7,474 research outputs found
Hoff Family Folder
No full text14 pages of family history documents containing and related to Hans Thor Hoff; Theodore "Ted" Hoff; Hannah I. Hoff; Irvin Hoff; Irma Hoff King; Priscilla E. Hayes; James C. Hayes; Helen Hoff Frye; - including: McCall sawmill; logging; Irvin Hoff interview; photographs; obits; written letters; wedding anniversar
A non-ideal replacement for the Boyle van’t Hoff equation
No full textA non-ideal osmotic equilibrium equation is proposed as a replacement for the Boyle van’t Hoff equation to describe the equilibrium volume of a living cell as a function of external osmolality. Contrary to common understanding, the Boyle van’t Hoff equation is only valid for ideal, dilute solutions. However, the Boyle van’t Hoff equation is commonly used to determine the osmotically-inactive fraction of the cell. This involves extrapolating to infinite osmolality, which violates the ideal, dilute solution constraint. It has been noted that the osmotically-inactive fractions obtained from the Boyle van’t Hoff equation for human erythrocytes are markedly larger than measured values of the dry volume fraction of the cell. Using the new osmotic equilibrium equation to analyze experimental osmotic equilibrium data reduces the inferred osmotically-inactive fraction of human erythrocytes by approximately 20 %
Entocytheridae Hoff 1942
No full textFamily Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942 1942b Entocytherinae subfam. nov.—Hoff: 63, 64, 65, 66 (T). 1942a Entocytherinae.—Hoff: 8, 159, 166 (C, K). 1942a Fentocytherinae.— Rioja: 203, erroneous spelling (C). 1942b Entocytherinae.— Rioja: 685–686 (C, T). 1943 Entocytherinae.—Hoff: 276, 281 (C). 1944a Entocytherinae.—Hoff: 330 (C). 1951 Entocytherinae.— Rioja: 169, 170 (C). 1953 Entocytheridae.—Hobbs: 181 (E). 1953 Entocytherinae.— Rioja: 289 (C). 1953 Entocytherinae.—Pennak: 421 (K, U). 1955 Entocytherinae.—Howe: 66, 67 (C, U). 1958 Entocytherinae.—Ferguson: 198 (C). 1961 Entocytheridae.—Moore: Q96, Q98, first time appears as family (C, T). 1961 Entocytheridae.—Howe & Sylvester-Bradley: Q255, Q257, elevated to family (C, T). 1961 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Howe: Q300, elevated to family (nom. transl.), Fig. 226 (D, T). 1962 Entocytheridae Howe 1961.—Howe: 80, incorrect authority (C). 1962 Entocytheridae Hoff 1942.—Hart: 121 [and as Entocytherinae], 122 [and as Entocytherinae], 123 [as Entocytherinae Hoff 1942], 124, 125, 126, 139, expanded diagnosis (C, T). 1963 Entocytherinae Hoff 1942.—Hartmann: 145 (C). 1963a Entocytheridae.—Hobbs & Walton: 363 (C). 1964 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Hartmann: 586, 589 [as part of progress report and discussion following paper] (C, T). 1964 Entocytherinae.—Vandel: 303 (C). 1965 Entocytheridae.—Hobbs: 160 (C). 1965a Entocytheridae (Hoff, 1942).—Hart: 255 (C). 1966b Entocytheridae.—Hart & Hart: 564 (C). 1966 Entocytheridae.—Hobbs & Hart: 35 (C). 1966 Entocytheridae.—Hobbs & Walton: 1 (C). 1967 Entocytheridae.—Barr: 160 (C). 1967a Entocytheridae.—Hart & Hart: unpaged (E, U). 1968 Entocytheridae.—Crocker & Barr: 42 (C). 1968 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Ferguson: 499, 501 (C). 1968 Entocytheridae.—Hobbs III: 41 (B). 1969 Entocytheridae.—McGregor & Kessling: 231 (C). 1969 Entocytheridae.—Reddell & Mitchell: 6 (C). 1969a Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Hart & Hart: 182, 183, Fig. 5 (R). 1970 Entocytheridae.—Reddell: 395 (C). 1970 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Delorme: 1257 (C). 1971a Entocytheridae.—Danielopol: 189, 190, 201, 202 (C, T). 1971b Entocytherinae (Hoff).—Danielopol: 181, 190 (C). 1971 Entocytheridae.—Hart: 7, 9, Fig. 12 (T). 