1,721,274 research outputs found

    Outcome of Jehovah's Witnesses after adult cardiac surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: The objective was to evaluate the early outcome after adult cardiac surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses (JWs) compared with controls not refusing blood transfusions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A literature review was performed through PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify any comparative study evaluating the outcome of JWs and patients not refusing blood transfusion after adult cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Six studies comparing the outcome of 564 JWs and 903 controls fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this study. All series included a matched control cohort. Baseline characteristics of these two cohorts were similar, but JWs had higher hemoglobin (Hb) levels as reported in three studies. Pooled analysis of postoperative outcomes showed that JWs had higher postoperative levels of Hb (data from four studies: mean, 11.5 g/L vs. 9.8 g/L; p < 0.001) and significantly less postoperative blood loss (mean, 402 mL vs. 826 mL; p < 0.001) compared to controls. JWs and controls had similar early outcome. However, JWs had a nonsignificant trend toward decreased early mortality (2.6% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.318), reoperation for bleeding (3.2% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.070), atrial fibrillation (9.9% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.056), stroke (2.2% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.439), myocardial infarction (0.4% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.203), and length of stay in the intensive care unit (1.5 days vs. 2.0 days; p = 0.081). CONCLUSION: JWs undergoing adult cardiac surgery have a nonsignificant trend toward better early outcome than controls receiving or not blood transfusions. The suboptimal quality of available studies prevents conclusive results on the possible benefits of a transfusion-free strategy in patients not refusing blood transfusion

    Pooled estimates of immediate and late outcome of mitral valve surgery in octogenarians: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

    No full text
    Objective: The authors evaluated the outcome of patients >= 80 years undergoing mitral valve (MV) surgery.Design: Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.Setting: None.Participants: None.Interventions: None.Main Results: Twenty-four studies reporting on 5,572 patients 80 years of age who underwent MV surgery were included in this analysis. Pooled proportion of operative mortality was 15.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.9-18.1), stroke was 3.9% (95% Cl 2.6-5.2), and dialysis was 2.7% (95% Cl 0.5-4.9). Early date of study (p = 0.014), increased age (p = 0.006), MV replacement (p = 0.008), procedure other than isolated MV surgery (p = 0.010), MV surgery associated with coronary artery surgery (p = 0.029), aortic cross-clamping time (p < 0.001), and cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001) were associated significantly with increased operative mortality. MV repair had lower operative mortality compared with MV replacement (7.3% v 14.2%, relative risk 0.573, 95% Cl 0.342-0.962). Random-effects metaregression showed that prolonged aortic cross-clamping time (p = 0.005) was the only determinant of increased operative mortality, even when adjusted (p < 0.001) for date of study (p = 0.004). Operative mortality was significantly higher in studies reporting a mean cross-clamp time >90 minutes (17.0% v 7.4%, p < 0.001). Survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 76.1%, 67.7%, and 56.5%, respectively.Conclusions: MV surgery in patients >= 80 years of age is associated with operative mortality, which has decreased significantly during recent years. Prolonged aortic cross-clamp time is a major determinant of operative mortality. MV repair may achieve better results than MV replacement in the very elderly. Five-year survival of these patients is good and justifies surgical treatment of MV diseases in octogenarians. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

    Meta-analysis on the performance of the EuroSCORE II and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Scores in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement

    No full text
    Objective: To evaluate the performance of the EuroSCORE II (ESII) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) scores in surgical (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Design: Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Setting: University hospitals. Participants: Studies reporting data on the performance of ESII and STS scores in patients undergoing SAVR or TAVR. Interventions: SAVR or TAVR. Measurements and Main Results: Ten studies validated these scores in 13,856 patients who underwent either TAVR or SAVR. Operative mortality was 5.9% (SAVR 3.1%; TAVR 9.6%). ESII-expected mortality was 5.1% (O/E ratio: 1.15, SAVR, O/E ratio 0.94; TAVR, O/E ratio 1.23) and STS-expected mortality was 6.3% (O/E ratio: 0.94, SAVR, O/E ratio 0.84; TAVR, O/E ratio 1.13). The area under the ROC curve for ESII was 0.70 and for STS was 0.70 (SAVR patients: 0.73 for ESII and 0.75 for STS; TAVR patients; 0.66 for ESII and 0.63 for STS). The difference between observed/expected mortality was not significant for ESII (Peto's OR 0.99, p = 0.88) and was significant for STS (Peto's OR 0.86, p = 0.008). ESII (Peto's OR 1.35, p < 0.00001) and STS (Peto's OR 1.23, p < 0.00001) significantly underestimated the mortality risk in TAVR patients. The STS (Peto's OR 0.74, p < 0.0001) and, to a lesser extent, the ESII (Peto's OR 0.86, p = 0.0.04) overestimated the mortality risk in SAVR patients. Conclusions: The ESII and STS scores have good O/E ratios for either TAVR or SAVR patients, but both scores significantly underpredicted the risk of TAVR patients. ESII seemed to be accurate in predicting the risk of SAVR patients

    Decompressive hemicraniectomy for treatment of space occupying ischemic stroke after repair of type-A aortic dissection

    No full text
    Postoperative stroke after cardiac surgery is often a lethal complication. Herein, we report on a patient who suffered space-occupying ischemic stroke after surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection. He underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy and, despite residual hemianopsia and left side flaccid hemiplegia, survived surgery and was discharged for rehabilitation. This observation suggests that early consultation with a neurosurgeon, intracranial pressure monitoring and, when indicated, decompressive hemicraniectomy should be considered in order to reduce the high mortality rate associated with ischemic stroke after cardiac surger

    A Nomogram for Predicting Long Length of Stay in The Intensive Care Unit in Patients Undergoing CABG: Results From the Multicenter E-CABG Registry

    No full text
    Many papers evaluated predictive factors for prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay after cardiac surgery, but efforts in translating those models in practical clinical tools is lacking. The aim of this study was to build a new nomogram score and test its calibration and discrimination power for predicting a long length of stay in the ICU among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)

    Red blood cell transfusion is a determinant of neurological complications after cardiac surgery

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions on the occurrence of stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) after cardiac surgery. METHODS Data on 14 956 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve surgery (with or without concomitant CABG) were retrieved at three European University Hospitals. The prognostic impact of RBC transfusion on postoperative stroke and TIA was investigated by logistic regression and multilevel propensity score analysis. RESULTS Postoperative stroke was observed in 147 (1.0%) patients and combined stroke/TIA in 238 (1.6%). Of the total population, 6439 (43%) patients received RBC transfusion with a median of 2 units (25th-75th percentile, 2-4 units). When adjusted for other significant risk factors, RBC transfusion was an independent predictor of stroke [odds ratio (OR) 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.17 per unit] and stroke/TIA (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.09-1.15 per unit). Increase in the amount of transfused RBC units was associated with higher rates of stroke (no RBC transfusion: 0.5%, 1-2 RBC units: 1.0%, OR 1.42; >2 RBC units: 2.7%, OR 3.10) and stroke/TIA (no RBC transfusion: 0.8%, 1-2 RBC units: 1.8%, OR 1.49; >2 RBC units: 4.0%, OR 2.72). Multilevel propensity score analysis confirmed these findings and showed a very high risk of stroke (3.9%; OR 3.85; 95% CI 2.30-6.45) and stroke/TIA (5.9%; OR 3.30; 95% CI 2.17-5.02) associated with transfusion of ≥ 6 units of RBCs. CONCLUSIONS Transfusion of more than 2 units of RBCs after cardiac surgery is associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative stroke and TIA

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore