1,791 research outputs found
Agreodontia Beck 2014
No full textAgreodontia Beck et al., 2014 CONTENTS: Dasyuromorphia, Notoryctemorphia, and Peramelemorphia. STEM AGE: 48.0 Mya (95% HPD: 44.3–50.9 Mya). CROWN AGE: 45.7 Mya (95% HPD: 42.3–49.2 Mya). UNAMBIGUOUS CRANIODENTAL SYNAPOMORPHIES: Median parietal suture at least partially fused in subadults (char. 25: 0→1; ci = 0.143). COMMENTS: Beck et al. (2014) gave the name Agreodontia to a clade comprising the Australian orders Dasyuromorphia, Peramelemorphia, and Notoryctemorphia, which they defined as the most inclusive clade including Perameles nasuta, Notoryctes typhlops, and Dasyurus maculatus, but excluding Phalanger orientalis (Beck et al., 2014: 132). Monophyly of Agreodontia has been consistently supported by analyses of nuclear and combined nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data (e.g., Amrine-Madsen et al., 2003b; Phillips et al., 2006; Beck, 2008a; Meredith et al., 2008b, 2009 c, 2011; Mitchell et al., 2014; Duchêne et al., 2018; Álvarez-Carretero et al., 2021), but it is supported only by mitochondrial sequence data when base composition is corrected for (Nilsson et al., 2004; Phillips et al., 2006). A single, uncontradicted retrotransposon insertion also supports agreodontian monophyly, but this does not represent statistically significant support (Nilsson et al., 2010; Gallus et al., 2015a). Recent morphological analyses vary as to whether they recover Agreodontia or not (e.g., Horovitz and Sánchez-Villagra, 2003; Beck et al., 2008 a, 2014; Horovitz et al., 2008, 2009; Carneiro and Oliveira, 2017a; Carneiro et al., 2018; Carneiro, 2019), but this clade has been recovered by most total-evidence analyses (Beck et al., 2008 a, 2014, 2016; Beck, 2012, 2017a; Maga and Beck, 2017) with the exception of that of Asher et al. (2004). Our results conform to this general pattern of inconsistent support: whereas our nuclear (fig. 27), combined nuclear and mitochondrial (fig. 29), and total evidence (figs. 32, 33) analyses support monophyly of Agreodontia, our mitochondrial (fig. 28) and morphological (figs. 30, 31) analyses do not. Only partial fusion of the median parietal suture before adulthood optimizes as an unambiguous craniodental synapomorphy of this clade in our dated total-evidence analysis, but this transformation is reversed within Dasyuromorphia. Putative peramelemorphians have been reported from the earliest Eocene Tingamarra Local Fauna (Godthelp et al., 1992; Archer et al., 1993a; Muirhead, 1994; Archer et al., 1999; Long et al., 2002). Given the published early Eocene (54.6 Mya) radiometric date for Tingamarra (Godthelp et al., 1992), this material would represent the oldest known record of the Agreodontian crown clade and would markedly predate our estimate for the most recent common ancestor of Agreodontia (45.7 Mya; 95% HPD: 42.3–49.2 Mya). However, examination of these Tingamarran specimens by R.M.D.B. revealed some similarities to bunodont, nonperamelemorphian metatherians from the Palaeogene of South America and Australia (e.g., Chulpasia, Rosendolops; see Archer et al., 1993a; Crochet and Sigé, 1993; Goin and Candela, 1996; Sigé et al., 2009), so we are not convinced that they represent peramelemorphians. A major gap in the Australian fossil record after the early Eocene (Archer et al., 1999; Long et al., 2002; Woodhead et al., 2014) means that the oldest definitive agreodontians are from the late Oligocene, which is much younger than our estimate for the age of the most recent common ancestor of Agreodontia. Specifically, representatives of Peramelemorphia and Dasyuromorphia are known from multiple late Oligocene sites in central Australia and at Riversleigh World Heritage Area (Long et al., 2002; Wroe, 2003; Archer et al., 2006; Archer and Hand, 2006; Warburton and Travouillon, 2016; Kealy and Beck, 2017; Eldridge et al., 