1971 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Hobbs Jr.: 1, 3, 18, 19 (C, K). 1971 Entocytheridae.—Reddell: 18 (C). 1971 Entocytheridae.—Reddell & Mitchell: 142 (C). 1971 Entocytheridae.—Young: 399, 400 (C). 1973 Entocytheridae.—McKenzie: 143, 144, 147 [and as Entocytheri d ae, lapsus calami] (C, D, H, R). 1973 Entocytheridae.—Reddell & Elliott: 172 (C). 1974 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Hart & Hart: vii, 1, 14, 15, 16, 17 (C, K, T). 1974 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Hartmann & Puri: 8, 24, 50, 51 (C). 1975 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Hart & Hart: 1, 2 (C, D, H). 1975 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Hobbs III: 280, 281 (C, D). 1975 Entocytheridae (Hoff, 1942).—Peters: 1 (C). 1977b Entocytheridae.—Danielopol: 21, 36, 39 (C). 1977 Entocytheridae.—Hobbs, Hobbs & Daniel: 151, 152, 179 (D, H). 1977 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Hobbs & Peters: iii, 15, 16 (C). 1978 Entocytheridae.—Hart: 727 (K). 1978 Entocytheridae.—Hobbs III: 502 (C, H). 1981 Entocytheridae.—Reddell: 80, 82, 83, 319, 320, Fig. 5 (C, D, H). 1982 Entocytheridae.—Cohen: 194 (C, D, H). 1982 Entocytheridae.—Eng & Daniels: 210 (C, H). 1985 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Danielopol & Hart: 54, 60, 65 (C). 1986 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Andolshek & Hobbs: iii, 1, 9 (C). 1988 Enthocytheridae.—Alderman & Polglase: 204, erroneous spelling (C). 1989 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Meisch, Wouters & Martens: 46 (C). 1989 Entocytheridae.—Pennak: 450, 456, 618 (C, K). 1990 Entocytheridae.—Clamp: 14 (E). 1990 Entocytheridae.—Cohen & Morin: 202, 203 (E). 1994 Entocytheridae.—Danielopol et al.: 121, 122 (C, R). 1994 Entocytheridae.—Franz, Bauer & Morris: 37 (C). 1994 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Martens & Behen: 8 (C). 1998 Entocytheridae.—Gall & Jezerinac: 204 (N). 1998 Entocytheridae.—Horne, Danielopol & Martens: 162, 168, 169, 174, Fig. 10.7 (C, E, T). 2000 Entocytheridae.—Culver et al.: 400 (C). 2000 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Meisch: 33, 45, 424, 464 (C, D, H, R, T). 2000 Entocytheridae.—Reeves, Jensen & Ozier: 172 (C). 2001 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Lalana & Ortiz: 104 (C). 2001 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Smith & Kamiya: 57, 60 (C). 2001 Entocytheridea.—Smith & Kamiya: 60, erroneous spelling (C). 2002 Entocytheridae.—Cuellar, Garcia-Cuenca & Fontanillas: 961 (E). 2002 Enthocytheridae.—Evans & Edgerton: 418, erroneous spelling (C). 2002 Enthocytheridae.—Edgerton et al.: 113, erroneous spelling (N). 2002 Entocytheridae.—Horne, Cohen & Martens: 8, 32 (C, T). 2005 Entocytheridae.—Smith & Kamiya: 217, 218, 224, 225, 228, 229 (C, R). 2008 Entocytheridae.—Martens et al.: 187 (C). 2008 Entocytheridae.—Norden: 49 (C). 2009 Enthocytheridae.—Pieri et al.: 6, erroneous spelling (C). 2010 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Smith & Delorme: 748, 765, 766 (C, K, R). 2011 Entocytheridae.—Martens & Savatenalinton: 3 (C). 2011 Entocytheridae.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 347 (C). 2011 Entocytheridae.—Williams et al.: 276 (C). 2012 Entocytheridae.—Aguilar-Alberola et al.: 64 (C) 2012 Entocytheridae Hoff 1942.—Karanovic: xii, 4, 59, 60 [as Enthocytheridae, erroneous spelling], 62, 63, 91, 95, 115–116 [erroneous mention of Fig. 8b] (C, E, H, K, T). 2012 Entocytheridae.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 45, 46 (C). 2013 Entocytheridae.—Castillo-Escrivà et al.: 217, 226 (C, H). 2014a Entocytheridae.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 925, 926, 927, 929, 930, 931, 932, Figs. 1 –4 (C, D, H). 