76,256 research outputs found
Arius cookei
<p>Types. material of A. cookei is listed in Acero and Betancur-R. (2002) (data of UCR 314-3 not included);</p>Published as part of <i>Ricardo Betancur-R. & Arturo Acero P., 2004, Description of Notarius biffi n. sp. and redescription of N. insculptus (Jordan and Gilbert) (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from the eastern Pacific, with evidence of monophyly and limits of Notarius., pp. 1-20 in Zootaxa 703</i> on page 1
Fig. 20. Cathorops melanopus, UMMZ 197336, 188.0 in Revision of the species of the genus Cathorops (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from Mesoamerica and the Central American Caribbean, with description of three new species
Fig. 20. Cathorops melanopus, UMMZ 197336, 188.0 mm SL (headindorsalview).Guatemala, Izabal, ríoMotaguaatFincaHopi.Published as part of Marceniuk, Alexandre P. & Betancur-R, Ricardo, 2008, Neotropical Ichthyology 6 (1) on page 25, DOI: 10.1590/S1679-62252008000100004, http://zenodo.org/record/541964
Cathorops Jordan and Gilbert
[[Cathorops Jordan and Gilbert]] The genus Cathorops Jordan and Gilbert is a strongly supported clade of sea catfishes endemic to the New World (Marceniuk, 1997; Betancur-R., 2003; Betancur-R. et al., 2004; Kailola, 2004) that has been recently presented as including eleven species (Marceniuk and Ferraris, 2003; Kailola, 2004). Nevertheless, the genus probably includes several other unrecognized species from both American coasts. The Mapalé Sea Catfish, a Cathorops species important to artisanal fisheries, is a putative Colombian Caribbean endemic that lacks a scientific name. Traditional meristic and morphometric data, the molecular phylogeny of the genus Cathorops (Betancur-R., 2003), and mitochondrial genetic divergence values all support recognition of this new species, which previously was misidentified as C. spixii (Agassiz)Published as part of Ricardo Betancur-R. & Arturo Acero P., 2005, Description of Cathorops mapale, a new species of sea catfish (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from the Colombian Caribbean, based on morphological and mitochondrial evidence., pp. 45-60 in Zootaxa 1045 on page 4
Notarius Gill
[[Notarius Gill]] The amphiamerican sea catfish genus Notarius Gill was recently revised by Betancur-R. and Acero P. (2004). Notarius includes at least 14 species, with seven distributed in the eastern Pacific (EP). The monophyly of the genus is strongly supported by molecular evidence obtained from the sequences of five mitochondrial genes and one nuclear gene [3900 base pairs (bp)] (Betancur-R., 2003; Betancur-R. and Acero P., 2004). This claim was not supported by Kailola (2004), who placed the species of Notarius sensu Betancur-R. and Acero P. (2004) in the genera Hemiarius Bleeker, Ariopsis Gill, Aspistor Jordan & Evermann, and Sciades Müller & Troschel, as well as two species recognized as incertae sedis (Table 1). It is noteworthy, however, that none of the species assigned by Betancur-R. and Acero P. (2004) in Notarius were included in Kailola (2004)’s phylogenetic analysis. Marceniuk and Ferraris (2003), based on the results of Marceniuk’s (2003) unpublished dissertation, also proposed a different classification scheme for New World ariids, placing most of the species of Notarius sensu Betancur-R. and Acero P. (2004) in Notarius (only four species), Aspistor, Arius Valenciennes, and Hexanematichthys Bleeker (Table 1). In summary, despite the recent efforts to resolve the taxonomy of the Ariidae, its generic nomenclature is still unstable.Published as part of Ricardo Betancur-R. & Arturo Acero P., 2006, A new species of Notarius (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from the Colombian Pacific., pp. 47-59 in Zootaxa 1249 on page 4
Notarius armbrusteri Betancur-R. & P., 2006, new species
Notarius armbrusteri new species Figs. 2-3 Arius planiceps non Steindachner: Acero P. and Betancur-R. (2002): 9, Fig. 3. Holotype. INVEMAR-PEC 6677 (undeposited tissue tagged as 527), female, 194 mm SL, purchased by R. Betancur-R. and A. Acero P., 28 May 2004, fish market of Buenaventura, Valle del Cauca (VC), Colombia (CO); cyt b, ATPase 8 and ATPase 6 sequences are available in GenBank, accession numbers DQ373045, DQ373041, and DQ373043, respectively. Paratypes. INVEMAR-PEC 6678 (undeposited tissue tagged as 529), male, 177 mm SL, same collection data as holotype; cyt b, ATPase 8 and ATPase 6 sequences are available in GenBank, accession numbers DQ373046, DQ373042, and DQ373044, respectively.ICN-MHN 14829, female, 208 mm SL, unsexed specimen, same collection data as holotype.USNM 292738, female, 205 mm SL, purchased by W.R. Taylor, 17 October 1970, fish market of Buenaventura, VC, CO.USNM 264834, skeletonized specimen, 69 mm skull length, purchased at fish market of Buenaventura, VC, CO, catalogued 25 January 1984. Diagnosis. Notarius armbrusteri is distinguished from other EP species of Notarius by the following combination of features: mouth rather small, its width 11.1-11.8% SL; eye large, diameter 4.3-4.9% SL; distance between anterior nostrils 6.1-6.9% SL, distance between posterior nostrils 5.9-6.9% SL; short maxillary barbels, barely reaching pectoralfin bases, their length 20.5-22.2% SL; and gill rakers on first arch 3-4+8-9 (total 11-13). Meristic and morphometric data of the type series are summarized in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Selected features distinguishing N. armbrusteri from the seven other EP species of Notarius are summarized in Table 4. See key section at the end for diagnostic characters distinguishing the new species from other EP ariid taxa. Description (based on combined data from type series). Body depth 5.0-5.4 in SL; body width 4.7-5.2 in SL. Head not elongated, moderately depressed anteriorly, posterior profile slightly convex, length 3.7-4.1 in SL, width 1.1-1.2 in HL, depth 1.5-1.7 in HL. Snout rounded, length 3.1-3.4 in HL. Mouth inferior to subterminal, width 2.1-2.4 in HL. Lips thin to moderately thick, upper lip width 9.8-18.5 in HL. Maxillary barbels 1.2-1.3 in HL; mandibulary barbels 1.6-1.8 in HL, passing gill membrane; mental barbels 2.2-2.4 in HL, not reaching gill membrane. Distance between anterior nostrils 3.9-4.0 in HL; distance between posterior nostrils 3.9-4.2 in HL, no fleshy furrow connecting nostrils. Interorbital distance 1.9-2.2 in HL. Eyes lateral, diameter 5.1-6.2 in HL, 2.6-3.0 in interorbital distance. Postorbital length 1.8-2.0 in HL. Head shield exposed, covered posteriorly with dense layer of tiny granules extending anteriorly to opposite eyes (granules sometimes not very apparent). Frontal depression broad, with large pale spot on anterior margin immediately after interorbital space. Supraoccipital process keeled, rather short, slightly convex; length 3.6-4.7 in HL; width 3.6-4.0 in HL, 0.8-1.0 in length. E pioccipital bones (= epiotics) not invading or slightly invading skull surface (Fig. 1B). Predorsal plate narrow, crescent-shaped. Premaxillary teeth villiform, arranged in two subrectangular bands forming wide arrow point (Fig. 4). Palate with villiform teeth, arranged in four patches: inner patches (vomerine) united medially, longer than wide; lateral patches broader, triangular, projected posteriorly, with an indentation into which fit inner patches (Fig. 4). Predorsal fin length 2.6-3.1 in SL. Dorsal-fin base 8.3-9.0 in SL; dorsal-fin spine long, rather thin, longer than pectoral-fin spine, with small serrations along external margin, inner margin slightly serrated only in distal end; height 4.4-4.7 in SL. Distance between dorsal fin and adipose fin 3.5-3.9 in SL. Base of adipose fin 8.0-8.6 in SL, as long as or somewhat longer than base of dorsal fin, 0.9-1.0 in dorsal-fin base; height of adipose fin 9.1-10.2 in SL. Pectoral-fin base 15.5-16.7 in SL; pectoral-fin spine long, thin, slightly serrated along external margin, serrations on inner margin smaller and absent near proximal end; length 4.6-5.0 in SL. Pelvic-fin base 20.0-21.3 in SL; pelvic-fin length 5.3-5.7 in SL in females and 7.1 in SL in one