2019). A single partial upper molar of an alleged thylacinid (NTM P2815- 10; Murray and Megirian, 2006b) and a single upper molar of a probable notoryctemorphian (NTM P2815-6; Murray and Megirian, 2006b; Beck et al., 2014: 151, 2016: 166) are known from the Pwerte Marnte Marnte Local Fauna in the Northern Territory, which is probably slightly older than the central Australian and Riversleigh sites (Megirian et al., 2010), but which is still late Oligocene.Published as part of Beck, Robin M. D., Voss, Robert S. & Jansa, Sharon A., 2022, Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials, pp. 1-353 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457) on pages 206-207, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/697135
Galadi speciosus Travouillon, Gurovich, Beck & Muirhead 2010
No full text† <i>Galadi</i> <p> SPECIES SCORED: † <i>Galadi speciosus</i> (type species).</p> <p>GEOLOGICAL PROVENANCE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Boid, Camel Sputum, Judith’s Horizontalis, Microsite, Mike’s Menagerie, Neville’s Garden, Quantum Leap, Upper, and Wayne’s Wok sites (Riversleigh Faunal Zone B), Riversleigh World Heritage Area, Queensland, Australia.</p> <p>AGE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Riversleigh Faunal Zone B is interpreted to be early Miocene based on biostratigraphy (see above); radiometric dates from Woodhead et al. (2014) are 16.97– 18.53 Mya for Camel Sputum Site and 17.72–18.53 Mya for Neville’s Garden Site, but the other sites lack dates, so we have conservatively assumed the entire span of the early Miocene (Aquitanian to Burdigalian; Cohen et al., 2013 [updated]) for this taxon.</p> <p>ASSIGNED AGE RANGE: 23.030 –15.970 Mya.</p> <p> REMARKS: † <i>Galadi speciosus</i> was described by Travouillon et al. (2010) based on well-preserved craniodental specimens (notably the holotype, QM F23393, an almost perfect cranium and associated partial dentaries) from Riversleigh Faunal zones A and B. Later, a three further species († <i>G. adversus</i>, † <i>G. amplus</i>, and † <i>G. grandis</i>) were described from Riversleigh Faunal zones B and C (Travouillon et al., 2013b), but we did not use these to score character data for this study. Like † <i>Bulungu</i>, † <i>Galadi</i> appears to be craniodentally more plesiomorphic than Recent peramelemorphians, and it has been recovered outside the peramelemorphian crown clade in published phylogenetic analyses (Travouillon et al., 2010, 2013a, 2013b, 2014a, 2105b, 2017, 2019; Gurovich et al., 2014; Chamberlain et al., 2015; Kear et al., 2016; Travouillon and Phillips, 2018). The proportionally brevirostral skull of † <i>G. speciosus</i> also suggests that it may have fed on larger prey items than do modern peramelemorphians (Travouillon et al., 2010).</p>Published as part of <i>Beck, Robin M. D., Voss, Robert S. & Jansa, Sharon A., 2022, Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials, pp. 1-353 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457)</i> on pages 325-326, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/6971356">http://zenodo.org/record/6971356</a>
Priscileo roskellyae Beck & Voss & Jansa 2022
No full text† Lekanoleo SPECIES SCORED: † Lekanoleo roskellyae (type and only described species). GEOLOGICAL PROVENANCE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: White Hunter site (Riversleigh Faunal Zone A), and Upper, Dirk’s Towers, and Camel Sputum sites (Riversleigh Faunal Zone B), Riversleigh World Heritage Area, Queensland, Australia. AGE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Riversleigh Faunal zones A and B are interpreted to be late Oligocene and early Miocene respectively, based on biostratigraphy (see above). We have assigned the entire age range of the late Oligocene to early Miocene (Chattian to Serravallian; Cohen et al., 2013 [updated]). ASSIGNED AGE RANGE: 27.820 –15.970 Mya. REMARKS: † Lekanoleo roskellyae is one of the oldest thylacoleonids known from relatively complete craniodental material, with a single well-preserved cranium (QM F23453) collected from Upper Site in Riversleigh Faunal Zone B, and additional craniodental fragments known from sites in Riversleigh Faunal zones A and B (Gillespie, 1997, 2007; Gillespie et al., 2020). In her original description, which was of the upper dentition of QM F23453 only, Gillespie (1997) referred this taxon to the existing genus † Priscileo. More recently, Gillespie et al. (2020) described the cranial morphology of QM F23453, provided additional information on the dentition, and referred this taxon to a new genus, † Lekanoleo. † Lekanoleo roskellyae is notable for its small size relative to most other known thylacoleonids, with an estimated body mass of 1.8 kg based on dental measurements (Gillespie et al., 2016) and 2.7– 3.1 kg based on skull length (Gillespie et al., 2020); however, † Microleo attenboroughi, from the early Miocene (Riversleigh Faunal Zone B) Neville’s Garden site at Riverseigh, which is known from much less complete remains, and so has not been included in this study, is even smaller, with an estimated body mass of 590 g based on dental measurements (Gillespie et al., 2016).Published as part of Beck, Robin M. D., Voss, Robert S. & Jansa, Sharon A., 2022, Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials, pp. 1-353 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457) on page 330, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/697135
ORDINARY REDUCTION OF SHARE CAPITAL OF STOCK CORPORATION AND LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
No full textV magistrski nalogi obravnavam postopek rednega zmanjšanja osnovnega kapitala v delniški družbi (d. d.) in družbi z omejeno odgovornostjo (d. o. o.). Gre za enega najzahtevnejših postopkov v d. d. ali d. o. o., ker lahko prinaša velike posledice za delničarje oziroma družbenike, predvsem pa za upnike družbe. Ključni del zakonske ureditve zmanjšanja osnovnega kapitala je varstvo upnikov. Varstvo upnikov se zagotavlja s pravico zahtevati zavarovanje za nezapadle terjatve in prepovedjo izplačil delničarjem na podlagi zmanjšanja osnovnega kapitala, preden so upniki poplačani ali zavarovani. Upnikom je dana tudi možnost ugovora proti vpisu sklepa o zmanjšanju osnovnega kapitala v sodni register, če družba krši zakonska določila o varstvu upnikov. V nalogi izpostavljam določene dileme glede uveljavljanja pravic upnikov v praksi.
V magistrski nalogi najprej predstavljam pojem osnovnega kapitala s poudarkom na načelu ohranitve osnovnega kapitala in pomenu osnovnega kapitala kot jamstvene mase upnikom družbe. V nadaljevanju obravnavam postopek rednega zmanjšanja osnovnega kapitala po postopkovnih korakih, posebno poglavje pa namenjam varstvu upnikov. Vključujem tudi primerjavo z nemško ureditvijo, ki je zelo podobna slovenski.This thesis deals with ordinary reduction of share capital in stock corporation and limited liability company. Resolution for the reduction of share capital is amongst the most complex resolutions, adopted by general meeting of shareholders, which can bear great risks for shareholders and especially for creditors. Therefore, the protection of creditors is the essential part of the regulation on capital reduction. Creditors are protected by the right to demand securities for their claims and prohibition of repaying the shareholders the shared capital before the creditors have been given securities or their claims have been paid. Creditors can also contest the registration of the resolution for the reduction of share capital, if the company violates the provisions for their protection. In regard to these creditors’ rights the author points out some uncertainties that exist in Slovenian law when it comes to practical application.
The thesis begins by introducing the term of share capital with focus on its preservation and meaning of share capital as a fond for creditors. Further on the author deals with procedure for the reduction of share capital and protection of creditors in respective chapters. The thesis also includes a brief comparative view to German legal system in regard to the matter of the thesis
Thylacoleo carnifex
No full text† Thylacoleo SPECIES SCORED: † Thylacoleo carnifex (type species). GEOLOGICAL PROVENANCE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Multiple Pleistocene sites in South Australia. AGE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Pleistocene. ASSIGNED AGE RANGE: 2.580 –0.012 Mya. REMARKS: † Thylacoleo carnifex was the largest (with some individuals possibly> 100 kg; Wroe et al., 1999; 2003; Richards et al., 2019), morphologically most specialized, and last surviving thylacoleonid (Gillespie, 1999; Long et al., 2002; Gillespie, 2007). It is known from abundant craniodental and postcranial material from various Pleistocene deposits around Australia (Gillespie, 2007).Published as part of Beck, Robin M. D., Voss, Robert S. & Jansa, Sharon A., 2022, Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials, pp. 1-353 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457) on page 331, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/697135
Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials
No full textBeck, Robin M.D., Voss, Robert S., Jansa, Sharon A. (2022): Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457): 1-353, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, URL: https://bioone.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-american-museum-of-natural-history/volume-457/issue-1/0003-0090.457.1.1/Craniodental-Morphology-and-Phylogeny-of-Marsupials/10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1.ful
Muramura undetermined
No full text† Muramura SPECIES SCORED: † Muramura williamsi (type species), † M. pinpensis. GEOLOGICAL PROVENANCE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: SAM PL 8307 (Member 5) locality, Zone A (“Minkina” or “wynyardiid” Local Fauna), Lake Palankarinna, Etadunna Formation, South Australia († M. williamsi); AMNH site B, Zone B (Pinpa Local Fauna) Namba Formation, Lake Pinpa, South Australia († M. pinpensis). AGE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: See † Ilaria above, for a discussion of the ages of the Etadunna and Namba formations. In the absence of radiometric dates, we have assumed the entire span of the late Oligocene (Chattian; Cohen et al., 2013 [updated]) for this terminal. ASSIGNED AGE RANGE: 27.820 –23.030 Mya. REMARKS: The diprotodontian family † Wynyardiidae takes its name from † Wynyardia bassiana, which is known from a single incomplete skull and associated partial postcranial skeleton collected from Table Cape (near Wynyard) in Tasmania some time before 1876 (Spencer, 1901). Unfortunately, this specimen had lost its entire dentition through erosion prior to discovery. Largely as a result of this lack of dental evidence, the relationships of † Wynyardia were controversial for many years (Spencer, 1901; Osgood, 1921; Jones, 1930; Gill, 1957; Ride, 1964; Haight and Murray, 1981). However, Aplin’s (1987) careful study of the wellpreserved auditory region of the holotype clearly supports diprotodontian, and most likely vombatiform, affinities. Tedford et al. (1977) tentatively referred a number of fossil diprotodontian specimens from Lake Pinpa to † Wynyardiidae based on postcranial similarities to † W. bassiana; this material was ultimately described as † Muramura pinpensis by Pledge (2003). Prior to this, Pledge (1987a) had described † Muramura williamsi based on two virtually complete skeletons from the Minkina Local Fauna, Lake Palankarinna, in the Etadunna Formation. We used specimens of both † M. pinpensis and † M. williamsi to score a composite † Muramura terminal. The cranial morphology of † Muramura has yet to be described in detail, but the molar dentition is noteworthy (as is that of the second wynyardiid included here, † Namilamadeta; see below) in that it appears to be intermediate between selenodont and lophodont-type morphologies (Pledge, 1987a: fig. 2; 2003: fig. 19.2; Beck et al., 2020). Doubts have been expressed as to whether † Wynyardiidae (comprising the genera † Wynyardia, † Muramura, and † Namilamadeta) is monophyletic (Aplin and Archer, 1987: xlviii; Long et al., 2002: 117). However, the phylogenetic analyses of Pledge (2005)—who included all three genera—and Beck et al. (2020)—who did not include † Wynyardia due to the poor preservation of the only known specimen—both supported the monophyly of † Muramura + † Namilamadeta.Published as part of Beck, Robin M. D., Voss, Robert S. & Jansa, Sharon A., 2022, Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials, pp. 1-353 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457) on page 332, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/697135
Bulungu palara Gurovich, Travouillon, Beck, Muirhead & Archer 2013
No full text† <i>Bulungu</i> <p> SPECIES SCORED: † <i>Bulungu palara</i> (type species).</p> <p>GEOLOGICAL PROVENANCE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Lee Sye’s Outlook (LSO) Site (Riversleigh Faunal Zone A), Boid Site East, Camel Sputum, Dirk’s Towers, Inabeyance, Judith’s Horizontalis, Mike’s Potato Patch, Neville’s Garden, Outasite, Price Is Right, Quantum Leap, Rat Vomit, RSO, Upper, and Wayne’s Wok sites (Riversleigh Faunal Zone B); and AL90, Gag, Gotham City, Henk’s Hollow, Rick’s Sausage, Ringtail, Two Trees, and Wang sites (Riversleigh Faunal Zone C), Riversleigh World Heritage Area, Queensland, Australia.</p> <p>AGE OF SCORED SPECIMENS: Riversleigh Faunal zones A, B, and C are interpreted to be late Oligocene, early Miocene, and middle Miocene, respectively, based on biostratigraphy (see previous accounts above). Radiometric dates from Woodhead et al. (Woodhead et al., 2014) are 16.97–18.53 Mya for Camel Sputum Site, 17.72– 18.53 Mya for Neville’s Garden Site, 17.76–18.26 Mya for Outasite, 16.24–16.86 Mya for RSO Site, 14.17–15.11 Mya for AL90 Site, and 14.23–12.89 Mya for Ringtail Site, but the other sites lack dates, so we have conservatively assumed the entire span of the late Oligocene to middle Miocene (Chattian to Serravallian; Cohen et al., 2013 [updated]) for this taxon.</p> <p>ASSIGNED AGE RANGE: 27.820 –11.630 Mya.</p> <p> REMARKS: Gurovich et al. (2014) described a single well-preserved skull of † <i>Bulungu palara</i> (QM F23437) from Upper Site at Riversleigh and they also referred additional fragmentary specimens from multiple other sites spanning Riversleigh Faunal zones A, B, and C to this taxon. Gurovich et al. (2014) additionally referred two specimens from the?early-middle Miocene Leaf Locality of the Kutjamarpu Local Fauna in the Wipajiri Formation of South Australia (see † <i>Barinya</i> above) to † <i>B. palara</i>, but we did not examine these for scoring character data. Travouillon et al. (2013a) described an additional two species of † <i>Bulungu</i> from the Etadunna Formation of South Australia († <i>B. muirheadae</i>, from the Ditjimanka Local Fauna, and † <i>B. campbelli</i>, from the Ngapakaldi Local Fauna), which we likewise did not use for scoring characters. Based on QM F23437, † <i>B. palara</i> differs from all Recent peramelemorphians in exhibiting a number of putatively plesiomorphic craniodental features, such as alisphenoid-parietal (rather than frontal-squamosal) contact on the lateral wall of the braincase, and nasals that extend posteriorly beyond the anterior margin of the orbits (Gurovich et al., 2014). It consistently falls outside the peramelemorphian crown-clade (= Perameloidea) in published phylogenetic analyses (Travouillon et al., 2013a, 2014a, 2015b, 2017, 2019; Gurovich et al., 2014; Chamberlain et al., 2015; Kear et al., 2016; Travouillon and Phillips, 2018).</p>Published as part of <i>Beck, Robin M. D., Voss, Robert S. & Jansa, Sharon A., 2022, Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials, pp. 1-353 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457)</i> on page 325, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/6971356">http://zenodo.org/record/6971356</a>
Yalkaparidontia Archer 1988
