89,831 research outputs found
Bouchard Family Interview, October 2, 1975
No full textMembers of the Bouchard family (possibly Joseph A. Bouchard, Louise Bouchard Pankratz, Alma Bouchard Smith, Luke F. Bouchard) discuss their ancestral home in Frenchtown, Montana. They tour the house, discussing changes that have been made, including original colors of the walls, what certain rooms were used for, and things that had been added or removed from the house. The Bouchards also describe the grounds, adding brief biographical details to explain certain areas of the house.
This interview was conducted as the Bouchard family toured the house, making it difficult to hear. Only a partial transcript of the interview exists because audio quality is very poor.https://scholarworks.umt.edu/frenchtown_oralhistory/1000/thumbnail.jp
John F. Marok : Peintures
No full textBouchard describes the symbols and iconography used by painter Marok to represent solitude. The author compares the paintings in the series entitled «Insula Solitudinis» (the Island of Solitude) to those of 19th century painter Arnold Böcklin, and discusses the various techniques used by the artist. Texts in French and English. Bio-bibliography 2 p
Variations on the Author
No full text“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Soulé (M.), Noel (J.) et Bouchard (F.). — Le Placement familial (Paris, P.U.F., 1964)
No full textTurbiaux Marcel. Soulé (M.), Noel (J.) et Bouchard (F.). — Le Placement familial (Paris, P.U.F., 1964). In: Bulletin de psychologie, tome 21 n°267, 1968. p. 621
Bouchard (J.-F.). - Recherches archéologiques dans la région de Tumaco, Colombie, 1984 (Mémoire n° 34)
No full textLegoupil Dominique. Bouchard (J.-F.). - Recherches archéologiques dans la région de Tumaco, Colombie, 1984 (Mémoire n° 34). In: Les Nouvelles de l'archéologie, n°15, printemps 1984. p. 99
Bouchard (J.-F.). - Recherches archéologiques dans la région de Tumaco, Colombie, 1984 (Mémoire n° 34)
No full textLegoupil Dominique. Bouchard (J.-F.). - Recherches archéologiques dans la région de Tumaco, Colombie, 1984 (Mémoire n° 34). In: Les Nouvelles de l'archéologie, n°15, printemps 1984. p. 99
Macrophthalmus (Chaenostoma) lisae Poupin & Bouchard, 2010, sp. nov.
No full textMacrophthalmus (Chaenostoma) lisae sp. nov. (Figs 1 a–c, 2 a–o) Type material. Mayotte. Holotype: 1 male 3.75 × 4.9 mm, stn 26, 12° 45 ’ 15.60 ”S, 45 °02’ 49.86 ”E, upper intertidal beach on Mliha, “Platier de Mutsumbatsou”, coll. J.-M. Bouchard, R. Cléva, J. Poupin, J. Dumas, V. Dinhut, KUW fieldwork 16.xi. 2009 (MNHN B 32254). Paratypes: same data as holotype, 1 female ov. 3.85 × 5.1 mm (MNHN B 32362); 1 male 4.1 × 5.4 mm, 3 females ov. 3.1 × 4.1 – 3.95 × 5.3 mm, 3 females 2.6 × 3.3– 3.7 × 4.9 mm, 1 female juvenile broken (MNHN B 32071); 1 female ov. 3.75 × 5.01 mm, stn 13 b, 12 ° 55 ’ 22.08 ”S, 45 °09’ 22.08 ”E, Malamani mangrove, intertidal, coll. J.-M Bouchard, 08.x. 2008 (MNHN B 32072). Comparison material: Macrophthalmus (Chaenostoma) boscii Audouin, 1826 Mayotte. 1 female 7.5 × 9.1 mm, stn 1, 12° 43 ’ 50.45 ”S, 45 ° 11 ’ 39.66 ”E, intertidal beach of Trévani, coll. J. Delmas, J. Poupin, R. Cléva, 01.xi. 2009 (MNHN B 32073); 1 male 3.6 × 4.6 mm, 1 juvenile, stn 31, low intertidal Brandélé, Musicale beach, 12 ° 55 ’01.60”S, 45 ° 11 ’ 12.43 ”E, coll. J. Poupin, R. Cléva, 19.xi. 2009 (MNHN B 32074). Diagnosis. Small-size species with carapace breadth less than 6 mm, greatest breath occurs at tip of first anterolateral teeth (external orbital angle); carapace subrectangular, 1.3 wider than long; front broad, 0.2–0.3 distance between external orbital angles, not constricted between bases of ocular peduncles. Dorsal surface of carapace smooth. Anterolateral margin with 3 teeth, including external orbital angle; first two teeth separated by a V-shaped incision, last tooth feebly marked. Ocular peduncles short and stout, not projecting significantly beyond lateral carapace margin. Upper and lower orbital border with small granules; males without stridulating mechanism. Central region of posterior border of epistome straight. Ischium of third maxilliped 1.2–1.3 times merus length. Male chela with palm inflated, 1.1 times as high as long, furnished with mat of setae on inner face; fingers short 1.0– 1.2 times as long as palm, cutting margins with sets of small triangular teeth, without differentiated larger teeth. Female chela with thinner palm, 0.9 as high as long, whithout mat of setae on inner face; fingers 1.0– 1.2 as long as palm with smooth cutting margins; telson 3.4 times as wide as long, with lateral margins straight to feebly convex. Description. Carapace subrectangular, 1.3 wider than long (Figs. 1 b, c; 2 a). Anterolateral margin with three teeth (Fig. 2 b), widest being between tips of first teeth. Outer orbital tooth, made by external orbital angle, broad, directed outwards; anterior and posterior margins minutely serrated. Second tooth smaller, separated from first one by V-shaped incision, with margins minutely serrated. Third tooth reduced, indistinct, separated from second tooth by minute incision. Dorsal surface of carapace smooth with sparse tufts of short setae, regions poorly defined; branchial regions with few scattered setae and few low tubercles. Lateral margins with row of long setae. Front deflexed with smooth margins, broad, width 0.2–0.3 the distance between external orbital angles, not constricted between bases of ocular peduncles; anterior margin forming somewhat large