2015 Entocytheridae.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 2109 (C). 2016 Entocytheridae.—Larson & Williams: 405, 433, 434, 435 (C). 2016 Entocytheridae.—Mestre et al.: 3177 (C). 2016 Entocytheridae.—Shelton, Weaver & Williams: 525 (C, E, H). 2016 Entocytheridae.—Weaver & Williams: 252 (E). 2017 Entocytheridae.—Ohtaka, Gelder & Smith: 123 (C, D). 2017 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Weaver & Williams: 576, 577, 579, 583 (C, E). Remarks: Family Entocytheridae was established in Howe (1961). Hart (1962) expanded the diagnosis for the taxon, and it has since remained largely unmodified. Prior to 1961, “ Entocythere ” was used in a manner that might refer to the genus Entocythere, subgenus Entocythere, or what would ultimately become the subfamily, Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942; Entocytherinae referred to, in part, what was to become the family. Hobbs (1953: 181) erroneously referred to “...ostracods of the family Entocytheridae...” (perhaps) unintentionally foreshadowing establishment of the family by Howe (1961).Published as part of Williams, Bronwyn W. & Weaver, Patricia G., 2018, A historical review of the taxonomy and classification of Entocytheridae (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Podocopida), pp. 1-129 in Zootaxa 4448 (1) on pages 21-23, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4448.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/144449
Entocytherinae Hoff 1942
No full textSubfamily Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942 1903 Entocythere.—Marshall: 118–120, 121–135 (D, E, H, T). 1912 Entocythere Wm. S. Marshall. —Müller: XXVII, 255, 317, 430 (C, K). 1926 Cytherites new genus.—Sars: 10 (T). 1926/1927 Entocythere.—Kükenthal: 432 (U). 1930 Entocythere.—Klie: 272 (R). 1931 Entocythere.—Klie: 334 (C, D, H, R). 1934–1938 Entocythere.—Wolf: 42 (U). 1940a Entocythere Marshall (1903).— Rioja: 593, 594 (C, R). 1940c Entocythere.— Rioja: 57 (C). 1941 Cytherites Sars. —Dobbin: 184 (C, R). 1941 Entocythere Marshall, 1903.—Dobbin: 182, 184 (C, K). 1941a Entocythere.— Rioja: 177 (C). 1941b Entocythere.— Rioja: 193, 194 (C). 1942a Entocythere.—Hoff: 166 (C). 1942a Entocythere.— Rioja: 203 (C). 1942b Cytherites Sars 1926.—Hoff: 66, 69; genus Cytherites synonymized with genus Entocythere, but retained as a subgenus (T). 1942b Entocythere Marshall 1903.—Hoff: 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69, 71 (C, K). 1942b Entocythere Marshall 1903.— Rioja: 685, 686, 688 (C, K). 1943a Entocythere.— Rioja: 553, 554, 565, 566 (C). 1943b Entocythere.— Rioja: 567, 574, 575, 582, 583, 584 (C, R). 1943 Entocythere.—Hoff: 276, 280, 281, 284, 285 (C, D, T). 1944b Entocythere Marshall, 1903.—Hoff: 370, 371 (C, D, E, R). 1944a Entocythere.—Hoff: 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 345, 346, 347, 352 (C, K, R, T). 1945 Entocythere.— Rioja: 419 (C). 1947 Enthocythere.—Bronstein: 270, erroneous spelling (C, H). 1947 Entocythere.—Tressler: 699, 705 (C). 1948 Entocythere.—Pratt: 413 (U). 1949 Entocythere.— Rioja: 315 (C). 1951 Entocythere.—Kesling: 92 (D, E, H). 1951 Entocythere Marshall. — Rioja: 169, 170, 174 [as Entochythere, erroneous spelling], 175, 176 (C). 1951 Cytherites Sars. — Rioja: 169 (C). 1953 Entocythere.— Rioja: 288, 290 (C). 1953 Entocythere.—Pennak: 415, 421, 460 (U). 1954 Entocythere.—Kozloff & Whitman: 159, 162 (C). 1954 Entocythere.—Tressler: 138 (C). 1955 Entocythere.—Kozloff: 156, 158 (C). 1955 Entocythere.— Rioja: 193 (C). 1955 Entocythere.—Hobbs: 325 (C). 1956 Entocythere.—Hobbs: 431, 432 (C). 1957 Entocythere.—Stamper: 50 (C, E). 1958 Entocythere Marshall 1903.—Ferguson: 198, 199 (C). 1959 Entocythere.