215,358 research outputs found
Heritage Society (Houston)
Transcript of Letter from Allan M. Lean & Buckley to William M. Rice discussing the urgency to repay the debt owed to J. H. Brower & Co
Heritage Society (Houston)
Letter from Allan M. Lean & Buckley to William M. Rice discussing the urgency to repay the debt owed to J. H. Brower & Co
Correspondence between Dr. Aziz Atiya and John S. Badeau, James M. Buckley
Correspondence between Dr. Aziz Atiya, John S. Badeau, and James M. Buckley regarding various Sinai trips, books on the Crusades, the Library of Congress, and other matters of research. Record contains 13 pagesCorrespondence between Dr. Aziz Atiya and John S. Badeau, James M. Buckley. 1. Typed letter dated 9 December 1952 to Dr. Atiya, 14 Sharia Wadi El Nil, Maadi, from John S. Badeau, President of the American University at Cairo. Badeau thanks Dr. Atiya for a trip to monasteries. 2. Typed letter dated 23 October, 1950, to John S. Badeau from Dr. Atiya. Dr. Atiya describes his agenda for visiting the United States and assisting the Library of Congress. 3. Typed letter dated 15 July 1959 from James M. Buckley, Press Officer, Office of Education, to Dr. Atiya at Princeton University. Mr. Buckley asks Dr. Atiya for a copy of Dr. Atiya\u27s book "The Crusade in the Later Middle Ages." 4. Typed letter dated 19 November 1949 from John S. Badeau, The American University at Cairo, to Dr. Atiya. Mr. Badeau thanks Dr. Atiya for gifting him with Dr. Atiya\u27s two books on the Crusades. 5. Typed letter dated 20 November 1950 from John S. Badeau, The American University at Cairo, to Dr. Atiya, 100 Ru
Dark matter
Cover title: Giles Ryder.
Essay: Bryan Gaensler
Carolyn Barnes.
Catalogue of an exhibition held at John Buckley Gallery, Richmond, Victoria, 28 May - 14 June 2008.
Price list tipped in.Includes bibliographical references
Letter from Charles A. Buckley to Representative Burdick Containing a Copy of the US Deptartment of the Army\u27s Report on US House Resolution 10990, July 2, 1956
This letter, dated July 2, 1956, from Charles A. Buckley, chairperson of the United States (US) House Committee on Public Works, to US Representative Usher L. Burdick contains a copy of a report from Secretary of the US Army Wilbur M. Brucker regarding US House Resolution 10990 (H. R. 10990). Buckley notes that the report is unfavorable in regards to H. R. 10990.
See also:
Letter from Representative Burdick to Charles A. Buckley regarding the US Department of the Army\u27s report on US House Resolution 10990, July 6, 1956https://commons.und.edu/burdick-papers/1517/thumbnail.jp
Personal Papers (MS 80-0002)
Letter from Daniel W. Kempner to H. M. Buckley and Sons enclosing a check and requesting 50 poinsettias
George M. Buckley, The nature and unity of metaphysics
De Raeymaeker Louis. George M. Buckley, The nature and unity of metaphysics. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Troisième série, tome 44, n°3, 1946. pp. 441-442
George M. Buckley, The nature and unity of metaphysics
De Raeymaeker Louis. George M. Buckley, The nature and unity of metaphysics. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Troisième série, tome 44, n°3, 1946. pp. 441-442
Modification of the Dykstra-Parsons method to incorporate Buckley-Leverett displacement theory for waterfloods
The Dykstra-Parsons model describes layer 1-D oil displacement by water in
multilayered reservoirs. The main assumptions of the model are: piston-like
displacement of oil by water, no crossflow between the layers, all layers are individually
homogeneous, constant total injection rate, and injector-producer pressure drop for all
layers is the same. Main drawbacks of Dykstra-Parsons method are that it does not take
into account Buckley-Leverett displacement and the possibility of different oil-water
relative permeability for each layer.
A new analytical model for layer 1-D oil displacement by water in multilayered reservoir
has been developed that incorporates Buckley-Leverett displacement and different oilwater
relative permeability and water injection rate for each layer (layer injection rate
varying with time). The new model employs an extensive iterative procedure, thus
requiring a computer program.
To verify the new model, calculations were performed for a two-layered reservoir and
the results compared against that of numerical simulation. Cases were run, in which
layer thickness, permeability, oil-water relative permeability and total water injection
rate were varied.
Main results for the cases studied are as follows. First, cumulative oil production up to
20 years based on the new model and simulation are in good agreement. Second, model
water breakthrough times in the layer with the highest permeability-thickness product (kh) are in good agreement with simulation results. However, breakthrough times for the
layer with the lowest kh may differ quite significantly from simulation results. This is
probably due to the assumption in the model that in each layer the pressure gradient is
uniform behind the front, ahead of the front, and throughout the layer after water
breakthrough. Third, the main attractive feature of the new model is the ability to use
different oil-water relative permeability for each layer. However, further research is
recommended to improve calculation of layer water injection rate by a more accurate
method of determining pressure gradients between injector and producer
- …