male. Anal-fin base 6.0-6.5 in SL; anal-fin height 5.2-5.7 in SL. Caudal peduncle depth 13.5-14.3 in SL. Caudal fin deeply forked, lower lobe shorter than upper lobe. Lateral line originating below predorsal plate, tilting ventrally to mid-body line at about level of pelvic-fin origin, running posteriorly, bending dorsally before caudal fin. Gill rakers on second arch 3-4+9 (total 12-13). Dorsal fin elements I,7; pectoral fin elements I,11-12; pelvic fin elements 6; anal fin elements 19-22. Coloration. In life, dorsum brownish grey with metallic tinges, flanks and venter whitish. Lower caudal fin lobe and tip of anal fin dark; pectoral and pelvic fins dark, distal tips pale. In alcohol, coloration fades, metallic tinges disappear. Size. Largest female specimen examined 208 mm SL (ICN-MHN 14829, paratype), largest male 177 mm SL (INVEMAR-PEC 6678, paratype). Female ariids have a greater development of pelvic fins than have males, and this dimorphism exhibits a positive allometry becoming more evident in mature specimens (Acero P. et al., 2005). Given that there is a clear difference in the size of pelvics between female (17.5-18.5% SL) and male (14.1% SL) specimens, it seems likely that Notarius armbrusteri reaches maturity below 200 mm SL and is probably the smallest known species of Notarius. Distribution and habitat. Notarius armbrusteri is known only from Buenaventura, Valle del Cauca, Colombian Pacific. The species has not been recorded from Tumaco, Nariño, CO, about 300 km southwestwards from Buenaventura (pers. obs.). Habitat preferences are unknown. Etymology. Named for Dr. Jonathan W. Armbruster, curator of the Auburn University Museum, in recognition of his important contributions to the taxonomy of neotropical catfishes. We suggest the common names of “ Ñato Sea Catfish”, “bagre ñato ” (Spanish, name given by fishermen in the area), and “ mâchoiron ñato ” (French). Discussion A new molecular phylogeny for the species of Notarius, inferred from the combined cyt b + ATPase 8/6 dataset, is presented in Fig. 5. The mitochondrial evidence suggests that N. armbrusteri is the sister species of N. insculptus, from the Pacific coast of Panama; the bootstrap supporting this clade is strong (100%). The combined mitochondrial K2P distances between haplotypes of N. armbrusteri and N. insculptus are 4.1-4.2%. Both species are also related to the N. planiceps /aff. planiceps group (bootstrap 94%), known from the Pacific Panama to Mexico. Despite the few specimens in the type series (five complete and one skeletonized), the fact that N. armbrusteri is well discriminated as a separate and monophyletic entity among EP species of Notarius in the phylogram, gives strong support for its specific status. Notarius armbrusteri can be separated from its sister species, N. insculptus, by the following features: epioccipitals not invading or only slightly invading skull surface (Fig. 1B) (vs. widely invading in N. insculptus, Fig. 1A), complex process (formed by the epioccipitals and the supraoccipital) absent (Fig. 1B) (vs. present in N. insculptus, Fig. 1A); two pairs of palatal tooth patches present (vs. three pairs in N. insculptus); smaller mouth (11.1-11.8% SL in N. armbrusteri vs. 12.3-14.4% SL in N. insculptus); shorter maxillary barbels (20.5-22.2% SL in N. armbrusteri vs. 26.7-30.3% SL in N. insculptus); and larger eyes (4.3-4.9% SL in N. armbrusteri vs. 3.8-4.3% SL in N. insculptus). Other EP species of Notarius are compared in Table 4.Published as part of Ricardo Betancur-R. & Arturo Acero P., 2006, A new species of Notarius (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from the Colombian Pacific., pp. 47-59 in Zootaxa 1249 on pages 50-5
Cathorops festae (Boulenger 1898) (Siluriformes; Ariidae), a valid species from Ecuador and Peru
Marceniuk, Alexandre P., Marchena, José, Betancur-R, Ricardo (2016): Cathorops festae (Boulenger 1898) (Siluriformes; Ariidae), a valid species from Ecuador and Peru. Zootaxa 4170 (1): 137-148, DOI: http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4170.1.
