1,720,989 research outputs found
Reply to "Letter to the Editor on: The impact of the third fragment features on the healing of femoral shaft fractures managed with intramedullary nailing: a radiological study".
Not availabl
Reply to "Letter to Editor regarding: Development of the Italian fractures registry (RIFra): A call for action to improve quality and safety"
No abstract availabl
Letter to the Editor on "Abnormally High Dislocation Rates of Total Hip Arthroplasty After Spinal Deformity Surgery"
not availabl
Role of biomechanical assessment in rotator cuff tear repair: Arthroscopic vs mini-open approach
BACKGROUNDRotator cuff (RC) tears are one of the most frequent pathologies within the shoulder girdle. Hand dominance and older age are associated with RC tears. Two different surgical procedures, the mini-open (MO) and all-arthroscopic (AA) approach, represented the standard of treatment.AIMTo compare the clinical and biomechanical outcomes of two surgical techniques (AA vs MO procedure) performed to address the painful shoulder syndrome with partial or total supraspinatus tendon tear.METHODSEighty-eight participants, 50 following RC repair with AA and 38 with MO approach, were recruited in the present cross-sectional case-control study (ORTHO-SHOULDER, Prot. 0054602). All patients underwent postoperative clinical evaluation for pain (Visual analogic scale), impairment, and disability (disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand) and limitation in daily activity (Constant-Murley score). Patients' shoulder mobility was also assessed in our Laboratory of Functional Movement through a wearable inertial sensor and surface electromyography to monitor kinematics and muscle activity during the movement on the frontal (abduction/adduction) and sagittal (flexion-extension) planes.RESULTSNo statistically significant differences between the two procedures were observed in either main clinical score or range of motion. A significant increase in velocity during the movement execution and a higher contribution of upper trapezius muscles were found in the AA group compared with MO patients.CONCLUSIONIn terms of clinical scores, our findings were in line with previous results. However, the use of technology-based assessment of shoulder mobility has revealed significant differences between the two techniques in terms of mean velocity and pattern of muscle activation
Physiologic postoperative presepsin kinetics following primary cementless total hip arthroplasty: A prospective observational study
Background: Presepsin is an emerging biomarker in the diagnosis of sepsis. In the field of orthopaedics, it could be useful in diagnosing and managing periprosthetic joint infections. Aim: To define the normal postoperative presepsin plasmatic curve, in patients undergoing primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Patients undergoing primary cementless THA at our Institute were recruited. Inclusion criteria were: Primary osteoarthritis of the hip; urinary catheter time of permanence < 24 h; peripheral venous cannulation time of permanence < 24 h; no postoperative homologous blood transfusion administration and hospital stay ≤ 8 d. Exclusion criteria were: The presence of other articular prosthetic replacement or bone fixation devices; chronic inflammatory diseases; chronic kidney diseases; history of recurrent infections or malignant neoplasms; previous surgery in the preceding 12 mo; diabetes mellitus; immunosuppressive drug or corticosteroid assumption. All the patients received the same antibiotic prophylaxis. All the THA were performed by the same surgical and anaesthesia team; total operative time was defined as the time taken from skin incision to completion of skin closure. At enrollment, anthropometric data, smocking status, osteoarthritis stage according to Kellgren and Lawrence, Harris Hip Score, drugs assumption and comorbidities were recorded. All the patients underwent serial blood tests, including complete blood count, presepsin (PS) and C-reactive protein 24 h before arthroplasty and at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h postoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12-mo follow-up. Results: A total of 96 patients (51 female; 45 male; mean age = 65.74 ± 5.58) were recruited. The mean PS values were: 137.54 pg/mL at baseline, 192.08 pg/mL at 24 h post-op; 254.85 pg/mL at 48 h post-op; 259 pg/mL at 72 h post-op; 248.6 pg/mL at 96-h post-op; 140.52 pg/mL at 3-mo follow-up; 135.55 pg/mL at 6-mo follow-up and 130.11 pg/mL at 12-mo follow-up. In two patients (2.08%) a soft-tissue infection was observed; in these patients, higher levels (> 350 pg/mL) were recorded at 3-mo follow-up. Conclusion: The dosage of plasmatic PS concentration is highly recommended in patients undergoing THA before surgery to exclude the presence of an unknown infection. The PS plasmatic concentration should be also assessed at 72 h post-operatively, evaluate the maximum postoperative PS value, and at 96 h post-operatively when a decrease of presepsin should be found. The lack of a presepsin decrease at 96 h post-operatively could be a predictive factor of infection
Hip hemiarthroplasty with modular neck: is it useful in residents' learning curve? A prospective clinical trial
The number of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) worldwide will drastically increase in the next few decades, reaching 6.3 million by 2050. In the future, therefore, newly-qualified orthopaedic surgeons will treat this kind of injury more frequently than in past decades. This prospective observational study aims to assess whether hip hemiarthroplasty with modular neck, performed via the Hardinge approach, can be safely carried out by orthopaedic residents
Optimum timing of conversion from DCO to definitive fixation in closed fractures of the lower limb: When and how?