No full text†Yalkaparidontia Archer et al., 1988 CONTENTS: † Yalkaparidon. STEM AGE: 39.9 Mya (95% HPD: 30.7–49.7 Mya). CROWN AGE: Not applicable. UNAMBIGUOUS CRANIODENTAL AUTAPOMORPHIES: Postglenoid process greatly reduced or absent (char. 75: 0→1; ci = 0.200); mandible usually with one mental foramen (char. 98: 1→0; ci = 0.063); second and third upper incisors entirely lacking enamel (char. 105: 0→1; ci = 1.000); first upper premolar absent (char. 114: 0→1; ci = 0.200); protocone absent (char. 141: 0→1; ci = 1.000); talonid greatly reduced or absent (char. 166: 0→1; ci = 0.500). COMMENTS: The peculiar † Yalkaparidon is known only from two described species († Y. coheni and † Y. jonesi) from late Oligocene to middle Miocene sites at Riversleigh World Heritage Area in northern Australia (Archer et al., 1988; Beck et al., 2014). † Yalkaparidon coheni is by far the better known of the two species, being represented by partial cranial material, whereas † Y. jonesi is known only from a fragmentary right mandible (Archer et al., 1988; Beck et al., 2014). † Yalkaparidon combines some relatively plesiomorphic features of the skull (particularly of the basicranium) with a highly derived dentition that includes an enlarged “gliriform” anteriormost lower incisor and zalambdodont molars (Archer et al., 1988; Beck, 2009; Beck et al., 2014). Of the other unambiguous craniodental apomorphies identified here, extreme reduction of the postglenoid process likely reflects extensive anteroposterior movement of the lower jaw (a trait also seen, for example, in members of the placental clade Glires; Cope, 1888; Druzinsky, 2015), whereas absence of enamel from I2 and I3 is an autapomorphy that we have not seen in any other metatherian. Based on its unusual combination of features, we agree with Archer et al. (1988) and Beck et al. (2014) that † Yalkaparidon warrants classification within its own family and order. † Yalkaparidon is the only definitive member of this order currently known, although the enigmatic † Yingabalanara richardsoni (known from two lower molars from the early Miocene of Riversleigh; Archer et al., 1990) may be a dentally plesiomorphic yalkaparidontian (see Beck et al., 2014: 155). Our undated (fig. 32) and dated (fig. 33) total-evidence analyses both recover a clade that unites † Yalkaparidon with paucituberculatans. However, isolated tarsals tentatively referred to † Yalkaparidon by Beck et al. (2014) show greater derived similarities to australidelphians than to paucituberculatans and Beck et al.’s (2014) accompanying phylogenetic analyses also supported australidelphian affinities for this taxon (see also Beck et al., 2016). Nevertheless, the subsequent phylogenetic analyses of Beck (2017a) and Zimicz and Goin (2020), which included † Yalkaparidon and used character scores from these referred tarsals also placed this taxon in a clade with paucituberculatans (including argyrolagids, a fossil group not included in our study; but see Abello and Candela, 2019). Although this clade is worthy of further investigation, we suspect that placement of † Yalkaparidon with paucituberculatans largely reflects convergent acquisitions of a gliriform lower incisor. Current evidence (including the analyses presented here) indicates that diprotodontians evolved a similar lower incisor independently of paucituberculatans, so it is plausible that † Yalkaparidon represents a third origin of this tooth type. Based on our results and those of other recent studies (Beck et al., 2014, 2016; Beck, 2017a; Abello and Candela, 2019; Zimicz and Goin, 2020), we consider the higher-level affinities of † Yalkaparidon to be uncertain, beyond its being a member of Marsupialia.Published as part of Beck, Robin M. D., Voss, Robert S. & Jansa, Sharon A., 2022, Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials, pp. 1-353 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457) on page 201, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/697135
FIG. 22 in Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials
No full textFIG. 22. Occlusal views of right deciduous third lower premolars (dp3) of Sminthopsis crassicaudata (A, AMNH 196686) and Isoodon macrourus (B, AMNH 160085). Alternative states of character 157 (see main text for description of this character and character states) are illustrated as follows: Sminthopsis 157(0); Isoodon 157(1). Teeth are not shown to the same scale.Published as part of Beck, Robin M.D., Voss, Robert S. & Jansa, Sharon A., 2022, Craniodental Morphology And Phylogeny Of Marsupials, pp. 1-353 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2022 (457) on page 154, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090.457.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/697135
- …
