3 research outputs found
Tolerance Against Ischemic Neuronal Injury Can Be Induced by Volatile Anesthetics and Is Inducible NO Synthase Dependent
No full text
Background and Purpose
—
We tested whether volatile anesthetics induce neuroprotection that is maintained for a prolonged time.
Methods
—
Rats were pretreated for 3 hours with 1 minimal anesthetic concentration of isoflurane or halothane in normal air (anesthetic preconditioning [AP]). The animals were subjected to permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) at 0, 12, 24, or 48 hours after AP. Halothane-pretreated animals were subjected to MCAO 24 hours after AP. Histological evaluation of infarct volumes was performed 4 days after MCAO. Cerebral glucose utilization was measured 24 hours after AP with isoflurane. Primary cortical neuronal cultures were exposed to 1.4% isoflurane for 3 hours. Oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) was performed 24 hours after AP. Injury was assessed 24 hours later by measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase into the medium 24 hours after OGD.
Results
—
Isoflurane anesthesia at 0, 12, and 24 hours before MCAO or halothane anesthesia 24 hours before MCAO significantly reduced infarct volumes (125±42 mm
3
,
P
=0.024; 118±51 mm
3
,
P
=0.008; 120±49 mm
3
,
P
=0.009; and 121±48 mm
3
,
P
=0.018, respectively) compared with control volumes (180±51 mm
3
). Three hours of isoflurane anesthesia in rats did not have any effect on local or mean cerebral glucose utilization measured 24 hours later. Western blot analysis from cortical extracts of AP-treated animals revealed an increase of the inducible NO synthase (iNOS) protein beginning 6 hours after AP. The iNOS inhibitor aminoguanidine (200 mg/kg IP) eliminated the infarct-sparing effect of AP. In cultured cortical neurons, isoflurane exposure 24 hours before OGD decreased the OGD-induced release of lactate dehydrogenase by 49% (
P
=0.002).
Conclusions
—
Pretreatment with volatile anesthetics induces prolonged neuroprotection in vitro and in vivo, a process in which iNOS seems to be critically involved.
</jats:p
Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
No full textEvaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
No full textBackground: Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods: The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results: A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion: Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)
