102,204 research outputs found
Paolo Carozza awarded honorary doctorate
No full textPázmány Péter Catholic University awarded an honorary doctorate to Paolo Carozza, director of the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies and law professor at Notre Dame Law School, on March 27 in Budapest, Hungary.
According to the University’s official citation, the doctorate was conferred in recognition of Carozza’s “excellent and tireless service to the community and the Church, especially in the area of human rights, by cultivating jurisprudence and … through many [other] works and efforts.”
This was the first honorary degree for Carozza, who said the honor was “unexpected but gratifying”. His trip to receive the degree was his first visit to Hungary
Altered anti-inflammatory resolvin E1 in an in vivo model of age-related macular degeneration
No full textFundamental Rights, Moral Law, and the Legal Defense of Life in a Constitutional Democracy
No full textArticle by Martin Rhonheimer, translated by Paolo G. Carozza
Introduction. Dialogue as a method
No full textThe work presents six distinct areas of particular interest from a comparative constitutional perspective: first, the role of legal scholarship in the work of constitutional courts; second, structures and processes that contribute to more “open” or “closed” styles of constitutional adjudication; third, pros and cons of collegiality in the work of constitutional courts; fourth, forms of access by individuals to constitutional justice; fifth, methods of constitutional interpretation; and sixth, the relationship between national constitutional adjudication and the transnational context. In each of these areas the chapter highlits the Italian approach in comparison with other international experiences
The Anglo-Latin Divide and the Future of the Inter-American System of Human Rights
No full textA former President of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Paolo Carozza draws on his personal experience to identify and propose solutions for a key flaw in the Inter-American Human Rights System: the division between English-language member states and states with Latin-based languages. Terming this division The Anglo-Latin Divide, Carozza traces the division not only to linguistic difference, but also to differences in legal traditions. He explains how the differences between Anglo tradition of common law and the Latin tradition of civil law manifest in both substantive and procedural divides within the Inter-American Human Rights system, including in sensitive areas of the law such as right-to-life cases. Carozza offers solutions for the future, ranging from changing the composition of the Inter-American Court and Commission to the radical solution of requiring universal ratification of the American Convention on Human Rights. Ultimately, Carozza concludes that, whatever the solution, the viability and strength of the Inter-American system requires a much stronger effort to integrate the English-speaking world into a Latin-dominated system
Cotiugà V., Adrian F., Bodi G. (2009) – Itinera in Praehistoria : studia in honorem magistri Nicolae Ursulescu quinto et sexagesimo anno, Iasi, Editura Universitatii “ Alexandru Ioan Cuza ”
No full textMicu Cristian, Carozza Laurent. Cotiugà V., Adrian F., Bodi G. (2009) – Itinera in Praehistoria : studia in honorem magistri Nicolae Ursulescu quinto et sexagesimo anno, Iasi, Editura Universitatii “ Alexandru Ioan Cuza ”. In: Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, tome 108, n°3, 2011. pp. 581-582
Fifty Years of the European Court of Human Rights viewed by Its Fellow International Courts
No full textRemarks by Paolo Carozza, President of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Strasbourg, January 30, 200
- …
