1,721,203 research outputs found

    Public perception of laboratory animal testing: Historical, philosophical, and ethical view

    Full text link
    The use of laboratory animals in biomedical research is a matter of intense public debate. Recent statistics indicates that about half of the western population, sensitive to this discussion, would be in favor of animal testing while the other half would oppose it. Here, outlining scientific, historical, ethical, and philosophical aspects, we provide an integrated view explaining the reasons why biomedical research can hardly abandon laboratory animal testing. In this paper, we retrace the historical moments that mark the relationship between humans and other animal species. Then starting from Darwin's position on animal experimentation, we outline the steps that over time allowed the introduction of laws and rules that regulate animals' use in biomedical research. In our analysis, we present the perspectives of various authors, with the aim of delineating a theoretical framework within which to insert the ethical debate on laboratory animals research. Through the analysis of fundamental philosophical concepts and some practical examples, we propose a view according to which laboratory animals experimentation become ethically acceptable as far as it is guided by the goal of improving humans and other animal species (i.e., pets) life. Among the elements analyzed, there is the concept of responsibility that only active moral subjects (humans) have towards themselves and towards passive moral subjects (other animal species). We delineate the principle of cruelty that is useful to understand why research in laboratory animals should not be assimilated to a cruel act. Moreover, we touch upon the concepts of necessity and “good cause” to underline that, if biomedical research would have the possibility to avoid using animals, it would surely do that. To provide an example of the negative consequences occurring from not allowing laboratory animal research, we analyze the recent experience of Covid-19 epidemic. Finally, recalling the principle of “heuristics and biases” by Kahneman, we discuss why scientists should reconsider the way they are conveying information about their research to the general public

    Nuclear peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) as a therapeutic target to treat neurodegeneration and dependence elicited by drugs of abuse

    Full text link
    Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factors that are located in the cytoplasm. After activation by specific ligands, PPARs enter the nucleus and heterodimerize with the retinoid x receptor. This heterodimer binds to PPAR response element in DNA to regulate the transcription of genes that are involved in different physiological processes, including insulin sensitization inflammatory response, and neuroprotection (Kapadia et al., 2008). The PPAR receptor family is composed of three isoforms—PPARalpha, PPARgamma and PPARdelta—that are expressed in both peripheral tissues and the brain. Endogeneous ligands of PPAR include polyunsatured fatty acids (e.g., oleic acid and arachidonic acid), prostaglandins, and low-density lipoproteins. PPAR can also be targeted by specific synthetic agonists that belong to the class of thiazolidinediones (TZDs), including pioglitazone and rosiglitazone. Because of their ability to bind PPARgamma, TZDs are approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance, improving insulin sensitivity in muscle, liver, and adipose tissue

    Coeliac disease and secondary autoimmunity

    No full text
    Tissue transglutaminase deamidation may create new antigene epitopes leading to secondary autoimmunit

    N-acylethanolamine acid amidase (NAAA) inhibition decreases the motivation for alcohol in Marchigian Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats

    Full text link
    Rationale: N-acylethanolamine acid amidase (NAAA) is an intracellular cysteine hydrolase that terminates the biological actions of oleoylethanolamide (OEA) and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), two endogenous lipid-derived agonists of the nuclear receptor, and peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-α. OEA and PEA are important regulators of energy balance, pain, and inflammation, but recent evidence suggests that they might also contribute to the control of reward-related behaviors. Objectives and methods: In the present study, we investigated the effects of systemic and intracerebral NAAA inhibition in the two-bottle choice model of voluntary alcohol drinking and on operant alcohol self-administration. Results: Intraperitoneal injections of the systemically active NAAA inhibitor ARN19702 (3 and 10 mg/kg) lowered voluntary alcohol intake in a dose-dependent manner, achieving ≈ 47% reduction at the 10 mg/kg dose (p < 0.001). Water, food, or saccharin consumption was not affected by the inhibitor. Similarly, ARN19702 dose-dependently attenuated alcohol self-administration under both fixed ratio 1 (FR-1) and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement. Furthermore, microinjection of ARN19702 (1, 3 and 10 μg/μl) or of two chemically different NAAA inhibitors, ARN077 and ARN726 (both at 3 and 10 μg/μl), into the midbrain ventral tegmental area produced dose-dependent decreases in alcohol self-administration under FR-1 schedule. Microinjection of ARN19702 into the nucleus accumbens had no such effect. Conclusion: Collectively, the results point to NAAA as a possible molecular target for the treatment of alcohol use disorder

    Effect of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR-141716A on ethanol self-administration and ethanol-seeking behaviour in rats.

