investigate breast cancer incidence in women presenting with breast pain and establish health economics of referring women with breast pain to secondary care.Design & Setting Prospective cohort study of all consecutive women referred to a breast diagnostic clinic over 12 months.Methods Women were categorised by presentation into 4 distinct clinical groups and cancer incidence investigated.Results Of 10 830 women, 1972 (18%) were referred with breast pain, 6708 (62%) with lumps, 480 (4%) with nipple symptoms,1670 (15%) with ‘other’ symptoms. Mammography, performed in 1112 women with breast pain, identified cancer in 8 (0.7%). In 1972 women with breast pain, breast cancer incidence was 0.4% compared with ~5% in each of the three other clinical groups. Using ‘breast lump’ as reference, odds ratio (OR) of women referred with breast pain having breast cancer was 0.05 (95% confidence interval 0.02–0.09; P<0.001). Compared to reassurance in primary-care, referral was more costly (net cost £262) without additional health benefits (net Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) loss -0.012). Greatest impact on the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was when QALY loss due to referral associated anxiety was excluded. Primary-care reassurance no longer dominated, but the ICER remained greater (£45,528/QALY) than typical UK National Health Service cost-effectiveness thresholds.Conclusions This study shows that referring women with breast pain to a breast diagnostic clinic is an inefficient use of limited resources. Alternative management pathways could improve capacity and reduce financial burden
Prospective Comparison of Standard Triple Assessment and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast for the Evaluation of Symptomatic Breast Lesions
No full textNo association between breast pain and breast cancer:a prospective cohort study of 10 830 symptomatic women presenting to a breast cancer diagnostic clinic
No full textBACKGROUND: Women with breast pain constitute >20% of breast clinic attendees.AIM: To investigate breast cancer incidence in women presenting with breast pain and establish the health economics of referring women with breast pain to secondary care.DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective cohort study of all consecutive women referred to a breast diagnostic clinic over 12 months.METHOD: Women were categorised by presentation into four distinct clinical groups and cancer incidence investigated.RESULTS: Of 10 830 women, 1972 (18%) were referred with breast pain, 6708 (62%) with lumps, 480 (4%) with nipple symptoms, 1670 (15%) with 'other' symptoms. Mammography, performed in 1112 women with breast pain, identified cancer in eight (0.7%). Of the 1972 women with breast pain, breast cancer incidence was 0.4% compared with ∼5% in each of the three other clinical groups. Using 'breast lump' as reference, the odds ratio (OR) of women referred with breast pain having breast cancer was 0.05 (95% confidence interval = 0.02 to 0.09, P<0.001). Compared with reassurance in primary care, referral was more costly (net cost £262) without additional health benefits (net quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] loss -0.012). The greatest impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was when QALY loss because of referral-associated anxiety was excluded. Primary care reassurance no longer dominated, but the ICER remained greater (£45 528/QALY) than typical UK National Health Service cost-effectiveness thresholds.CONCLUSION: This study shows that referring women with breast pain to a breast diagnostic clinic is an inefficient use of limited resources. Alternative management pathways could improve capacity and reduce financial burden.</p
No Association Between Breast Pain and Breast Cancer. A Prospective Cohort Study of 10,830 Symptomatic Women Presenting to a Breast Cancer Diagnostic Clinic
No full textBackground Women with breast pain constitute upto 20% of breast clinic attendees.Aim To investigate breast cancer incidence in women presenting with breast pain and establish health economics of referring women with breast pain to secondary care.Design & Setting Prospective cohort study of all consecutive women referred to a breast diagnostic clinic over 12 months.Methods Women were categorised by presentation into 4 distinct clinical groups and cancer incidence investigated.Results Of 10 830 women, 1972 (18%) were referred with breast pain, 6708 (62%) with lumps, 480 (4%) with nipple symptoms,1670 (15%) with ‘other’ symptoms. Mammography, performed in 1112 women with breast pain, identified cancer in 8 (0.7%). In 1972 women with breast pain, breast cancer incidence was 0.4% compared with ~5% in each of the three other clinical groups. Using ‘breast lump’ as reference, odds ratio (OR) of women referred with breast pain having breast cancer was 0.05 (95% confidence interval 0.02–0.09; P<0.001). Compared to reassurance in primary-care, referral was more costly (net cost £262) without additional health benefits (net Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) loss -0.012). Greatest impact on the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was when QALY loss due to referral associated anxiety was excluded. Primary-care reassurance no longer dominated, but the ICER remained greater (£45,528/QALY) than typical UK National Health Service cost-effectiveness thresholds.Conclusions This study shows that referring women with breast pain to a breast diagnostic clinic is an inefficient use of limited resources. Alternative management pathways could improve capacity and reduce financial burden