—Westervelt & Kozloff: 243, 244 (C). 1959 Entocythere.—Tressler: 657 (C). 1959 Entocythere.—Hart: 193, 194, 197 (C, K). 1959 Entocythere.—Walton & Hobbs: 114 (K). 1959 Entocythere.—Crawford: 149, 179 (C). 1959 Entocytherinae.—Riek: 248, 257 (C). 1960 Entocythere.—Crawford: 26 [name appears only in title, although referred to in text body] (C, D) 1960 Entocythere.—Hobbs & Walton: 17 (C). 1960 Entocythere.—Hart: 1, 2 (C, R). 1961 Entocythere.—Crawford: 236 (C). 1961 Entocythere.—Benson: Q57 (E). 1961 Entocythere.—Swain: Q210 (E). 1961 Entocythere Marshall, 1903.—Howe: Q300 (C). 1961 Entocythere.—Moore: Q428 (T). 1961a Entocythere.—Hart & Hobbs: 173 (K). 1961 Entocythere.—Hobbs & Walton: 379 (C). 1962 Entocytherinae Hoff 1942.—Hart: 121 [as Entocythere Marshall 1903], 122 [as Entocythere], 123 [as Entocythere], 124 [and as Entocythere], 125–126 [and as Entocythere], restricted (C, K, T). 1962 Entocytherinae Hoff 1942.—Howe: 80 (C). 1963 Entocytherinae.—Hart: 51 (C). 1963 Entocytherinae Hoff 1942.—Hartmann: 145 (C). 1963 Entocythere Marshall 1903.—Hartmann: 145 (C). 1964 Entocythere Marshall, 1903.—Hartmann: 586 (C). 1964 Entocythere.—Vandel: 303, 304 (C). 1966 Entocythere.—Hobbs: 67 (C). 1966 Entocytherinae.—Hobbs & Hart: 36 (C). 1966 Entocytherinae.—Hobbs & Walton: 1 (C). 1967 Entocytherinae.—Hobbs, Holt & Walton: 6 (C). 1967 Entocytherinae.—McKenzie: 230 (C). 1968 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Ferguson: 499 [as...old genus Entocythere Marshall 1903], 501 (C). 1969a Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Hart & Hart: 182, 183 (R). 1969b Entocytherinae.—Hart & Hart: 157 (T). 1969 Entocythere.—Straskraba: 28 (C). 1970 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Delorme: 1257 (C). 1970 Entocytherinae.—Hobbs & Hobbs: 1 (C). 1971b Entocytherini.—Danielopol: 190, nomen nudum (D). 1971 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Hobbs Jr.: 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 14, 19 (C, D, H, K, T) 1971a Entocytherinae.—Danielopol: 190, 201 (D). 1971 Entocytherinae.—Young: 400 (C). 1973 Entocytherinae.—McKenzie: 147, 148, Fig. 5 (C, D). 1974 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Hart & Hart: vii, 1, 9, 14 [and as Entocythere], 15 [and as Entocythere], 16, 17, 18 (C, D, H, K, T). 1974 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942 (restricted).—Hartmann & Puri: 50 (C). 1975 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Hart & Hart: 2–3 (C, D, H). 1975 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Hobbs III: 280, 281 (C, D, H). 1975 Entocytherinae.—Lahser: 284 (C). 1977b Entocytherinae.—Danielopol: 21, 22, 23, 34, 35, Fig. 1 (C, D). 1977 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Hobbs & Peters: iii, 1, 16 (C). 1978 Entocytherinae.—Hart: 727 (K). 1978 Entocytherinae (Hoff, 1942).—Hobbs III: 502 (C, H). 1985 Entocytherinae.—Danielopol & Hart: 54, 55, Fig. 1 (C, D). 1985 Entocytherinae.—Hart et al.: 1, 6 (C, E) 1985 subfamily Entocytheridae.—Hart et al.: 4, lapsus calami (C). 1986 Entocytheridae Hoff, 1942.—Andolshek & Hobbs: iii, 9 (C). 1988 Entocytherinae.—Alderman & Polglase: 204 (D, H). 1988 Enthocythere.—Bronshtein: 345, 466 (C, H). 1994 Entocytherinae.—Danielopol et al.: 121 (C). 1994 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Martens & Behen: 8 (C). 2001 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Lalana & Ortiz: 104 (C). 2001 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Smith & Kamiya: 57 (C). 2002 Entocytherinae.—Edgerton et al.: 113 (C). 2005 Entocytherinae.—Smith & Kamiya: 221 (C). 2010 Entocytherinae.—Smith & Delorme: 766 (R). 2011 Entocytherinae.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 347 (C, D). 2011 Entocytherinae.—Williams et al.: 276 (C). 