1,721,224 research outputs found
Una filosofia prima della filosofia. Royer-Collard, Jouffroy, Cousin
No full textFocusing
on the debate with conservative counterrevolution on the one hand and the revolutionary
philosophy of the subject on the other, French liberalism in the first half of the
XIX century (Royer-Collard, Jouffroy, Cousin) proposed not a philosophy of politics
but, rather, a politics of philosophy with a view to stabilizing postrevolutionary society.
In reconstructing this politics of philosophy, the Author concentrates on the
rehabilitation of philosophy as rational discourse (against the counterrevolution), on
the recovery of the networks of social knowledge produced by common sense (against
the philosophy of the Revolution) and, above all, on the theory of impersonal reason
developed at the Sorbonne after its reopening at the beginning of the Restauration. The
philosophy of the doctrinarians is presented as a crucial moment in the strategy of a
«governmental liberalism» of the kind that French liberals were aiming for
The Mole & The Snake
Full text linkThis article starts from the Foucaultanian notions of biopower and discipline, deal- ing with the strategies of the modern and contemporary capitalism. Introducing the term biopower into his research, Foucault is alluding to a series of transformations re- lated to the capitalist system: life enters into the scope of power in terms of “controlled insertion of bodies” in the social apparatus of production, as well as in terms of an “adaptation of population phenomena to economic processes”. It involves the exchange of services on which the Fordist social pact was founded in the twentieth century. The life that is claimed in and against the relationship of capital concerns “needs” that refer to a “concrete essence of man”. In the undeniable awareness of a “triangulation” between sovereignty, discipline and biopower, the author, as a criterion for reading the dynamics of contemporary power, analyzes the theme of control referring to Deleuze. This is de- lineated in the double form of “biopolitical algorithms” and of the normalization that by means of the selection and targeted processing of big data and information packages, incessantly produced by social activity in and on the network, capture forms of life at the service of capitalism
Diferencia y repetición. Brunner, Koselleck, la história conceptual
Full text linkThe article deals with the critic that Reinhart Koselleck makes to Otto Brunner’s use of historical sources, which is regarded as a crucial point to understand the methodological reflection of both German speakers authors. This reflection is related, on one hand to the history of political and social concepts; on the other to constitutional history. In addition, it will be argued that methodological discussion had an important role in the very concept of history and the meaning acquired by historio- graphical practic
Recensione di: Jacob Taubes (Hrsg.), Religionstheorie und politische Theologie, Bd. III, Theokratie, München-Wien-Padeborn-Zürich, Wilhelm Fink/Ferdinand Schöningh Verlag, 1987
No full text
E. Voegelin-C. Schmitt. Un carteggio inedito (lettere 1931-1955)
No full textEdizione e traduzione italiana, con introduzione, di carteggio inedit
«Fetishism with the Norm» and Symbols of Politics. Eric Voegelin between Sociology and Rechtswissenschaft (1924-1938)
No full textOccasional Papers des «Eric-Voegelin-Archiv» in München, n. X
- …
