1,720,988 research outputs found
Implant survival after sinus elevation with Straumann(®) BoneCeramic in clinical practice: ad-interim results of a prospective study at a 15-month follow-up.
Abstract: Objectives
Elevation of the sinus floor with Straumann (R) BoneCeramic gave promising results in some recent clinical studies. However, no study has evaluated the long-term survival of implants after this surgical procedure. We are conducting a prospective, observational study to evaluate the long-term implant survival after this surgical procedure in clinical practice. We present here an ad-interim report of this study, including only patients with >= 12-month follow-up after implant placement.
Methods
This prospective cohort study will last until a follow-up of 5 years will be achieved in at least 50 patients. Inclusion criteria are: age >= 18 years; presence of a maxillary partial unilateral or bilateral edentulism involving the premolar/molar areas; elective rehabilitation with oral implants; and physical capability to tolerate conventional surgical and restorative procedures. Patients are treated according to the two-stage technique and the preparation is filled with Straumann (R) BoneCeramic. Implant survival is evaluated every 3 months for the first 2 years, and then every 6 months up to 5 years.
Results
Fifteen patients are considered in this ad-interim analysis. Mean follow-up was 14.9 +/- 3.1 (range: 6-18 months). In total, three implants failed, in one single patient, 6 months after insertion. The cumulative implant survival rate was 92.5% (95% confidence interval: 83.0-100%).
Conclusions
This ad-interim analysis suggests that the elevation of the sinus floor with Straumann (R) BoneCeramic may be an effective clinical option over > 1-year follow-up. A longer term follow-up will allow a deeper characterization of these preliminary findings
To cite this article:Covani U, Orlando B, Giacomelli L, Cornelini R, Barone A.Implant survival after sinus elevation with Straumann (R) BoneCeramic in clinical practice: ad-interim results of a prospective study at a 15-month follow-up.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 481-484doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02042.x
Connective tissue grafts in postextraction implants with immediate restoration: a prospective controlled clinical study
Advances in biomaterial technology and clinical research have equipped clinicians with efficient tools to provide advanced treatment options. As a result, some of the original prerequisites for osseointegration have been redefined to satisfy patients' expectations of reduced treatment time, improved aesthetics, and increased comfort. Novel treatment concepts, such as immediate implant loading and early implant loading, have been proposed to reduce the overall treatment time and to allow delivery of the definitive prosthesis in the shortest time possible following implant placement. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the aesthetic results obtained following the placement of transmucosal implants into fresh extraction sockets and immediate restoration with provisional crowns
Buccal Bone Augmentation Around Immediate Implants With And Without Flap Elevation: A Modified Approach
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical success and bone healing of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using a flapless procedure compared to those placed with flap elevation. Materials and Methods: Twenty teeth in 20 patients were selected for this study and were scheduled for tooth extraction and immediate implant placement. Ten implants were placed with flap elevation (control group), and 10 implants were placed without flap elevation (test group). All the sites selected showed a complete bone defect at the facial wall. All the implants included in this study were 2-stage implants placed at the level of palatal/lingual bone in augmented bone. Each surgical site was protected with a collagen membrane and, subsequently, a standardized radiograph was taken to evaluate the distance between the implant shoulder and the first bone-implant contact (DIB). Six months after placement, both control and test implants underwent a second-stage surgery and a clinical examination to determine the implant stability quotient, DIB, and the distance between implant shoulder and the crestal bone at the midbuccal aspect (DIC). Results: One implant failed in the test group. Only 1 implant (test group) showed bone growth over the implant neck at the re-entry procedure. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and DIB did not show any significant differences between the control and test group; however, a higher DIC was found in the test sites compared to the control sites. Conclusion: Data from this study showed that immediate implants with and without a mucoperiosteal flap elevation can be successfully used even in the presence of bone defects requiring augmentation procedures. It was also noted that the bone regenerated reached a higher coronal level in the group with flap elevation than in the group without flap elevation
Bucco-lingual bone remodeling around implants placed into immediate extraction sockets: a case series
Abstract: Background: Implants placed immediately after tooth extraction have shown high percentages of clinical success. Few studies in the scientific literature have observed the horizontal bone remodeling in the buccal-lingual direction after immediate placement of implants. The aim of this study was to analyze bone healing and coronal bone remodeling around 15 implants placed immediately after tooth removal without the use of guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques.
Methods: Ten patients received a total of 15 implants placed immediately after removal of 15 single-rooted teeth. All implants were placed within the alveolar confines, limiting, in most cases, small peri-implant bone defects. After implant placement, the distance from the buccal to lingual bone plate was measured. No membranes or filling materials were used. Primary flap closure was performed in all cases.