2012 Entocytherinae.—Aguilar-Alberola et al.: 64 (C). 2012 Entocytherinae Hoff 1942.—Karanovic: 116 (C). 2012 Entocytherinae.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 45 (C). 2013 Entocytherinae.—Castillo-Escrivà et al.: 217 (C, D, H). 2014a Entocytherinae.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 926, 928 (D). 2014b Entocytherinae.—Mestre et al.: 227, 235 (C, D, H). 2017 Entocytherinae Hoff, 1942.—Weaver & Williams: 576, 577, 579, 583, 584 (C, D, E, K, R).Published as part of Williams, Bronwyn W. & Weaver, Patricia G., 2018, A historical review of the taxonomy and classification of Entocytheridae (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Podocopida), pp. 1-129 in Zootaxa 4448 (1) on pages 23-25, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4448.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/144449
Lawrence C. Hoff Honorary Degree Citation
No full text1 p.Corporate executive and civic leader Lawrence C. Hoff received an honorary Doctor of Laws degree at Commencement in 1987. This is the text of the degree citation
Writings of an inconvenient author. The prose of Kay Hoff
No full textDer 1924 in Neustadt in Holstein geborene, heute in Berlin lebende, Kay Hoff hat in seiner mehr als 50 Jahre andauernden Schriftstellerkarriere seinen Ruf als unbequemer, das heißt gesellschaftliche und politische Missstände unmissverständlich tadelnder, Autor häufig in Werk und Wirken unter Beweis gestellt. Leben und Schaffen des promovierten Germanisten zeigen sich geprägt durch das, was er selbst bezeichnet als seinen „wichtigsten Lebenseinschnitt [...]: das Kriegsende 1945.“ So gehören Vergangenheitsbewältigung und Schuld, aus immer neuen Perspektiven betrachtet, zu seinen zentralen Fragen; dazu treten nach und nach weitere Themen: die Kritik am Kleinbürgertum, die Skepsis gegenüber der Sprache, die Konfrontation zwischen konservativ-bürgerlicher und progressiv-kritischer Literatur, die Krise des Individuums und immer wieder die Probleme zwischenmenschlicher Beziehungen. In späteren Werken wird der Themenkreis noch erweitert um Erörterungen über Wahrheit und Wirklichkeit, Verlust und Vergänglichkeit sowie um den Generationskonflikt. Das Werk Kay Hoffs ist äußerst vielfältig und, den Schaffensjahren entsprechend, umfangreich. Neben sieben Romanen veröffentlichte er Dutzende von Erzählungen und zwölf Gedichtbände (der letzte erschien 2006), darüber hinaus verfasste er vierzig Hörspiele und Funk-Features sowie mehrere Fernsehspiele. Als unbequem gilt Hoff auch, weil er durch den Einatz einer Vielzahl von Stilmitteln sowie durch besondere sprachliche und strukturelle Konstruktionen ein leichtes Konsumieren seiner Texte verhindert. So fällt in den frühen Romanen die Tendenz zum nicht-linearen Erzählen auf, häufig vorgetragen in einem ironischen, satirischen Ton. Die Expositionen werden ausgespart oder verkürzt und verschiedene Stilmittel, wie Multiperspektivismus, Montage, Ellipse und Anakoluth, kommen zum Einsatz. Der Gebrauch dieser Stilmittel steigert sich bis zum dritten Roman Drei. Anatomie einer Liebesgeschichte, dem eine ausgeprägt experimentelle Form zugrunde liegt. Danach, in Wir reisen nach Jerusalem, dem letzten Roman des nach Jürgen Petersen sogenannten Frühwerks, ist ein deutlicher Rückgang an stilistischen Erprobungen zu verzeichnen, bis Hoff mit Janus, dem Beginn des Spätwerks, endgültig zum narrativen Erzählen zurückfindet. Übereinstimmend gilt sowohl für die frühen als auch für die späten Romane, die stets aus ihrer jeweiligen Entstehungszeit heraus formuliert sind, dass auf eine spannungsgeladene, aktionsreiche Handlung verzichtet wird und statt dessen die Wiedergabe von Gesprächen und Reflexionen den Vorrang erhalten. Das