1,721,066 research outputs found

    School inspectors, policy implementers, policy shapers: influences and activities

    No full text
    This chapter introduces the idea of school inspectors as implementers of public policy, framing their role within the context of policy implementation and the governance of education. Using a framework for policy implementation developed by Weible and Sabatier (2006), it presents a modified framework for inves-tigating inspectors’ work and practices as policy implementers. In so doing it questions their role as policy shapers and policy coalition workers in the context of the practice of inspection in Finland, Sweden, England, Germany, The German State of Lower Saxony, The Netherlands, The Republic of Ireland and The Austrian province of Styria. In introducing the idea of policy learning it introduces the ways in which policy learning theory has contributed to implementation theory, in order to further reflect on these issues in the final chapter of this book

    School inspectors: shaping and evolving policy understandings

    No full text
    As chapter one explained, the factors at play in the implementation of public policy are not limited to the complex, confounding and often competing values that jostle with one another when education policy is formulated, but may also variously come to light depending upon the lens through which the process is viewed. In this the final chapter I move to examine what understandings the country studies in this book reveal about the impact of policy subsystems in education and inspection policy, and the role of the inspectors within this. In so doing I examine how far the implementation of inspection policy can be said to convene to a model of ten preconditions necessary to achieve perfect implementation (Hogwood and Gunn, 1984). I then move to examine the part played by inspectors in variously framing the idea of policy implementation as: evolution; learning; coalition; responsibility and trust, (see Lane, 1987, p.532, in Ham and Hill, 1984, p.108), and to what extent inspectors can be said to be ‘coalition workers’ in influencing inspection policy. The chapter concludes that the work of inspectors is a key element within policy implementation and formation within the governance process and should be seen as central to any future research which investigates accountability from a governance perspective. It also concludes that it forms an important element within research into intended and unintended consequences of inspection policy

    Framing the debate: influencing public opinion of inspection, inspectors and academy policy: the role of the media

    No full text
    International research has shown that school inspection and the media are both powerful in-fluences on education policy. Since 2010 the government has sought to implement radical changes to the English education system, creating a new system of autonomous schools that support one another through formal or informal partnerships. These changes have suffered from considerable resistance from both schools and Local Education Authorities who often perceive these changes to be ideologically motivated and largely ineffective in raising stand-ards of teaching and learning. These changes are largely implemented following inspection visits by Ofsted, the English schools’ inspectorate, in which schools are deemed to be under-performing. For this reason Ofsted has become a powerful driver within the implementation of this policy: lending both legitimacy and rationale to the process. Yet Ofsted, is arguably independent agency, purporting to inspect ‘without fear or favour’ and has, on many occa-sions since its inception in 1992, argued that its strength lies in its independence from gov-ernment. Yet this argument is undermined when the agency is used to implement what is per-ceived as ideologically motivated policy. This chapter investigates to what extent Ofsted is used within the framing of education policy and what this means in terms of perceptions of the agency (its impartiality) and for education more broadly. Sampling from 3 national news-papers the study analyses 160 articles on inspection, drawing on media discourse theory it posits a framework developed in order to examine the ways in which Ofsted (the English school inspectorate) is used to frame debate on the government’s academies project. Employ-ing this framework it investigates to what extent the media shape their coverage of a policy which has proven contentious with certain publics, in order to frame the debate in ways which appeal to their readership. Using the framework for analysis the chapter responds to the following questions: A) To what extent do broadsheet newspapers frame their approach to the Academy Project, by the work of the inspectorate B) What values are assumed of the readership of each newspaper and how are these mobilised within news articles C) What do the results of questions A and B imply for Ofsted’s claims of impartiality from government

    Distrusting contexts and cultures and capacity for system-level improvement

    No full text
    Capacity of education systems to improve is recognised as key to a well-performing system linked to high levels of system-wide trust at micro, meso and macro levels (Cerna, 2014). However, a number of systems suffer from climates of distrust, which infuse the system at every level, undermining motivation and commitment of staff and proving inimical for capacity. This chapter considers how distrust permeates education systems and how distrusting cultures undermine capacity and, concomitantly, learning outcomes. It concludes with a discussion of how distrusting cultures can be overturned and capacity restored, arguing that, in order to do this, a system-wide perspective must be adopted, and changes effected at every level within it
    corecore