241,995 research outputs found
Vla les beaux jours, chansonnette. Paroles de L. Rafarel. Musique de R. Bruno et L.-M. Fournier
No full textThe ethics of thinking in Heidegger, Bruno & Spinoza
Full text linkThe aim of the present work is to face Heidegger’s claim that philosophy has ended.
Facing this claim for us has not taken the form of creating a new method or positing a
new question but that of a search for anomalies in what Heidegger decrees as
finished, which is philosophy as metaphysics. In his historical confrontation with the
history of thought Heidegger seems to have left out, dismissed or forgotten those
authors who do not fit into his definition of metaphysics. We have chosen Giordano
Bruno and Baruch Spinoza, metaphysical thinkers who have undertaken a
philosophical practice that does not intend to demolish subjectivity but actually
begins without any need for it. The birth of the subject as grounding reality finds its
affirmation with Descartes and inaugurates modernity that, according to Heidegger,
exhausts philosophy and leads it into the arms of modern science and technology.
Bruno and Spinoza respectively precede and follow the birth of modernity and of
modern science, which they look at with an eye that is not that of the modern subject.
Following their different approaches to philosophy, we shall also explore their
relation to Renaissance Humanism, dismissed by Heidegger as a historical reiteration
of the Roman world, perceived as a perversion of the Greek origin of thought. We
shall show how hasty such a dismissal is. Our goal is to show not merely that
Heidegger is wrong but that if Western thinking contains the seeds of its own end, it
also contains the ones of a different understanding of the Western world and its
achievements. The three authors will engage on the grounds of ontology, gnosiology
and ethics and yet we have defined the whole enterprise of this work as an ethics
overall. An ethics of thinking is a practice of thought that wishes to envisage the
possibility for Western man of inhabiting his own world by understanding himself
not as an isolated subject and master of nature but as the place where the unity and
multiplicity of nature come to be thought at the same time
Bruno Benci: credere e promuovere l'architettura - Presentazione
No full textL’uscita di questo volume Architetture Arezzo è uno dei frutti lasciati da Bruno Benci. Raramente, nella promozione della collana Architetture delle Province, abbiamo avuto un riscontro così immediato nella condivisione degli obiettivi, come è stato con lui. La sua propensione per la diffusione della cultura lo guidava nei suoi comportamenti, facendogli superare i numerosi ostacoli, spesso di ordine anche solo formale, che nel nostro paese, purtroppo, inevitabilmente ci sono
Schelling, Bruno e il Bruno di Schelling
No full textIl contributo ricostruisce il complesso intreccio tra la filosofia di Bruno e quella di Schelling a partire dal dialogo schellinghiano "Bruno"
La filosofia come stile di vita. Introduzione alle pratiche filosofiche
No full textMILANO: Bruno Mondadori, 2003
Correction to: Drill and Blast in Gypsum Quarries: Optimization of Technical, Economic, and Safety Aspects in “Monte Tondo” Mid-mountain Case Study (Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, (2025), 42, 1, (99-113), 10.1007/s42461-024-01133-9)
No full textThe article Drill and Blast in Gypsum Quarries: Optimization of Technical, Economic, and Safety Aspects in “Monte Tondo” Mid mountain Case Study, written by Daniele Casertano, Francesco Tinti, Sara Kasmaeeyazdi, Vanessa Cellini, and Roberto Bruno was originally published under exclusive license to Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Inc. 2024 on 9 December 2024. As a result of the subsequent decision to publish the article under the open access model, the article’s copyright notice was changed on 29 December 2025 to © The Author(s) and the article is now distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
- …