Ende der Romane bleibt meist offen, wobei Lösungsmöglichkeiten allenfalls angedeutet werden oder die zirkuläre Konstruktion auf die Ausgangskonstellation zurückverweist. Die Erzählungen sind den Romanen thematisch vielerorts verwandt, und auch stilistisch zeigen sich ähnliche Entwicklungen. Während Hoff in den frühen Erzählungen der Nachkriegsjahre in knapper, nüchterner Sprache den Überlebenskampf „kleiner“ Leute schildert, entstehen in den 60er Jahren experimentelle Arbeiten, in denen sich die ehedem von außen an die Figuren herangetragenen Probleme zu inneren Krisen gewandelt haben. In der Kurzprosa der jüngeren Zeit kehrt Hoff dann wieder zu stärker narrativen Erzählformen zurück. Die Dissertationsschrift stellt die erste Monografie über Arbeiten von Kay Hoff dar. Trotz der mehr als fünfzigjährigen Schreibtätigkeit, während der er in bekannten Verlagen und Literaturzeitschriften sowie im Hörfunk veröffentlichen konnte und für seine Arbeiten mit einer Reihe von Auszeichnungen geehrt wurde, blieben Hoff und seinem Werk bisher eine angemessene Beachtung in der wissenschaftlichen Forschung wie auch in der lesenden Öffentlichkeit versagt. Die Ziele der Dissertationsschrift sind daher, eine Einführung in Hoffs Prosawerk zu leisten, einen literaturwissenschaftlichen Diskurs anzuregen sowie eine breitere Leserschaft auf seine Arbeiten aufmerksam zu machen.Kay Hoff was born in 1924 in Neustadt in Holstein. In more than 50 years of writing he proved his reputation as an inconvenient author who criticizes social and political deficiencies. Life and work of this graduated Germanic Philologist is impressed on World War II, as he says, his “most important period of life”. So guilt and the process of coming to terms with the past are the central issues; this comes along with other topics: criticism on petty bourgeoisie, considerations about language, literature, the crisis of the individual and human relations. At a later period topics like truth, realness, loss, perishableness and the generation gap were added. The opus of Kay Hoff is, according to his years of working, very multifarious and comprehensive. It contains seven novels, dozens of novellas, twelve poem anthologies, forty radio plays and several TV-plays. Hoff is also considered an inconvenient writer because he avoids an effortless reading of his works through multiplicity of linguistical and structural constructions. Especially in his early novels he applies a lot of different stylistic devices. In particular his third novel Drei. Anatomie einer Liebesgeschichte has a distinctive experimentel form. After this, in Wir reisen nach Jerusalem, according to Jürgen Petersen the last novel of the early works, there is a noticeable decline of stylistic trials. With Janus, the beginning of his late work, Hoff finally finds back to narrative telling. It is effective for all his novels, that Hoffs resigns of a thrilling story line. Instead of that he prefers dialogues and reflexion. The novels are open-ended and offer no denouements. The novels are related to the novellas in many issues. In the early novellas of the post-war period Hoff describes the struggle for existence of ordinary people. In the sixties occur experimental works which show people in psychologic crisis. Even here Hoff turns back in his late work to more narrative tellings. The thesis is the first monograph about the works of Kay Hoff. Despite of his long career as an author Hoff is fairly unknown among readers and experts. Hence the aim of the thesis is an introduction in Hoffs prose work as well as to initiate a scientifical discussion and not least to get through to the reading public
Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff 1942, sp. nov.
