1,721,117 research outputs found
Syk and Btk Transduce Survival and Proliferation-Inducing Signals By Activating Distinct Signaling Pathways and Transcriptional Programs in AML Cells
No full textSyk and Btk Transduce Survival and Proliferation-Inducing Signals By Activating Distinct Signaling Pathways and Transcriptional Programs in AML Cells
No full textComparison Between 5-Azacytidine Treatment and Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients With Advanced MDS According to Donor Availability (VidazaAllo Study)
No full textPURPOSE In contrast to 5-azacytidine (5-aza), allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a curative treatment strategy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), but therapy-related mortality (TRM) limits its broader use in elderly patients with MDS. The present prospective multicenter study compared HSCT following 5-aza pretreatment with continuous 5-aza treatment in patients with higher-risk MDS age 55-70 years. METHODS One hundred ninety patients with a median age of 63 years were enrolled. Patients received 4-6 cycles of 5-aza followed by HLA-compatible HSCT after reduced-intensity conditioning or by continuous 5-aza if no donor was identified. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients did not fulfill inclusion criteria (n = 20), died (n = 2) withdrew informed consent (n = 5), or were excluded for an unknown reason (n = 1). 5-aza induction started in 162 patients, but only 108 (67%) were eligible for subsequent allocation to HSCT (n = 81) or continuation of 5-aza (n = 27) because of disease progression (n = 26), death (n = 12), or other reasons (n = 16). Seven percent died during 5-aza before treatment allocation. The cumulative incidence of TRM after HSCT at 1 year was 19%. The event-free survival and overall survival after 5-aza pretreatment and treatment allocation at 3 years were 34% (95% CI, 22 to 47) and 50% (95% CI, 39 to 61) after allograft and 0% and 32% (95% CI, 14 to 52) after continuous 5-aza treatment ( P < .0001 and P = .12), respectively. Fourteen patients progressing after continuous 5-aza received a salvage allograft from an alternative donor, and 43% were alive at last follow-up. CONCLUSION In older patients with MDS, reduced-intensity conditioning HSCT resulted in a significantly improved event-free survival in comparison with continuous 5-aza therapy. Bridging with 5-aza to HSCT before is associated with a considerable rate of dropouts because of progression, mortality, and adverse events
Comparison of fludarabine/melphalan (FM140) with fludarabine/melphalan/BCNU (FBM110) in patients with relapsed/refractory AML undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation – a registry study on behalf of the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party
No full textAbstract The treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with a dismal prognosis. The allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is frequently performed as salvage therapy. Reduced intensity conditioning protocols have been developed with the aim of reducing the leukemia burden without increasing their toxicity. We compared the reduced intensity conditioning FM140 (fludarabine, 150 mg/m 2 ; melphalan 140 mg/m 2 ) with FBM110 (fludarabine 150 mg/m 2 ; BCNU, also known as carmustine, 300–400 mg/m 2 ; and melphalan 110 mg/m 2 ). From the European Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Acute Leukemia Working Party registry, we identified 293 adult patients (FM140, n = 118 and FBM110, n = 175) with AML with relapsed/refractory disease prior to allo-HCT. There were some differences such as age (FM140 = 59.5 years vs. FBM110 = 65.1 years, p < 0.001) and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis based on in vivo T-cell depletion (TCD, FM140 = 39% vs. FBM110 = 75%, p < 0.001). No differences were observed between FM140- and FBM110-treated patients regarding overall survival (OS) (2-year OS: 39.3% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.58), progression-free survival (PFS) (2-year PFS: 36.1% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.69), non-relapse mortality (NRM) (2-year NRM: 15.3% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.10) and relapse incidence (RI) (2-year RI: 48.6% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.7). In conclusion, despite differences in age and GvHD prophylaxis, AML patients with active disease undergoing allo-HCT after FBM110 conditioning showed similar outcomes compared to FM140
Correction: Real‑world data suggest effectiveness of the allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells preparation MSC‑FFM in ruxolitinib‑refractory acute graft‑versus‑host disease
No full textReal-world data suggest effectiveness of the allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells preparation MSC-FFM in ruxolitinib-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease
No full textAbstract Background Patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) not tolerating/responding to ruxolitinib (RR-aGvHD) have a dismal prognosis. Methods We retrospectively assessed real-world outcomes of RR-aGvHD treated with the random-donor allogeneic MSC preparation MSC-FFM, available via Hospital Exemption in Germany. MSC-FFM is provided as frozen cell dispersion for administration as i.v. infusion immediately after thawing, at a recommended dose of 1–2 million MSCs/kg body weight in 4 once-weekly doses. 156 patients, 33 thereof children, received MSC-FFM; 5% had Grade II, 40% had Grade III, and 54% had Grade IV aGvHD. Median (range) number of prior therapies was 4 (1–10) in adults and 7 (2–11) in children. Results The safety profile of MSC-FFM was consistent with previous reports for MSC therapies in general and MSC-FFM specifically. The overall response rate at Day 28 was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36–55%) in adults and 64% (45–80%) in children; most responses were durable. Probability of overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 47% (38–56%), 35% (27–44%) and 30% (22–39%) for adults, and 59% (40–74%), 42% (24–58%) and 35% (19–53%) for children, respectively (whole cohort: median OS 5.8 months). Conclusion A recent real-world analysis of outcomes for 64 adult RR-aGvHD patients not treated with MSCs reports survival of 20%, 16% and 10% beyond 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively (median 28 days). Our data thus suggest effectiveness of MSC-FFM in RR-aGvHD
Real-World Data Suggest Effectiveness of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stromal (MSC-FFM) Cells in Ruxolitinib-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease
No full textIntroduction:
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) remains the leading cause of treatment-related morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Current first-line treatment of aGvHD is with high-dose corticosteroids, the standard for steroid-refractory aGvHD (SR-aGvHD) is the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor ruxolitinib.
Outcomes for patients with ruxolitinib-refractory or -intolerant aGvHD (RR-aGvHD) are poor. Thus in a recent real-world study of adult patients with RR-aGvHD (Abedin BJH 2021) median survival was 28 days (21 days for ruxolitinib refractoriness, 50 days for ruxolitinib intolerance), the probability of overall survival (OS) at 6, 12, and 24 months were about 20%, 16%, and 10%, respectively.
We assessed real-world outcomes of patients with RR-aGvHD treated with the random-donor allogeneic MSC preparation “MSC-FFM,” available via Hospital Exemption in Germany.
Patients:
Between December 2017 and February 2023, 156 patients, including 33 children and adolescents (<18 years of age), received MSC-FFM for RR-aGvHD. Thirty-two German sites contributed 139 patients, while the remaining 17 patients came from seven transplant centers in France, Hungary, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland. The adult cohort (n=123) consisted of 41% females, with an age range of 19 to 79 years (median 55 years). Except for one patient, all had been diagnosed with malignant diseases (missing information, n=3). Among the adult patients with malignant diseases, 88% (n=105) received HSCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), advanced myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloproliferative neoplasm or lymphoma, and 12% (n=15) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In the pediatric cohort (n=33), 48% of patients were females, with an age range of 0 to 17 years (median 9 years). Overall, 58% of pediatric patients (n=19) had malignant diseases as the indication for allogeneic HSCT, 42% (n=8) having ALL and 32% (n=6) with AML. The remaining 42% of pediatric patients (n=14) had non-malignant diseases as the indication for HSCT. Of the adult patients, 6 (4.9%) had grade II, 52 (42.3%) had grade III, and 63 (51.2%) had grade IV aGvHD, with no specification reported for 2 patients (1.6%). In children, 2 (6.1%) had grade II, 10 (30.3%) had grade III, and 21 (63.6%) had grade IV
Treatment:
MSC-FFM is manufactured from pooled bone marrow mononuclear cells from eight HLA-disparate healthy donors. MSCs are selected by plastic adherence, expanded until the end of passage 3, then frozen in saline-albumin with DMSO. The recommended dosing for MSC-FFM is 1-2 million cells/kg body weight (BW), for four weekly doses. The median dose administered was 1.18 million cells/kg BW, with a median number of four doses and a median inter-dose interval of 7 days.
Results:
Safety: Tolerability of MSC-FFM was good, with only five adverse drug reactions reported in three adult patients (chills, BK virus cystitis, increase in C-reactive protein [reported twice in one patient], nausea) and did not result in cessation of MSC treatment or dose reductions.
Response: The overall response rate at day +28 was 49% (95%-CI: 41-58%), with 45% (36-55%) in adults and 64% (45-80%) in children. Most responses were durable, resulting in an overall response rate of 49% (41-57%) for both adults and children at 2 months, and 40% (31-48%) at 6 months.
Survival: Overall survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 47% (38-56%), 35% (27-44%), and 29% (21-38%) for adults, and 59% (40-74%), 42% (24-58%), and 37% (19-54%) for children, respectively (Table 1). Median overall survival was 5.8 months. These outcomes compare favourably to published overall survival estimates for adult RR-aGvHD patients not treated with MSC-FFM (Abedin BJH, see above).
