1,721,006 research outputs found

    A Bayesian model averaging approach with non-informative priors for cost-effectiveness analyses in health economics

    No full text
    We consider the problem of assessing new and existing technologies for their cost-effectiveness in the case where data on both costs and effects are available from a clinical trial, and we address it by means of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. The main difficulty in these analyses is that cost data usually exhibit highly skew and heavy-tailed distributions, so that it can be extremely difficult to produce realistic probabilistic models for the underlying population distribution, and in particular to model accurately the tail of the distribution, which is highly influential in estimating the population mean. Here, in order to integrate the uncertainty about the model into the analysis of cost data and into cost-effectiveness analyses, we consider an approach based on Bayesian model averaging in the particular case of weak prior informations about the unknown parameters of the different models involved in the procedure. The main consequence of this assumption is that the marginal densities required by Bayesian model averaging are undetermined. However in accordance with the theory of partial Bayes factors and in particular of fractional Bayes factors, we suggest replacing each marginal density with a ratio of integrals, that can be efficiently computed via Path Sampling. The results in terms of cost-effectiveness are compared with those obtained with a semi-parametric approach that does not require any assumption about the distribution of costs

    A Bayesian model averaging approach with non-informative priors for cost-effectiveness analyses

    No full text
    We consider the problem of assessing new and existing technologies for their cost-effectiveness in the case where data on both costs and effects are available from a clinical trial, and we address it by means of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. The main difficulty in these analyses is that cost data usually exhibit highly skew and heavy-tailed distributions, so that it can be extremely difficult to produce realistic probabilistic models for the underlying population distribution. Here, in order to integrate the uncertainty about the model into the analysis of cost data and into cost-effectiveness analyses, we consider an approach based on Bayesian model averaging in the particular case of weak prior informations about the unknown parameters of the different models involved in the procedure. The main consequence of this assumption is that the marginal densities required by Bayesian model averaging are undetermined. However, in accordance with the theory of partial Bayes factors and in particular of fractional Bayes factors, we suggest replacing each marginal density with a ratio of integrals, that can be efficiently computed via Path Sampling

    Sensitivity of the fractional Bayes factor to prior distributions

    No full text
    Calculation of a suitable Bayes factor is required for Bayesian model comparison. The fractional Bayes factor is one of several alternative Bayes factors that have been introduced in recent years to address the problem of sensitivity of the usual Bayes factor when prior information is weak. Sensitivity of the fractional Bayes factor with respect to prior distributions is easy to assess when these are proper. On the other hand, when the priors are improper, most methods lead to trivial answers. Also, earlier work on fractional Bayes factors has assumed that sensitivity will be reduced if the training fraction, b, is increased, but this has only been justified by appeal to heuristic reasoning and simple examples. In this paper we derive a measure of the sensitivity of the fractional Bayes factor with respect to improper priors, and prove that it is a decreasing function of b in a class of problems

    An alternative bayes factor for testing for unit autoregressive roots

    No full text
    In this paper we deal with the identification of an autoregressive model for an observed time series, and the detection of a unit root in its characteristic polynomial. This is a big issue concerned with distinguishing stationary time series from time series for which differencing is required to induce stationarity. We consider a Bayesian approach, and particular attention is devoted to the problem of the sensitivity of the standard Bayesian analysis with respect to the choice of the prior distribution for the autoregressive coefficients

    Fractional Bayes factors for the analysis of autoregressive models with possible unit roots

    No full text
    In this paper we consider the problem of identifying an autoregressive model for an observed time series and detecting a possible unit root in its characteristic polynomial. This is a big issue concerned with distinguishing stationary time series from time series for which differencing is required to induce stationarity. We adopt the Bayes approach and assume that the prior information about the parameters of the models is weak. For the comparison of the models in this setting we introduce a modified version of the fractional Bayes factor

    Comparing parametric and semi-parametric approaches for bayesian cost-effectiveness analyses in health economics

    No full text
    We consider the problem of assessing new and existing technologies for their cost-effectiveness in the case where data on both costs and effects are available from a clinical trial, and we address it by means of the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. The main difficulty in these analyses is that cost data usually exhibit highly skew and heavytailed distributions, so that it can be extremely difficult to produce realistic probabilistic models for the underlying population distribution, and in particular to model accurately the tail of the distribution, which is highly influential in estimating the population mean. Here, in order to integrate the uncertainty about the model into the analysis of cost data and into cost-effectiveness analyses, we consider an approach based on Bayesian model averaging: instead of choosing a single parametric model, we specify a set of plausible models for costs and estimate the mean cost with its posterior expectation, that can be obtained as a weighted mean of the posterior expectations under each model, with weights given by the posterior model probabilities. The results are compared with those obtained with a semi-parametric approach that does not require any assumption about the distribution of costs

    A note on Bayesian hypothesis testing for the scalar skew-normal distribution

    No full text
    The skew-normal distribution is a class of densities that preserves some useful properties of the normal distribution while allowing a shape parameter to account for skewness. It has various remarkable properties in terms of mathematical tractability and turned out to be quite useful in modelling real data. However from an inferential point of view its use gives raise to many difficulties, that are intrinsically tied with the shape of the likelihood function. This fact suggests to solve the problem by calibrating the likelihood with a weight function, and perhaps the most intuitive calibration can be obtained in the Bayesian framework, where the prior distribution plays naturally the role of the weight function. Here we consider in details the problem of testing normality in the general skew-normal model, and solve it by means of different tools for hypothesis testing in the Bayesian framework, namely the Bayes factor and the Jeffreys divergence, pointing out benefits and problems of both approaches
    corecore