No full textEntocythere illinoisensis Hoff, 1942 1942b Entocythere (E.) illinoisensis sp. nov. —Hoff: 66, 67–69, 72, 73, Figs. 1 –8 (D, H, K, R, T). 1942a Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff 1942.—Hoff: 16, 166 (C). 1942a E. (s. str.) illinoisensis Clayton Hoff. — Rioja: 201, 202, 203, Fig. 4 (R). 1942b E. (E.) illinoisensis Clayton Hoff 1942.— Rioja: 686, 687, 689, 690 [E. (S. Str.) illinoisensis Clayton Hoff], 691, 692, 693, 694, 695, Figs. 1, 14, 18, 19, expanded description, specifically related to copulatory apparatus (K, R). 1943 E. illinoisensis Hoff, 1942.—Hoff: 280, 281, 286 (A, D, H). 1943a Entocythere (s. str.) illinoisensis Clayton Hoff. — Rioja: 558, 560 (R). 1943b Entocythere (s. str.) illinoisensis Clayton Hoff. — Rioja: 569, 572, 573 [as ilinoisensis, erroneous spelling], 577, 578, 579, 580, Figs. 29, 30 (R). 1944a E. illinoisensis Hoff 1942.—Hoff: 330, 331, 349 (C, K, R). 1947 E. illinoisensis Hoff. —Tressler: 705 (C). 1949 Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff. — Rioja: 327 (R). 1957 Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff, 1942.—Stamper: 50 (E, H). 1959 E. illinoisensus Hoff (1942).— Crawford, 1959: 152, erroneous spelling (C). 1959 Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff 1942.—Tressler: 727, Fig. 28.180a, b, c (D, H, K T). 1960 E. illinoisensis Hoff, 1942.—Hobbs & Walton: 22 (A, D, H). 1962 Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff. —Hart: 122, 134 (C, D, T). 1966a Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff, 1942.—Hart & Hart: 3 (A). 1967 E. illinoisensis.—Hobbs, Holt & Walton: 7 (C, E). 1969a E. illinoisensis Hoff, 1942.—Hart & Hart: 185 (D). 1971 Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff, 1942a:67.—Hobbs Jr.: 40, 53 (D, K). 1974 Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff, 1942.—Hart & Hart: 2 [as “ E. illinoisensis ”; perhaps questioning the identification of Stamper (1957)], 14, 15, 84, 88–90, 202, 227, Pl. XXVI Figs. 3–4, Pl. LI (C, D, E, H, K, T). 1975 Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff, 1942.—Hart & Hart: 33 (C, D, H). 1975 Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff, 1942. — Hobbs & Walton: 12, (A, D, H). 1977 Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff (1942:66).—Hobbs & Walton: 603 (A, D, H). 1982 Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff, 1942.—Hobbs & Peters: 300, 301, 302 [by implication], 303, 304, 311, 312, 315, Figs 3 [by implication], 7 (A, C, D, H, K). 1999 E. illinoisensis Hoff. —Peters & Pugh: 348 (D). 2014a Entocythere illinoisensis Hoff, 1942.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 949 (C). Remarks: Hoff (1942b: 69) designated a female as the holotype of E. illinoisensis and a male as the allotype. This reversal in type designation was repeated for all species described in Hoff (1942b) and Hoff (1943); Hoff (1944a) reverted to what would become convention, designating a male as the holotype and a female as the allotype.Published as part of Williams, Bronwyn W. & Weaver, Patricia G., 2018, A historical review of the taxonomy and classification of Entocytheridae (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Podocopida), pp. 1-129 in Zootaxa 4448 (1) on pages 68-69, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4448.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/144449
Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff 1944, sp. nov.
