1,721,094 research outputs found

    Spatial cognition in indoor vs. outdoor planning: An experimental approach

    No full text
    The concept of spacescape has been studied by many scholars over time (Golledge, 1998; Lloyd, 2009; Lynch, 1960). Both landscapes and townscapes are knowledge-intensive entities that humans adapt for their life. Because of their dynamic complexity, spatial behaviours are hard to be simulated in mainstream AI robotics. Therefore, a question arises about the basic features, or ‘fundamentals’, of spacescapes by agents who live in and move through them. In fact, from the one hand, common sense claims that well designed space architectures make space more meaningful for humans than amorphous spaces. Conversely, the drama of social marginality in cities also depends on the abundance of landmarks and symbols, often inappropriate and alienating to poor people. Yet, a distinction emerges in literature and is worthwhile emphasizing in general. As a matter of facts, spacescape structural, ‘fundamental’ qualities may be opposed to spacescape ‘ornamental’ qualities in describing spaces (Goodman, 1951). This sort of ontological representation of space is essential for artificial intelligence and robotics, because of the inherent need of fine-tuning the characterization of space in planning automatic navigation. As there is circularity between AI and cognitive science, it is evident that developing robotic devices may in turn increase knowledge on human behaviours in space. Therefore, space imaging can be of great interest in strategic spatial planning, too, because it enhances the representation of the structural, invariant, resilient characters of the environment, for the development and management of human spaces. The present paper looks at space ontology as made by human agents. In doing this, it follows the cognitive approach used by AI robotics, with integrations coming from the expert knowledge of the planning domain. After an introduction in the first chapter, the second chapter shows two experimentations carried out in the context of space perception, imaging and navigation and discusses some results achieved. Brief conclusions and research perspectives are reported in the final chapter

    Modelos multi-agentes de la gobernanza ambiental: Notas a partir de un caso de estudio

    No full text
    El concepto de gobernanza comunitaria se entiende generalmente como la gestión de procesos complejos que subyacen a la complejidad del sistema ambiental. De hecho, este enfoque complejo proporciona los procesos de gestión difundidos, deslocalizados y multiagentes que tienen lugar en territorios establecidos con una visión multiscalar, multisectorial y transdisciplinaria. Los aspectos de interés de este estudio sobre el tema de la gobernanza tratan de la definición de un sistema de agentes múltiples basado en las TIC para la representación de conocimientos, roles, relaciones, tareas y niveles operativos involucrados en los procesos de gobernanza. Este modelo se orienta hacia la construcción de arquitecturas de sistemas basadas en MAS para apoyar la formulación de políticas de desarrollo, gestionadas a través de modelos de procesos de gobernanza comunitaria
    corecore