Ariopsis canteri Marceniuk, Acero, Cooke & Betancur-R, 2017, new species
Ariopsis canteri, new species Acero P., Betancur-R. & Marceniuk New Granada Sea Catfish (English) Chivo cabezón (Spanish) Figures 6 and 7, Tables 2–4 and 6. Ariopsis bonillai (non Miles), Dahl, 1971: 48–49; Taylor & Menezes, 1978; Acero P. et al., 2002: 60–63; Acero P., 2003: 839. Hexanematichthys bonillai (non Miles), Marceniuk & Ferraris, 2003. Sciades bonillai (non Miles), Marceniuk & Menezes, 2007. Ariopsis sp. Betancur-R et al., 2012; Robertson et al., 2015; Acero P. et al. 2017: 73–76. Material examined. Holotype. INV PEC 5332 (male, 225 mm SL), Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Pueblo Viejo, fisherfolk (10° 47' 8.7" N, 74° 24' 58.3" W). Paratypes. INV PEC 276 (5, 185– 259 mm SL) Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Boca Río Sevilla, hook (10° 52' 30.2" N, 74° 24' 53.6" W); INV PEC 529 (1, 41 mm SL) Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Pueblo Viejo (10° 47' 8.7" N, 74° 24' 58.3" W); INV PEC 782 (4, 125– 306 mm SL) Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Boca Río Sevilla (10° 52' 30.2" N, 74° 24' 53.6" W); INV PEC 895 (5, 45– 82 mm SL) Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Cabaña Palmira (10° 52' 30.2" N, 74° 24' 53.6" W); INV PEC 1356 (2, 45– 48 mm SL) Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Boca de la Barra, west shore (10° 52' 30.2" N, 74° 24' 53.6" W); INV PEC 1756 (2, 104– 261 mm SL) Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Caño Grande and Río Fundación (10° 52' 30.2" N, 74° 24' 53.6" W); INV PEC 2294 (2, 68– 73 mm SL), Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Boca Río Fundación (10° 43' 54.2" N, 74° 25' 44.7" W); INV PEC 3651 (1, 155 mm SL) Colombia, Córdoba, close to Bahía Cispata (9° 24' 36.4" N, 75° 46' 41.3" W); INV PEC 5945 (1, 117 mm SL) Colombia, La Guajira, Uribia, Bahía Portete (12° 8' 53.3" N, 71° 58' 1.1" W); INV PEC 8169 (1, 149 mm SL), Colombia, Córdoba, San Antero, Ciénaga Ostional (9° 24' 18" N, 75° 52' 53" W); INV PEC 9010 (1, 227 mm SL) Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, collected with the Holotype, Pueblo Viejo, fisherfolk (10° 47' 8.7" N, 74° 24' 58.3" W); INV PEC 9086 (23, 142– 357 mm SL), Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Pueblo Viejo (10° 47' 8.7" N, 74° 24' 58.3" W); USNM 286488 (2, 220– 248 mm SL), Colombia, Bolívar, Cartagena, among mangroves at La Boquilla; USNM 292999 (3, 207– 215 mm SL), Colombia, Magdalena, Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, east side near SE end of highway bridge. Diagnosis. Ariopsis canteri can be differentiated from its congeners as follows: from A. assimilis, from Mexico (Quintana Roo) to Honduras (Caribbean), by having 36–44 gill rakers on the first and second gill arches, rarely 37 or 36 (vs. 31–36, rarely 37); from A. felis, from Massachusetts (US) to Yucatán (Caribbean), by the presence of 36–44 gill rakers on the first and second gill arches (vs. 29–32), lateral margin of sphenotic straight, as wide anteriorly as medially (vs. notched laterally, narrower medially than anteriorly, Figs. 3 and 7), pterotic lateral margin markedly convex, sometimes angled (vs. smoothly convex, Figs. 3 and 7); from A. gilberti, from Mexico (EP), by the absence of an osseous medial groove (vs. present; Figs. 3 and 7), lateral margin of sphenotic straight, as wide anteriorly as medially (vs. notched laterally, narrower medially than anteriorly, Figs. 3 and 7); from A. guatemalensis, from Mexico to Costa Rica (EP), by its narrower median portion of mesethmoid (vs. wide, Fig. 3), mesethmoid medial notch narrow and deep (vs. large and shallow, Fig. 3); from A. jimenezi, from Archipiélago de las Perlas in Panama (EP), by the absence of an osseous medial groove (vs. present; Figs. 3 and 7), fleshy medial groove of neurocranium conspicuous or inconspicuous, but never surpassing posterior margin of eyes (vs. conspicuous and very long, always surpassing the