No full textEntocythere dorsorotunda Hoff, 1944 1944a Entocythere dorsorotunda sp. nov. —Hoff: 332, 334, 335, 341–345, Plate 1 Fig. 11, Plate 2 Figs. 12–14 (D, H, K, R, T). 1947 E. dorsorotunda Hoff. —Tressler: 705 (C). 1949 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff. — Rioja: 328 (R). 1959 E. dorsorotunda Hoff (1944).—Crawford: 152 (C). 1959 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff, 1944.—Hart: 194, 201, 202, Fig. 12 (D, H, K). 1959 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff 1944.—Tressler: 732, 733, Fig. 28.195a, b, c (D, H, K, T). 1959 E. dorsorotunda Hoff (1944).—Walton & Hobbs: 115, 116, 117, Fig. 15 (K). 1962 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff. —Hart: 122, 125, 133–134 (C, D, T). 1966 E. dorsorotunda Hoff (1944).—Hobbs & Walton: 7 (R). 1967 E. dorsorotunda Hoff, 1944.—Hobbs, Holt & Walton: 44 (T). 1970 E. dorsorotunda Hoff, 1944: 341.—Hobbs & Hobbs: 11 (T). 1971 E. dorsorotunda Hoff, 1944.—Hart, D.G. & Hart: 114 (T). 1971 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff, 1944b:341.—Hobbs Jr.: 40, 53 (D, K). 1974 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff, 1944.—Hart & Hart: 15, 83, 84, 86–87, 91, 201, 227, Pl. XXV Figs. 13–15, Pl. LI (D, H, K, R, T). 1975 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff, 1944.—Hart & Hart: 32 (C, D, H). 1977 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff (1944:341).—Hobbs & Peters: 50 [synonymization of E. dentata reported from Cook Co., GA in Hart & Hart (1974:86) with E. dorsorotunda] (C, D). 1981 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff (1944:332).—Hobbs: 344, 500, 540 (A, D, H). 1983 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff (1944: 332).—Hobbs: 438 (A, D, H). 1986 Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff. —Andolshek & Hobbs: iii, 2, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 15, 18, 20, 23, 27, 29–30, 35, 36, Figs. 3i, 11, 15a–h (A, D, H, K, R, T). 2014a Entocythere dorsorotunda Hoff, 1944.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 949 (C). Remarks: Andolshek & Hobbs (1986: 27) noted that Entocythere dentata referenced by Hart & Hart (1974: 86) was a synonym of E. dorsorotunda; the actual synonymization of the two Cook County, Georgia localities listed in Hart & Hart (1974: 86) occurred in Hobbs & Peters (1977: 49–50).Published as part of Williams, Bronwyn W. & Weaver, Patricia G., 2018, A historical review of the taxonomy and classification of Entocytheridae (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Podocopida), pp. 1-129 in Zootaxa 4448 (1) on pages 66-67, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4448.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/144449
Can the Internet Swing the Vote? Results from a study of the 2007 Danish parliamentary election
No full textThis article investigates whether political use of the Internet affects users politically. Using a combination of log- and survey data from a study of Internet use during the Danish 2007 parliamentary election, and inspired by theories on agenda setting and on the active/interactive user, three hypotheses are tested: 1) that those who use the Internet most intensively politically are also the most politically affected, 2) that "net activists" (web 2.0 users) are affected more by their political Internet use than "information seekers" (web 1.0 users), and 3) that those who are somewhat or little interested in politics are those most affected by their political Internet use in an election period. All three hypotheses are verified with some modifications. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that socio-demographic factors like age, gender, education and income are of little importance in explaining variation in how voters are affected by their political Internet use. Rather, the level and type of political activity on the Internet and political interest seem to be the most important factors in explaining the degree to which voters are politically affected by their Internet use.political Internet use, parliamentary election, political effects of Internet use, web 2.0, political interest, political media
- …
