1,721,018 research outputs found

    Section Overview: Governance and Management for Social Policy in Latin America

    No full text
    This chapter presents the Latin American section and provides an overview of its main findings. It discusses the governance and management for social policy in a region with high levels of inequality, informal employment, low fiscal efforts, and major weaknesses in terms of social risks and state capacity. Besides these similarities, wide variations also exist in social policy regimes across countries in terms of governance, administrative arrangements, levels of decentralization, and mixes of public services and private services. Innovations in social policy over the 21st century have produced a range of mixed systems that are not always consistent, distributionally sound, or sustainable.Fil: Filgueira, Fernando. Universidad de la República; UruguayFil: Arza, Camila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Blofield, Merike. Universitat Hamburg; Alemani

    The Slow and Reluctant Development of Social Citizenship in Latin America

    No full text
    This chapter puts the region’s social protection policy models into historical, political, and social context. It distinguishes four major stages in Latin American welfare state models, clearly associated with four stages in Latin American state building: the minimalist “welfare” state of the primary export period; the contribution-based welfare state under the import substitution model; the turn to the reluctant welfare state and the introduction of the market into social affairs that characterized the Washington Consensus era; and finally, the expansionary stage of post-Washington Consensus until the mid-2010s. In the initial stages, the state role was minimal, focusing on primary education and boosting urban sanitation infrastructure. In the import substitution period, there was a strong push for modern social protection, tied firmly to the protection for formal workers. However, informal labor markets and incomplete protection of a variety of risks produced a stratified model of social security with incomplete coverage. The liberal turn led to a focus on extreme poverty along with an increased reliance on market mechanisms in healthcare, education, and pensions. As the 20th century came to an end, pressures for more inclusive social policies promoted the expansion of coverage and benefits. The return and resilience of democracy, an export-oriented external stance, and the substantial economic growth of the first two decades of the 21st century were all factors that contributed to this new and still unstable social citizenship contract.Fil: Filgueira, Fernando. Universidad de la República; UruguayFil: Arza, Camila. Centro Interdisciplinario para el Estudio de Políticas Públicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Blofield, Merike. Universitat Hamburg; Alemani

    Reviews: Traumatic States: Gendered Violence, Suffering and Care in Chile

    No full text
    The space between the two points in time allows the author to explore how these women have coped with their situation over the time between them, how they interpret the suffering they have undergone, how they have sought help from the state (at times successfully and at times not), and the healing that they are constantly and proactively engaging in. The author seeks to take us beyond numbers and render visible the social and psychological effects of domestic violence, through the subjects' own narratives and with their own agency. The first step toward healing when it comes to a historically "invisible" problem such as domestic violence, is simply the process of naming: "The ability to express pain requires language for talking about the pain, identification of the origins of the pain, and the willingness and ability of individuals and institutions to hear that pain and address it, to shift power relations in such a way as to rework the sources of the pain" (p. 10)

    Friedenssaboteure und Friedensunterstützer: Wie individuelle Eigenschaften die Dauer und den Ausgang von Bürgerkriegen beeinflussen

    No full text
    In dieser Arbeit wird versucht zu erklären, warum Staatsoberhäupter und Rebellenanführer zeitweise Bürgerkriege verlängern oder sie durch Friedensabkommen beenden. Dies ist sowohl von wissenschaftlicher als auch von politischer Bedeutung, da Personen in Führungspositionen oft die Möglichkeit haben, den Ausgang und die Dauer von Konflikten zu beeinflussen. Zu diesem Zweck wird in dieser Arbeit, die Beziehung zwischen den individuellen Merkmalen und den strukturellen und institutionellen Bedingungen untersucht. Dabei gehe ich von der These aus, dass die individuellen Eigenschaften von Staatsoberhäupter und Rebellenanführer ihre Grundüberzeugungen und Werte und damit ihre Entscheidungsfindung in Bürgerkriegen beeinflussen. Genauer gesagt zeige ich, dass einige individuelle Eigenschaften förderlich für den Frieden sind, während andere sich für die Dauer und den Ausgang eines Konflikts von als nachteilig erweisen. Ich belege diese theoretische Annahme in Form von vier Aufsätzen zu folgenden Themen: 1) Merkmale des Präsidenten und das Friedensabkommen in Kolumbien 2016. 2) Gewalterfahrung und die Unterstützung von Friedensreferenden. 3) Militärische Ausbildung von Rebellenanführern und die Dauer von Bürgerkriegen. 4) Kampferfahrung von Staatsoberhäupter und Rebellenanführer und Friedensabkommen. Ich komme zu dem Schluss, dass unter den Bedingungen der Ungewissheit die individuellen Eigenschaften der Führungspersonen für den Ausgang und die Dauer von Bürger-kriegen von Bedeutung sein können.This thesis attempts to explain why state and rebel leaders prolong civil wars or end them through peace agreements. This is of both academic and political relevance, as leaders are often able to influence the outcome and duration of conflicts. To this end, this thesis examines the relationship between leaders’ individual characteristics and struc-tural and institutional conditions. I argue that state and rebel leaders’ individual characteristics influence their core beliefs and values and thus their decision-making in civil wars. More specifically, I show that some individual characteristics are conducive to peace, while others are detrimental in terms of duration and outcome of conflicts. I provide evidence for this theoretical assumption in the form of four articles, covering: 1) the biographical characteristics of a state leader who signed a peace agreement, 2) the relevance of exposure to violence for support for a peace referendum, 3) the negative effect of rebel leaders’ military training on the duration of civil wars, and 4) the positive impact of state leaders’ combat experience – and the partially negative impact of the same among rebel leaders – on the likelihood of peace agreements being signed. I conclude that under conditions of uncertainty, leaders’ individual characteristics matter for the outcome and duration of civil wars

    The Great Gap: Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Latin America

    No full text
    The relationship between socioeconomic inequality and democratic politics has been one of the central questions in the social sciences. Recent waves of democratization combined with deepened global inequalities have made understanding this relationship ever more crucial. This study analyzes inequality and politics in the region with the highest socioeconomic inequalities in the world, Latin America. Contributions address the socioeconomic context and inequality of opportunities; elite culture, public opinion, and media framing; capital mobility, campaign financing, representation and gender equality policies; and taxation and social policies
    corecore