posterior margin of eyes, Figs. 4 and 7), lateral margin of sphenotic straight, as wide anteriorly as medially (vs. notched laterally, narrower medially than anteriorly, Figs. 3 and 7), external posterior branch of lateral ethmoid columnar and thin (vs. depressed and thick, Fig. 3), fenestra delimited by mesethmoid and lateral ethmoid conspicuous (vs. inconspicuous, Fig. 3), lateral margin of pterotic markedly convex, sometimes angled (vs. smoothly convex, Figs. 3 and 7); from A. seemanni, from El Salvador to Panama (EP), by the absence of an osseous medial groove (vs. present; Figs. 3 and 7); from A. simonsi, from Colombia to Peru (EP), by the absence of an osseous medial groove (vs. present; Figs. 3 and 7), lateral margin of sphenotic notched, narrower medially than anteriorly (vs. straight, as wide medially as anteriorly, Figs. 3 and 7). Description. Morphometrics and meristics summarized in Tables 2–4, 6. Head moderately long, wide and high, especially depressed at lateral ethmoid and frontal area, profile elevated posteriorly, convex from mesethmoid to frontal and straight on parietosupraoccipital. Snout rounded and moderately long. Anterior nostril rounded, with fleshy edge, posterior nostril covered by flap of skin, moderately distant to one another and moderately distant to orbit, not connected by fleshy furrow. Eye lateral, relatively large. Eyes widely separated. Three pairs of long teretiform barbels; maxillary barbel surpassing or not membranous portion of operculum, lateral and mesial mental barbel not reaching posterior margin of gill membrane. Osseous bridge formed by lateral ethmoid and frontal moderately long and slender, delimiting a fenestra little evident under the skin. Cephalic shield exposed, moderately long and wide on supracleithrum, lateral ethmoid and frontal areas, with thick granulation forming distinct patterns from eyes to parietosupraoccipital process. Fleshy portion of dorsomedial groove of neurocranium, affixed to anterior cranial fontanel, evident, reaching or not reaching eyes. Sphenotic straight laterally, as wide medially as anteriorly. Pterotic lateral margin markedly convex, sometimes angled. Parietosupraoccipital slightly keeled, triangular, with straight lateral margins converging posteriorly, relatively short and moderately wide posteriorly, with posterior margin convex. Nuchal plate crescent-shaped, conspicuously granulated dorsally, moderately long and narrow. Mouth subterminal, moderately large, with lips moderately thick and lower jaw arched. Vomerine tooth plates rounded. One pair of accessory tooth plates ovate, with sharp teeth. Premaxilla rectangular transversally, moderately long and wide, with sharp teeth. Dentary with eyebrow-shaped patch of teeth, separated at midline with sharp teeth. Gill membranes fused, attached to isthmus. Sixteen to 20 acicular gill rakers on first arch, 17–24 spike-shaped gill rakers on second arch, rakers present on posterior margin of all gill arches. Body significantly wider than its height at pectoral girdle area, progressively compressed from pectoral to caudal peduncle, ventrally flattened from pectoral girdle to anal origin. Lateral line sloping ventrally on anterior one-third, extending posteriorly to caudal peduncle, bending abruptly onto dorsal lobe of caudal. Dorsal spine relatively short and thick, shorter than pectoral spine; anterior margin granulated on basal two-thirds, with weak serrations on distal third; posterior margin smooth on basal third, distal third with weak serrations. Seven dorsal-fin soft rays. Pectoral spine moderately long and thick; two-thirds of anterior margin weakly granulated, with weak serrations on distal third; posterior margin straight on basal one-fourth, distal three-fourths with conspicuous serrations. Nine to 11 pectoral soft rays. Posterior process of cleithrum triangular, smooth to rugose, slightly visible. Pelvic-fin deep and large at base, with six rays and well-developed fleshy protuberances in adult