1,721,536 research outputs found

    Dose-finding study and pharmaco-kinetics of epirubicin and paclitaxel over 3 hours: a regimen with high activity and low cardiotoxicity in advanced breast cancer.

    No full text
    To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel over 3 hours with a fixed dose of epirubicin, to investigate the plasma pharmacokinetics of this combination, and to evaluate the toxicity and the activity in previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with metastatic breast cancer, measurable disease, and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were eligible. Epirubicin was administered as an intravenous (I.V.) bolus at the fixed dose of 90 mg/m2 before the infusion of paclitaxel over 3 hours. The initial dose of paclitaxel was 135 mg/m2 and was increased by 20 mg/m2 in subsequent cohorts of six patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and epirubicin was performed at cycle 1 in at least two patients per dose level of paclitaxel (175 up to 225 mg/m2). RESULTS: The DLT of this combination was febrile neutropenia in two of eight patients who received paclitaxel at 225 mg/m2. The mean peak plasma concentration of paclitaxel ranged between 5.1 and 6.2 micromol/L at doses of 175 to 225 mg/m2. The concentration of epirubicinol decreased from 47.3 +/- 9.4 to 37.9 +/- 7.5 ng/mL in patients treated with paclitaxel 175 and 225 mg/m2. The most relevant toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia (61% of all courses). The pharmacokinetic data of paclitaxel, in particular the time above the threshold level of 0.05 micromol/L, were not significantly related to myelosuppression. Cardiac toxicity was mild: three patients (6%) developed mild congestive heart failure that was responsive to therapy. Among 49 assessable patients, 41 responses (84%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 70% to 92%) were observed, and nine (18%) of these were complete. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that (1) the MTD is epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2; (2) no clear relationship exists between pharmacokinetic data of paclitaxel and myelosuppression, while the increase in the dose of paclitaxel is associated with a reduction in epirubicinol plasma levels; and (3) the association is feasible, with low cardiotoxicity, and has a high activity in metastatic breast cancer

    Role of anthracyclines in first line combination chemotherapy of ovarian carcinoma.

    No full text
    The association of cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide (PC) is considered to be the standard medical treatment for advanced ovarian carcinoma, while the role of doxorubicin in combination with cisplatin and cyclophosphamide (PAC regimen) is still controversial. Recently, four randomized clinical trials evaluating PC versus PAC regimen have been published. None of these studies showed a convincing advantage for the addition of doxorubicin to PC. By pooling the data from the 1200 or so patients included in these four studies and analyzing them with the statistical technique of meta-analysis, a statistical benefit for PAC over PC is demonstrated in terms of pathologic complete response rate (30 vs 23\%, P = 0.01) and 6-year survival rate (27 vs 21\%, P = 0.01)

    The Gemcitabine-Epirubicine-Paclitaxel trials in Advanced Breast Cancer.

    No full text
    Numerous trials have shown that the pharmacokinetic interferences of epirubicin (Ellence)/paclitaxel (Taxol) combinations produce less pharmacodynamic effect than doxorubicin/paclitaxel regimens. Paclitaxel is more easily combined when infused over 3 (as compared to 24) hours; the administration of optimal doses of both agents is important. Based on these findings, a phase II study was performed to evaluate the feasibility and activity of the combination of gemcitabine (Gemzar), epirubicin, and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. Patients received gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 4, plus epirubicin at 90 mg/m2 on day 1, plus paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2/d on day 1 every 21 days. After six courses, patients less than 60 years old and in complete or partial remission or stable disease were treated with high-dose chemotherapy as consolidation treatment. The overall response rate was 92%, with 31% complete responses; 25 patients received high-dose chemotherapy, achieving a final overall response rate of 97%, with 47% complete responses. At a median follow-up of 25 months, median progression-free survival is 21 months. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 64% of patients. Other hematologic toxicities were mild. Mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy was experienced by 39% of patients; grade 2 or 3 mucositis occurred in 25% and 17% of patients, respectively. Based on these results, a multicenter trial has been started in seven Italian centers to confirm the feasibility of this regimen

    Delay in progression of bone metastases in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous pamidronate: result from a multinational randomized controlled trial.

    No full text
    Bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity in breast cancer, resulting in complications that include pain, loss of mobility, pathologic fracture, and tumor-induced hypercalcemia (TIH). Inhibition of osteoclast-mediated bone destruction using bisphosphonates represents a promising new management approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients with bone metastases were randomly allocated to receive chemotherapy alone (152 patients) or chemotherapy plus pamidronate 45 mg in 250 mL of saline as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks (143 patients). Whenever possible, treatment continued until progression of disease (PD) in bone appeared on radiographs or bone scan. Time to PD in bone and pain reduction according to a self-assessment six-point scale were selected as primary end points. PD in bone was verified during extramural review (EMR) of all imaging studies by blinded observers, and these data were used as the main efficacy criterion. Analgesic intake, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status, and complications of bone metastases (radiotherapy, TIH, fractures, orthopedic surgery) were also compared in the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: At EMR, median time to PD in bone was increased by 48% in patients who received pamidronate (249 v 168 days; P = .02, Wilcoxon test). Marked pain relief, defined as a two-point decrease lasting for > or = 6 weeks, was reported by 44% of pamidronate patients and by 30% of controls (P = .025, chi 2 test). The infusions (median, nine per patient; range, 0 to 39) were well tolerated, with no major toxicities reported. Pamidronate by repeated infusion can significantly slow the progression of bone metastases and reduce attendant morbidit

    Safety of intravenous and oral bisphosphonates and compliance with dosing regimens

    No full text
    Patients with advanced cancers--particularly breast and prostate cancers--are at high risk for bone metastasis, leading to accelerated bone resorption and clinically significant skeletal morbidity. Bisphosphonates are effective inhibitors of bone resorption and reduce the risk of skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases. The standard routes of administration for bisphosphonates used in clinical practice are either oral or i.v. infusion. Oral administration of bisphosphonates is complicated by poor bioavailability (generally <5%) and poor gastrointestinal tolerability. First-generation bisphosphonates, such as clodronate (Bonefos; Anthra Pharmaceuticals; Princeton, NJ), must be administered at high oral doses (1,600-3,200 mg/day) to achieve therapeutic effects, which leads to poor tolerability and compliance with oral dosing regimens. Infusion of bisphosphonates is associated with dose- and infusion-rate-dependent effects on renal function. In particular, high bisphosphonate doses (e.g., 1,500 mg clodronate) can cause severe renal toxicity unless infused slowly over many hours. In contrast, the newer, more potent bisphosphonates effectively inhibit bone resorption at micromolar concentrations, and the small doses required can be administered via relatively short i.v. infusions without adversely affecting renal function. Zoledronic acid (Zometa; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.; East Hanover, NJ) is a new generation bisphosphonate, and the recommended dose of 4 mg can be safely infused over 15 minutes. The 90-mg dose of pamidronate (Aredia; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.) and the 6-mg dose of ibandronate (Bondronat; Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.; Nutley, NJ) require 1- to 4-hour infusions. Intravenous bisphosphonates require less frequent dosing (once a month) and are generally well tolerated with long-term use in patients with bone metastases. Zoledronic acid has demonstrated the broadest clinical activity in patients with bone metastases
    corecore