2,177 research outputs found

    Telegram re: Eisenhower editorial

    No full text
    Telegram from Morgan Bryan to Amon Carter congratulating Carter on the October 19, 1952 front page editorial in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram entitled "Dwight D. Eisenhower - a Great American," supporting Eisenhower for president

    Carter, Ben

    No full text
    Chronicles of Oklahoma, June 1938. Information taken from this volume containing minutes of meeting of the Oklahoma Historical Society, April 26, 1938. Ben Carter, Bryan County Attorney (son of late Congressman Charles D. Carter) spoke at the dedication of the Robert M. Jones Cemetery near Hugo

    Letter re: rubber plant

    No full text
    Letter from Ben Stone, attorney with Bryan, Stone, Wade & Agerton, to Amon Carter regarding a rubber plant. Enclosed is a letter to the United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt

    3-Dimensional simulation of multistage depressed collectors on microcomputers.

    No full text
    A three-dimensional (3-D) package for simulation of asymmetric and crossed-field multistage depressed collectors for microwave tubes has been developed. This package is based upon the 3-D finite-difference code KOBRA3-INP. The main features of the package are a user-friendly input interface, postprocessors for collector analysis and calculation of secondary electron trajectories, and versatile output graphics. Both PC and. mainframe versions of the package have been developed. The results of simple benchmark tests and those of simulation and analysis of asymmetric and crossed-field collectors including the effects of secondary electrons are presented. It is found that the asymmetric hyperbolic electric field collector shows very low backstreaming. It is shown that the representation of trajectories in energy space gives a better insight into the behavior of individual trajectories than plotting in coordinate-space. The package will be useful for designing novel types of depressed collector

    Special Issue of American Philosophical Quarterly: Varieties of Externalism: Epistemic, Content, Vehicle [Guest Editors]

    No full text
    TOC: Introduction to Special Issue of American Philosophical Quarterly Varieties of Externalism: Epistemic, Content, Vehicle ii J. Adam Carter, Andy Clark, Jesper Kallestrup, S. Orestis Palermos, and Duncan Pritchard Know-wh Does Not Reduce to Know-That 109 Katalin Farkas The Dual Concepts Objection to Content Externalism 123 Bryan Frances The Sound of Music: Externalist Style 139 Luke Kersten and Robert A. Wilson Access Internalism and the Guidance Deontological Conception of Justification 155 Ram Neta Embodied Knowledge, Conceptual Change, and the A Priori; or, Justification, Revision, and the Ways Life Could Go 169 Robert D. Rupert Semantic Deference versus Semantic Coordination 193 Laura Schroeter and François Schroete

    Special Issue of American Philosophical Quarterly: Varieties of Externalism: Epistemic, Content, Vehicle [Guest Editors]

    No full text
    TOC: Introduction to Special Issue of American Philosophical Quarterly Varieties of Externalism: Epistemic, Content, Vehicle ii J. Adam Carter, Andy Clark, Jesper Kallestrup, S. Orestis Palermos, and Duncan Pritchard Know-wh Does Not Reduce to Know-That 109 Katalin Farkas The Dual Concepts Objection to Content Externalism 123 Bryan Frances The Sound of Music: Externalist Style 139 Luke Kersten and Robert A. Wilson Access Internalism and the Guidance Deontological Conception of Justification 155 Ram Neta Embodied Knowledge, Conceptual Change, and the A Priori; or, Justification, Revision, and the Ways Life Could Go 169 Robert D. Rupert Semantic Deference versus Semantic Coordination 193 Laura Schroeter and François Schroete

    Letter, 1964, Aug. 31, Greenup, K.Y., to "Dear Roland," [Roland D. Carter]

    No full text
    In this letter to his friend (Dr. Roland D. Carter, Department of English, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga), Stuart writes that he received Carter's letter and another from Mr. Harrison Kroll, a retired Professor of the English Department of Lincoln Memorial University: the alma mater of both men (Class of 1929). He speaks highly of his former professor and Appalachian author, that "he's not whipped 26 he'll go on to the end-fighting all the way." He mentions a letter from Don [West] that he found in his attaché case

    I had a different way of governing : the evangelical presidential style of Jimmy Carter and his mission for middle east peace