Results: At second-stage surgery, all peri-implant defects were completely filled and the distance from buccal to lingual bone was measured again. The pattern of bone healing around the neck of immediate implants showed an absence of peri-implant defects and a narrowing of bone crest width in a buccal-lingual direction. The mean distance between buccal bone and lingual bone at the time of implant placement was 10.5 mm (+/-1.52) and, at second-stage surgery, 6.8 mm (+/-1.33).
Conclusions: The coronal bone remodeling around immediate implants showed a healing pattern with new bone apposition around the neck of the implants and, at the same time, bone resorption with horizontal width reduction of the bone ridge. The small peri-implant bone defects were completely healed without the use of GBR procedures. An absence of complications during the healing period was also observed, probably due to the absence of barrier membranes and grafting materials
Rialzo del seno mascellare utilizzando plasma ricco di piastrine e solfato di calcio. Una serie di casi clinici
Immediate Restoration of Single-Tooth Implants in Mandibular Molar Sites: A 12-month Preliminary Report
PURPOSE:
The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the survival rates at 12 months of transmucosal implants placed in the posterior mandible and immediately restored with single crowns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Thirty ITI dental implants with sandblasted, acid-etched surfaces were placed in 30 patients missing at least 1 mandibular molar and immediately restored if acceptable primary stability was attained. Primary stability was measured with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) using the Osstell device, and only implants with a stability quotient greater than 62 were included in the study. RFA measurement and radiographic assessment were made at baseline and 6 months after implant placement. Plaque Index, Bleeding Index, probing depth, attachment level, and width of keratinized tissue were measured at the 12 month follow-up examination.
RESULTS:
At 12 months, only 1 implant had been lost; it was removed because of acute infection. Radiographic as well as clinical examination confirmed osseointegration of all implants, with a survival rate of 96.7%.
DISCUSSION:
Interestingly, implant stability as measured using RFA did not increase significantly from baseline to 12 months (P > .05).
CONCLUSION:
The present study showed that immediate restoration of transmucosal implants placed in the mandibular area with good primary stability can be a safe and successful procedure. However, larger, long-term clinical trials are needed to confirm the present results
Radiographic bone density around immediately loaded oral implants
Abstract: Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the bone density around immediately loaded oral implants by a new volumetric CT scan (Maxiscan) and to compare it with that of unloaded implants.
Material and methods: Four patients with an age range from 44 to 65 years old were selected for this study. All the patients needed a prosthetic rehabilitation in partially edentulous posterior maxillas or mandibles. A total of 12 oral implants were placed in the four patients. Six of these implants were immediately loaded while six were left unloaded. Six months after placement, immediately loaded and unloaded oral implants were analyzed by a volumetric CT scan.
Results: The overall success rate in this study with immediately loaded oral implants was 100%. The radiological assessments showed that the mean densitometric profile, which is a measure of bone mineralization, was higher in the immediately loaded group than in the unloaded group. The differences observed between the two groups of oral implants (immediately loaded and unloaded) were statistically significant (P<0.05). The bone was significantly more dense around immediately loaded than unloaded oral implants on the basis of a radiological assessment.
Conclusion: The innovative aspect of this clinical study is to propose a new method to analyze the bone density, reducing the need for histological analysis from human biopsy
Soft tissues healing around implants placed immediately after tooth extraction without incisions. A Clinical Report
Abstract: Purpose: The purposes of the present study were to evaluate implants placed immediately after tooth extraction without incision or primary flap closure and to observe the peri-implant soft tissue healing. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients (9 men and 6 women) aged 31 to 54 years were included in this study. Each patient had a tooth that required extraction, and each had at least 4 mm of bone beyond the root apex. Teeth with multiple roots were excluded from this study. After tooth extraction, the implants were immediately placed without incision or flap elevation. Implant sites showing bone fenestrations, bone dehiscences, or peri-implant bone defects exceeding 2 mm were excluded from this study. In these cases, a standard guided bone regeneration procedure with a surgical flap elevation was used. The second-stage surgical procedure was performed 6 months after the first procedure. The following clinical parameters were evaluated at the time of implant placement and at second-stage surgery: levels of mesial and distal papillae, width of keratinized mucosa, position of mucogingival junction relating to the surrounding tissues, and peri-implant radiolucency and marginal bone loss, which were evaluated radiographically. Results: The postsurgical healing period was uneventful for all patients. Soft tissue closure over the implant sites was achieved in 1 to 3 weeks after surgery at all sites. At second-stage surgery, no peri-implant bone defects were observed or detected by probing around all the experimental implants. The soft tissue anatomy was considered clinically acceptable in all patients. Discussion and Conclusion: Successful osseointegration and complete bone healing were observed for all patients. The soft tissue healing and morphology were satisfactory; additional mucogingival surgery was not required before definitive prosthetic rehabilitation
- …