open V in frontal view (Fig. 2 c); upper face smooth, with median furrow filled with short setae. Upper orbital border curved with minutely granular margin. Lower orbital border with regular tubercles along whole length; pterygostomian region with line of granules sub-parallel to lower orbital border; granules very small not forming stridulating ridge with large tubercles. Ocular peduncles short, stout, reaching outer orbital tooth but not projecting significantly beyond carapace margin; diameter of cornea about 0.3 times length of peduncle. Posteromedian margin of epistome straight; central region of anterior buccal cavity without median ridge (Fig. 2 c). Ischium of third maxilliped 1.2–1.3 times length of merus; carpus inserted at distolateral angle of merus (Fig. 2 d). Dorsal surface of merus of male cheliped separated from lateral, mesial surfaces by finely tuberculated edges; mesial surface smooth, without horny ridge; ventral margin with fringe of long setae (Fig. 2 e). Carpus with few indistinct tubercles on dorsal surface, without spine, with long setae on disto-mesial angle. Chela with palm inflated, 1.1 times as high as long, furnished with mat of setae on inner surface, not extending on inner surface of fingers; upper margin rounded with small tubercles, lower margin rounded and smooth (Figs. 2 f, g). Fingers 1.0– 1.2 times as long as palm, cutting margins with sets of small triangular teeth but without differentiated tooth. Immovable finger undeflexed, outer surface smooth, with median longitudinal ridge, extending on distal half of outer surface of palm; inner surface smooth, with median longitudinal ridge not extending on inner surface of palm. Movable finger slightly curved; outer surface smooth with longitudinal ridge parallel to upper margin in proximal half; inner surface smooth. Merus and carpus of female cheliped similar to that of male in terms of tubercules and setae. Chela more elongated than in male, without mat of setae on inner surface of palm. Palm 0.9 as high as long, outer surface slightly convex, not inflated; upper margin slightly curved, weakly tuberculated, lower margin almost straight, smooth (Fig. 2 m). Fingers 1.0– 1.2 as long as palm, cutting margins smooth, distal thirds as corneous tips; immovable finger with median, sharp longitudinal ridge, extending onto distal half of palm. Second to fifth pereopods stout, setose on dorsal, ventral margins, P 3 –P 4 the longest (Figs. 2 h, i). Upper and lower margins of P 3 merus granular with scattered setae, 2.4 (female) to 2.6 (male) times as long as high, distodorsal angle with small spine; carpus, propodus and dactyl unarmed, with smooth upper and lower margins, dactyl slightly longer than propodus. P 4 merus granular on upper, lower margins, 2.2 (female) to 2.4 (male) times as long as high, distodorsal angle with small spine; carpus unarmed with few granules on distoventral margin, distal part of upper margin; propodus faintly granulated on upper, lower margins; dactyl unarmed slightly longer than propodus. Male abdomen narrow, somite 3 without transverse ridge, somite 6 the highest; telson with regularly convex lateral margins, 1.6 times as wide as long (Fig. 2 j). Male first pleopod moderately compressed, slightly curved; lateral margin with long spaced setae, mesial margin with scattered short setae; terminal lobe with rounded horny apex, rows of stiffs bristles (Figs. 2 k, l). Female abdomen wide, third somite without transverse ridge, somite 5 the highest; telson 3.4 times as wide as long, distolateral margins straight to feebly convex, basal margin feebly concave, as wide as distal margin of sixth somite (Fig. 2 n). Female vulvae situated medially posterior to suture between sternites of fifth and sixth thoracic sternites, operculum situated postero-mesially, aperture oriented antero-laterally (Fig. 2 o). Size. Males 3.75 × 4.94 mm and 4.06 × 5.44 mm; females 2.61 × 3.33–3.7 × 4.9 mm; ovigerous females 3.14 × 4.14 – 3.95 × 5.26 mm. Live coloration. Dorsal surface of carapace and appendages white-cream scattered with brownish patches (Figs. 1 b, c). Coloration acts as camouflage, and the crabs were hardly noticeable on the substrate, when collected. Distribution. So far known only from the island of Mayotte, western Indian Ocean. Potentially also in neighbouring islands with similar biotopes (Madagascar, Comoros, Glorieuses, Seychelles) where the small size of the species may have made individuals difficult to detect. Habitat. Macrophthalmus lisae sp. nov. digs burrows on sandy mudflats. Entrances of burrows are located on the upper part of the intertidal area (Fig. 1 a); they are only few millimetres in diameter and can remained unnoticed during sampling. Etymology. This new species is named after Lisa, ten-year old daughter of the second author, for enthusiastically participating in the collections.Published as part of Poupin, Joseph & Bouchard, Jean-Marie, 2010, A new dwarf sentinel crab from Mayotte Island, western Indian Ocean (Decapoda: Brachyura: Macrophthalmidae), pp. 61-67 in Zootaxa 2501 on pages 62-65, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.29410
[Newspaper Clipping: Author Claims Evidence of Second JFK Assassin #1]
No full textNewspaper article titled "Author Claims Evidence of Second JFK Assassin." The article states that author Richard J. Whalen concluded "that there is circumstantial evidence to support the theory of a second assassin in the shooting of President John F. Kennedy.
- …
