1,721,067 research outputs found
Replication Data for: "The Lasting Effect of Sex Ratio Imbalance on Marriage and Family: Evidence from World War II in Russia"
No full textBrainerd, Elizabeth, (2017) “The Lasting Effect of Sex Ratio Imbalance on Marriage and Family: Evidence from World War II in Russia.” Review of Economics and Statistics 99:2, 229-242
Replication Data for: "The Lasting Effect of Sex Ratio Imbalance on Marriage and Family: Evidence from World War II in Russia"
No full textBrainerd, Elizabeth, (2017) “The Lasting Effect of Sex Ratio Imbalance on Marriage and Family: Evidence from World War II in Russia.” Review of Economics and Statistics 99:2, 229-242
Figure 2 in Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes
No full textFigure 2. Models of axial patterning in fishes. A, vertebral number; B, vertebral aspect ratio (centrum length/centrum width). For an explanation of the models, see text.Published as part of Ward, Andrea B. & Brainerd, Elizabeth L., 2007, Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes, pp. 97-116 in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90 on page 99, DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00714.x, http://zenodo.org/record/784638
Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes
No full textWard, Andrea B., Brainerd, Elizabeth L. (2007): Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90: 97-116, DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00714.
Figure 7 in Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes
No full textFigure 7. Vertebral aspect ratio (AR) in the abdominal and caudal regions (AR = centrum length/centrum width). Solid lines are reduced major axis (RMA) regressions based on the raw data (the data points shown), and dashed lines are RMA regressions based on independent contrasts of abdominal and caudal aspect ratio. Regression statistics are given in Tables 4, 5.Published as part of Ward, Andrea B. & Brainerd, Elizabeth L., 2007, Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes, pp. 97-116 in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90 on page 107, DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00714.x, http://zenodo.org/record/784638
Figure 5 in Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes
No full textFigure 5. Number of abdominal and caudal vertebrae from our literature-based data set. Species were grouped into orders. Regression results are in Table 1, and a list of the species plotted is available in Supplementary Material: Table S1. The dotted line has a slope of one, indicating equal changes in abdominal and caudal vertebrae.Published as part of Ward, Andrea B. & Brainerd, Elizabeth L., 2007, Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes, pp. 97-116 in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90 on page 104, DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00714.x, http://zenodo.org/record/784638
Figure 3 in Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes
No full textFigure 3. Intrarelationships of the seven groups included in our museum-based study. In the line drawings, the grey portion of each silhouette highlights the tail region of the body. A, Polypteriformes (Nelson, 1994); B, Osteoglossomorpha (Hilton, 2003); C, Elopomorpha (Belouze, 2002); D, Ostariophysi (Fink & Fink, 1981; Nelson, 1994); E, Paracanthopterygii (Patterson & Rosen, 1989; Endo, 2002); F, Beloniformes (Lovejoy, 2000); G, Scombroidei (Johnson & Baldwin, 1994).Published as part of Ward, Andrea B. & Brainerd, Elizabeth L., 2007, Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes, pp. 97-116 in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90 on page 100, DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00714.x, http://zenodo.org/record/784638
Figure 8 in Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes
No full textFigure 8. Squared-change parsimony traced phylogenies for number of abdominal vertebrae and number of caudal vertebrae. The interrelationships of the seven clades examined are based on Lauder & Liem (1983), and references for the intrarelationships are given in the legend to Fig. 3. Both traces are based on a squared-change parsimony algorithm in MacClade, version 4.06 (Maddison, 1991). Lighter coloured branches (white, yellow) are lower vertebral numbers and darker branches (purple, black) are higher vertebral numbers. Electrophorus electricus was pseudocoloured in the number of caudal vertebrae to allow for greater resolution of the caudal vertebrae trace (see Material and methods). Two nodes are labelled A and B to allow their identification in the text.Published as part of Ward, Andrea B. & Brainerd, Elizabeth L., 2007, Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes, pp. 97-116 in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90 on page 109, DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00714.x, http://zenodo.org/record/784638
Figure 4 in Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes
No full textFigure 4. Contribution of increases in vertebral number and aspect ratio to overall body elongation. Elongation ratio (ER) is the standard length divided by the next largest body axis, either width or depth. The raw values plotted here were converted to independent contrast scores and a reduced major axis (RMA) regression, with the intercept forced through zero, was performed. A, total vertebral number vs. ER. Results from RMA regression on independent contrasts: y = 9.3x, R = 0.32, P = 0.02. B, vertebral aspect ratio (AR = centrum length/centrum width) vs. ER. Points represent the mean of abdominal and caudal ARs for each species. Results from RMA regression on independent contrasts: R = 0.18, P = 0.72. C, axial elongation index (AEI) vs. ER. AEI = (abdominal vertebral number)(abdominal AR) + (caudal vertebral number)(caudal AR). Results from RMA regression on independent contrasts: y = 10.0x, R = 0.46, P <0.001., Beloniformes;, Elopomorpha;, Ostariophysi;, Osteoglossomorpha;, Paracanthoptery-Published as part of Ward, Andrea B. & Brainerd, Elizabeth L., 2007, Evolution of axial patterning in elongate fishes, pp. 97-116 in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90 on page 103, DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00714.x, http://zenodo.org/record/784638
- …