    No full text
    Rationale: It has been suggested that endocannabinoid mechanisms are involved in the control of ethanol consumption. Objectives: The aims of the present study were (1) to evaluate the role of the endocannabinoid system in the control of operant ethanol self-administration and in the reinstatement of ethanol seeking, when induced by stress or conditioned stimuli and (2) to offer new insights on the specificity of such a role. Methods: Rats were administered intraperitoneally with the selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, SR-141716A, 30 min before operant self-administration or reinstatement sessions. Two schedules of reinforcement, the fixed-ratio 1 (FR1) and the progressive ratio (PR), were used to study 10% (w/v) alcohol and 5.0% sucrose self-administration. NaCl (2% w/v) intake in sodium-depleted rats was studied only under the FR1 program. Results: Treatment with SR-141716A (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) significantly attenuated FR1 alcohol self-administration and lowered the break point for ethanol under PR. SR-141716A also markedly inhibited the reinstatement of alcohol seeking elicited by presentation of cues predictive of drug availability. Conversely, the cannabinoid antagonist did not prevent the reinstatement of alcohol seeking induced by foot-shock stress. Lever pressing for sucrose under FR1 and PR schedules was also significantly decreased by SR-141716A treatment, whereas the drug modestly and only at the highest dose decreased 2% NaCl self-administration. Conclusions: Results emphasize that endocannabinoid mechanisms play a major role in the control of ethanol self-administration and in the reinstatement of conditioned ethanol seeking. However, these effects extend to the control of operant behaviours motivated by natural rewards (i.e. sucrose). On the other hand, SR-141716A only weakly reduces NaCl self-administration in sodium-depleted rats, in which salt intake is largely controlled by homeostatic mechanisms. Overall, these observations demonstrate that the inhibition of operant behaviour following blockade of CB1 receptors by SR-141716A is linked to a reduction of reward-related responding and is not related to drug-induced motor deficits

    Regenerative medicine: the red planet for clinicians

    No full text
    Regenerative medicine represents the forefront of health sciences and holds promises for the treatment and, possibly, the cure of a number of challenging conditions. It relies on the use of stem cells, tissue engineering, and gene therapy alone or in different combinations. The goal is to deliver cells, tissues, or organs to repair, regenerate, or replace the damaged ones. Among stem-cell populations, both haematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells have been employed in the treatment of refractory chronic inflammatory diseases with promising results. However, only mesenchymal stem cells seem advantageous as both systemic and local injections may be performed without the need for immune ablation. Recently, also induced pluripotent stem cells have been exploited for therapeutic purposes given their tremendous potential to be an unlimited source of any tissue-specific cells. Moreover, through the development of technologies that make organ fabrication possible using cells and supporting scaffolding materials, regenerative medicine promises to enable organ-on-demand, whereby patients will receive organs in a timely fashion without the risk of rejection. Finally, gene therapy is emerging as a successful strategy not only in monogenic diseases, but also in multifactorial conditions. Several of these approaches have recently received approval for commercialization, thus opening a new therapeutic era. This is why both General Practitioners and Internists should be aware of these great advancements

    Antinociceptive profile of ARN19702, (2-ethylsulfonylphenyl)-[(2S)-4-(6-fluoro-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl)-2-methylpiperazin-1-yl] methanone, a novel orally active N-acylethanolamine acid amidase inhibitor, in animal models

    No full text
    N-Acylethanolamine acid amidase (NAAA) is an N-terminal cysteine hydrolase that stops the physiologic actions of palmitoylethanolamide, an endogenous lipid messenger that activates the transcription factor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-a. We have previously reported that the compound ARN19702 [(2-ethylsulfonylphenyl)-[(2S)-4-(6-fluoro-1,3-ben-zothiazol-2-yl)-2-methylpiperazin-1-yl]methanone] is an orally active, reversible NAAA inhibitor (IC50 on human NAAA = 230 nM) that produces remarkable protective effects against multiple sclerosis in mice. In the present study, we assessed the profile of ARN19702 in mouse and rat models of acute and neuropathic pain. Oral administration in male mice attenuated in a dose-dependent manner the spontaneous nocifensive response elicited by intraplantar formalin injection and the hyper-sensitivity caused by intraplantar carrageenan injection, paw incision, or sciatic nerve ligation. In male rats, ARN19702 reduced nociception associated with paclitaxel-induced neuropathy without development of subacute antinociceptive tolerance. Finally, ARN19702 (30 mg/kg, oral) did not produce place preference or alter exploratory motor behavior in male mice. The findings support the conclusion that NAAA is a suitable molecular target for the discovery of efficacious analgesic drugs devoid of rewarding potential. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study evaluated the pharmacological profile of the orally bioavailable N-acylethanolamine acid amidase (NAAA) inhibitor (2-ethylsulfonylphenyl)-[(2S)-4-(6-fluoro-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl)-2-methylpiperazin-1-yl]methanone (ARN19702) in mouse and rat models of neurogenic and inflammatory pain. The compound's potential rewarding and sedative effects were also examined. It is concluded that ARN19702 exhibits a broad analgesic profile that can be generalized across rodent species. The findings point to NAAA as a control node in the processing of neuropathic and inflammatory pain and to ARN19702 as a lead to uncover novel pain therapeutics devoid of addictive potential
    corecore