Introduction: In damage control orthopaedics (DCO), fractures are initially stabilised with external fixation followed by delayed conversion to definitive internal fixation. The aim of this study is to determine whether the timing of the conversion influences the development of deep infection and fracture healing in a cohort of patients treated by DCO after a closed fracture of the lower limb. Furthermore, we wanted to evaluate whether the one-stage conversion procedure is always safe. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single level 1 trauma centre. Ninety-four cases of closed fractures of lower limb treated by DCO subsequently converted to internal fixation from 2012 to 2019 were included. Development of deep infection, superficial infection, non-union and time to union were recorded. Patients were then divided into three groups according to the timing of conversion: Group A (<7 days), Group B (7-13 days), Group C (> 14 days). Comparison between groups was performed to assess intergroup variabilty. Results: The mean number of days between DCO and conversion was 6.7±4.52 (range 1-22). We observed one case of deep infection (1.1%), one case of non-union (1.1%), four cases of superficial infection (4.3%) and mean time to union was ±1.38 months. Comparison between groups demonstrated no significant correlation between timing of conversion and development of superficial or deep infection and non-union, while it highlighted that complexity of the fracture and longer surgical time of conversion procedure were significantly higher in Group C. Conclusions: One-stage conversion to definitive internal fixation within 22 days from DCO is a safe and feasible procedure, which does not influence the incidence of infection or non-union
Aetiology of trauma-related acute compartment syndrome of the leg: A systematic review
Background: Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is characterised by abnormal pressure inside a compartment, resulting in ischemia of muscles and nerves. Most orthopaedic surgeons, especially those who work in major trauma centres, have been or will be facing a case of ACS in their clinical activity. Fortunately, complications related to untreated compartment syndrome have become less frequent thanks to a better understanding of pathogenesis and to early recognition and prompt surgical treatment. The aim of this study is to identify the existing evidence regarding aetiology of trauma-related ACS of the leg.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using PubMed Medline, Ovid Medline and the Cochrane library, extended by a manual search of bibliographies. Retrieved articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported data about aetiology of trauma-related compartment syndrome of the tibia.Results: Ninety-five studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were identified. By dividing the studies into three groups according to the traumatic aetiology, we were able to classify traumatic ACS as fracture related, soft tissue injury related and vascular injury related. Fracture related was the most represented group, comprising 58 papers, followed by the soft tissue injury related group which includes 44 articles and vascular injury related group with 24 papers.Conclusions: Although traditionally ACS has been associated mainly with fractures of tibial diaphysis, literature demonstrates that other localisations, in particular in the proximal tibia, are associated with an increased incidence of this serious condition.The forms of ACS secondary to soft tissues injuries represent an extremely variable spectrum of lesions with an insidious tendency for late diagnosis and consequently negative outcomes. In the case of vascular injury, ACS should always be carefully considered as a priority, given the high incidence reported in the literature, as a result of primitive vascular damage or as a result of revascularisation of the limb.Knowledge of aetiology of this serious condition allows us to stratify the risk by identifying a population of patients most at risk, together with the most frequently associated traumatic injuries. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Lateral collateral ulnar ligament reconstruction techniques in posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow: A systematic review
Background: Elbow chronic instability is a disable complication, presenting as recurrent joint subluxations or dislocations. This systematic review aims to assess (1) the clinical outcome and (2) the complication rates of the surgical techniques currently used in the management of posterolateral rotatory elbow insta- bility. Methods: OVID-MEDLINE®, SCOPUS, and PubMed were searched from January 2009 to February 2019 to identify relevant studies. The search terms used were "LUCL", "Posterolateral dislocation", "Elbow Docking technique", "Elbow Jobe technique" and "Elbow single strand technique". The methodological qualities of the studies were evaluated, relevant data were extracted. Results: Three studies, published between 2012 and 2015, were included in this review. No studies con- cerning the single strand technique met the inclusion criteria. The included studies had a level of evi- dence IV and recruited 33 patients undergoing a Jobe technique reconstruction and 8 patients undergoing a Docking technique. Jobe procedure registered better clinical and functional outcome, assessed using the Mayo Clinic Elbow Performance Scale (MEPS), compared with patients managed with Docking technique. Nonetheless, this difference is not significant. There was not a significantly different complication rate ( p = 0.57) between patients treated with these two different techniques. Conclusion: This systematic review showed that both Jobe and Docking techniques are safe and effective in the treatment of posterolateral elbow instability. However, future studies with larger sample size and a longer follow-up interval are needed to draw stronger conclusions on the efficacy of the different LUCL surgical reconstruction techniques.Background: Elbow chronic instability is a disable complication, presenting as recurrent joint subluxations or dislocations. This systematic review aims to assess (1) the clinical outcome and (2) the complication rates of the surgical techniques currently used in the management of posterolateral rotatory elbow instability.Methods: OVID-MEDLINE (R), SCOPUS, and PubMed were searched from January 2009 to February 2019 to identify relevant studies. The search terms used were "LUCL", "Posterolateral dislocation", "Elbow Docking technique", "Elbow Jobe technique" and "Elbow single strand technique". The methodological qualities of the studies were evaluated, relevant data were extracted.Results: Three studies, published between 2012 and 2015, were included in this review. No studies concerning the single strand technique met the inclusion criteria. The included studies had a level of evidence IV and recruited 33 patients undergoing a Jobe technique reconstruction and 8 patients undergoing a Docking technique. Jobe procedure registered better clinical and functional outcome, assessed using the Mayo Clinic Elbow Performance Scale (MEPS), compared with patients managed with Docking technique. Nonetheless, this difference is not significant. There was not a significantly different complication rate (p = 0.57) between patients treated with these two different techniques.Conclusion: This systematic review showed that both Jobe and Docking techniques are safe and effective in the treatment of posterolateral elbow instability. However, future studies with larger sample size and a longer follow-up interval are needed to draw stronger conclusions on the efficacy of the different LUCL surgical reconstruction techniques. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd
- …
