1,720,986 research outputs found
Facing hospital malnutrition : when will we understand that a precious ally lies in our catering service leading chef?
Food waste : other issues and settings should be considered : it is not just a matter of money and pollution
The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI)
Purpose of review: A new nutrition-related risk assessment tool, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), has been recently proposed. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidences on the use of this tool with particular focus on the rationales of its application in elderly healthcare. Recent findings: Structured as a dichotomous index, based on serum albumin values and the discrepancy between real and ideal weight, the GNRI seems to account for both acute and chronic reasons of nutrition-related complications. It allows us to face the frequent difficulties in obtaining a profitable participation of the old patient to nutritional assessment. Its application appears feasible in all healthcare settings in which it shows adequacy to discriminate different profiles of nutritional risk. A GNRI less than 92 might be suggested as clinical trigger for routine nutritional support. Summary: In maths of nutrition 'recognize and treat' has become a clinical imperative. Actually, clinical judgement by an expert is still considered the reference standard to diagnose malnutrition but the use of simplified tools profitably assists in nutritional risk screening process. The GNRI is easy to use and preliminary results show that it is promising. Its routine application, next to the other validated tools already available, might be enforced in the assessment of the old patient
ASPEN recommendations for enteral nutrition : practice is the result of potential benefits, harms, clinical judgement and ethical issues
The use of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) as simplified nutritional screening tool
Fighting hospital malnutrition : let’s start by calibrating hospital scales!
Body weight measurement is fundamental in nutritional screening. Thus, weighing scales should be regularly calibrated. This procedure is so important that in 1990 the Council of Europe produced an ad hoc directive. Unfortunately, little is known about scales management in hospitals. We performed an inventory in the City Hospital of Trento (900 beds), which is responsible for the healthcare of 250,000 inhabitants. The analysis included flat, chair and paediatric neonatal scales. We focused attention on the date of arrival and calibration management. In the hospital, there were 211 scales: 190 flat scales, 13 chair scales and 8 paediatric neonatal scales. The mean "age" was 10.3±7.3 years; 22.3% were 5-10 years old and 44.1% were aged >10 years. No scale was ever calibrated. They are managed by the "Internal Logistics Unit", meaning that scales are regarded as pieces of furniture rather than as diagnostic tools. Accurate weight measurement is a key task in nutritional management. However, our results once highlight limitations in this process. It is not enough to design laws and accreditation standards for the European Community; enforcement should be also checked
- …
