2,549 research outputs found

    [Report : Petition of Nicholas Ware and Wm. A. Carr

    No full text
    R-P of the Executors of T. Carr. 28 Jan. SD 29, 17-1, vl, 2p. [59] Indian hostilities on the Georgia frontier; 1784-1785

    Supplemental Material - A pilot study to evaluate clinical factors associated with iron and ferritin elevations during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

    No full text
    Supplemental Material for A pilot study to evaluate clinical factors associated with iron and ferritin elevations during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation by Ashley Sam, Zachary Weber, Alejandra Pena, Cody Henderson, Jonathan M King and Nicholas R Carr in Perfusion</p

    A Distinct Mode of Pastoral in Elizabethan Cambridge:Giles Fletcher the Elder (c. 1546-1611), Ecloga Daphnis

    No full text
    This chapter presents in full the Ecloga Daphnis by Giles Fletcher the Elder (1546–1611). This text is included in a Cambridge commemorative collection created to mark the passing of Nicholas Carr (d. 1568), who had been Regius Professor of Greek from 1551 to 1564. It is representative of Fletcher's Cambridge pastoral and is significant for the history of Anglo-Latin and English pastoral, not least because it constitutes an example of Cambridge pastoral that precedes that of Edmund Spenser and John Milton. Written by a young poet and Greek scholar, the eclogue also illustrates the increasingly widespread currency of occasional verse within the community of university poets

    Supplemental Material - Current practices for genetic testing in neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Findings from a National survey

    No full text
    Supplemental Material for Current practices for genetic testing in neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Findings from a National survey by KT Wild, Franscesca Miquel-Verges, Natalie E Rintoul, Robert DiGeronimo, Sarah Keene, Shannon E Hamrick, Burhan Mahmood, Rakesh Rao, Nicholas R Carr, on behalf of the Children’s Hospitals Neonatal Consortium (CHNC) in Perfusion</p

    A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence: The LiMA study protocol

    No full text
    Paper 228Nadine Ezard, Adrian J. Dunlop, Andrew Carr, Rebecca Mcketin, Robert Ali, Jason White, Raimondo Bruno, Kate Dolan, Brendan Clifford & Nicholas Lintzeri

    A Research Agenda for Linked Closed Data

    No full text
    While it is preferable that Linked Data is published without access or licence restrictions, there will always remain certain datasets which, perhaps due to financial considerations, cannot be published as Linked Open Data. If these valuable datasets do join the Web of Linked Data, it will be as Linked Closed Data - Linked Data with access and license restrictions. In this paper, we outline a research agenda for Linked Closed Data that considers the effects that access and license restrictions may have on the Web of Linked Data. If implemented poorly, access restrictions have the potential to break URI resolvability, but even when implemented well, we can expect them to affect dataset selection processes and inter-dataset link creation rates. Additionally, there remains the technical challenge of developing and standardising access restriction and automated payment techniques for the Web of Linked Data

    External interventions and the duration of civil wars

    No full text
    The authors combine an empirical model of external intervention, with a theoretical model of civil war duration. Their empirical model of intervention allows them to analyze civil war duration, using"expected"rather than"actual"external intervention as an explanatory variable in the duration model. Unlike previous studies, they find that external intervention is positively associated with the duration of civil war. They distinguish partial third-party interventions that extend the length of war, from multilateral"peace"operations, which have a mandate to restore peace without taking sides - and which typically take place at war's end, or at least when both sides have agreed to a cease-fire. In a future paper, the authors will examine whether partial third-party interventions - whatever their effect on a war's duration - increase the risk of war's recurrence. If that proves true, then even if interventions reduce the length of civil war, they may do so at the cost of further destabilizing the political system, and sowing the seeds of future rebellion.Children and Youth,Peace&Peacekeeping,Post Conflict Reconstruction,Post Conflict Reconstruction,International Affairs,Post Conflict Reconstruction,Social Conflict and Violence,Peace&Peacekeeping,Post Conflict Reconstruction,International Affairs

    The Open Research Web: A Preview of the Optimal and the Inevitable

    No full text
    The multiple online research impact metrics we are developing will allow the rich new database , the Research Web, to be navigated, analyzed, mined and evaluated in powerful new ways that were not even conceivable in the paper era – nor even in the online era, until the database and the tools became openly accessible for online use by all: by researchers, research institutions, research funders, teachers, students, and even by the general public that funds the research and for whose benefit it is being conducted: Which research is being used most? By whom? Which research is growing most quickly? In what direction? under whose influence? Which research is showing immediate short-term usefulness, which shows delayed, longer term usefulness, and which has sustained long-lasting impact? Which research and researchers are the most authoritative? Whose research is most using this authoritative research, and whose research is the authoritative research using? Which are the best pointers (“hubs”) to the authoritative research? Is there any way to predict what research will have later citation impact (based on its earlier download impact), so junior researchers can be given resources before their work has had a chance to make itself felt through citations? Can research trends and directions be predicted from the online database? Can text content be used to find and compare related research, for influence, overlap, direction? Can a layman, unfamiliar with the specialized content of a field, be guided to the most relevant and important work? These are just a sample of the new online-age questions that the Open Research Web will begin to answer

    Open access self-archiving: An author study

    No full text
    This, our second author international, cross-disciplinary study on open access had 1296 respondents. Its focus was on self-archiving. Almost half (49%) of the respondent population have self-archived at least one article during the last three years. Use of institutional repositories for this purpose has doubled and usage has increased by almost 60% for subject-based repositories. Self-archiving activity is greatest amongst those who publish the largest number of papers. There is still a substantial proportion of authors unaware of the possibility of providing open access to their work by self-archiving. Of the authors who have not yet self-archived any articles, 71% remain unaware of the option. With 49% of the author population having self-archived in some way, this means that 36% of the total author population (71% of the remaining 51%), has not yet been appraised of this way of providing open access. Authors have frequently expressed reluctance to self-archive because of the perceived time required and possible technical difficulties in carrying out this activity, yet findings here show that only 20% of authors found some degree of difficulty with the first act of depositing an article in a repository, and that this dropped to 9% for subsequent deposits. Another author worry is about infringing agreed copyright agreements with publishers, yet only 10% of authors currently know of the SHERPA/RoMEO list of publisher permissions policies with respect to self-archiving, where clear guidance as to what a publisher permits is provided. Where it is not known if permission is required, however, authors are not seeking it and are self-archiving without it. Communicating their results to peers remains the primary reason for scholars publishing their work; in other words, researchers publish to have an impact on their field. The vast majority of authors (81%) would willingly comply with a mandate from their employer or research funder to deposit copies of their articles in an institutional or subject-based repository. A further 13% would comply reluctantly; 5% would not comply with such a mandate
    corecore