1,720,975 research outputs found
A scientometric analysis of international collaboration and growth of literature at the macro level
No full text
K-core of co-author network (k = 10).
No full text<p>The size of the node denotes the number of papers and the thickness of interconnecting lines (edges) denotes the number of co-authored papers between the authors. Authors having 10 or more co-author links during the study period have been visualized.</p
Letter to the editor of Heliyon re: Mapping sustainability reporting research with the UN's sustainable development goal. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18510
No full textThis letter to the editor discusses an investigation on sustainability reporting research in line with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). There was an error found in the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) calculation in the original research, which was rectified by applying the correct formula. Despite this error, the study's outcomes remained unaffected. It concludes by emphasizing the importance of a systematic approach in academic writing to learn from errors and avoid similar mistakes in the future
Comment on ‘Research contribution of bibliometric studies related to sustainable development goals and sustainability’ [Discover Sustainability, 2023, 5, 1, 7, 10.1007/s43621-024-00182-w]
No full textAbstract This investigation discusses a comment on a recently published research study (Raman, Discov Sustain 5:7, 2024) related to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Sustainability, focusing on bibliometric analysis. The observation highlighted a computational error in the calculation of Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) as presented in the original publication. A revised formula was provided, along with corrected computations, revealing a notable disparity in growth forecasts. It emphasizes the need to use appropriate formulas for growth assessments and suggests that researchers should focus on identifying and rectifying inaccuracies
One Hundred Scopus Citations to a Non-Scopus Indexed Article: A Case Study
No full textReceiving 100 citations from indexed journals is not a common occurrence, although it does happen very rarely, and it is even more uncommon for a non-indexed article. Given this, the purpose of this present study is to perform a bibliometric analysis of 100 cited Scopus articles to a non-Scopus indexed article, using a case study of the article titled “Authorship trends and collaboration pattern in the marine sciences literature: A scientometric study” which was published by Elango and Rajendran in the International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology in 2012. On October 15, 2022, the Scopus database was searched with the article title in the references field, and the resulting bibliographic data was exported as a comma-separated values file. The tools utilized for this analysis were ScientoPy, the Bibliometrix R Package, and VOSviewer. Based on the findings, most of the cited articles were published within the last three years, and international researchers have given more recognition compared to Indian researchers. The most popular topics were found to be bibliometrics, bibliometric analysis, and bibliometrix. The fact that all 100 cited articles were published across various subject disciplines used by Scopus to categorise sources demonstrates how well-established the citing article is within the scientific community
Scientometric analysis of <i>Nature Nanotechnology</i>
No full text
Purpose
The aim of this study is to examine the bibliometric characteristics of literature published in Nature Nanotechnology in the first 10 years (2006-2015). Yearly output, impact factor (IF) changes, document type, top authors, institutes and countries, most cited articles were examined.
Design/methodology/approach
The bibliographic records related to Nature Nanotechnology were retrieved from SCIE of Web of Science. Various software tools such as HistCite, Sci2 tool, intcoll.exe and CitNetExplorer were used.
Findings
The results reveals that 55 per cent of publications were citable articles; average number of authors per article was 4.57; 136 per cent increase in impact factor and reviews received highest citations per paper. Harvard University had most number of publications, whereas University of Cambridge had highest CPP among the most productive institutes. Almost 50 per cent of publications were contributed by authors from the USA; 1 per cent of total publications received more than 1,000 citations.
Originality/value
Scientometric analysis of high impact journals has been carried out in very few. Hence, the results of the present study will be useful to compare with low impact journals.
</jats:sec
- …