females. Adipose fin low; its base moderately long but shorter than the anal-fin base. Anal fin short and moderately long at base, with 18 to 22 rays and ventral profile almost straight. Caudal peduncle moderately high. Caudal fin forked, dorsal and ventral lobes relatively short; dorsal lobe somewhat longer than ventral lobe, posteriorly pointed. Maximum length: Grows to 460 mm TL. Coloration in alcohol. Head and body dark brown to bluish above, whitish below; dorsal surfaces of pelvic fin proximally black, distally lighter; anal fin dark, distal tips lighter; caudal grayish to blackish (Figs. 6). Sexual dimorphism. Only females have well developed fleshy protuberances or pads in basal portion of the pelvic fins, especially during the reproductive season. Vomerine tooth patches ovate to square in females, and reduced and transversally elongated in males. In females, accessory tooth patches larger and ovate, while relatively smaller and elongated in males (Fig. 8). Distribution and habitat. Endemic to the Caribbean coast of Colombia in the WA (Fig. 5). Found in costal marine and brackish waters; sometimes entering freswaters (e.g., Atrato, Sinú, Magdalena, and Ranchería rivers). Molecular evidence and phylogenetic relationships. The Caribbean endemic Ariopsis canteri is the sister species of the EP A. seemanni (Fig. 9). This biogeographic pattern suggests that divergence of these species involved a transithmian vicariant event (Betancur-R. et al., 2007, 2012; Betancur-R., 2009). Etymology. Named after Diego Canter Ríos (1984–2007), a young and talented Colombian ichthyologist who died in a car accident near Santa Marta, along with three other biologists. Species delimitation in Ariopsis was part of Diego’s B.Sc. thesis in Marine Biology, which he could not complete due to his untimely death. Diego collected most of the morphometric and meristic data for the new species and for Ariopsis simonsi. Remarks. Description of Ariopsis canteri n. sp. contributes to the alpha taxonomy of New World Ariidae, providing formal scientific recognition of a species endemic to the Colombian Caribbean, which has been recognized as endangered (see Acero P. et al., 2016, 2017). See Introduction about misidentification of the New Granada Sea Catfish with Galeichthys bonillai Miles, 1945, a freshwater ariid in the genus Notarius Gill, 1863 (Acero P. & Betancur-R., 2006).Published as part of Marceniuk, Alexandre P., Acero, Arturo, Cooke, Richard & Betancur-R, Ricardo, 2017, Taxonomic revision of the New World genus Ariopsis Gill (Siluriformes: Ariidae), with description of two new species, pp. 1-42 in Zootaxa 4290 (1) on pages 9-14, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4290.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/82884
Notarius cookei
STRI 5709 (stri 16750), Rio Santa María, Herrera, PA, Notarius cookei;Published as part of Ricardo Betancur-R. & Arturo Acero P., 2004, Description of Notarius biffi n. sp. and redescription of N. insculptus (Jordan and Gilbert) (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from the eastern Pacific, with evidence of monophyly and limits of Notarius., pp. 1-20 in Zootaxa 703 on page 1
Arius arius arius
USNM 376608 (stri x3656), Chilika lake, Orissa, India, Arius arius;Published as part of Ricardo Betancur-R. & Arturo Acero P., 2004, Description of Notarius biffi n. sp. and redescription of N. insculptus (Jordan and Gilbert) (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from the eastern Pacific, with evidence of monophyly and limits of Notarius., pp. 1-20 in Zootaxa 703 on page 1
Bagre bagre bagre (Linnaeus
MHNG 2608.096 (stri x3540), Le Mahury, French Guiana, Bagre bagre (Linnaeus);Published as part of Ricardo Betancur-R. & Arturo Acero P., 2004, Description of Notarius biffi n. sp. and redescription of N. insculptus (Jordan and Gilbert) (Siluriformes: Ariidae) from the eastern Pacific, with evidence of monophyly and limits of Notarius., pp. 1-20 in Zootaxa 703 on page 1
- …