Abstract P2-06-02: Breast cancer stem-like cell activity correlates with tumour progression to metastasis but not with clinical or tumour characteristics
No full textPatient-derived Mammosphere and Xenograft Tumour Initiation Correlates with Progression to Metastasis
No full textBreast cancer specific mortality results from tumour cell dissemination and metastatic colonisation. Identification of the cells and processes responsible for metastasis will enable better prevention and control of metastatic disease, thus reducing relapse and mortality. To better understand these processes, we prospectively collected 307 patient-derived breast cancer samples (n = 195 early breast cancers (EBC) and n = 112 metastatic samples (MBC)). We assessed colony-forming activity in vitro by growing isolated cells in both primary (formation) and secondary (self-renewal) mammosphere culture, and tumour initiating activity in vivo through subcutaneous transplantation of fragments or cells into mice. Metastatic samples formed primary mammosphere colonies significantly more frequently than early breast cancers and had significantly higher primary mammosphere colony formation efficiency (0.9 % vs. 0.6 %; p < 0.0001). Tumour initiation in vivo was significantly higher in metastatic than early breast cancer samples (63 % vs. 38 %, p = 0.04). Of 144 breast cancer samples implanted in vivo, we established 20 stable patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models at passage 2 or greater. Lung metastases were detected in mice from 14 PDX models. Mammosphere colony formation in vitro significantly correlated with the ability of a tumour to metastasise to the lungs in vivo (p = 0.05), but not with subcutaneous tumour initiation. In summary, the breast cancer stem cell activities of colony formation and tumour initiation are increased in metastatic compared to early samples, and predict metastasis in vivo. These results suggest that breast stem cell activity will predict for poor outcome tumours, and therapy targeting this activity will improve outcomes for patients with metastatic disease.</p
HER2-enriched subtype and novel molecular subgroups drive aromatase inhibitor resistance and an increased risk of relapse in early ER+/HER2+ breast cancer
No full textBACKGROUND: Oestrogen receptor positive/ human epidermal growth factor receptor positive (ER+/HER2+) breast cancers (BCs) are less responsive to endocrine therapy than ER+/HER2- tumours. Mechanisms underpinning the differential behaviour of ER+HER2+ tumours are poorly characterised. Our aim was to identify biomarkers of response to 2 weeks’ presurgical AI treatment in ER+/HER2+ BCs. METHODS: All available ER+/HER2+ BC baseline tumours (n=342) in the POETIC trial were gene expression profiled using BC360™ (NanoString) covering intrinsic subtypes and 46 key biological signatures. Early response to AI was assessed by changes in Ki67 expression and residual Ki67 at 2 weeks (Ki672wk). Time-To-Recurrence (TTR) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox models adjusted for standard clinicopathological variables. New molecular subgroups (MS) were identified using consensus clustering. FINDINGS: HER2-enriched (HER2-E) subtype BCs (44.7% of the total) showed poorer Ki67 response and higher Ki672wk (p<0.0001) than non-HER2-E BCs. High expression of ERBB2 expression, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and TP53 mutational score were associated with poor response and immune-related signatures with High Ki672wk. Five new MS that were associated with differential response to AI were identified. HER2-E had significantly poorer TTR compared to Luminal BCs (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.14–5.69; p=0.0222). The new MS were independent predictors of TTR, adding significant value beyond intrinsic subtypes. INTERPRETATION: Our results show HER2-E as a standardised biomarker associated with poor response to AI and worse outcome in ER+/HER2+. HRD, TP53 mutational score and immune-tumour tolerance are predictive biomarkers for poor response to AI. Lastly, novel MS identify additional non-HER2-E tumours not responding to AI with an increased risk of relapse