Summary:
The unique MSC-preparation MSC-FFM appears to be effective against RR-aGvHD
Retrospective Comparison between 12-Gray and 8-Gray Total Body Irradiation (TBI) before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission
No full textAbstract
Introduction: Total body irradiation (TBI) continues to be an important part of the conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Previous dose escalation studies showed that higher than 12-Gray (Gy) was toxic and did not provide any apparent survival benefit - at least in patients (pts) transplanted in first complete remission (CR1) - thus establishing 12-Gy as the standard TBI dosage. Whether 8-Gy instead of 12-Gy TBI is sufficient in ALL CR1, as has been prospectively demonstrated for AML CR1 (Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 1035-1044), has not yet been studied.
Methods : In this registry-based retrospective study of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ALWP-EBMT), we compared outcomes of ALL-CR1 pts who underwent a matched-sibling donor (MSD) or matched-unrelated donor (MUD) allo-HCT (94% peripheral blood stem cells) with TBI-based conditioning at a total dose of 12-Gy vs 8-Gy. Patients included in this analysis had received fludarabine (Flu) as the sole chemotherapy counterpart of TBI (12-Gy vs 8-Gy TBIFlu).
Results: The median follow up for the whole cohort (n=639 pts) was 22.5 months (95% CI, 17.2-24.1) and did not differ between the 8-Gy (n=494) and 12-Gy (n= 145) TBIFlu treated pts. 25% pts had B-precursor ALL, 54% Philadelphia (Ph)-positive ALL and 21% T-ALL (p=0.008 between groups). Patients conditioned with 8-Gy TBIFlu were older than 12-Gy TBIFlu treated pts (median 55.7 vs 40.3 years, IQR 50.2-61.3 vs 27-50.2 years, <0.0001) and more frequently received in vivo T-cell depletion (71% vs 40%, <0.0001). All other characteristics were well balanced between 8-Gy vs 12-Gy groups including time from diagnosis to HCT (5.5 vs 5.8 months), Karnofksy <90% (34% vs 26%), minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity at HCT (37% vs 43%), MUD (72% vs 68%) and type of GvHD prevention. Engraftment failure was low and below 2% in both groups. Overall, 29% and 27% of 8-Gy vs 12-Gy treated patients died, with the main causes of death not differing between groups (relapse 41% vs 44%, infections 26% vs 24%, GVHD 12.6% vs 12.7%, respectively). Both in univariate and in the age-adjusted Cox proportional-hazards analysis, relapse (REL), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were not influenced by TBI dose (Figure 1, Table 1). These results were confirmed when we focused on pts aged <55 years (median age 47 years; 8-Gy 229 pts vs 12-Gy 131 pts). In the multivariate analysis, an incremental age of 10 years was associated with increased NRM risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, 95% CI, 1.25-2.22) and reduced OS (HR 1.32, 1.09-1.59). Ph+ and T-ALL pts had significantly better survival outcomes than Ph- B-ALL pts, mainly due to significantly fewer relapses (Table 1).
Conclusion: Although there were limitations to this study (TBI dose and age were correlated; missing data on TBI fractionation; missing MRD data for nearly one-third of the pts) this retrospective analysis was able to investigate the effect of TBI total dose independently from the chemotherapy counterpart (TBIFlu regimen only) and suggests that 12-Gy and 8-Gy results in similar outcomes in ALL patients transplanted in CR1. Whether this is also true for more advanced disease (>=CR2) and/or young adults) cannot be answered, as our study included only CR1 pts, few of whom were below 25 years of age. The reduced REL risk of Ph+ B-ALL pts is probably due to the increased use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) pre- and post-transplant. Clinically, these results suggest 8-Gy TBI as sufficient for ALL patients transplanted in CR1 with no additional benefit of augmenting the conditioning intensity to 12-Gy, a finding which should be validated in prospective trials.
Figure 1 Figure 1.
Disclosures
Spyridonidis: Menarini: Current Employment. Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Giebel: Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Peric: Therakos: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Schönland: Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Prothena: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Sanofi: Research Funding. Kröger: Novartis: Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Pharma: Honoraria. Stelljes: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Schroeder: JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding. McDonald: BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ganser: Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Wulf: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Clinigen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bazarbachi: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Hikma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees
Treatment of Poor Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia with a Combination of 5-Azacytidine and Valproic Acids
No full text- …