    No full text
    President Jimmy Carter once said, “I had a different way of governing.” In attempting to explain what he meant by this, Carter has been variously described as a political amateur, a trustee, a non-political politician, an “active-positive” president, and a forerunner of the 1990s’ New Democrats. It is argued here, however, that mere secular descriptions and categories such as these do not adequately capture the essence of Carter’s brand of politics and his understanding of the presidency. Rejecting Richard Neustadt’s prescriptions for effective presidential leadership, Carter thought political bargaining and compromise were “dirty” and “sinful.” He deemed the ways of Washington as “evil,” and considered many, if not most, career politicians immoral. While he fully supported the institutional separation of church and state, politics for Carter was about “doing right,” telling the truth, and making the United States and the world “a better demonstration of what Christ is.” Like two earlier Democrats, William Jennings Bryan and Woodrow Wilson, Carter understood politics as an alternative form of Christian ministry and service. In this regard, Carter was a presidential exception. Carter’s evangelical faith gave his politics meaning, skill, vision, and a framework for communication. Using Fred Greenstein’s categories of presidential leadership, Carter’s faith provided him with “emotional intelligence”, too. However, Carter’s evangelical style provoked many of his contemporaries, including many of his fellow Democrats. To his critics at home and abroad, Carter was often accused of being arrogant, stubborn, naive, and ultimately a political failure. But as evinced by his indispensable role in negotiating peace between Israel and Egypt, his leadership style also provided him some remarkable achievements. The research here is based on a thorough examination of President Carter’s many writings, his public papers, interviews, and opinion pieces. Written accounts from former Carter administration officials and from Israeli and Egyptian participants at Camp David are also used. This project is largely descriptive, qualitative in approach, but quantitative data are used when appropriate and as supplements

    Food and eating in fiction since 1950 with particular reference to the writing of Angela Carter, Doris Lessing, Michele Roberts and Alice Thomas Ellis.

    No full text
    PhDEating is a fundamental activity. What people eat, how and with whom, what they feel about food, what they do or do not want to eat and why - even who they eat - are of crucial significance in any reading of human behaviour. In this thesis, I consider the diverse and complex uses of food and eating in fiction since 1950, especially that written by women. I argue both that food and eating carry much of the meaning of a novel or story and that the acts of cooking, feeding and eating depicted are inseparable from issues of power and control: individually, interpersonally, culturally, politically. My discussion centres on the writing of Angela Carter, Doris Lessing, Michele Roberts and Alice Thomas Ellis. Drawing on psychoanalytic theory, sociology, anthropology, Foucault, Bakhtin and others, the thesis aims to construct an interdisciplinary perspective which both resists reductive interpretations and emphasises the centrality, complexity and diversity of food and eating in literature in our culture. I begin with an examination of the ambiguities of maternal feeding and nurturing, moving on to explore the links between appetite, eating and sexuality. I explore cannibalism and vampirism as manifestations of oppression, but also as indicating insatiable emptiness and transgressive appetite. The body itself is crucial, and my argument considers the paradox of not eating as control/enslavement, also tracing self-starvation as a positive route towards wholeness and connection. The last part of my argument focuses on social eating, examining conventions, rituals and food itself in connection with power relations, and finally considers how we might truly speak of food and eating in the context of society as a whole

    Health promotion practice, research ethics and publishing in the Health Promotion Journal of Australia

    No full text
    Article > Contents Vol 26(3) Health promotion practice, research ethics and publishing in the Health Promotion Journal of Australia Stacy M. Carter A D, Annette Braunack-Mayer B and Jonine Jancey C A Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sydney School of Public Health, Medical Foundation Building K25, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. B School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Mail Drop DX 650207, SA 5005, Australia. C School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. D Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract PDF (58.8 KB) Export Citation Print ShareThis Health Promotion Journal of Australia 26(3) 167-169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/HEv26n3_ED2 Published: 21 December 2015 This special issue of the HPJA focuses on ethics in the context of health promotion practice. This editorial takes a narrower focus: the issue of Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) approval for health promotion research, evaluation and quality assurance (QA). We will focus on three papers in the special issue: each argue that those working in health promotion should consider ethics from the very beginning of their research, evaluation and/or QA activities. The first paper, by Ainsley Newson and Wendy Lipworth, is entitled ‘Why should ethics approval be required before publication of health promotion research?’ In it they argue that ‘journals should not, in general, publish articles with no ethics approval’, even if the findings are interesting or apparently important.1 The second paper, by Peter Sainsbury, is entitled ‘Development and oversight of ethical health promotion quality assurance and evaluation activities involving human participants’. In it he argues that the boundaries between research, evaluation and QA are not clear, and that all of these activities should be underpinned by research ethics principles and focus on the central issue of potential risk to participants.2 The final paper, a commentary by Judy Allen, reflects on the ethical dimensions of health promotion research and evaluation from the inside of an HREC.3SMC is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship (1032963)
    corecore